I am describing the mainstream consensus within science. You are the one entertaining fantasies that your views are what most scientists believe. They absolutely are not.
A. I thought the "whole point" was that collapse is centered around "us". So you're done with that b.s., finally? Good!Atla wrote: ↑May 24th, 2021, 11:45 pmThe whole point is that, when from our perspective, a system in superposition comes in contact with our already classical "environment", it will either very quickly decohere, or instantaneously collapse (which are very importantly two different processes, but this is beside the point here, let's not make it too difficult for you).
B. "Decoherence" is one model for explaining collapse. But let's not make it too difficult for you.
No one knows the complete, total, and deep reasons for any of the weirder things in QM. But we know for sure that one that is responsible for initiating decoherence/collapse is interaction between one quantum system and another object/system. That's the struggle which computer scientists working in quantum computing deal with on a very pragmatic level every. If you weren't just pretending to know something about this subject, I wouldn't have to point out such basic facts to you.
No it isn't. This is just a ridiculous, science free fantasy that you couldn't back up with a serious scientific citation from a respected, mainstream source if your life depended on it.