It seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
The ethics of flogging a dead horse
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14995
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
But does "respect" lie in internal attitudes or externally viewed behaviors?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 10th, 2021, 9:06 pmIt seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
Doesn't the former lead directly to the latter?
"Who cares, wins"
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
The external is evidence of the inner.LuckyR wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 2:29 amBut does "respect" lie in internal attitudes or externally viewed behaviors?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 10th, 2021, 9:06 pmIt seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
Not sure why a dig at China is apposite here. I've seen phesants offered for sale in the UK stung by the neck, though you do not see that so much these days.
The plasticising of meat products is a way to separate the reality of meat eating from the public. The industry has shot itself in the foot I think. When people find out the truth, they are horrified and go vegetarian.
- Papus79
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
I think you're right that that is the source of a lot of outrage. It's a point that's been made by several other posters. But one point I raised was one of consistency. Do you think there is any value in being consistent in what we find outrageous and what we find acceptable? If so, would you see any inconsistency in, for example, sitting on a leather chair, eating a burger made from intensively reared beef, and shouting with outrage at the TV when a story comes on the news about a man sitting on a dead horse?Papus79 wrote:A lot of people's outrage at someone sitting on a dead horse would be at what sort of slippery slope it represents.
If you don't think there is value in that kind of consistency, it's understandable. We're almost all inconsistent in that respect to some extent. For example, most people are, for obvious reasons, inconsistent in our attitudes towards human life and non-human animal life. We'd regard sitting on a dead human as even worse! So if we're also inconsistent in our attitudes towards horses and cows, that's understandable.
- Papus79
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
The lovely US outrage mobs we have which are trying to cancel just about everything that's not nailed down at least shows me that there's as much motivation to twist this impulse in hyperbolic directions as there is to understate it.Steve3007 wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 1:22 pm Do you think there is any value in being consistent in what we find outrageous and what we find acceptable? If so, would you see any inconsistency in, for example, sitting on a leather chair, eating a burger made from intensively reared beef, and shouting with outrage at the TV when a story comes on the news about a man sitting on a dead horse?
I don't think consistency will be possible for as long as people keep this to emotional disgust. The number of 'nerds' lets say (thinking of people like Bret Weinstein or Sam Harris) who can pull themselves back from highly emotionally charged things, analyze them, and pull a principle out that helps straighten what would have otherwise just been sensed as an isolated emotional reaction (non-nerds), we'd have to move as a culture to being nerdier. It's not to say we we should be assaulting our emotions, emotions as far as I can tell adjust to incoming information and the better that information is the better our house-keeping on information inform us.
With eating meat or using leather - its an open question as to whether all of humanity can survive well as vegans. It's also an open question as to - if we have to kill for food because it's just part of what's required for maintaining our species - what uses of an animal's body are actually optimizing our utility and causing us to be less destructive vs. which applications of animal product give us a more sadistic or psychopathic contextual framing for non-human life. Eating Jell-O or me taking collagen hydrolase for my shoulders probably won't do it, leather's a funny thing because when it's cured enough it doesn't give away any obvious sense that it's an animal skin.
The parsing difficulty is that there are immovable objects, such as some people needing to eat meat, and there are the dials of human motivation which have to be calibrated very carefully not to have societies filled with arms races which aim at maximizing defection.
- Papus79
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
Oops - meant to say the better housekeeping we do on information the better the information that our emotions give us.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14995
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
Not a dig, just an observation. It's extremely important at this fraught time to tell the difference. It was a harmless observation that, back in the day, it was only ever Chinese food shops that hung ducks up in that way. I don't see that much any more but it used to be pretty common - but only in Chinese food shops.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 6:22 amThe external is evidence of the inner.LuckyR wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 2:29 amBut does "respect" lie in internal attitudes or externally viewed behaviors?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 10th, 2021, 9:06 pmIt seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
Not sure why a dig at China is apposite here. I've seen phesants offered for sale in the UK stung by the neck, though you do not see that so much these days.
