Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
AverageBozo
Posts: 502
Joined: May 11th, 2021, 11:20 am

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by AverageBozo »

Consul wrote: July 26th, 2021, 12:35 pm
Pattern-chaser wrote: July 26th, 2021, 11:20 am
Consul wrote: July 24th, 2021, 10:04 am But this conceptual possibility of brain-/body-independent consciousness isn't the same as a real, natural possibility.
A possibility is something that is (or might be) possible. In that sense, all possibilities are the same: they are possible.
Yes, but not unqualifiedly, because there are different kinds of possibility.
What different kinds of possibility are there?
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Sy Borg »

Consul wrote: July 27th, 2021, 12:32 pmTo quote myself: "If having a (C)NS is unnecessary for having subjective experiences, what is physically necessary for it? Being a living organism?

Structures that perform equivalent, if far simpler than, functions to a CNS.

Over the years researchers regularly notice that, while form and function in nature have close correlates, often functions considered particular to a structure are found to be performed by analogous structures. For instance, plants, fungi and microbes can sense their environment with structures that perform equivalent functions to neurons.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Consul »

Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 3:00 am
Consul wrote: July 27th, 2021, 12:32 pmTo quote myself: "If having a (C)NS is unnecessary for having subjective experiences, what is physically necessary for it? Being a living organism?

Structures that perform equivalent, if far simpler than, functions to a CNS.
What material structures can do that?
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 3:00 amOver the years researchers regularly notice that, while form and function in nature have close correlates, often functions considered particular to a structure are found to be performed by analogous structures. For instance, plants, fungi and microbes can sense their environment with structures that perform equivalent functions to neurons.
Functions and their famous "multiple realizability"…
For instance, if plants and humans are both capable of learning (in the same literal and general sense of the term), it doesn't follow that there aren't any significant differences between the kind(s) of learning plants are capable of and the kind(s) of learning humans are capable of.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Consul »

AverageBozo wrote: July 27th, 2021, 5:33 pm What different kinds of possibility are there?
logical, conceptual, metaphysical/ontological, nomological (natural/physical), epistemological

See:
* The Epistemology of Modality > Varieties of Modality: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moda ... rgEpisModa

* Varieties of Modality: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/modality-varieties/
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Consul »

Consul wrote: July 28th, 2021, 9:34 amFor instance, if plants and humans are both capable of learning (in the same literal and general sense of the term)…
But what is the definition of "learning" that can be applied literally and generally to plants and humans?

"learning n. 1 Any lasting change in behaviour resulting from experience, especially conditioning. 2. The act or process of acquiring knowledge or skill, or knowledge gained by study (He had several university degrees and was a man of learning)."
—Oxford Dictionary of Psychology

"Learning is a generic term for a diverse number of different cognitive processes. Its simplest and broadest definition can be encapsulated as: learning is a change in the state of a system produced by experience and reflected in behavior. Learning must be distinguished from similar behavioral changes produced by growth, maturation, or development, each of which can mimic the effects of experience. Obviously this diffuse term includes an enormous array of behavioral changes ranging from psychomotor skills such as learning to ride a bicycle to learning one’s multiplication tables to learning how to think logically. That which we call learning comes in many guises."

(Uttal, William R. Mind and Brain: A Critical Appraisal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011. p. 177)

Problem: If learning presupposes the capacity for sensory experience, then humans are learners and plants are not. But we can substitute "sensory influence", "sensory impact", or "sensory input" for "sensory experience", so as to broaden the meaning of "learning": "any lasting change in behaviour resulting from sensory influence/impact/input". Or: "a change in the state of a system produced by sensory signals/sensory information and reflected in behavior".

Next problem: If learning is a cognitive process, then humans are learners and plants are not. For cognition requires the use of semantic information in the form of mental representations, and plants surely can't use this sort of information.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
AverageBozo
Posts: 502
Joined: May 11th, 2021, 11:20 am

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by AverageBozo »

Consul wrote: July 28th, 2021, 11:10 am
AverageBozo wrote: July 27th, 2021, 5:33 pm What different kinds of possibility are there?
logical, conceptual, metaphysical/ontological, nomological (natural/physical), epistemological

See:
* The Epistemology of Modality > Varieties of Modality: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moda ... rgEpisModa

* Varieties of Modality: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/modality-varieties/
Thanks. I am working through these now.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Sy Borg »

Consul wrote: July 28th, 2021, 9:34 am
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 3:00 am
Consul wrote: July 27th, 2021, 12:32 pmTo quote myself: "If having a (C)NS is unnecessary for having subjective experiences, what is physically necessary for it? Being a living organism?

