Existence only appears or manifests....

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

....in the form of a subjectively experiencing person and that which the person experiences at the moment the person experiences it.

Existence does not appear in any other form.

Existence may not appear in any other form.

In order for something to be experienced, it must be composed of subjective experience.

If something is not composed of subjective experience, it cannot be experienced.
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 6227
Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
Location: NYC Man

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Terrapin Station »

On this view, what are people supposed to be? They'd obviously not be bodies as we think of them, situated in a world with things like trees and grass and hills and rivers etc. What would they be? And why would we believe this? What would be a good reason to buy this over other ideas?
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

On this view, what are people supposed to be?
Living "pocket dimensions" made up of subjective experience.
They'd obviously not be bodies as we think of them, situated in a world with things like trees and grass and hills and rivers etc.
In the absence of what Bishop George Berkeley termed "unperceived substance" (i.e. that which is not subjective experience or the fact or act of experiencing), there would only be "Matrix"-like simulated or invented realities made up not of physical matter and energy, as these do not exist....but of the subjective experience of the person experiencing the "Matrix" or constructed reality. That is, in the absence or non-existence of mind-independent, non-experiential bodies, trees, buildings, grass, hills, rivers, etc. there would only be a construct of these things in the form of one's subjective experience.

And....these constructed or simulated realities exist in the mythology that brains create consciousness. Especially given the mythology holds that consciousness winks out of existence should the brain be destroyed or cease to function, taking the simulated reality made up of a person's subjective experience (as opposed to the subjective experience of any other being in existence) with it.

Thus in the mythology that brains create consciousness there are two versions of the bodies of other persons, trees, grass, hills, rivers, cars, DNA, etc. There is the perception of an object created by the brain, i.e. a "put up job" or construct made up of the person's subjective experience and an external world-dwelling doppelganger not created by the brain that, as it has never been inside the brain in order to hop out of it like the perceived copy, is entirely uncaring and unaffected by any state or function of the brain as it does not depend upon the brain in order to exist.

Thus in the belief that consciousness or subjective experience must be accounted for by some neural circuit(s) in the brain, there is a simulated or constructed reality or "Matrix" world: perceived objects are believed to be perceptions of objects in the external world, but perceived objects are created by the brain thus "come from" or "spring out of" the brain while external objects are not created by the brain, have never existed within a brain, and thus do not "come from" or "spring out of" the brain like perceived objects. So we have two separate existences, separate from each other, that cannot be one and the same things as one comes from the brain and the other has never been inside the brain and is unaffected by whether or not the brain functions or even exists in the first place.

When one views a chair, for example, there is the chair created by the brain and another, separate chair not created by the brain that is not one and the same thing as the chair created by the brain because the external doppelganger never was in the brain to come out of it, like the chair created by the brain. The chair created by the brain, unlike (barring Idealism or Panpsychism) the chair not created by the brain, is made up of subjective experience.

The external chair cannot be made to fit inside the brain without rupturing the neurons and killing the person, if you could force the chair through the skull. This is further, albeit absurdly entertained, proof that the external chair is not one and the same thing as a chair that can immaterially wink into existence and emerge from neurons within a skull.

The upshot being that especially in the mythology that consciousness "comes from" or is created by the brain, persons and that which persons experience are a "Matrix" or simulated or constructed reality, albeit one created by neurons.

In Idealism, there are no non-experiential doppelgangers of perceived objects and events, as these are only constructs made up of the person's consciousness or subjective experience, ergo, they consist only of subjective experience and not something that is not subjective experience.
And why would we believe this? What would be a good reason to buy this over other ideas?
Er, because of the evidence appearing right before your eyes (or mind). Look at what you are: a first-person subjective experience or "POV camera shot" made up of subjective experience. That's the form your existence assumes or takes, the form we all take, the only form in which existence has ever appeared, manifested, or assumed. Every single thing that demonstrates it exists from planets, to nebula, to DNA, to functioning brains, has only ever appeared within the conscious experience of a person made up of the consciousness of that person (it must be: in order for something to be experienced by a person it must be made up of that person's experience of it; if something is not or is other than a person's subjective experience, it cannot be experienced by the person as it is, well, something other than that person's experience).

Existence has only ever appeared and manifested in the form of a person and that which the person experiences.

