Are there eternal moral truths?

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
Post Reply
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7094
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 7:32 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 6:45 am
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:03 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 6th, 2022, 9:15 am

Here's the "truth"
You are confusing two completely different things. There is something that we can agree is "true", and then there is a vague and diffuse concept "eternal moral truth".
This phrase is effectively a oxymoron. Morality have everything in common with subjective values, whilst truth is a concept searching for the objective.
I agree that 'truth' means either subjective truth or objective truth or, if I confuse those, both objective and subjective truth.

However, I suggest both Sculptor and Eric psychologically while aiming at objective truths are doing so because their unspoken stance is towards objective truth. NB I would not claim that objective truth is definable. Nor would I claim that all men stand to face indefinable objective truth as some men psychologically prefer lies.
If you think that, then, with respect you are not following what I am saying.
I was very careful in my words; "truth is a concept searching for the objective." That does not imply that objectivity is attainable, except on the most mundane level of "oh look a cup".
Morality cannot be matched with eternal since we know that humanity, the bearer and inventor of morality, is temporal. Nor can is so easily be matched with "truth" except on the most basic culturally, historically, socially, and personally subjective way.
Morality is human and culturally relative. Objective , absolute, or eternal truth is not human and we know it only by attitudes towards it.
There are people who psychologically prefer their lies or others' lies even while they know they prefer lies. Obviously you and Eric prefer telling your separate truths.
And you think you can exclude yourself here?
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Belindi »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 8:39 am
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 7:32 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 6:45 am
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:03 am

I agree that 'truth' means either subjective truth or objective truth or, if I confuse those, both objective and subjective truth.

However, I suggest both Sculptor and Eric psychologically while aiming at objective truths are doing so because their unspoken stance is towards objective truth. NB I would not claim that objective truth is definable. Nor would I claim that all men stand to face indefinable objective truth as some men psychologically prefer lies.
If you think that, then, with respect you are not following what I am saying.
I was very careful in my words; "truth is a concept searching for the objective." That does not imply that objectivity is attainable, except on the most mundane level of "oh look a cup".
Morality cannot be matched with eternal since we know that humanity, the bearer and inventor of morality, is temporal. Nor can is so easily be matched with "truth" except on the most basic culturally, historically, socially, and personally subjective way.
Morality is human and culturally relative. Objective , absolute, or eternal truth is not human and we know it only by attitudes towards it.
There are people who psychologically prefer their lies or others' lies even while they know they prefer lies. Obviously you and Eric prefer telling your separate truths.
And you think you can exclude yourself here?
I include myself.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7094
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 4:48 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 8:39 am
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 7:32 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 6:45 am
If you think that, then, with respect you are not following what I am saying.
I was very careful in my words; "truth is a concept searching for the objective." That does not imply that objectivity is attainable, except on the most mundane level of "oh look a cup".
Morality cannot be matched with eternal since we know that humanity, the bearer and inventor of morality, is temporal. Nor can is so easily be matched with "truth" except on the most basic culturally, historically, socially, and personally subjective way.
Morality is human and culturally relative. Objective , absolute, or eternal truth is not human and we know it only by attitudes towards it.
There are people who psychologically prefer their lies or others' lies even while they know they prefer lies. Obviously you and Eric prefer telling your separate truths.
And you think you can exclude yourself here?
I include myself.
So here is the odd thing.
You accuse me of a "separate truth", yet I have not made any claim concerning ANY moral truth.
If you think I have then show me where I did.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Belindi »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:04 pm
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 4:48 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 8:39 am
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 7:32 am

Morality is human and culturally relative. Objective , absolute, or eternal truth is not human and we know it only by attitudes towards it.
There are people who psychologically prefer their lies or others' lies even while they know they prefer lies. Obviously you and Eric prefer telling your separate truths.
And you think you can exclude yourself here?
I include myself.
So here is the odd thing.
You accuse me of a "separate truth", yet I have not made any claim concerning ANY moral truth.
If you think I have then show me where I did.
I did not 'accuse' I credited you with your separate truth. Cultures of belief are more or less autocratic. I presume you can be objective about all cultures of belief including your own. As you will know it's one of the problems of anthropological investigations that the observer has an effect on the observed so you try to circumvent that by participant observation. Participant observation is a practical aim despite no foreigner can be 100% a native participant.

When we are doing not anthropology but philosophy participant observation does not apply and we are learning from each other(if we learn at all) by the adversarial method, which necessitates us speaking as if we are individuals. It's right to be sceptical about evidence from authority or popular opinion.

