But posts where you make claims and you are asked to provide evidence for those claims and you never do, should be automatically kept, correct? And/or, posts you make where you completely misconstrue and misunderstand what I am actually saying, and meaning, et cetera should be also absolutely kept, as well, correct?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑May 24th, 2020, 11:13 amAny posts you make criticizing how people respond, criticizing their understanding of your posts, etc. should be automatically deleted. Maybe then you'd have to post some content other than just meta stuff about posting.
Have you ever even considered just asking clarifying questions when I explained to you that you are misunderstanding what I am saying, and meaning? Or has that never even come into consideration. Obviously if you do not open up and change the way you are seeing what I am actually saying, and meaning, then it does not matter how many times I rearrange my words to 'try to' explain to you what I am actually meaning, it will still not be understood.
If I say that a person is not understanding my posts, then that is NOT a criticism, but rather just a statement of fact. If people cannot handle that Truth, then I suggest not coming into a philosophy forum. You can try and shut me up AGAIN, by proposing my post are automatically deleted, but I suggest AGAIN; If you want to make claims, then at least have some thing to back up and support those claims. I also suggest if someone tells you that you are not understanding them, then you listen to them, and at least 'try' to understand them, or alternatively, if you do not want to even want to try to understand them, then just do not communicate with them. SIMPLE REALLY.
Now, to your claims, where have I supposedly criticized how people respond to me? Let us see if you are even capable and thus will back up and support this claim, or not? And then, let us see just how open you are to discussing this further?