From this, one can safely eschew anything that is not a person or the experience of a person and logically assume that only persons exist. From here, one can note the logical existence of something that is external to all persons, and eschewing the existence of non-experience (as it cannot logically or rationally have anything to do with something it is not: experience), surmise that the external world is not a non-experiential infinite space but is itself a Person, within which all other persons reside.
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by RJG »

phenomenal_graffiti wrote:Existence only appears or manifests.... ....in the form of a subjectively experiencing person and that which the person experiences at the moment the person experiences it.

-Existence does not appear in any other form.
-Existence may not appear in any other form.
-In order for something to be experienced, it must be composed of subjective experience.
-If something is not composed of subjective experience, it cannot be experienced.
Correct, ...and to put it more succinctly - "EVERYTHING we experience, is just ...another ...EXPERIENCE"

But be careful, this does NOT mean that existence is not "objectively" (ontologically) real. A person's inability to directly experience 'objective' existence itself is not proof of the non-existence of existence (of real objects). On the contrary, a person's ability to experience "subjective" experiences, is PROOF of the "objective" reality/existence of the "person" himself (aka the "Experiencer"). Without some-thing experiencing, there is no experience. If experiences exist, then so must an Experiencer.

Simple Logic tells us:
  • 1. Everything we experience is just an 'experience'.

    2. A "subjective experience" is not possible without an "objective (real) Experiencer". If "SUBJECTIVE experience" exists, then so MUST an "OBJECTIVE experiencer". One cannot be without the other.

    3. The Experiencer can never experience himself, for Experiencers can only experience "experiences", not 'real' existent objects themselves. Therefore, true "self-awareness" is a myth.

    4. Although the Experiencer cannot directly "experience" objectivity, he can subjectively know of its objective existence.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 6227
Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
Location: NYC Man

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Terrapin Station »

phenomenal_graffiti wrote: January 30th, 2020, 5:05 am
Er, because of the evidence appearing right before your eyes (or mind).
When I look at the evidence appearing to me, I see that I'm a body--flesh, blood, limbs, etc. situated in a world made of trees and rocks and so on.

To conclude that a phenomenal tree, say, is really just my mind, I have to do something theoretical. The phenomenal tree doesn't appear to be mental. It simply appears to be a tree.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Consul »

phenomenal_graffiti wrote: January 30th, 2020, 5:05 amWhen one views a chair, for example, there is the chair created by the brain and another, separate chair not created by the brain that is not one and the same thing as the chair created by the brain because the external doppelganger never was in the brain to come out of it, like the chair created by the brain. The chair created by the brain, unlike (barring Idealism or Panpsychism) the chair not created by the brain, is made up of subjective experience.

The external chair cannot be made to fit inside the brain without rupturing the neurons and killing the person, if you could force the chair through the skull. This is further, albeit absurdly entertained, proof that the external chair is not one and the same thing as a chair that can immaterially wink into existence and emerge from neurons within a skull.

The upshot being that especially in the mythology that consciousness "comes from" or is created by the brain, persons and that which persons experience are a "Matrix" or simulated or constructed reality, albeit one created by neurons.

In Idealism, there are no non-experiential doppelgangers of perceived objects and events, as these are only constructs made up of the person's consciousness or subjective experience, ergo, they consist only of subjective experience and not something that is not subjective experience.
To see a chair is certainly not to have a chair in one's brain/mind but a chair-appearance or -impression, which is not itself a chair. A visual sensation functioning as a visual appearance or impression of a chair is neither a chair nor a chair-model or chair-picture.

The basic mistake of idealism is to equate the experiential content of sensory perception (qua medium of sensory perception) with its intentional object, and then to reduce all physical objects to mental objects ("sense-data").
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Consul »

The subjective sensory content (and medium) of perception isn't perceived because it is (constitutes) the perceiving of something else. To see something is not to see one's seeing of it. The sensory content is introspectible (by subjects capable of introspection such as humans) but not sensorily perceptible, and introspection is different from sensory perception. Sensory perception doesn't consist in the introspection of sensations.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

RJG:
Correct, ...and to put it more succinctly - "EVERYTHING we experience, is just ...another ...EXPERIENCE"
As a Judeo-Christian Pantheopsychic Theist, in which we are "living ideas" (ideas having tiny, internal consciousnesses of their own granted by or borrowed from the consciousness of the external Person) residing in the subconscious mind of the Judeo-Christian God, I must agree with this.

