The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
marigold_23
Posts: 40
Joined: April 22nd, 2021, 10:08 am

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by marigold_23 »

LuckyR wrote: May 15th, 2021, 2:11 am
marigold_23 wrote: May 14th, 2021, 11:38 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 14th, 2021, 9:41 pm
Markgrundr wrote: May 12th, 2021, 7:00 pm
There is a fundamental difference between myself and all other beings, just as there is between yourself and all other beings- a fundamental uniqueness that indicates something other-worldly even from an atheist perspective. Although multiples souls exist, each one isn't just unique but uniquely unique.
Do you think every ant in a colony is unique? How about every strept bacterium? Every cold virus?

You're not as unique as you think.
LuckyR,

Technically all organisms (even simple viruses) are unique by definition, occupying separate positions in space, moving in different directions at different velocities, composed of a different assortment and ammount of molecular/atomic components... actually one ant is extremely unique to another although that uniqueness is not noticed by us.
And
The observable universe of one position is not the same as in another, so any thing, no matter how simple, even as simple as a particle, may be ascribed its own unique circumstances, totally separate in that moment from the circumstances of another particle....(photons may be different, im not sure, not a physics person)

I think it's reasonable to admit that differential physical things are different and unique to that extent, particularly a physical conglomerate which is as complex as an organism...

However, I don't see any indication of anything "other worldly" in that fact. And I think it is fundamentally incorrect to describe souls (or the ephemeral "observer") as contingent or physical in itself... and certainly never plural, such that there could ever be more than one relevant observer to that observer... and even then, use of the term "soul" is pushing it... If by soul you mean your mind and memories as some fundamental being which you expect to go on as your "essense" in some afterlife... yeah that's just religion and it's made up to help us avoid the fact of death... in my opinion.

There may be something interesting beyond what we can necessarily describe in the phenomenon of being ... but we have to be cautious in describing something which we claim as fundamental, simply because description itself tends to rely on contingent reality... things which are some way to some other things, rather than things which simply are...
Your comments make complete and total sense... in a Philosophy Forum, yet almost no one actually behaves in accordance with these ideas. You have a sore throat, you take penicillin and millions of bacteria die. So what? Everyone thinks, they're barely thought of as life forms, let alone unique individuals. Ants in the kitchen, get out the bug spray, no thought required.
Yes, you're right that this uniqueness is not believed in many instances...
But I would say it should be acknowledged. For instance, if you put down some ant poison or take penicillin, you are not concerned with some specific ant or bacteria, typically... you are concerned with a colony of ants and a colony of bacteria... to your concern, it is represented as one entity.... You're not really representing the individual entities in that colony at all to the extent you represent the conglomerate entity.

However, if you focus on the ants individually (or the bacteria under a microscope), it won't take long to notice that they are separate entities with their own drives, and that you were only able to think of them as a conglomerate because they were so similar, allowing you to interpret the similarity as sameness. This interpretation of sameness was better for the efficiency of your purpose, which would have been hindered by having to devote attention to the personal execution of each ant.

This apparent fact of uniqueness at the level of a component or constituent member is not relevant to the simple purpose of destroying the total colony, only when our purpose is to better understand some individual component(s) of the colony.
User avatar
Markgrundr
New Trial Member
Posts: 10
Joined: May 12th, 2021, 3:04 pm

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by Markgrundr »

marigold_23 wrote: May 14th, 2021, 5:51 pm The contradiction I am suggesting rests on the definition of an experience.

Some may mean a "happening" or a "bare phenomenon" or "act" when they use the term "experience"... But in your usage, you have said "I experience myself."
So correct me if I'm wrong, but I have interpreted your usage of the word "experience" to mean:
"an interaction between two or more things"
Or, a felt effect or felt relationship by an entity from (or of) an entity

Where the happening of an experience specifically requires two interacting entities

