Is morality objective or subjective?
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: May 26th, 2019, 6:52 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
That makes sense that it would be subjective.Belindi wrote: ↑July 4th, 2019, 4:38 amit's subjective . "The sun rising every day" is an example of a form of causation called 'nomic connection'. In the case of the sun rising every day the phenomenon is caused by the movement of Earth round the Sun. The movement of Earth round the Sun is part of larger relativity "General Relativity" which includes natural forces. If there were no humans General Relativity would not exist. Perhaps if there had been no Einstein General Relativity would not have existed.
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Name a theory that does not have a subjective basis. Presumably a subject (i.e., an individual) composed the heliocentric theory of the solar system you mentioned earlier, perhaps as the result of a revelation, and then shared his idea with others. When others came to agree with him, when there was general consensus that his subjective opinion was true, it became a fact.Peter Holmes: 'Subjective' means 'based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions'. What has nomic connection - a theory about a causal relationship between the mind (or consciousness) and the brain - got to do with subjectivity?
The Geocentric model of the universe, the idea that the sun revolves around the earth rather than vice versa, was a fact for far longer than the current heliocentric model, and the heliocentric model may one day be superceded by some other one, which is just as factual.
Woah, simply recognizing the problem as a "category error" puts it to rest?! Think of all the poor misguided neurologists wasting their time looking for the source of consciousness in the brain, when a smidgin of philosophical insight would have solved the problem!Peter Holmes: If instead we recognise that this is a category error - that what we call consciousness or the mind are not such things - the mind-brain problem dissolves.
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: July 19th, 2017, 8:20 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
2 If, as neurologists are showing, consciousness is produced by the brain, there is no mystery - no strange, non-material thing needing causal explanation.
3 I assume you are Univalence/ Logik / some other dickish persona. So my advice is, as usual, to **** off and bother someone else.
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: July 19th, 2017, 8:20 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Actually it was taken as a fact that the sun goes round the earth.Peter Holmes wrote: ↑July 4th, 2019, 12:05 pm 1 If a fact is what we say it is, then it isn't a matter of opinion. That the sun revolves around the earth wasn't a fact - a true factual assertion.
2 If, as neurologists are showing, consciousness is produced by the brain, there is no mystery - no strange, non-material thing needing causal explanation.
3 I assume you are Univalence/ Logik / some other dickish persona. So my advice is, as usual, to **** off and bother someone else.
In the same way it was a fact that the body was a receptacle for the soul which animated it.
Copernican turns tend to be big enough to stay turned. And as it would fly against all physics for the earth to be the centre of the universe, so too would we have to overturn vast amounts of patient study, interpretation, and knowledge to take the absurd step to reinstate some kind of dualism - which would answer absolutely nothing.
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
My point was that facts too are relative, they change or are even abandoned as our subjective knowledge increases, e.g., the heliocentric theory may in time be superceded by something grander, maybe a solaricentric theory.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Actually the root of the problem seems to be that the "MIND" or "SOUL" or "SPIRIT" is seen as a thing in itself. And has been taken as separate.Felix wrote: ↑July 4th, 2019, 11:01 am Woah, simply recognizing the problem as a "category error" puts it to rest?! Think of all the poor misguided neurologists wasting their time looking for the source of consciousness in the brain, when a smidgin of philosophical insight would have solved the problem!
Rather the "mind" is what the brain does. It is not a thing attached to the brain ,but the activity of the brain like the journey is what a car does. Only separate in a categorical way.
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
"Rather the "mind" is what the brain does."
Or vice versa - but I admit to mystical tendencies.
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: May 26th, 2019, 6:52 am
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: July 19th, 2017, 8:20 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Sorry if I misunderstand your question - but I think the point is that the fact (living organisms look to avoid pain and maximise well-being) doesn't entail the moral judgement that living organisms should or ought to maximise, etc, or that it's morally right to maximise, etc, other organisms etc.
An 'is' (a fact) can never entail and 'ought' (a moral opinion).
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: May 26th, 2019, 6:52 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Yes your right.. it's scientifically objective thoPeter Holmes wrote: ↑July 31st, 2019, 4:33 pm Kaz
Sorry if I misunderstand your question - but I think the point is that the fact (living organisms look to avoid pain and maximise well-being) doesn't entail the moral judgement that living organisms should or ought to maximise, etc, or that it's morally right to maximise, etc, other organisms etc.
An 'is' (a fact) can never entail and 'ought' (a moral opinion).
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: July 19th, 2017, 8:20 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
Trouble is, sometimes some people seek out pain. And what constitutes well-being isn't straightforward anyway. Martyrs glory in a painful death to win eternal well-being in their heaven, for example. Exceptions prove (test) the rule. How about living organisms that sacrifice themselves for their offspring?
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
For a while I figured that objective good related to growth and entropy. Amusingly, the most derided lines of the old hit song, Macarthur Park, nicely summarises the situation for me:
Someone left the cake out in the rain
And I don't think that I can take it
'Cause it took so long to bake it
And I'll never have that recipe again.
Oh nooooooooooooooooo :)
We are looking at how difficult it is for something or someone to exist and persist. Who cares about the welfare of building rubble?
It's a matter of uniqueness and replaceability and influence, which is why killing is usually considered an objective wrong ...
no, the killing of a human ...
no, killing a human outside of war ...
no, killing a human outside of war or a siege situation or capital punishment (where there are varying opinions) ...
or killing of someone's pet ...
or another intelligent animal capable of suffering ...
and then there's the debate about whether non-viable foetuses are fully human ...
which raises the question of "what makes us human" ...
but if we say "reason", then we exclude infants, young children and some with severe mental illness or retardation ...
but these days there's too many people anyway ...
and what constitutes "killing"? Understaffing in hospitals leading to worker fatigue and fatal mistakes?
So we humans do what we always do, knowing that absolute precision is impractical, we round off the outliers and act as if they don't exist.
-
- Posts: 562
- Joined: July 19th, 2017, 8:20 am
Re: Is morality objective or subjective?
As I've been arguing, I think the expression 'objective wrong' is the mistake, because what we count as right and wrong can only be a matter of opinion, and 'objective' means 'independent of opinion'. But I agree about the danger of claiming moral objectivity.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023