The qualifier, of course, is EXPERIENCE, i.e. the fact or act of experiencing and that which only appears when it is experienced as it is composed or materialistically made up only of the subjective experience of the person experiencing it. You are correct: everything we experience is just another experience, not something that is not experience at all. That's probably logically impossible.
But be careful, this does NOT mean that existence is not "objectively" (ontologically) real. A person's inability to directly experience 'objective' existence itself is not proof of the non-existence of existence (of real objects). On the contrary, a person's ability to experience "subjective" experiences, is PROOF of the "objective" reality/existence of the "person" himself (aka the "Experiencer").
Also true. I am certainly not saying that humans experiencing themselves as children, teenagers, young adults, elderly, etc. simply pop magically into existence after having previously not existing at all, or living eternally in an infinite void wherein human consciousness is the only thing that exists, or that the external world is chock full of human consciousnesses that fill every single interstitial psychic space in the external world ("standing room only, folks"). This would be a very bizarre (but not logically and metaphysically impossible!) state of affairs.

There is probably ("probably" as we can only imagine what may exist in the external world and it's causal power and connection to human consciousness) something outside us that is probably (as we can only imagine things and how they work in the external world that may or may not be true for all anyone knows) responsible (logically) for the existence of the "Matrix" worlds that are the simulated or constructed realities that are each and every individual human being: my confident assertion is that this "whatever" that is outside and responsible(?) for the existence and content of human experience is itself made up of subjective experience (the only logical and rational conclusion, as anything else requires the most absurd magic) and more, may indeed by an external Person.

Of course one could alter the belief to state that instead of only a single Being (God), there are external persons responsible for the existence and content of each "Matrix" of each individual human that shall or can exist (gods), but it's still just our imagination trying to define the external "thing", logically made up of subjective experience (illogically made up of something else), from which our individual "Matrix" worlds derive it's substance (first-person subjective experience) and content (the various forms the substance of first-person subjective experience assumes).
Without some-thing experiencing, there is no experience. If experiences exist, then so must an Experiencer.
I like this. Couldn't have said it better myself.
Simple Logic tells us:
1. Everything we experience is just an 'experience'.
True. Something that is not an experience, particularly if it is not the experience of the person experiencing and not materialistically composed of experience, particularly not the subjective experience of the person experiencing it (this person's experience held in isolation from the subjective experience of any and every other being in the whole of existence), cannot be experienced...as, well, it is not experience nor the experience of that particular person.
2. A "subjective experience" is not possible without an "objective (real) Experiencer". If "SUBJECTIVE experience" exists, then so MUST an "OBJECTIVE experiencer". One cannot be without the other.
True. A subjective experience qua something that is subjectively experienced has only ever existed when experienced by an experiencer. There have always only been, when something, say, a tree, is experienced, there is a person experiencing it as the tree cannot be experienced unless a person is present to experience it. There has never been a moment (presumably) when an experience existed without someone experiencing it, so it's (probably) safe to say #2 is obviously true.
3. The Experiencer can never experience himself, for Experiencers can only experience "experiences", not 'real' existent objects themselves. Therefore, true "self-awareness" is a myth.
Hmm. 'Real' existent objects probably do not exist, and even if these external objects were themselves made out of subjective experience, it does not follow how they can be both themselves and the experience of a person. I suppose, using our wild imaginations, we can imagine the external object "Mr. Fantastic-ing" itself into a person or morphing into the person and its current perception, but it's probably easier to do away with the existence of external objects and events altogether, holding they only "exist" as constructs in the consciousness of a person made up of the consciousness of a person, "props" made up of a person's subjective experience which is essentially a constructed world made up of the person, i.e. the person's consciousness, as 'real' objects do not exist.
4. Although the Experiencer cannot directly "experience" objectivity, he can subjectively know of its objective existence.
Really? The only thing that demonstrates it exists is a person and the subjective experience of that person. Everything that is not that person and what the person currently experiences is, to the person, entirely imaginary. That is, anything that is not you and what you currently experience is make-believe, "made-believe" by you...by your counsciousness, that you then happen to find you are convinced exists outside you so you then come to believe it. But as there is only evidence of the existence of you and what you currently experience, anything that is not you can only, in terms of their experience, be supported only by your belief and a quasi-religious faith they objectively exist.

We all perform this cognitive "trick".

That being said, it may be that these "not you" things actually exist for all you know and your faith is secretly rewarded...but you cannot really know (experience) their existence: you can only experience you and the objects and events surrounding you that are, well, actually made out of you.
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Atla »

phenomenal_graffiti wrote: January 29th, 2020, 5:47 am ....in the form of a subjectively experiencing person and that which the person experiences at the moment the person experiences it.

Existence does not appear in any other form.

Existence may not appear in any other form.

In order for something to be experienced, it must be composed of subjective experience.