I have never noticed you being dishonest so I credit you with (perhaps unwittingly I don't know)with an unspoken respect for honesty, which is necessary in any search for truth.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7094
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 5:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:04 pm
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 4:48 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 8:39 am
And you think you can exclude yourself here?
I include myself.
So here is the odd thing.
You accuse me of a "separate truth", yet I have not made any claim concerning ANY moral truth.
If you think I have then show me where I did.
I did not 'accuse' I credited you with your separate truth. Cultures of belief are more or less autocratic. I presume you can be objective about all cultures of belief including your own. As you will know it's one of the problems of anthropological investigations that the observer has an effect on the observed so you try to circumvent that by participant observation. Participant observation is a practical aim despite no foreigner can be 100% a native participant.

When we are doing not anthropology but philosophy participant observation does not apply and we are learning from each other(if we learn at all) by the adversarial method, which necessitates us speaking as if we are individuals. It's right to be sceptical about evidence from authority or popular opinion.

I have never noticed you being dishonest so I credit you with (perhaps unwittingly I don't know)with an unspoken respect for honesty, which is necessary in any search for truth.
Gaslighting?
What did you mean by this; "Obviously you and Eric prefer telling your separate truths."
That is not "giving credit". It is patronising at best.
Yet I am not promoting any truth here.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Belindi »

Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 5:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:04 pm
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 4:48 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 8:39 am
And you think you can exclude yourself here?
I include myself.
So here is the odd thing.
You accuse me of a "separate truth", yet I have not made any claim concerning ANY moral truth.
If you think I have then show me where I did.
I did not 'accuse' I credited you with your separate truth. Cultures of belief are more or less autocratic. I presume you can be objective about all cultures of belief including your own. As you will know it's one of the problems of anthropological investigations that the observer has an effect on the observed so you try to circumvent that by participant observation. Participant observation is a practical aim despite no foreigner can be 100% a native participant.

When we are doing not anthropology but philosophy participant observation does not apply and we are learning from each other(if we learn at all) by the adversarial method, which necessitates us speaking as if we are individuals. It's right to be sceptical about evidence from authority or popular opinion.

I have never noticed you being dishonest so I credit you with (perhaps unwittingly I don't know)with an unspoken respect for honesty, which is necessary in any search for truth.
I am not in a position to patronise anybody.
It's fairly obvious that honesty is necessary though not sufficient to discover truth, if truth is to be discovered.
User avatar
Leontiskos
Posts: 695
Joined: July 20th, 2021, 11:27 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle and Aquinas

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Leontiskos »

CIN wrote: July 4th, 2022, 7:14 pm
Leontiskos wrote: June 26th, 2022, 9:49 pm
CIN wrote: June 26th, 2022, 7:11 pm
Leontiskos wrote: June 24th, 2022, 12:33 am CIN seems to think that if we ignore someone who needs help then we are failing to treat them as an end in themselves. Rather, the truth is that when we ignore someone we are not "treating" them at all. We are not treating them as a means or an end.
You are failing to treat them as an object deserving of moral consideration. Since they do deserve moral consideration, your failing to so treat them is immoral.
Whether or not it is immoral, it is not failing to treat them as an end in themselves, and that is what we are discussing. As @Good_Egg rightly pointed out, failure to treat someone as an end in themselves occurs when we treat them as a means (and we usually think of this happening in an overtly selfish way).
I think we may have to abandon this discussion, because you and I cannot agree on what it means to treat someone as an end in themselves. I hold that treating someone as an end in themselves means taking into consideration the effect on them of our actions when choosing how to act. By my definition, you are failing to treat the five unhealthy patients as ends in themselves, because you ignore the effect on them of not taking the healthy patient's organs.

I would consider an alternative view, according to which treating someone as end on themselves means acting in their interests. In that case your position would still be wrong, because clearly if the choice is between acting in five people's interests or one person's interests, you should act in the five people's interests. What it would boil down to, on this definition, is that the surgeon cannot in fact treat everyone as an end in themselves, so he should treat as many people as ends in themselves as he can.

Frankly, I do not understand what you mean by treating someone as an end in themselves: it seems to entail that you advocate leaving people to die when you could save their lives. Suppose you were standing by the road next to a blind man, and he stepped off the kerb into the path of a speeding car. My view is that you should pull him back to safety. You apparently would disagree, since you do not seem to believe we have a duty to save people's lives when we can do so.
There is no controversy or ambiguity about what "treating someone as an end in themselves" means. What you are doing is redefining words willy-nilly, and this form of dishonesty is a sign that you are unwilling to engage in real dialogue. Thus the conversation was over long ago; approximately when you claimed that one can murder someone for their organs while simultaneously treating them as an end in themselves.

