Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
Post Reply
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Sy Borg »

popeye1945 wrote: November 9th, 2020, 7:09 pm
Greta wrote: November 9th, 2020, 3:57 pm The concerns of the elite *are* the concerns of the human race. The rest of us and our genetic lines are doomed - for all the reasons you mentioned. All the nice animals die first. What will remain will mostly be cockroaches, rats, germs, billionaires and their machines.
Greta, Do you believe that if the collective does have a mind, that it is of this elite? This is where pressure need be applied if that is the case. They then need to have their world rocked for them, quite literally.
That would be akin to chimps throwing stones at established human settlements. With technology, the US's infamous Second Amendment has been rendered obsolete, now only good for terrorising citizens. Individuals with rifles and sticks cannot compete with radar tracking, automated drones and guided missiles. Further, the greater the upheaval caused by the masses, the more harsh the retribution - setting undesirable precedents, eg. Tiananmen Square.

As one who sees space exploration as critically important, I accept that some pooling of wealth is necessary. Loose aggregations of self-interested individuals do not build space programs - or decent infrastructure, for that matter.
popeye1945
Posts: 1110
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by popeye1945 »

Greta, You have a most interesting perspective, so the masses best just sit on their hands? I agree that it is necessary to have the elite, most often it is only they you advance our civilization mainly due to their leisure and advanced education. I am getting the impression that you believe the population is utterly powerless, perhaps your right. The support Trump received in this past election, has convinced me that the mentality of at least half the population of the United States is rather pathetic. The conservatives have done a wonderful job dummying down the population. Perhaps democracy by the people has become a bad joke. Even if I have not got a perfect slant on your perspective it does seem a little depressing. :)
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Sy Borg »

Popeye, the masses need not sit on their hands. They can do anything they like within reason, just that it won't make much difference. What people do may change how things transpire to some extent, but when 20-odd people own about as much as half of the world, it's pretty clear that there is a major division occurring in humanity.

To that end, the Trump CIVID case was illuminating. An obese, 74 year-old man contracts an illness that has killed millions, including many young and ostensibly healthy people. Yet this ageing fat man in a high stress job - with a level of help that only a billionaire can have - shrugged COVID off in three days, and was back on the campaign trail - work that could exhaust healthy young people. The advantages are widening rapidly behind the scenes, with advantages over the rest of us in every small transaction.

I don't find any of this depressing, just as I don't find the relative incompetence of children depressing. Like children, humanity in 2020 is not yet capable of achieving anything close to its loftiest aims. If our biosphere does not produce entities capable of broad wisdom and awareness, probabilities suggest that, a biosphere somewhere in the universe will at some stage break through The Great Filter*. Probably more than one, possibly millions.

So I don't see the stakes as being as great as I otherwise would have done. In a personal and short-term sense, sure, there's much to consider and fuss about, but I don't think that progress will cease. Imagine the scale of cataclysm needed for billionaires to be exposed to the same level of danger faced by the poor today. Perhaps an asteroid strike or a supervolcano eruption could do it. Not too much else, it seems.

It is clear that humanity is going to breed and consume until diverse and complex ecosystems are broken down to simple ones. There will be incredible death and destruction over time, and I would rather that some people (post-humans?) survive than all of humanity either dying our or reverting to primal lifestyles.

Many people would rather see humanity erased from the Earth. Not me. What happens if you remove humanity? Just more life surviving on others' deaths. SNAFU. With technology in the future, at least the most privileged of us may have a chance to transcend this harsh state of affairs. After all, once people have decimated everything, they will have to learn to consume exclusively non sentient life!


* The hypothesis that civilisations always reach a stage of self-destruction.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Sculptor1 »

arjand wrote: April 13th, 2020, 5:11 am Recent scientific discoveries increasingly indicate that plants are intelligent creatures that can "talk" to animals, including humans. Plants may even be capable of interspecies "love" (i.e. the forming of meaningful relationships in real-time).
This does not amount to anything remotely deserving of moral status.
popeye1945
Posts: 1110
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by popeye1945 »

Sculptor1 wrote: November 10th, 2020, 4:30 am

''This does not amount to anything remotely deserving of moral status.
arjand, Perhaps it would be helpful if you stated, what in your opinion necessitates a moral standing, if a given level of intelligence does not.
popeye1945
Posts: 1110
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by popeye1945 »

Greta, It is to me rather depressing, that the eons of suffering and death necessary to bring us to this level of civilization was all for not. If we are to meet our end however, there will be no one left to have regrets.



My previous post, should have been directed to Sculptor.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Sy Borg »

How do you know it's all for naught? The universe has another trillion years of forming stars ahead, and it will take another trillion and more for them to burn out. In all that time, any beings that manage to keep solving survival challenges could evolve to become more extraordinary than we can even imagine. We don't understand the big picture any more than a toddler comprehends his or her nation.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Sculptor1 »

popeye1945 wrote: November 10th, 2020, 9:31 am
Sculptor1 wrote: November 10th, 2020, 4:30 am

''This does not amount to anything remotely deserving of moral status.
arjand, Perhaps it would be helpful if you stated, what in your opinion necessitates a moral standing, if a given level of intelligence does not.
Being human, or at least being capable of pain and suffering.
popeye1945
Posts: 1110
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by popeye1945 »

Sculptor, I believe there is enough new science to indicate that consciousness is most definitely there, there is even indications of them caring of other individuals. They certainly nurture and raise their young and have amazing properties of self defense, so certainly harm registers. Google "Brilliant Green" A science and history of plant intelligence. It is an amazing journey you'll never experience the woods in quite the same way.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

popeye1945 wrote: November 9th, 2020, 9:42 pm Greta, You have a most interesting perspective, so the masses best just sit on their hands? I agree that it is necessary to have the elite...
Necessary? Just as it is necessary to have cancer? The elite are parasites; they do not earn the money they own; others do that for them. But they alone reap the benefits. No, the "elite" are far from necessary, IMO.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Sy Borg »