Structures that perform equivalent, if far simpler than, functions to a CNS.
What material structures can do that?
Logically, an organism smaller than a neuron will not have a nervous system to allow it to operate as a single entity, no more than humans need to have road and rail networks within them to commute to work. So microbes pass material and information around via ion channels.

Consul wrote: July 28th, 2021, 9:34 am
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 3:00 amOver the years researchers regularly notice that, while form and function in nature have close correlates, often functions considered particular to a structure are found to be performed by analogous structures. For instance, plants, fungi and microbes can sense their environment with structures that perform equivalent functions to neurons.
Functions and their famous "multiple realizability"…
For instance, if plants and humans are both capable of learning (in the same literal and general sense of the term), it doesn't follow that there aren't any significant differences between the kind(s) of learning plants are capable of and the kind(s) of learning humans are capable of.
There are jobs that an organism has to do to survive - to sense internal function, to sense environment and to respond to that data, which in turn influences the internal and external environments, resulting in a loop of constant adjustment. An organism will necessarily have to feel something to do this.

When it comes to P-consciousness, though, the difficulty I have is that I am suggesting something that no human can understand - states of consciousness that no human has ever experienced. In the thread's context, I am referring to a potential simplicity of consciousness that we cannot conceive. Like others, I struggle of imagine the sheer insignificance of basic qualia in the face of our extremely complex human minds.

Consider a grain of sand on the ocean floor. Should we care about that grain of sand? Probably not (unless it's a rare precious metal). Should we acknowledge its existence? I say "yes" for the sake of accuracy, but I doubt there are significant ethical issues at stake here. This is a not a serious ethical issue like that of food animal treatment and the anthropocentrism that stemmed from Descartes' and his horrific experiments.

But damn interesting to consider :)
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Consul »

Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pm
Consul wrote: July 28th, 2021, 9:34 amWhat material structures can do that?
Logically, an organism smaller than a neuron will not have a nervous system to allow it to operate as a single entity, no more than humans need to have road and rail networks within them to commute to work. So microbes pass material and information around via ion channels.
The interesting question is what can be and what cannot be done psychologically without a nervous system. To repeat my view, I think cognition qua processing of semantic information (mental representations/signs) and phenomenal consciousness qua subjective experience require a central nervous system in order to be naturally realizable.
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pmThere are jobs that an organism has to do to survive - to sense internal function, to sense environment and to respond to that data, which in turn influences the internal and external environments, resulting in a loop of constant adjustment. An organism will necessarily have to feel something to do this.
If by "feelings" you mean subjective experiences, that's just a question-begging non sequitur!

QUOTE>
"Most researchers accept that even quite complex perception, cognition, and control of action can go on entirely 'in the dark'."

(Godfrey-Smith, Peter. "The Evolution of Consciousness in Phylogenetic Context." In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds, edited by Kristin Andrews and Jacob Beck, 216-226. London: Routledge, 2018. p. 220)
<QUOTE
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pmWhen it comes to P-consciousness, though, the difficulty I have is that I am suggesting something that no human can understand - states of consciousness that no human has ever experienced. In the thread's context, I am referring to a potential simplicity of consciousness that we cannot conceive. Like others, I struggle of imagine the sheer insignificance of basic qualia in the face of our extremely complex human minds.

Consider a grain of sand on the ocean floor. Should we care about that grain of sand? Probably not (unless it's a rare precious metal). Should we acknowledge its existence? I say "yes" for the sake of accuracy, but I doubt there are significant ethical issues at stake here. This is a not a serious ethical issue like that of food animal treatment and the anthropocentrism that stemmed from Descartes' and his horrific experiments.

But damn interesting to consider :)
I don't think the postulation of experiential qualia in nonanimal organisms becomes more plausible by restricting it to "basic" or "simple" qualia, because it seems that even the most basic or simplest experiences require nonsimple minds that cannot be realized on subneuronal levels of physiological organization.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
AmericanKestrel
Posts: 356
Joined: May 22nd, 2021, 6:26 am
Favorite Philosopher: Yagnyavalkya
Location: US

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by AmericanKestrel »

Scott wrote: July 15th, 2021, 11:56 am Sometimes there will be news headlines about someone living with "no brain" but actually the person has 10% of a brain left or such, so in those cases the news headline is using hyperbole, if not being outright dishonest. This topic is not for discussing whether someone can be conscious with a very small and/or severely damaged brain. Rather, this topic is for discussing whether a person/creature can be conscious without any brain at all.