If something is not composed of subjective experience, it cannot be experienced.
Umm no, you can't actually find that "person" once you look for it. You can only find the thoughts and sensations etc. saying that they are that person.

"Subjective" experience and the "objective" universe are one and the same thing.
True philosophy points to the Moon
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

Consul:
phenomenal_graffiti wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:05 am

When one views a chair, for example, there is the chair created by the brain and another, separate chair not created by the brain that is not one and the same thing as the chair created by the brain because the external doppelganger never was in the brain to come out of it, like the chair created by the brain. The chair created by the brain, unlike (barring Idealism or Panpsychism) the chair not created by the brain, is made up of subjective experience.

The external chair cannot be made to fit inside the brain without rupturing the neurons and killing the person, if you could force the chair through the skull. This is further, albeit absurdly entertained, proof that the external chair is not one and the same thing as a chair that can immaterially wink into existence and emerge from neurons within a skull.

The upshot being that especially in the mythology that consciousness "comes from" or is created by the brain, persons and that which persons experience are a "Matrix" or simulated or constructed reality, albeit one created by neurons.

In Idealism, there are no non-experiential doppelgangers of perceived objects and events, as these are only constructs made up of the person's consciousness or subjective experience, ergo, they consist only of subjective experience and not something that is not subjective experience.
To see a chair is certainly not to have a chair in one's brain/mind but a chair-appearance or -impression, which is not itself a chair. A visual sensation functioning as a visual appearance or impression of a chair is neither a chair nor a chair-model or chair-picture.
True, as there are two "chairs"...a chair created by the brain and one not created by the brain, as the chair not created by the brain has never been inside the brain in any form, whole or disintegrated, that it might to emerge from a brain in the way a perceived or experienced chair does (for those believing brains create consciousness).
The basic mistake of idealism is to equate the experiential content of sensory perception (qua medium of sensory perception) with its intentional object, and then to reduce all physical objects to mental objects ("sense-data").
The basic mistake of non-idealism is to assume that intentional or physical objects exist. Given we only have evidence of the existence of mental objects that only appear within the consciousness of a person and are constructed of the consciousness of that person, we have no evidence (experience) of something that is not a person and that which the person experiences. Physical objects are therefore fundamentally imaginary (the imagination made up of, well, subjective experience) and probably do not exist.

As "physical" means "that which is not first-person subjective experience/that which is something other than first-person subjective experience" (a consequence of the mythology there was a time when consciousness did not exist as there was a time when brains or any other brain-like or consciousness-creating mechanism did not exist), it is probably logically impossible that 'not-experience' has anything to do with the existence of subjective experience as, well, not-experience is 'something other than or that is not experience'.
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

Atla:
phenomenal_graffiti wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2020 4:47 am
....in the form of a subjectively experiencing person and that which the person experiences at the moment the person experiences it.

Existence does not appear in any other form.

Existence may not appear in any other form.

In order for something to be experienced, it must be composed of subjective experience.

If something is not composed of subjective experience, it cannot be experienced.
Umm no, you can't actually find that "person" once you look for it. You can only find the thoughts and sensations etc. saying that they are that person.
You certainly can't find the consciousness of any other person in the whole of existence were you to look for them. You can only have faith they objectively exist. As for you, the thought and sensations, etc. given that one is experience one's own thoughts and sensations, etc. means that a person, some person, exists. The term "person" applies to the thoughts and sensations that say they are a person". I certainly will not call it an "apple".
"Subjective" experience and the "objective" universe are one and the same thing.
In a sense this is true, but with a logical stipulation: only subjective experience exists, and exists only in the form of persons (denying solipsism as might be implied by my statements). As a Judeo-Christian Pantheopsychist, I go further to state that all persons reside in the mind (the subconscious mind) of an infinite, external Person (you know who).
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Atla »

phenomenal_graffiti wrote: January 30th, 2020, 1:38 pm You certainly can't find the consciousness of any other person in the whole of existence were you to look for them. You can only have faith they objectively exist. As for you, the thought and sensations, etc. given that one is experience one's own thoughts and sensations, etc. means that a person, some person, exists. The term "person" applies to the thoughts and sensations that say they are a person". I certainly will not call it an "apple".
I mean that "you" can't actually find "yourself" either, once you try. But idealists usually don't perform this test.