But, as you said, the point of the nice packaging is to hide the truth of meat eating. It's so pretentious, when you think about it, how many of us put on these refined airs and then we mindlessly chow down into the bodies of animals that had been tortured and slaughtered on our behalf. We remain beasts, no matter how much we want to pretend we are different to other beasts.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
But which is better: pretending to not be a beast, or embracing one's beastliness?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 8:10 pmNot a dig, just an observation. It's extremely important at this fraught time to tell the difference. It was a harmless observation that, back in the day, it was only ever Chinese food shops that hung ducks up in that way. I don't see that much any more but it used to be pretty common - but only in Chinese food shops.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 6:22 amThe external is evidence of the inner.LuckyR wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 2:29 amBut does "respect" lie in internal attitudes or externally viewed behaviors?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 10th, 2021, 9:06 pm
It seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
Not sure why a dig at China is apposite here. I've seen phesants offered for sale in the UK stung by the neck, though you do not see that so much these days.
But, as you said, the point of the nice packaging is to hide the truth of meat eating. It's so pretentious, when you think about it, how many of us put on these refined airs and then we mindlessly chow down into the bodies of animals that had been tortured and slaughtered on our behalf. We remain beasts, no matter how much we want to pretend we are different to other beasts.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
What - you never seen a pigs head in an English butchers. What's the issue here?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 8:10 pmNot a dig, just an observation. It's extremely important at this fraught time to tell the difference. It was a harmless observation that, back in the day, it was only ever Chinese food shops that hung ducks up in that way. I don't see that much any more but it used to be pretty common - but only in Chinese food shops.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 6:22 amThe external is evidence of the inner.LuckyR wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 2:29 amBut does "respect" lie in internal attitudes or externally viewed behaviors?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 10th, 2021, 9:06 pm
It seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
Not sure why a dig at China is apposite here. I've seen phesants offered for sale in the UK stung by the neck, though you do not see that so much these days.
Farm animals are no often "tortured" though the vegan brigade like to spread the myth.
But, as you said, the point of the nice packaging is to hide the truth of meat eating. It's so pretentious, when you think about it, how many of us put on these refined airs and then we mindlessly chow down into the bodies of animals that had been tortured and slaughtered on our behalf. We remain beasts, no matter how much we want to pretend we are different to other beasts.
We are beasts, true. But we have the potential to kill our food with less pain and suffering than nature offers.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 8:10 pmNot a dig, just an observation. It's extremely important at this fraught time to tell the difference. It was a harmless observation that, back in the day, it was only ever Chinese food shops that hung ducks up in that way. I don't see that much any more but it used to be pretty common - but only in Chinese food shops.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 6:22 amThe external is evidence of the inner.LuckyR wrote: ↑March 11th, 2021, 2:29 amBut does "respect" lie in internal attitudes or externally viewed behaviors?Sy Borg wrote: ↑March 10th, 2021, 9:06 pm
It seems worse to sit on a cadaver. The fact that we must kill to live is something we tend to avoid thinking about. Each degree of separation from a warm corpse to a processed animal product results in less disturbance. So, back when people worse fur coats, many would baulk at having the animals head still attached. It is confronting to be faced with our entropic existence, so we tend to like meats to packaged in such a way that the animal is unrecognisable. People can find ox tongue offputting, as with Chinese food shop displays of throttled ducks dangling off hooks. Chop it all up and put it in a plastic pack and no probs!
Not sure why a dig at China is apposite here. I've seen pheasants offered for sale in the UK stung by the neck, though you do not see that so much these days.
I disagree. In the UK, "back in the day" when I was a lad, butchers and game merchants displayed their wares in exactly that way, as Sculptor1 describes. I used to see them as I walked to school. Lines of pheasants, rabbits, sheep, ducks, and other assorted corpses, hanging up with hooks through them.
"Who cares, wins"
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
Well the latter is at least honest, and isn't honesty "better" than pretence?
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
- runaway
- Posts: 21
- Joined: January 2nd, 2021, 5:08 am
Re: The ethics of flogging a dead horse
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023