Should people have a right to privacy?
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
"Who cares, wins"
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
We can change our rules if we choose to, but I take your point.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 9:37 amKind of difficult to get the toothpaste back in the tube...Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 8:56 amAnd yet, if those folks decided it will be a right, they could make it happen. These folks are human, and 'rights' are created, maintained and enforced by humans, so it is entirely possible. I wonder if it will happen?
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 801
- Joined: January 27th, 2022, 5:12 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Legal rights of privacy are created by humans making laws about it. Practical rights of privacy are created by humans enforcing their ideas of privacy on each other (whether or not laws exist). Customary rights of privacy are created by humans building a culture in which privacy is valued.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 8:56 am And yet, if those folks decided it will be a right, they could make it happen. These folks are human, and 'rights' are created, maintained and enforced by humans, so it is entirely possible. I wonder if it will happen?
But to say that any of these rights should exist is to say that the moral right does exist.
Because saying "should" in the unconditional sense (rather than the conditional sense of "if you want a particular sort of society you should do this to bring it about") means that people ought to have privacy, I.e. it is a moral right.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15159
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Yes.
----
In terms of practicalities, Lucky, I like your toothpaste analogy.
Personally, I have no problem with the collection of browsing data for targetted ads. It does not impact on me. Ads are annoying enough, so I'd rather they at least be vaguely relevant. Untargetted spam can be pretty offensive. Further, the information collected will be useful in developing AI and for future historians.
The issue to me is with the release of private information that can cause harm, eg. outing gay people, revealing the address or contact details of a person who has offended some online communities. In some cultures and subcultures, privacy breaches might involve outing atheists or those not deemed loyal to a "Supreme Leader". Information is indeed power, and the ethics of its use seem likely to become ever more pertinent.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
I agree with your analysis of what does and does not contribute to harm. But let's dig a little deeper. Where does the information about the gay person's sexualité reside (to be leaked from)? There is no governmental list of sexual preferences. It could be a frenemy who acts maliciously. That has very little to do with electronic information age tech. It could be the closeted gay person participated in the online gay community "anonymously" only to be unmasked. That has everything to do with electronic information age tech. First of all, the myth of anonymity in an extremely trackable and traceable medium. Never say or write anything online that you wouldn't say in public... because you ARE in public! These are not private conversations, neither are they anonymous.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 7:57 pmYes.
----
In terms of practicalities, Lucky, I like your toothpaste analogy.
Personally, I have no problem with the collection of browsing data for targetted ads. It does not impact on me. Ads are annoying enough, so I'd rather they at least be vaguely relevant. Untargetted spam can be pretty offensive. Further, the information collected will be useful in developing AI and for future historians.
The issue to me is with the release of private information that can cause harm, eg. outing gay people, revealing the address or contact details of a person who has offended some online communities. In some cultures and subcultures, privacy breaches might involve outing atheists or those not deemed loyal to a "Supreme Leader". Information is indeed power, and the ethics of its use seem likely to become ever more pertinent.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15159
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Yes, it's largely about rules of engagement at the personal level.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 2:51 amI agree with your analysis of what does and does not contribute to harm. But let's dig a little deeper. Where does the information about the gay person's sexualité reside (to be leaked from)? There is no governmental list of sexual preferences. It could be a frenemy who acts maliciously. That has very little to do with electronic information age tech. It could be the closeted gay person participated in the online gay community "anonymously" only to be unmasked. That has everything to do with electronic information age tech. First of all, the myth of anonymity in an extremely trackable and traceable medium. Never say or write anything online that you wouldn't say in public... because you ARE in public! These are not private conversations, neither are they anonymous.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 7:57 pmYes.
----
In terms of practicalities, Lucky, I like your toothpaste analogy.
Personally, I have no problem with the collection of browsing data for targetted ads. It does not impact on me. Ads are annoying enough, so I'd rather they at least be vaguely relevant. Untargetted spam can be pretty offensive. Further, the information collected will be useful in developing AI and for future historians.
The issue to me is with the release of private information that can cause harm, eg. outing gay people, revealing the address or contact details of a person who has offended some online communities. In some cultures and subcultures, privacy breaches might involve outing atheists or those not deemed loyal to a "Supreme Leader". Information is indeed power, and the ethics of its use seem likely to become ever more pertinent.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
So separate from electronic communications, friends betraying one another's trust to keep secrets. Very important, but nothing new.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 3:17 amYes, it's largely about rules of engagement at the personal level.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 2:51 amI agree with your analysis of what does and does not contribute to harm. But let's dig a little deeper. Where does the information about the gay person's sexualité reside (to be leaked from)? There is no governmental list of sexual preferences. It could be a frenemy who acts maliciously. That has very little to do with electronic information age tech. It could be the closeted gay person participated in the online gay community "anonymously" only to be unmasked. That has everything to do with electronic information age tech. First of all, the myth of anonymity in an extremely trackable and traceable medium. Never say or write anything online that you wouldn't say in public... because you ARE in public! These are not private conversations, neither are they anonymous.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 7:57 pmYes.
----
In terms of practicalities, Lucky, I like your toothpaste analogy.
Personally, I have no problem with the collection of browsing data for targetted ads. It does not impact on me. Ads are annoying enough, so I'd rather they at least be vaguely relevant. Untargetted spam can be pretty offensive. Further, the information collected will be useful in developing AI and for future historians.
