Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Belindi »

Papus79 wrote:
----neurons, while special in certain kinds of potency, seem to be a difference in amount rather than a difference in kind.
Yes. There are several chemical psychoactive secretions in the brain each of which activates a different sort of consciousness, e.g. REM sleep, deep sleep: waking awareness. These psychoactive secretions become depleted by turns and then another secretion becomes dominant.
SteveKlinko
Posts: 710
Joined: November 19th, 2021, 11:43 am

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by SteveKlinko »

GrayArea wrote: December 21st, 2021, 9:06 pm
SteveKlinko wrote: December 21st, 2021, 8:22 am
GrayArea wrote: December 20th, 2021, 4:37 pm
SteveKlinko wrote: December 19th, 2021, 4:28 pm
Yes exactly, some Magical property of the Neurons that nobody knows about. It's only a Speculation and not any kind of Scientific fact. Doesn't mean the Physicalist/Materialist proposition is wrong, but it sure has not been shown to be true.

In fact, the statement that Conscious Experience is Identical to Electrochemical Mechanisms in the Brain doesn't make sense at any level as an Explanation of anything. The statement is completely Incoherent on the face of it. The Experience of Redness for example stands as a Phenomenon that exists as a Thing-In-Itself. The Experience of Redness is in a different Category of Phenomenon than any Phenomenon of Electrochemical Neural Activity. You are expressing a pure Belief, without any Chain of Logic to explain it.
If I may interject, I personally believe that Conscious Experience is essentially identical to the enclosed system of the neurons' own dialectics that is created from neural interactions——where their languages within the dialectics are the sheer "facts" that electrochemical mechanisms work in a specific way within the neurons themselves and the meanings/each symbols of the languages are how exactly the electrochemical mechanisms work in certain areas. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this one.
It is fine to Speculate and Believe. You might be right. But there must be some Chain of Logic that starts with the Neural Activity you specified and shows how something like the Experience of Redness is produced.
I would say that sensory experiences such as the experience of seeing red is created when our neurons receive information in their own ways and try to process it in their own ways. As in, it happens during the process in which the neurons try to translate the impulse from light into the electrochemical languages that they operate on.

Basically, colors are what lightwaves mean to the overall dialectics between the biological components/neurons. Or how lightwaves affect their network.

Since colors are purely native to the mind and do not exist in the actual world, we can safely assume that colors arise from the interactions that involve what makes our mind, our mind. In this case, what makes our mind our mind, in the face of outside environmental impulse (lightwaves) that is not internal. To look into what neural interactions display this notion, we can look into how the neurons *unknowingly* solidify what makes the mind what it is—their own languages within the dialectic system, while they translate lightwaves into their own languages.
That's not a Chain of Logic.
User avatar
Papus79
Posts: 1798
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Papus79 »

GrayArea wrote: December 21st, 2021, 11:44 pm Oof, those are some big philosophical terms I haven't learned yet. (FYI English is not my first language) Could you dumb it down for me a little? Thanks a lot.
Youtube or Google Michael Levin. That's my TL/DR.
Humbly watching Youtube in Universe 25. - Me
User avatar
Papus79
Posts: 1798
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Papus79 »

Belindi wrote: December 22nd, 2021, 6:37 am Yes. There are several chemical psychoactive secretions in the brain each of which activates a different sort of consciousness, e.g. REM sleep, deep sleep: waking awareness. These psychoactive secretions become depleted by turns and then another secretion becomes dominant.
I meant something a bit more like neurons being more specialized for certain kinds of information relay and processing but most if not all other cells having some degree of that function.
Humbly watching Youtube in Universe 25. - Me
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Consul »

Consul wrote: December 19th, 2021, 5:56 pmNo, just (certain combinations and interactions of) natural properties physicists and chemists know about!
"Que si vous me demandez, comment les premieres qualitez produisent les secondes, ie vous diray que quelques Atheurs enseignent, qu'elles les produisent comme causes effectives. Les autres disent qu'elles sont seulement leurs causes materielles, & que de leur meslange naissant les qualitez secondes. Et en cette opinion il est tres probable, que les secondes qualitez ne sont rien autre chose que les qualitez premieres diversement meslées."

(Dabillon, André. La physique des bons esprits, ou l'idée et abrégé d'une physique familière et solide. Paris, 1643. pp. 139-40)

"…it is very probable that the secondary qualities are nothing else but the primary qualities diversely mixed." (A. Dabillon)



"What of the secondaries? Think of secondary qualities as arrangements of the primaries."

