Er, no. Liberty is not "granted" by other people. You would have it if they did not exist. Their only role in it is to respect it or violate it.
Should people have a right to privacy?
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
This is not just about minding one's business, but about publicly outing innocuous people, humiliating them in public, risking their vocation and relationships. Minding one's own business means one does not have the knowledge to impinge on others' lives, so it comes down to having knowledge and allowing other people the freedom to disclose personal information at the circumstance of their choosing.Good_Egg wrote: ↑June 5th, 2022, 7:50 pmOK. I'd suggest that there is a minor virtue of minding one's own business. And that outing anyone to anyone else is thus an unvirtuous act, unless there is some particular circumstance which makes it one's own business to do so.Sy Borg wrote: ↑June 3rd, 2022, 8:10 pmTalking about sympathy is a red herring.
The discussion is about ethics and the practical limitations of law. You can't expect such a discussion to solve the problems of the world but to examine the issues.
But that being a matter of virtue rather than a matter of rights, that's maybe not so simple to reflect in law.
In the workplace, official sanctions are sometimes possible, depending on workplace policy. In society at large we are, to some extent, at the mercy of others who would use their personal information against us.
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: May 9th, 2012, 3:13 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
The right to liberty is granted by other people. What else can it mean? How much liberty do you have if you are buried by an earthquake? How free you to walk where you will if you get some disease that cripples you? If other people didn't exist, no rights would exist. You might be free to move about, you might be trapped in a mine cave-in .
"LIberty" does not suggest that we are free from disease or disaster. It suggests we are free from oppression by other people (like the horribly onerous obligation to pay thieving taxes to support Medicare). I'm disappointed in you, GE. You're usually smarter than this.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Off topic, but US citizens spend far more per capita on healthcare than jurisdictions that provide Medicare. The Medicare levy is modest and the benefits to society at large are significant.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Ah so. You're totally fine with the concept of following laws such as the funding (through taxation) and distribution of Medicare, welfare etc (even though you might personally disagree with them), as long as folks don't confuse their description as legally vs morally based, right?
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
The "Liberty" you refer to can only exist because everyone else carries out their role to respect it, and not violate it.
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Yikes, you're having a very hard time with this. No, rights are not "granted" by anyone to anyone, except in cases of transfer --- e.g., if I sell you my car, then I grant you the right to it; I convey it to you. But that right didn't originate in any "grant." And I've told you several times what having a right means --- it means that you acquired the thing to which you are claiming the right without inflicting loss or injury on anyone else. If Crusoe alone on his island plucks an apple from a tree, by that act alone he acquires a right to it. No other people have any role in that fact (and can't, since by hypothesis there are no other people). The right comes into existence with that act. How many times do I have to answer that question?
Oh, quite right. I would have little, or none. Mother nature is not a moral agent and thus not bound by moral constraints, such as rights. She can violate them with impunity, and does so regularly.How much liberty do you have if you are buried by an earthquake? How free you to walk where you will if you get some disease that cripples you?
Well, now you're repeating yourself.If other people didn't exist, no rights would exist.
As I said before, the liberal concept of natural and common rights has been a formidable impediment to the designs of totalitarians of all stripes; hence they are determined to re-define it, dismiss it as a "oppressive tool of the capitalist class" (or "white supremicists" or "European chauvinism") or as an aspect of the "false reality of individualism" or to just ignore it. But the history of that concept is conclusive and its moral significance obvious.
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Oh, that's right. But it must have existed before the violation, or there would have been nothing to violate.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 6:46 amThe "Liberty" you refer to can only exist because everyone else carries out their role to respect it, and not violate it.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
By what right - on what authority - did you "acquire" this thing?
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
To be more accurate, your statement should read, "The "Liberty" you refer to can only continue to exist because everyone else carries out their role to respect it, and not violate it."
That would be true.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Alright then. The "Liberty" you refer to, as you understand it, exists only because other people grant it to you. If the people don't grant it to you, you cannot have Liberty.GE Morton wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 12:38 pmOh, that's right. But it must have existed before the violation, or there would have been nothing to violate.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 6:46 amThe "Liberty" you refer to can only exist because everyone else carries out their role to respect it, and not violate it.
Better?
"Who cares, wins"
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Never mind continuing to exist, this 'Liberty' can only start existing if and when people grant it to you.
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
None. Why do you assume some "authority" is needed? You are your own "authority."Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 12:40 pmBy what right - on what authority - did you "acquire" this thing?
Is that question a relic of some religious assumption or doctrine?
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
Well, no, PC. If someone refrains from stealing my car, he does not thereby "grant" it to me. Your car, your house, even your life and body, were not "granted" to you by everyone who refrains from taking them from you. You're misusing the word "grant."Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 12:43 pmAlright then. The "Liberty" you refer to, as you understand it, exists only because other people grant it to you. If the people don't grant it to you, you cannot have Liberty.GE Morton wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 12:38 pmOh, that's right. But it must have existed before the violation, or there would have been nothing to violate.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 6:46 amThe "Liberty" you refer to can only exist because everyone else carries out their role to respect it, and not violate it.
Better?
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Should people have a right to privacy?
*Sigh*. Does Crusoe alone on his island have liberty? Who "granted" it to him?Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑June 6th, 2022, 12:44 pmNever mind continuing to exist, this 'Liberty' can only start existing if and when people grant it to you.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023