So the idea that it's a given that those thoughts and sensations etc. are "your own", is just a false idealist belief. In that sense, there is no "you" that could own anything.
In a sense this is true, but with a logical stipulation: only subjective experience exists, and exists only in the form of persons (denying solipsism as might be implied by my statements). As a Judeo-Christian Pantheopsychist, I go further to state that all persons reside in the mind (the subconscious mind) of an infinite, external Person (you know who).
No, both idealists and physicalists are wrong. One claims the primacy of subjective experience, the other claims the primacy of matter, even though these two are one and the same. Both are talking about two things where there is only one.

Positing that external Person is just a way to take idealism one step further into a wrong direction.
True philosophy points to the Moon
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

Terrapin Station:
phenomenal_graffiti wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 4:05 am

Er, because of the evidence appearing right before your eyes (or mind).
When I look at the evidence appearing to me, I see that I'm a body--flesh, blood, limbs, etc. situated in a world made of trees and rocks and so on.
But your body: flesh, blood, limbs, etc. are made up of your subjective experience of them. This is the only form in which they have ever existed. You cannot experience them in a form other than your experience of them, in the moment you experience them, for as long as you experience them. Thus, it follows they are not made up and cannot logically be made up of something that is not your experience of them. Ergo, they are made up of experience, not something that is not experience. Same goes for the world made of trees and rocks and so on. These things only appear when you observe them, and have only ever appeared when you observe them, thus their very appearance is dependent upon and connected to your presence. They never appear when you are not present.

They are, one might surmise, actually only constructs within your consciousness made up of your consciousness, and thus depend upon you (my theology notwithstanding) for their very existence. The idea of them as external objects not made up of you that exist and remain were you to cease to exist is actually just an imagined fiction supported only by quasi-religious faith in the existence of external "not you composed" doppelgangers of the objects you experience residing in the invisible, inaccessible external world.
To conclude that a phenomenal tree, say, is really just my mind, I have to do something theoretical. The phenomenal tree doesn't appear to be mental. It simply appears to be a tree.
The term "mental" in this type of metaphysical subject means not so much "thoughts" or "something only in the imagination or mind" as it does "consciousness qua subjective experience" which is "mental" in the sense that it ain't physical (something that is not or that is other than subjective experience). Use of the term "mental" implies subjective experience when it comes to talk of the difference or causal relationship between perceived objects and "real" objects not made up of subjective experience perceived objects purportedly "experience" and mimic. The phenomenal tree appearing to you as a tree, therefore, is visual experience of a tree that is the visual version or mode of subjective experience: it was never meant to be "mental" in the sense of being a tree you can only imagine or that is made up of thought re: the thought version of subjective experience.
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 6227
Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
Location: NYC Man

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by Terrapin Station »

phenomenal_graffiti wrote: January 30th, 2020, 2:07 pm The term "mental" in this type of metaphysical subject means not so much "thoughts" or "something only in the imagination or mind" as it does "consciousness qua subjective experience"
That's fine. The phenomenal appearance of a tree doesn't appear to be consciousness qua subjective experience. I have to do something theoretical to get to that point. The phenomenal appearance of a tree simply seems to be a tree.
The phenomenal tree appearing to you as a tree, therefore, is visual experience of a tree that is the visual version or mode of subjective experience
That's a theoretical, not a phenomenal or experiential conclusion. How do we get to that theoretical conclusion?
User avatar
phenomenal_graffiti
Posts: 125
Joined: July 27th, 2009, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: George Berkeley

Re: Existence only appears or manifests....

Post by phenomenal_graffiti »

Terrapin Station:
phenomenal_graffiti wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:07 pm
The term "mental" in this type of metaphysical subject means not so much "thoughts" or "something only in the imagination or mind" as it does "consciousness qua subjective experience"
That's fine. The phenomenal appearance of a tree doesn't appear to be consciousness qua subjective experience. I have to do something theoretical to get to that point. The phenomenal appearance of a tree simply seems to be a tree.
What does 'do something theoretical' even mean? When you state: 'the phenomenal appearance of a tree seeming to be a tree' do you mean 'tree' as in the tree as it appears in the absence of consciousness? Do trees independent of persons exist, given that existence only appears as a person and it's experience of a tree?
The phenomenal tree appearing to you as a tree, therefore, is visual experience of a tree that is the visual version or mode of subjective experience
That's a theoretical, not a phenomenal or experiential conclusion. How do we get to that theoretical conclusion?
Again, the need for a 'theoretical conclusion' is unclear. There are only experiential conclusions when it comes to the experience of a person.
We are currently living within the mind of Jesus Christ as he is currently being crucified. One may think there is no God, or if one believes in God, one thinks one lives outside the mind of Christ in a post-crucifixion present.

In other news...
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021