The issue to me is with the release of private information that can cause harm, eg. outing gay people, revealing the address or contact details of a person who has offended some online communities. In some cultures and subcultures, privacy breaches might involve outing atheists or those not deemed loyal to a "Supreme Leader". Information is indeed power, and the ethics of its use seem likely to become ever more pertinent.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15159
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
It gets more serious when it's workmates or competing small businesses.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 3:21 amSo separate from electronic communications, friends betraying one another's trust to keep secrets. Very important, but nothing new.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 3:17 amYes, it's largely about rules of engagement at the personal level.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 2:51 amI agree with your analysis of what does and does not contribute to harm. But let's dig a little deeper. Where does the information about the gay person's sexualité reside (to be leaked from)? There is no governmental list of sexual preferences. It could be a frenemy who acts maliciously. That has very little to do with electronic information age tech. It could be the closeted gay person participated in the online gay community "anonymously" only to be unmasked. That has everything to do with electronic information age tech. First of all, the myth of anonymity in an extremely trackable and traceable medium. Never say or write anything online that you wouldn't say in public... because you ARE in public! These are not private conversations, neither are they anonymous.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 11th, 2022, 7:57 pm
Yes.
----
In terms of practicalities, Lucky, I like your toothpaste analogy.
Personally, I have no problem with the collection of browsing data for targetted ads. It does not impact on me. Ads are annoying enough, so I'd rather they at least be vaguely relevant. Untargetted spam can be pretty offensive. Further, the information collected will be useful in developing AI and for future historians.
The issue to me is with the release of private information that can cause harm, eg. outing gay people, revealing the address or contact details of a person who has offended some online communities. In some cultures and subcultures, privacy breaches might involve outing atheists or those not deemed loyal to a "Supreme Leader". Information is indeed power, and the ethics of its use seem likely to become ever more pertinent.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Can be. But if you had to pick a time to get outed, then you would pick now.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 5:40 amIt gets more serious when it's workmates or competing small businesses.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 3:21 amSo separate from electronic communications, friends betraying one another's trust to keep secrets. Very important, but nothing new.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 3:17 amYes, it's largely about rules of engagement at the personal level.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 12th, 2022, 2:51 am
I agree with your analysis of what does and does not contribute to harm. But let's dig a little deeper. Where does the information about the gay person's sexualité reside (to be leaked from)? There is no governmental list of sexual preferences. It could be a frenemy who acts maliciously. That has very little to do with electronic information age tech. It could be the closeted gay person participated in the online gay community "anonymously" only to be unmasked. That has everything to do with electronic information age tech. First of all, the myth of anonymity in an extremely trackable and traceable medium. Never say or write anything online that you wouldn't say in public... because you ARE in public! These are not private conversations, neither are they anonymous.
-
- Posts: 801
- Joined: January 27th, 2022, 5:12 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
One or two particular types of secret are less damaging if made public now, yes.
But on the other hand , the ability to retrieve other people's past indiscretions is greater now than in previous times. Potential employers can access your past conversations and youthful opinions because they were expressed online. And have a greater incentive to do so because of the possibility that they will "go viral" in future.
That seems to me an issue that potentially affects everyone.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Yes, our present situation puts a new complexion onto an older problem. Indiscretions can spread, sometimes virally, and they can't be got rid of. And so the 'right' to privacy, if there is one, takes on much greater import.Good_Egg wrote: ↑June 13th, 2022, 3:15 am But on the other hand , the ability to retrieve other people's past indiscretions is greater now than in previous times. Potential employers can access your past conversations and youthful opinions because they were expressed online. And have a greater incentive to do so because of the possibility that they will "go viral" in future.
That seems to me an issue that potentially affects everyone.
"Who cares, wins"
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Well it is a perfect storm: no legal right to privacy, easier access to information and greater ability to spread this information, plus folks thinking they're anonymous when they say stuff, yet they're generally very traceable.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 13th, 2022, 7:17 amYes, our present situation puts a new complexion onto an older problem. Indiscretions can spread, sometimes virally, and they can't be got rid of. And so the 'right' to privacy, if there is one, takes on much greater import.Good_Egg wrote: ↑June 13th, 2022, 3:15 am But on the other hand , the ability to retrieve other people's past indiscretions is greater now than in previous times. Potential employers can access your past conversations and youthful opinions because they were expressed online. And have a greater incentive to do so because of the possibility that they will "go viral" in future.
That seems to me an issue that potentially affects everyone.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15159
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
And add to that a sense of entitlement by those eager to expose others. How about the Rebel Wilson situation with the Sydney Morning Herald journalist complaining that Rebel had gazumped him on the story by outing herself before he planned to do so.LuckyR wrote: ↑June 13th, 2022, 6:41 pmWell it is a perfect storm: no legal right to privacy, easier access to information and greater ability to spread this information, plus folks thinking they're anonymous when they say stuff, yet they're generally very traceable.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 13th, 2022, 7:17 amYes, our present situation puts a new complexion onto an older problem. Indiscretions can spread, sometimes virally, and they can't be got rid of. And so the 'right' to privacy, if there is one, takes on much greater import.Good_Egg wrote: ↑June 13th, 2022, 3:15 am But on the other hand , the ability to retrieve other people's past indiscretions is greater now than in previous times. Potential employers can access your past conversations and youthful opinions because they were expressed online. And have a greater incentive to do so because of the possibility that they will "go viral" in future.
That seems to me an issue that potentially affects everyone.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023