A means is something we do for the sake of something else. An end is that "something else" we are aiming at. See BBC - An End in Itself.

Murdering someone for their organs is a paradigm example of treating someone as a means rather than as an end in themselves. In that case the murderer is treating them as a means to the proximate end of organ harvesting, and to the remote end of organ transplants. I have explained all of this above, and I fully expect that you understand the point being made, despite all of your evasion.
Wrestling with Philosophy since 456 BC

Socrates: He's like that, Hippias, not refined. He's garbage, he cares about nothing but the truth.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7094
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 12:26 pm
Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 5:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:04 pm
Belindi wrote: August 7th, 2022, 4:48 pm
I include myself.
So here is the odd thing.
You accuse me of a "separate truth", yet I have not made any claim concerning ANY moral truth.
If you think I have then show me where I did.
I did not 'accuse' I credited you with your separate truth. Cultures of belief are more or less autocratic. I presume you can be objective about all cultures of belief including your own. As you will know it's one of the problems of anthropological investigations that the observer has an effect on the observed so you try to circumvent that by participant observation. Participant observation is a practical aim despite no foreigner can be 100% a native participant.

When we are doing not anthropology but philosophy participant observation does not apply and we are learning from each other(if we learn at all) by the adversarial method, which necessitates us speaking as if we are individuals. It's right to be sceptical about evidence from authority or popular opinion.

I have never noticed you being dishonest so I credit you with (perhaps unwittingly I don't know)with an unspoken respect for honesty, which is necessary in any search for truth.
I am not in a position to patronise anybody.
As a mod you ought not to be, no.
It's fairly obvious that honesty is necessary though not sufficient to discover truth, if truth is to be discovered.
What do you mean by that?
How is that relevant, unless you are implying that untruths are being spoken?
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Belindi »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 11th, 2022, 5:49 am
Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 12:26 pm
Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 5:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:04 pm

So here is the odd thing.
You accuse me of a "separate truth", yet I have not made any claim concerning ANY moral truth.
If you think I have then show me where I did.
I did not 'accuse' I credited you with your separate truth. Cultures of belief are more or less autocratic. I presume you can be objective about all cultures of belief including your own. As you will know it's one of the problems of anthropological investigations that the observer has an effect on the observed so you try to circumvent that by participant observation. Participant observation is a practical aim despite no foreigner can be 100% a native participant.

When we are doing not anthropology but philosophy participant observation does not apply and we are learning from each other(if we learn at all) by the adversarial method, which necessitates us speaking as if we are individuals. It's right to be sceptical about evidence from authority or popular opinion.

I have never noticed you being dishonest so I credit you with (perhaps unwittingly I don't know)with an unspoken respect for honesty, which is necessary in any search for truth.
I am not in a position to patronise anybody.
As a mod you ought not to be, no.
It's fairly obvious that honesty is necessary though not sufficient to discover truth, if truth is to be discovered.
What do you mean by that?
How is that relevant, unless you are implying that untruths are being spoken?
People often tell deliberate lies usually because it's in their own interests to do so. The basis of all cooperation is mutual trust. Discovering the best truths is a communal effort at some points along the line.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7094
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Are there eternal moral truths?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Belindi wrote: August 11th, 2022, 11:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 11th, 2022, 5:49 am
Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 12:26 pm
Belindi wrote: August 8th, 2022, 5:08 am
I did not 'accuse' I credited you with your separate truth. Cultures of belief are more or less autocratic. I presume you can be objective about all cultures of belief including your own. As you will know it's one of the problems of anthropological investigations that the observer has an effect on the observed so you try to circumvent that by participant observation. Participant observation is a practical aim despite no foreigner can be 100% a native participant.

When we are doing not anthropology but philosophy participant observation does not apply and we are learning from each other(if we learn at all) by the adversarial method, which necessitates us speaking as if we are individuals. It's right to be sceptical about evidence from authority or popular opinion.

I have never noticed you being dishonest so I credit you with (perhaps unwittingly I don't know)with an unspoken respect for honesty, which is necessary in any search for truth.
I am not in a position to patronise anybody.
As a mod you ought not to be, no.
It's fairly obvious that honesty is necessary though not sufficient to discover truth, if truth is to be discovered.
What do you mean by that?
How is that relevant, unless you are implying that untruths are being spoken?
People often tell deliberate lies usually because it's in their own interests to do so. The basis of all cooperation is mutual trust. Discovering the best truths is a communal effort at some points along the line.
How is this relevant here?
Post Reply

Return to “Ethics and Morality”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021