Please do not answer with a simple yes or no, but instead make sure to provide evidence and argument to backup your answer.
Advaita, non-dualism, asserts the only thing that exists is consciousness, everything else is unreal.
the brain is an organ that informs the mind-body-intellect complex through the organs of perception. the consciousness illuminates the understanding of the world, it does not do anything, it simply is and there is no place where it is absent. consciousness is not dependent on the body gains sentience from the reflection of the consciousness.
"The Serpent did not lie."
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Consul »

AmericanKestrel wrote: July 29th, 2021, 12:28 pmAdvaita, non-dualism, asserts the only thing that exists is consciousness, everything else is unreal.
Where there is consciousness, there must be something having it, something conscious. For consciousness is not a substance, and there is no possible world full of experiencings but without any experiencers (subjects of experience). The subjectivity of experience consists in its being there for a subject that is not itself an experience, since it is nonsensical to say that experiences experience other experiences or themselves. Being experienced by a nonexperience is part of the essence of an experience.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Sy Borg »

Consul wrote: July 29th, 2021, 9:58 am
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pm
Consul wrote: July 28th, 2021, 9:34 amWhat material structures can do that?
Logically, an organism smaller than a neuron will not have a nervous system to allow it to operate as a single entity, no more than humans need to have road and rail networks within them to commute to work. So microbes pass material and information around via ion channels.
The interesting question is what can be and what cannot be done psychologically without a nervous system. To repeat my view, I think cognition qua processing of semantic information (mental representations/signs) and phenomenal consciousness qua subjective experience require a central nervous system in order to be naturally realizable.
Once again, I am not convinced that mentality is required needed to feel existence. It appears to be that way for humans and their analogues but - again! - humans only know existence with a big, dominant brain. Thus, we assume that a brained sense of existence is all that is possible. We are not talking about higher functions here - at all.

Consul wrote: July 29th, 2021, 9:58 am
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pmThere are jobs that an organism has to do to survive - to sense internal function, to sense environment and to respond to that data, which in turn influences the internal and external environments, resulting in a loop of constant adjustment. An organism will necessarily have to feel something to do this.
If by "feelings" you mean subjective experiences, that's just a question-begging non sequitur!
You are wrong. Yours is a misrepresentation. Who is talking about feelings? I spoke of feeling one's existence, which is rather important if one wants to avoid dangers.

I appreciate that you believe "biological robots" and "philosophical zombies" are real. I have doubts. If researchers at the cutting edge were always right that would be the end of science. It's is the mistakes and omissions that keep our journey of discovery going.

Consul wrote: July 29th, 2021, 9:58 am
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pmWhen it comes to P-consciousness, though, the difficulty I have is that I am suggesting something that no human can understand - states of consciousness that no human has ever experienced. In the thread's context, I am referring to a potential simplicity of consciousness that we cannot conceive. Like others, I struggle of imagine the sheer insignificance of basic qualia in the face of our extremely complex human minds.

Consider a grain of sand on the ocean floor. Should we care about that grain of sand? Probably not (unless it's a rare precious metal). Should we acknowledge its existence? I say "yes" for the sake of accuracy, but I doubt there are significant ethical issues at stake here. This is a not a serious ethical issue like that of food animal treatment and the anthropocentrism that stemmed from Descartes' and his horrific experiments.

But damn interesting to consider :)
I don't think the postulation of experiential qualia in nonanimal organisms becomes more plausible by restricting it to "basic" or "simple" qualia, because it seems that even the most basic or simplest experiences require nonsimple minds that cannot be realized on subneuronal levels of physiological organization.
If you are going to repeat yourself, I will respond in kind:
I appreciate that you believe "biological robots" and "philosophical zombies" are real. I have doubts. If researchers at the cutting edge were always right that would be the end of science. It's is the mistakes and omissions that keep our journey of discovery going.
And, as stated earlier, there will be equivalent processes happening, eg. ion channels rather than a nervous system. What do ion channels feel like to a human? Same answer as "What does Brownian motion feel like to a human?". Nothing at all. Minuscule and trivial processes to a human are the main game for very small organisms.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8265
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sy Borg wrote: July 29th, 2021, 4:38 pm I am not convinced that mentality is required, needed to feel existence. It appears to be that way for humans and their analogues but - again! - humans only know existence with a big, dominant brain. Thus, we assume that a brained sense of existence is all that is possible.
👍 If we are to answer the question - "Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?" - we need to consider other possibilities, not just fall back on "this is what we know, what has always been (as far as we know), so this is how it must (always) be".
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
AmericanKestrel
Posts: 356
Joined: May 22nd, 2021, 6:26 am
Favorite Philosopher: Yagnyavalkya
Location: US

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by AmericanKestrel »