Would you agree to that definition of experience or did you mean something else in your use of the word? How do you define "experience" if I have misunderstood you.
Birth and death are experiences that don't require two interacting entities. When I say "I experience myself." I'm satisfied with that experience being what Atla described : "Tbe the sensation of our self-awareness". Perhaps "I experience myself." wasn't the best way to describe it. But "self-awareness" is in a logical philosophical sense a contradiction also. So a better way of describing it might be as a meditative process of blocking out or objectifying one's interaction with the external (senses, thoughts, emotions, memories) with the purpose of giving one's self, whatever that is, greater purity. This process can offer some relative objectivity in trying to understand one's true nature; to isolate that which one interacts with from that which one is. So rather than "experiencing one's self", what is happening is one reaches a purer state of being.
User avatar
Markgrundr
New Trial Member
Posts: 10
Joined: May 12th, 2021, 3:04 pm

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by Markgrundr »

marigold_23 wrote: May 14th, 2021, 11:38 pm However, I don't see any indication of anything "other worldly" in that fact. And I think it is fundamentally incorrect to describe souls (or the ephemeral "observer") as contingent or physical in itself... and certainly never plural, such that there could ever be more than one relevant observer to that observer... and even then, use of the term "soul" is pushing it...
Totally lost you here. If you accept that selves are things and that they can have greater and lesser degrees of purity, do you believe that when selves or consciousnesses are in their purest form, they are entirely composed of the physical universe? If not, if you're going to assert the existence of something extra-physical, then it will be like walking a very thin tightrope over an abyss of nonsense.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by LuckyR »

marigold_23 wrote: May 15th, 2021, 8:32 am
LuckyR wrote: May 15th, 2021, 2:11 am
marigold_23 wrote: May 14th, 2021, 11:38 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 14th, 2021, 9:41 pm

Do you think every ant in a colony is unique? How about every strept bacterium? Every cold virus?

You're not as unique as you think.
LuckyR,

Technically all organisms (even simple viruses) are unique by definition, occupying separate positions in space, moving in different directions at different velocities, composed of a different assortment and ammount of molecular/atomic components... actually one ant is extremely unique to another although that uniqueness is not noticed by us.
And
The observable universe of one position is not the same as in another, so any thing, no matter how simple, even as simple as a particle, may be ascribed its own unique circumstances, totally separate in that moment from the circumstances of another particle....(photons may be different, im not sure, not a physics person)

I think it's reasonable to admit that differential physical things are different and unique to that extent, particularly a physical conglomerate which is as complex as an organism...

However, I don't see any indication of anything "other worldly" in that fact. And I think it is fundamentally incorrect to describe souls (or the ephemeral "observer") as contingent or physical in itself... and certainly never plural, such that there could ever be more than one relevant observer to that observer... and even then, use of the term "soul" is pushing it... If by soul you mean your mind and memories as some fundamental being which you expect to go on as your "essense" in some afterlife... yeah that's just religion and it's made up to help us avoid the fact of death... in my opinion.

There may be something interesting beyond what we can necessarily describe in the phenomenon of being ... but we have to be cautious in describing something which we claim as fundamental, simply because description itself tends to rely on contingent reality... things which are some way to some other things, rather than things which simply are...
Your comments make complete and total sense... in a Philosophy Forum, yet almost no one actually behaves in accordance with these ideas. You have a sore throat, you take penicillin and millions of bacteria die. So what? Everyone thinks, they're barely thought of as life forms, let alone unique individuals. Ants in the kitchen, get out the bug spray, no thought required.
Yes, you're right that this uniqueness is not believed in many instances...
But I would say it should be acknowledged. For instance, if you put down some ant poison or take penicillin, you are not concerned with some specific ant or bacteria, typically... you are concerned with a colony of ants and a colony of bacteria... to your concern, it is represented as one entity.... You're not really representing the individual entities in that colony at all to the extent you represent the conglomerate entity.

However, if you focus on the ants individually (or the bacteria under a microscope), it won't take long to notice that they are separate entities with their own drives, and that you were only able to think of them as a conglomerate because they were so similar, allowing you to interpret the similarity as sameness. This interpretation of sameness was better for the efficiency of your purpose, which would have been hindered by having to devote attention to the personal execution of each ant.

This apparent fact of uniqueness at the level of a component or constituent member is not relevant to the simple purpose of destroying the total colony, only when our purpose is to better understand some individual component(s) of the colony.
You are correct but a different explanation is germane here. Namely that the human mind loses the ability to appreciate differences at a certain number of individuals. If I give you 5 jelly beans and ask you to describe them, you can describe differences in flavor, minor size differences or imperfections in their manufacturing. OTOH if I have a jar of 5000 jelly beans, it's just a jar of candy.

