How is it possible that it was never tested whether Earth life can remain alive deeper in space? The cause appears to be the stubborn dogma that life is an independent biochemical process that started in a primordial chemical soup.
There is an indication that life on earth may be tied to Solar-neutrino energy from the Sun. On Earth, life is bathing in a continuous stream of Solar-neutrino energy at all times, including after sunset and on the dark side of Earth. Neutrinos can change their mass up to 3000x in size, by themselves, which is called flavour switching or morphing. It is why the particle is called a ‘ghost particle’ (spooky particle).
When Solar-neutrino energy is a 'topical' source of life that could imply that Earth life may be bound to a region around the Sun.
The following is a short perspective on the philosophical issue of space travel that I wrote on it recently:
Where are the aliens?
Most people in the modern world view life as something that is owned on an individual level, as something that can be taken with one during space travel. Popular films such as Star Trek and Star Wars have displayed a future in which humans travel through space.
Some scientists are wondering however: why is the Solar system and Earth not crowded with alien visitors? Why, after decades of space science, has no hint been found for the existence of extraterrestrial life?
Philosophy suppressed
The post–World War II era is considered to be an 'anti-philosophy' era in which philosophy was increasingly placed on a level comparable with that of religions. In a sense, while science originates from philosophy, science has attempted to overcome philosophy and intended to rid itself of any influence of philosophy, which includes morality.
In 2021 I discovered that the farthest distance that an animal, insect or bacteria had travelled in space was the Moon and meanwhile trillions of USD were already invested for a manned mission to Mars in 2030.
Science it's dogmatic influence on behalf of determinism, the ground upon which science envisions itself to become master of the Universe, has resulted in a such a repression that it was never considered that Earth life may be bound to a region around the Sun.
Philosophy naturally would have posed the following questions:
- Is there at least one clue that Earth life is independent from the Solar system?
- On what basis is it valid to consider that life is like a biochemical fire that can be taken with one during space travel?
When life would be bound to a region around a star, it could explain why the Universe is not crowded with alien activity.
Because the origin of life is unknown, it is evident that science intends to use atheism fuelled neglect – the stubbornly ignoring of the question 'why' life exists – as ground for among other things a synthetic biology revolution in which animal and plant life is rendered meaningless beyond the scope of empirical value, and the multi trillion USD preparation for a manned mission to Mars in 2030.
(2022) Elon Musk: Manned Mission to Mars is Just a Few Years Away
Elon Musk stated that a manned mission to Mars could happen as early as 2029 on Wednesday when asked on Twitter.
https://greekreporter.com/2022/03/19/el ... sion-mars/
Question: did you ever consider whether life might require a topical origin and if so, do you think that it would be plausible to consider that such an origin of life would be subjective (i.e. 'owned' on an individual level)?