Consul wrote: July 29th, 2021, 12:49 pm
AmericanKestrel wrote: July 29th, 2021, 12:28 pmAdvaita, non-dualism, asserts the only thing that exists is consciousness, everything else is unreal.
Where there is consciousness, there must be something having it, something conscious. For consciousness is not a substance, and there is no possible world full of experiencings but without any experiencers (subjects of experience). The subjectivity of experience consists in its being there for a subject that is not itself an experience, since it is nonsensical to say that experiences experience other experiences or themselves. Being experienced by a nonexperience is part of the essence of an experience.
Consciousness illuminates. It does not interact. It illuminates a body’s intellect and mind which are informed by organs of perception. Once the body dies there is nothing to interpret, no world to sense. Conciousness remains.
"The Serpent did not lie."
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Consul »

Sy Borg wrote: July 29th, 2021, 4:38 pmOnce again, I am not convinced that mentality is required needed to feel existence. It appears to be that way for humans and their analogues but - again! - humans only know existence with a big, dominant brain. Thus, we assume that a brained sense of existence is all that is possible. We are not talking about higher functions here - at all.
I'm talking about mental functions or capacities in general. What exactly counts (or should be counted) as mental is another question, but it seems a higher level of vital functioning, of physiological information processing—viz. the neurological one—is necessary for subjective sentience. Nonanimal organisms live their lives on lower levels "in inner darkness", but isn't it astonishing what they can do without P-consciousness?!
Sy Borg wrote: July 29th, 2021, 4:38 pm
Consul wrote: July 29th, 2021, 9:58 am
Sy Borg wrote: July 28th, 2021, 6:14 pm…An organism will necessarily have to feel something to do this.
If by "feelings" you mean subjective experiences, that's just a question-begging non sequitur!
You are wrong. Yours is a misrepresentation. Who is talking about feelings? I spoke of feeling one's existence, which is rather important if one wants to avoid dangers.

I appreciate that you believe "biological robots" and "philosophical zombies" are real. I have doubts. If researchers at the cutting edge were always right that would be the end of science. It's is the mistakes and omissions that keep our journey of discovery going.
You are talking about feelings: "An organism will necessarily have to feel something to do this."

Why should (successful) danger-avoidance behavior depend on subjective feelings?
It may depend on sensory signals or sensory information, but the organismal processing of such objective sensory information doesn't require P-consciousness. It is known that sensory perception can take place without any subjective sensations.

All (phenomenally) nonconscious organisms are biological machines, robots or zombies; but they are not zombies in the technical philosophical sense, viz. nonconscious physical duplicates of conscious agents. I believe that this sort of zombies cannot exist!
Sy Borg wrote: July 29th, 2021, 4:38 pm And, as stated earlier, there will be equivalent processes happening, eg. ion channels rather than a nervous system. What do ion channels feel like to a human? Same answer as "What does Brownian motion feel like to a human?". Nothing at all. Minuscule and trivial processes to a human are the main game for very small organisms.
There are (C)NS-independent forms of physiological signaling or information-processing on the one hand, and (C)NS-dependent forms on the other hand. The question is whether P-consciousness depends on the latter or only on the former. I maintain that the best bet in the light of our scientific knowledge is to affirm its brain-dependence.

There is certainly nothing another organism's experiences are like for me, since I cannot feel any experiences I don't have myself.

Our ancient ancestors were naively prone to projections of mentality/experientiality onto all kinds of animate and inanimate things, but scientific explanations of the activities and capacities of nonanimal organisms are possible without any appeal to P-consciousness.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Can consciousness exist without any brain at all?

Post by Atla »

AmericanKestrel wrote: July 30th, 2021, 10:26 am
Consul wrote: July 29th, 2021, 12:49 pm
AmericanKestrel wrote: July 29th, 2021, 12:28 pmAdvaita, non-dualism, asserts the only thing that exists is consciousness, everything else is unreal.
Where there is consciousness, there must be something having it, something conscious. For consciousness is not a substance, and there is no possible world full of experiencings but without any experiencers (subjects of experience). The subjectivity of experience consists in its being there for a subject that is not itself an experience, since it is nonsensical to say that experiences experience other experiences or themselves. Being experienced by a nonexperience is part of the essence of an experience.
Consciousness illuminates. It does not interact. It illuminates a body’s intellect and mind which are informed by organs of perception. Once the body dies there is nothing to interpret, no world to sense. Conciousness remains.
That version of nondualism is popular, but it's just wishful thinking. Consciousness can't illuminate the human mind/body, because everything is consciousness including the human mind/body. Something can't be outside of itself to illuminate itself.
True philosophy points to the Moon
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021