Similarly if I ask you to describe your cousins, I could listen all day to stories of their hopes and dreams. If your cousins go to a football game and the entire crowd is photographed, and I asked you to describe the photo, "it's a sports stadium crowd".
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Markgrundr
New Trial Member
Posts: 10
Joined: May 12th, 2021, 3:04 pm

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by Markgrundr »

When I brought up uniqueness with reference to selves, what I was getting at was the rather discrepancy of being, if you like, between one's self and all other selves, and how this only adds to the problem of Dualism. So you could say that compared to all other people, I'm not just unique but uniquely unique. (Although if you accept that all others have a life experience that is fundamentally similar to yours, this becomes less of a problem).
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by popeye1945 »

The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience, there is then nothing. Subject and object stand or fall together. If one takes these thing away which constitutes object, consciousness ceases to be. If one took the subject/consciousness away the objective world ceases to be.
User avatar
Markgrundr
New Trial Member
Posts: 10
Joined: May 12th, 2021, 3:04 pm

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by Markgrundr »

That's untrue. There exists in reality what might be referred to as the Realm of the Known Unknowables : other selves and the universe beyond your perception- as they exist in the present moment without any of your conceptualizing. It doesn't really matter if you can't prove their existence; the fact is that they exist and don't care much about your philosophy. It is the Realm of the Known Unknowables that make Descartes look like a self absorbed idiot.
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by popeye1945 »

There is only cognitive knowing, unless you are referring to something supernatural. The apparent reality is the relation between subject and object and the property of knowledge belongs to the conscious subject never to the object or world as object. Self is the experience of the constitution, it and its experiences become the I of self identity.
User avatar
AmericanKestrel
Posts: 356
Joined: May 22nd, 2021, 6:26 am
Favorite Philosopher: Yagnyavalkya
Location: US

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by AmericanKestrel »

Markgrundr wrote: May 12th, 2021, 7:00 pm Feel free to direct me to another discussion but I couldn't find one addressing my particular view. There's something that is constantly on that lies deeper than thought and sensation. Thoughts and senses are how I interact with the world, but they are not me. They are the vessel by which I exist in the universe. They are the coat I put on to go out in the universe night.

Although my body is composed entirely of the universe, it's not certain nor even apparent that the spirit inside is. You could say it's a cloud of electricity inside the brain, but this doesn't fully explain the "I"ness or how and why my consciousness evolved to exist. If any one of my father's sperm had beat the one that made it to my mother's egg, they'd have conceived a body very similar but the I that is me would never have existed (or would it?), and from my point of view the universe would never have existed.

The I is something that voluntarily interacts in the world but whose existence is involuntary (except to end it by suicide. The constant hum began and continues involuntarily).

There is a fundamental difference between myself and all other beings, just as there is between yourself and all other beings- a fundamental uniqueness that indicates something other-worldly even from an atheist perspective. Although multiples souls exist, each one isn't just unique but uniquely unique.

You can explain its biological origins and how it interacts with the world, but its essential origin is not of the scientific or corporeal realm..
Arebyou talking about non-dualism?
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by popeye1945 »

We are born without the identity I, we are at birth a constitution strong or weak with preferences and tastes, etc. but anonymous, a thing which experiences the physical world. One aquires one's identity I through the experience of context/environment and the history ever growing of one's experiential journey becomes this ever changing identity I. To imagine a self beyond thought, sensation and experience is to subtract the subject from the relation of subject and object, thus leaving nothing whatsoever.
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by RJG »

Markgrundr wrote:Feel free to direct me to another discussion but I couldn't find one addressing my particular view. There's something that is constantly on that lies deeper than thought and sensation. Thoughts and senses are how I interact with the world, but they are not me. They are the vessel by which I exist in the universe. They are the coat I put on to go out in the universe night.