(Heil, John. The Universe As We Find It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 82)

So the idea is that the secondary (experiential/phenomenal) qualities are nothing over and above certain mixtures or fusions of primary (physical/chemical) qualities (of the brain). When we are introspectively aware of the secondary qualities we experience, what we are actually aware of are groups of primary qualities in a holistic state of dynamic synthesis that isn't introspectively analyzable into discrete and distinct primary qualities. (But there are complex secondary qualities which are introspectively analyzable into secondary elements.) These holistic states of phenomenal consciousness are neurologically (physicochemically) intransparent and impenetrable from the first-person point of view of introspection. Introspective analysis cannot possibly reveal the real material essence or structure of qualia; and that is what misleads us into believing that they have no material essence or structure, no physicochemical composition or constitution.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
SteveKlinko
Posts: 710
Joined: November 19th, 2021, 11:43 am

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by SteveKlinko »

Consul wrote: December 22nd, 2021, 11:20 am
Consul wrote: December 19th, 2021, 5:56 pmNo, just (certain combinations and interactions of) natural properties physicists and chemists know about!
"Que si vous me demandez, comment les premieres qualitez produisent les secondes, ie vous diray que quelques Atheurs enseignent, qu'elles les produisent comme causes effectives. Les autres disent qu'elles sont seulement leurs causes materielles, & que de leur meslange naissant les qualitez secondes. Et en cette opinion il est tres probable, que les secondes qualitez ne sont rien autre chose que les qualitez premieres diversement meslées."

(Dabillon, André. La physique des bons esprits, ou l'idée et abrégé d'une physique familière et solide. Paris, 1643. pp. 139-40)

"…it is very probable that the secondary qualities are nothing else but the primary qualities diversely mixed." (A. Dabillon)



"What of the secondaries? Think of secondary qualities as arrangements of the primaries."

(Heil, John. The Universe As We Find It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 82)

So the idea is that the secondary (experiential/phenomenal) qualities are nothing over and above certain mixtures or fusions of primary (physical/chemical) qualities (of the brain). When we are introspectively aware of the secondary qualities we experience, what we are actually aware of are groups of primary qualities in a holistic state of dynamic synthesis that isn't introspectively analyzable into discrete and distinct primary qualities. (But there are complex secondary qualities which are introspectively analyzable into secondary elements.) These holistic states of phenomenal consciousness are neurologically (physicochemically) intransparent and impenetrable from the first-person point of view of introspection. Introspective analysis cannot possibly reveal the real material essence or structure of qualia; and that is what misleads us into believing that they have no material essence or structure, no physicochemical composition or constitution.
Take any Conscious Experience you like (I like Redness) and show me how that Conscious Experience is the result of Neural Activity. It's the simplest question in the world. There's Neural Activity and then there's a Conscious Experience. How?
User avatar
The Beast
Posts: 1403
Joined: July 7th, 2013, 10:32 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by The Beast »

I admit as true that there was a light spectrum plus x-rays and gamma rays. In addition, there was a substratum. In the beginning, a process of absorption of energy by the substratum included the lowest values of the light spectrum. The same as gravity, I speculate in a Universal process of self-calibration. As energy decreased by the filtering of the atmosphere the now self-calibrating molecules added a mechanism (existing in particles) to absorb the energy of other unsuspecting molecules. Offensive and defensive mechanisms evolved. If the idea is a covariance of a recalling mechanism of the executive function and only in the red spectra, then why not get more ideas. The least energetic process allows for less wear and tear of the supporting network by producing and absorbing waves in the red which correlates with the values measured so far. Low intensity and wider wavelength. It may be that the network is electrochemical responding only in the red spectrum.
User avatar
Papus79
Posts: 1798
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Papus79 »

This is interesting (1:00:00), he's saying that gap junctions break autonomy in living systems, ie. combine organisms to become organisms, which is where he's suggesting that collective sense of self comes from:

Mindscape 132 | Michael Levin on Information, Form, Growth, and the Self:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gm7VDk8kxOw
Humbly watching Youtube in Universe 25. - Me
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Belindi »

SteveKlinko wrote:
Take any Conscious Experience you like (I like Redness) and show me how that Conscious Experience is the result of Neural Activity. It's the simplest question in the world. There's Neural Activity and then there's a Conscious Experience. How?
Easy!

Take the conscious experience of walking upstairs.

Knee joints, hips joints, ankle joints , foot joints, and balance mechanisms send feedback via afferent nerves to the brain which sorts these distal impressions from organs of special sense so that they form a useful "wide screen image" of what is going on.

The above is description only and not a anatomical explanation which would be too much for a philosophy forum. But you can easily look it up.
SteveKlinko
Posts: 710
Joined: November 19th, 2021, 11:43 am

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by SteveKlinko »

Belindi wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 8:09 am SteveKlinko wrote:
Take any Conscious Experience you like (I like Redness) and show me how that Conscious Experience is the result of Neural Activity. It's the simplest question in the world. There's Neural Activity and then there's a Conscious Experience. How?
Easy!

