Is inaction morally wrong?
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
Personally I wouldn't make merely witnessing a crime illegal. I wouldn't even make encouraging a crime illegal, and I don't agree with conspiracy (to commit a crime) being illegal. Legally, I only hold the person who physically committed the crime responsible, which means that if someone is encouraging you, plotting with you, paying you, etc. to commit a crime, it's your responsibility to refrain from committing the crime.
- detail
- Posts: 171
- Joined: June 1st, 2019, 1:39 pm
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
To my mind the Trolley problem, as a lose/lose proposition, carries little to no moral equity. Neither choice is morally superior nor inferior to the other. There is no there, there. Similarly, it carries little legal risk, if one is defended well. It is reducible to a mildly interesting thought experiment demonstrating not much.Greta wrote: ↑May 28th, 2020, 6:53 pmBut this is the world we live in, not a world where one can pull a level to kill someone and have one's story believed. Even then, as per euthanasia (where the trolley problem can apply), it's not unusual for people who are doing the greatest good possible being sent to prison for doing so.
As to the OP's question (which I obviously don't think is represented well by the Trolley problem), I do see a difference, albeit a small one between outcomes caused by action vs inaction, so it is a legitimate question.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
Pull the lever and you go to prison. As with euthanasia, you would be taking a life with the intention of doing good and that does not stop the state from imprisoning people who fulfil their dying partner's request to be relieved of daily suffering. Then again, terrorists would say they are doing good too. So judges would not be impressed.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
If a decent defense team got five hostages to thank you for saving their lives you'd do fine. The justice system and the public at large despise terrorists, you might get a parade in your honor.Greta wrote: ↑June 1st, 2020, 6:21 pmPull the lever and you go to prison. As with euthanasia, you would be taking a life with the intention of doing good and that does not stop the state from imprisoning people who fulfil their dying partner's request to be relieved of daily suffering. Then again, terrorists would say they are doing good too. So judges would not be impressed.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
In some circumstances inaction might be morally better than action. Hitler was slightly unpredictable in 1938 and the inaction of the Munich Agreement was in good faith.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
Their inaction was immoral. All four officers had a duty of care which all four failed to act on.
As for Chauvin - he is guilty of first degree murder, unless he is a complete moron. Only a moron thinks you can kneel on s person's neck for nine minutes without killing them.
It is my view that the other 3 officers are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. More than simply morally wrong, but guilty of joint enterprise.
{PS it is known that Chauvin and Floyd worked in the same night club last year. I think there is more to this story than meets the eye. We'll see.}
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
In my view, the other officer's actions weren't immoral, but they had a professional duty to stop the actions of Chauvin.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑June 2nd, 2020, 6:45 am 3 police officers remain uncharged for the murder of George Floyd.
Their inaction was immoral. All four officers had a duty of care which all four failed to act on.
As for Chauvin - he is guilty of first degree murder, unless he is a complete moron. Only a moron thinks you can kneel on s person's neck for nine minutes without killing them.
It is my view that the other 3 officers are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. More than simply morally wrong, but guilty of joint enterprise.
{PS it is known that Chauvin and Floyd worked in the same night club last year. I think there is more to this story than meets the eye. We'll see.}
Also, unless evidence comes to light of intent, I wouldn't say that Chauvin should be charged with murder. He should be charged with manslaughter/criminally negligent homicide.
I'm not in favor of conspiracy laws period.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
I wouldn't say the person filming had a moral obligation to do this, though, especially given the risks involved. But there's no way I'd just stand by and watch it.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
It really was premeditated murder. A trained police officer does not act from emotional reaction. Moreover he could have desisted at any point during the nine minutes it took for Mr Floyd to suffocate.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
Police officers have a duty of care for those they have placed under arrest. They are responsible, as much a Chauvin. If they were civilians they'd all be in prison.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑June 2nd, 2020, 9:30 amIn my view, the other officer's actions weren't immoral, but they had a professional duty to stop the actions of Chauvin.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑June 2nd, 2020, 6:45 am 3 police officers remain uncharged for the murder of George Floyd.
Their inaction was immoral. All four officers had a duty of care which all four failed to act on.
As for Chauvin - he is guilty of first degree murder, unless he is a complete moron. Only a moron thinks you can kneel on s person's neck for nine minutes without killing them.
It is my view that the other 3 officers are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. More than simply morally wrong, but guilty of joint enterprise.
{PS it is known that Chauvin and Floyd worked in the same night club last year. I think there is more to this story than meets the eye. We'll see.}
Also, unless evidence comes to light of intent, I wouldn't say that Chauvin should be charged with murder. He should be charged with manslaughter/criminally negligent homicide.
I'm not in favor of conspiracy laws period.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
And yet you say the other 3 officers did not wrong by doing nothing?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑June 2nd, 2020, 9:34 am If I were the person who was in the position of filming Chauvin, by the way, I wouldn't have merely stood there videoing. I would have moved in and pushed him off of Floyd. That surely would have gotten me arrested or worse, but that's an acceptable trade-off in my view to watching a policeman stupidly kill someone.
I wouldn't say the person filming had a moral obligation to do this, though, especially given the risks involved. But there's no way I'd just stand by and watch it.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is inaction morally wrong?
Correct. I don't necessarily require others to act as I would.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑June 2nd, 2020, 4:27 pmAnd yet you say the other 3 officers did not wrong by doing nothing?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑June 2nd, 2020, 9:34 am If I were the person who was in the position of filming Chauvin, by the way, I wouldn't have merely stood there videoing. I would have moved in and pushed him off of Floyd. That surely would have gotten me arrested or worse, but that's an acceptable trade-off in my view to watching a policeman stupidly kill someone.
I wouldn't say the person filming had a moral obligation to do this, though, especially given the risks involved. But there's no way I'd just stand by and watch it.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023