Although my body is composed entirely of the universe, it's not certain nor even apparent that the spirit inside is. You could say it's a cloud of electricity inside the brain, but this doesn't fully explain the "I"ness or how and why my consciousness evolved to exist. If any one of my father's sperm had beat the one that made it to my mother's egg, they'd have conceived a body very similar but the I that is me would never have existed (or would it?), and from my point of view the universe would never have existed.

The I is something that voluntarily interacts in the world but whose existence is involuntary (except to end it by suicide. The constant hum began and continues involuntarily).

There is a fundamental difference between myself and all other beings, just as there is between yourself and all other beings- a fundamental uniqueness that indicates something other-worldly even from an atheist perspective. Although multiples souls exist, each one isn't just unique but uniquely unique.

You can explain its biological origins and how it interacts with the world, but its essential origin is not of the scientific or corporeal realm.
Mark, firstly I like how you express all this; your style of writing is very good in my opinion, but I see one technical (logical) error. You seem to have come to the conclusion that the mind or consciousness, aka the "I", is somehow an autonomous spirit that "voluntarily interacts within the world".

But if you look closer, you will see that our consciousness is nothing more than an "echo" (for lack of better word) of the happenings of our physical body.

When we are conscious, we are only conscious of our bodily experiences/reactions (e.g. thoughts, feelings, and sensory experiences), that's it! And nothing more! These bodily reactions, in turn, are supposedly caused by real objects or events out in the universe/reality (or within our physical body). So we don't actually experience the world/universe around us, we only experience physical bodily reactions/sensations, that in turn, may or may not represent the happenings out there; in reality.

In other words, consciousness is nothing more than an echo chamber within a reactive body. The "I" is not free. It cannot do anything whatsoever, for 100% of its thoughts, feelings, and sensations have been given/scripted to him. Consciousness is just another physical bodily reaction/experience. It is the experience of 'recognition', made possible by those physical objects that possess memory capability.

Logically, we cannot experience (feel, think, sense) something that is not already there for us to feel, think, or sense. The consciousness-of-X is not possible without the pre-existence of X. The consciousness-of-[nothing] is non-consciousness.

Therefore, we can't logically think our own thoughts without the pre-existing (already scripted) thoughts there for us to think (consciously experience).

The "self" ("I"; consciousness) is just the "experiencer" (physical recognition) of the thoughts, feelings, and sensations reactively created by the physical body. There is no "self" beyond these experiences.
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by popeye1945 »

RJG,
EXCELLENT KUDOS OUTSTANDING!
User avatar
AmericanKestrel
Posts: 356
Joined: May 22nd, 2021, 6:26 am
Favorite Philosopher: Yagnyavalkya
Location: US

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by AmericanKestrel »

RJG wrote: June 7th, 2021, 8:12 am
The "self" ("I"; consciousness) is just the "experiencer" (physical recognition) of the thoughts, feelings, and sensations reactively created by the physical body. There is no "self" beyond these experiences.
If the Self is the experiencer of the experience, and there is no self beyond these experiences, then the experience and the experiencer are the same. Where is the self?
Define self.
Advaita defines self (Atma) as the the reflection of the one single universal existence known as Brhman (Bigness) . It is the body that experiences the world created by the mind. The Atma remains as a seer and is not affected by the experience in any way.
"The Serpent did not lie."
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by popeye1945 »

AmericanKestrel wrote: June 7th, 2021, 1:47 pm
RJG wrote: June 7th, 2021, 8:12 am
The "self" ("I"; consciousness) is just the "experiencer" (physical recognition) of the thoughts, feelings, and sensations reactively created by the physical body. There is no "self" beyond these experiences.
If the Self is the experiencer of the experience, and there is no self beyond these experiences, then the experience and the experiencer are the same. Where is the self?
Define self.
Advaita defines self (Atma) as the the reflection of the one single universal existence known as Brhman (Bigness) . It is the body that experiences the world created by the mind. The Atma remains as a seer and is not affected by the experience in any way.
AmericanKestrel,
"The Atman remains as seer and is not affected by the experience in any way." quote You must admit that this is a mystical statement and really just a statement of the existence of a god, where else might one find a bases for such a statement. Personally I am more comfortable with Spinoza's god, being the totality.
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: The self beyond thought, sensation, and experience

Post by popeye1945 »

The self is both subject and object and the object includes the cosmos.
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021