Pattern-chaser wrote: November 11th, 2020, 8:13 am
popeye1945 wrote: November 9th, 2020, 9:42 pm Greta, You have a most interesting perspective, so the masses best just sit on their hands? I agree that it is necessary to have the elite...
Necessary? Just as it is necessary to have cancer? The elite are parasites; they do not earn the money they own; others do that for them. But they alone reap the benefits. No, the "elite" are far from necessary, IMO.
The personal angle is not important. Major projects - dams, buildings, drainage, sewerage and clean water systems, power grids - can only be achieved by pooling assets.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7940
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by LuckyR »

Pattern-chaser wrote: November 11th, 2020, 8:13 am
popeye1945 wrote: November 9th, 2020, 9:42 pm Greta, You have a most interesting perspective, so the masses best just sit on their hands? I agree that it is necessary to have the elite...
Necessary? Just as it is necessary to have cancer? The elite are parasites; they do not earn the money they own; others do that for them. But they alone reap the benefits. No, the "elite" are far from necessary, IMO.
The 1% are in fact necessary, statistically. If you measure anything among large groups, there will be outliers (just as there will be a median, both are going to happen). Rather than deny this reality the goal should be to limit (as many countries have done) the relative inequality between the 1st percentile and the 50th percentile, as opposed to fantasize that there isn't a difference between the two.

BTW cancer is also necessary, logically. That is, if there is a complex system, there will be malfunctions in the various steps in the complex system (since nothing runs 100% correctly). When there is a malfunction in the genetic repair mechanism, that's most cancers.

Perhaps we are using "necessary" differently, one use could be "preferred" and the other "inevitable".
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Pattern-chaser wrote: November 11th, 2020, 8:13 am The elite are parasites; they do not earn the money they own; others do that for them. But they alone reap the benefits. No, the "elite" are far from necessary, IMO.

LuckyR wrote: November 13th, 2020, 1:48 pm The 1% are in fact necessary, statistically. If you measure anything among large groups, there will be outliers (just as there will be a median, both are going to happen). Rather than deny this reality the goal should be to limit (as many countries have done) the relative inequality between the 1st percentile and the 50th percentile, as opposed to fantasize that there isn't a difference between the two.

[...]

Perhaps we are using "necessary" differently, one use could be "preferred" and the other "inevitable".
Yes, "the 1%" colloquially refers to the super-rich, not to ~80 million humans. It's not literal. And I referred anyway to "the elite", but it's much the same thing, I suppose. So yes, limits should be in place. While it is expected that people will benefit from their labours, it is not acceptable for people to own and control so much money that they couldn't spend it even in a hundred lifetimes. No-one can 'earn' that kind of money alone, so it is unreasonable for them to corner so much of the available wealth for themselves.

But even limits won't work on their own. If we say that the gap between the highest and lowest wages should be (say) a factor of 100, companies will emerge where all the workers will receive huge salaries, while those from other companies do much less well. The underlying problem seems to be greed, nurtured and fuelled by American Capitalistic mindsets. It affects individuals, it affects communities, and it affects our race as a whole, not forgetting what it does to an environment already under huge stress, when individuals stockpile money that is needed by all.

Our (global) pie is too small to make everyone rich...
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7940
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by LuckyR »

Pattern-chaser wrote: November 14th, 2020, 9:01 am
Pattern-chaser wrote: November 11th, 2020, 8:13 am The elite are parasites; they do not earn the money they own; others do that for them. But they alone reap the benefits. No, the "elite" are far from necessary, IMO.

LuckyR wrote: November 13th, 2020, 1:48 pm The 1% are in fact necessary, statistically. If you measure anything among large groups, there will be outliers (just as there will be a median, both are going to happen). Rather than deny this reality the goal should be to limit (as many countries have done) the relative inequality between the 1st percentile and the 50th percentile, as opposed to fantasize that there isn't a difference between the two.

[...]

Perhaps we are using "necessary" differently, one use could be "preferred" and the other "inevitable".
Yes, "the 1%" colloquially refers to the super-rich, not to ~80 million humans. It's not literal. And I referred anyway to "the elite", but it's much the same thing, I suppose. So yes, limits should be in place. While it is expected that people will benefit from their labours, it is not acceptable for people to own and control so much money that they couldn't spend it even in a hundred lifetimes. No-one can 'earn' that kind of money alone, so it is unreasonable for them to corner so much of the available wealth for themselves.

But even limits won't work on their own. If we say that the gap between the highest and lowest wages should be (say) a factor of 100, companies will emerge where all the workers will receive huge salaries, while those from other companies do much less well. The underlying problem seems to be greed, nurtured and fuelled by American Capitalistic mindsets. It affects individuals, it affects communities, and it affects our race as a whole, not forgetting what it does to an environment already under huge stress, when individuals stockpile money that is needed by all.

Our (global) pie is too small to make everyone rich...
It is natural human psychology to both compare and be envious, hence competition. In any competition there will be winners and losers (by definition). This is inevitable. As we both agree there should be limits on the amount of resource control, not bsed on hard work, but based on cleverness and luck.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Do plants deserve a moral status as "animal"?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

LuckyR wrote: November 16th, 2020, 3:59 am As we both agree there should be limits on the amount of resource control, not based on hard work, but based on cleverness and luck.
You believe success (in accumulating wealth) is justified by cleverness and luck, but not by "hard work"? Is that what you're saying?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
Post Reply

Return to “Ethics and Morality”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021