Would you murder an innocent child with your bare hands to cure cancer?

Carter Blunt · Post by **Carter Blunt** » March 5th, 2023, 8:14 pm

Darshan wrote: ↑March 4th, 2023, 11:25 pm Earthellism deals with such difficult questions. These type of questions can be seen as the work of the Devil. God is Love and Love is God and here on earthell (hell on earth) and Love and Karma is present but God is in Heaven. Love and Karma rules here and God would never ask a human being to make an impossible decision. The only real answer to this impossible question is that I would call out the Devil for this question and offer my own life and save the an innocent child but the Devil would not accept that altruistic sacrifice. This how human devils here on earthell operate. Hitler and Osama bin Laden and now Putin start a genocide this way in Poland and on 911 and now in Ukraine. Putin wants to destroy Ukraine to save Russia but he is a human devil asking soldiers to kill innocent men, women and children to save Russia. Putin like Hitler is the cancer destroying the world and either he dies or we all die. Putin cannot live in a World where Russia is not a new USSR so either we destroy the World to satisfy Putin or we kill Putin to save this World.

Yakvek was a shapeshifting reptilian who wanted to gaslight and enslave us. So was the serpent, but he changed his mind in the end... apparently paid a heavy price for it. The serpent gave us the capacity to judge whether an idea is good or bad, the basis for what we call free will. He mainly did it to troll Yakvek, but still. Nothing besides that separates us from the rest of the animals. The serpent didn't care about sacrifices or worship, or even followers. He just didn't like Yakvek not sharing any of the power with his people, and chose to defy. Yakvek is the one who enslaved us, tortured us, genocided us, and set us against each other. He is the real devil. He is the one the "elites" make sacrifices to. He is the one dividing all the major religions, which all worship him. He is the one who has promised to destroy us "soon", the apocalypse that the New World Order cult intends to bring. Don't be STUPID. Use the serpent's gift.

Vagueabsolute · Post by **Vagueabsolute** » March 7th, 2023, 11:09 am

In short, yes of course i would kill the child.

I am confident in this choice for a multitude of reasons, one of which i wish to discuss here.
To me, refraining from killing the child, is the same as murdering every future cancer victim, many of which undoubtedly children. The difference between these methods of murder is the weight on the killer, in this scenario, me. So, do i value these potential cancer victims enough to suffer the strain of claiming a life with my bare hands? Yes i do.

Carter Blunt · Post by **Carter Blunt** » March 8th, 2023, 3:56 am

That kid doesn't owe cancer victims s***. Lettem croak! Lol.

Anyway, there probably already is a cure for cancer. They just won't give it to the peasants.

Post by **LuckyR** » March 8th, 2023, 1:01 pm

Carter Blunt wrote: ↑March 8th, 2023, 3:56 am That kid doesn't owe cancer victims s***. Lettem croak! Lol.

Anyway, there probably already is a cure for cancer. They just won't give it to the peasants.

Part of the error of this thread is the simple-minded assumption that "cancer" is a simple problem with a single solution. Lots of cancer is curable right now. I bring that up to combat the conspiracy theory that there isn't a financial incentive to bring medical cures to market.

Carter Blunt · Post by **Carter Blunt** » March 9th, 2023, 4:11 am

LuckyR wrote: ↑March 8th, 2023, 1:01 pm Part of the error of this thread is the simple-minded assumption that "cancer" is a simple problem with a single solution. Lots of cancer is curable right now. I bring that up to combat the conspiracy theory that there isn't a financial incentive to bring medical cures to market.

If they're better "incentivized" to watch you slowly waste away, I'm sure they'll opt for that route. Not like they're forced to publish study results. I'm derailing the thread again, but come on... even marijuana has been shown to cure cancer. I'm betting there's heaps of research they buried. A guy had to get the news to come film him illegally smoking out his handicapped daughter to prove the medical benefits on parkinsons or something. Even during covid outbreak, all they would tell you was to get an experimental vaccine and wear a mask. Nothing about monoclonals, vitamin d, or cannabis, and called ivermectin horse dewormer. Its obvious they favor certain treatments over others: the ones they have patents on. It's not an accident.

The "different types of cancer" response makes sense in some of these "simple-minded" situations, but keeping it simple is probably better for a discussion like this. So, let's just say the tortured toddler carcass contains all the relevant data for each form of cancer, and no one is gonna suppress it. Lol. The "conspiracy theory" is pretty obvious though, buddy. Almost like you would have to be trying hard not to see it.

Post by **LuckyR** » March 9th, 2023, 7:16 pm

Carter Blunt wrote: ↑March 9th, 2023, 4:11 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑March 8th, 2023, 1:01 pm Part of the error of this thread is the simple-minded assumption that "cancer" is a simple problem with a single solution. Lots of cancer is curable right now. I bring that up to combat the conspiracy theory that there isn't a financial incentive to bring medical cures to market.
If they're better "incentivized" to watch you slowly waste away, I'm sure they'll opt for that route. Not like they're forced to publish study results. I'm derailing the thread again, but come on... even marijuana has been shown to cure cancer. I'm betting there's heaps of research they buried. A guy had to get the news to come film him illegally smoking out his handicapped daughter to prove the medical benefits on parkinsons or something. Even during covid outbreak, all they would tell you was to get an experimental vaccine and wear a mask. Nothing about monoclonals, vitamin d, or cannabis, and called ivermectin horse dewormer. Its obvious they favor certain treatments over others: the ones they have patents on. It's not an accident.

The "different types of cancer" response makes sense in some of these "simple-minded" situations, but keeping it simple is probably better for a discussion like this. So, let's just say the tortured toddler carcass contains all the relevant data for each form of cancer, and no one is gonna suppress it. Lol. The "conspiracy theory" is pretty obvious though, buddy. Almost like you would have to be trying hard not to see it.

There's a reason one needs a license to practice medicine on patients but only a phone to "practice medicine" on the Internet.