Take the conscious experience of walking upstairs.

Knee joints, hips joints, ankle joints , foot joints, and balance mechanisms send feedback via afferent nerves to the brain which sorts these distal impressions from organs of special sense so that they form a useful "wide screen image" of what is going on.

The above is description only and not a anatomical explanation which would be too much for a philosophy forum. But you can easily look it up.
But how do you Experience all these Impressions? Think about the Impressions themselves. What are those Sensations of the Impressions? That's the Hard Problem.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Belindi »

SteveKlinko wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 8:37 am
Belindi wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 8:09 am SteveKlinko wrote:
Take any Conscious Experience you like (I like Redness) and show me how that Conscious Experience is the result of Neural Activity. It's the simplest question in the world. There's Neural Activity and then there's a Conscious Experience. How?
Easy!

Take the conscious experience of walking upstairs.

Knee joints, hips joints, ankle joints , foot joints, and balance mechanisms send feedback via afferent nerves to the brain which sorts these distal impressions from organs of special sense so that they form a useful "wide screen image" of what is going on.

The above is description only and not a anatomical explanation which would be too much for a philosophy forum. But you can easily look it up.
But how do you Experience all these Impressions? Think about the Impressions themselves. What are those Sensations of the Impressions? That's the Hard Problem.
If all brains were the same great brain there would be no problem of consciousness. As it biologically is, qualia are mysterious because each subject of a quale has privileged access to it.

Trees,who together with fungi ,are being described in terms of one great nervous system have no problem with qualia.
SteveKlinko
Posts: 710
Joined: November 19th, 2021, 11:43 am

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by SteveKlinko »

Belindi wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 8:45 am
SteveKlinko wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 8:37 am
Belindi wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 8:09 am SteveKlinko wrote:
Take any Conscious Experience you like (I like Redness) and show me how that Conscious Experience is the result of Neural Activity. It's the simplest question in the world. There's Neural Activity and then there's a Conscious Experience. How?
Easy!

Take the conscious experience of walking upstairs.

Knee joints, hips joints, ankle joints , foot joints, and balance mechanisms send feedback via afferent nerves to the brain which sorts these distal impressions from organs of special sense so that they form a useful "wide screen image" of what is going on.

The above is description only and not a anatomical explanation which would be too much for a philosophy forum. But you can easily look it up.
But how do you Experience all these Impressions? Think about the Impressions themselves. What are those Sensations of the Impressions? That's the Hard Problem.
If all brains were the same great brain there would be no problem of consciousness. As it biologically is, qualia are mysterious because each subject of a quale has privileged access to it.

Trees,who together with fungi ,are being described in terms of one great nervous system have no problem with qualia.
The Privileged Access is only part of the Problem. Even with some Great Brain there would be a Hard Problem. Because there is still the mystery of the Conscious Experience of the Standard A Tone, Taste of Salt, Smell of Bleach, etc. But mostly that Beautiful, High Def, Wide Screen, Visual Experience that is embedded in the front of our faces. What the heck is that? Contemplate your own Visual Experience. Do you have any idea what you are actually Seeing? Are you Seeing the Physical Objects you are Looking at, or are you Seeing some Surrogate Image Phenomenon suspended in front of your face?
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Papus79 wrote: December 22nd, 2021, 11:05 am I meant something a bit more like neurons being more specialized...
I am no expert in neurochemistry, but I think the merit of neurons, and the way they work, is that they are NOT specialised...? 🤔
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Papus79
Posts: 1798
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Papus79 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 9:16 am I am no expert in neurochemistry, but I think the merit of neurons, and the way they work, is that they are NOT specialised...? 🤔
So axon, dendrites, and all of the gapped myelin is something every other cell has?

If they're not optimized for cross-system communication then I'm not sure I understand what I'm looking at.
Humbly watching Youtube in Universe 25. - Me
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Why All Current Scientific Theories Of Consciousness Fail

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Pattern-chaser wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 9:16 am I am no expert in neurochemistry, but I think the merit of neurons, and the way they work, is that they are NOT specialised...? 🤔
Papus79 wrote: December 23rd, 2021, 10:01 am So axon, dendrites, and all of the gapped myelin is something every other cell has?

If they're not optimized for cross-system communication then I'm not sure I understand what I'm looking at.
Ah. Ooops! I meant that neurons aren't specialised within themselves. Of course they do stuff that other cells don't do, using their 'tentacles' to connect to their fellows, and thus magically create ... a mind???
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021