If sperm is not sacred then why does the Catholic church have a ban on contraception: and warnings against mastebation?
Is abortion wrong?
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Looking for logic in a pile of dogma is a fool's errand.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2022, 7:17 pmIf sperm is not sacred then why does the Catholic church have a ban on contraception: and warnings against mastebation?
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
- Mounce574
- Premium Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: October 8th, 2021, 2:24 am
- Location: Oklahoma
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Why are microbes considered on the same level as a human child? And if a "Fetus" is not a living being, then how come it suddenly is a living being when it is born? What was it in the birth canal that allowed the non-living to become living?
Christianity actually follows Jeremiah 5:1 "Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you" and Isaiah 49:1 "The Lord called me from the womb, from the body of my mother he named my name."
Based upon those 2 verses (there are a lot more) we were alive before birth.
The Animal issue:
Personhood is properly defined by membership in the human species, not by stage of development within that species.
Personhood is not a matter of size, skill, or degree of intelligence.
The unborn’s status should be determined on an objective basis, not on subjective or self-serving definitions of personhood.
It is a scientific fact that there are thought processes at work in unborn babies.
If the unborn’s value can be compared to that of an animal, there is no reason not to also compare the value of born people to animals.
Even if someone believes that people are no better than animals, why would they abhor the killing of young animals, while advocating the killing of young children?
the body part is defined by the common genetic code it shares with the rest of its body; the unborn’s genetic code differs from his mother’s.
The child may die and the mother live, or the mother may die and the child live, proving they are two separate individuals.
The unborn child takes an active role in his own development, controlling the course of the pregnancy and the time of birth.
Being inside something is not the same as being part of something.
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." NF from Motto
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
- Mounce574
- Premium Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: October 8th, 2021, 2:24 am
- Location: Oklahoma
Re: Is abortion wrong?
If the unborn’s value can be compared to that of an animal, there is no reason not to also compare the value of born people to animals.
Basically, you are stating that a microbe is just as important as a human being. So when you have a bacterial infection, which is attacking you, why are you killing it? Because theoretically, it has the same value as the person it is killing. So who is of more value then.
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." NF from Motto
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Which is it? One minute you are saying that the issue is that the foetus is alive or has rudimentary senses.Mounce574 wrote: ↑December 5th, 2022, 2:30 am Something nonhuman does not become human by getting older and bigger; whatever is human must be human from the beginning.
If the unborn’s value can be compared to that of an animal, there is no reason not to also compare the value of born people to animals.
Basically, you are stating that a microbe is just as important as a human being. So when you have a bacterial infection, which is attacking you, why are you killing it? Because theoretically, it has the same value as the person it is killing. So who is of more value then.
The next the issue is that the foetus could potentially grow into a human. The latter does not matter. At that point the foetus is less like an adult human than a sheep, and the world is already catastrophically overpopulated with humans. If we are to consider who should die, for me, first would be elderly people living in pain who wish to die with dignity, next would be foetuses and next would be incorrigible dangerous criminals. However, since we often avoid making such decisions, opportunity costs and limited resources mean that the deaths are more spread out across age bands, meaning a greater net loss of sentience.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
But the thread is not about addressing logic, its about whether or not abortion is wrong.LuckyR wrote: ↑December 4th, 2022, 7:24 pmLooking for logic in a pile of dogma is a fool's errand.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 4th, 2022, 7:17 pmIf sperm is not sacred then why does the Catholic church have a ban on contraception: and warnings against mastebation?
That is a discussion about morality which is rarely logical.
Morality starts with emotion. You can overlay logic but that is not the primary focus.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
False.
No - that is what YOU are saying. You are saying that a small clump of cells is a human.
If the unborn’s value can be compared to that of an animal, there is no reason not to also compare the value of born people to animals.
Basically, you are stating that a microbe is just as important as a human being.
What makes you think you have the right to live?So when you have a bacterial infection, which is attacking you, why are you killing it? Because theoretically, it has the same value as the person it is killing. So who is of more value then.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
If you mean that morality starting with emotion is referring to that being how children and the immature decide how to behave, I agree with you. For adults with life experience and personal integrity, logic plays a significant role in personal morality (hence this Forum). Your experience may differ.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 5th, 2022, 8:40 amBut the thread is not about addressing logic, its about whether or not abortion is wrong.
That is a discussion about morality which is rarely logical.
Morality starts with emotion. You can overlay logic but that is not the primary focus.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
But as you suggest logic is not a great tool to understand morality.LuckyR wrote: ↑December 6th, 2022, 2:52 amIf you mean that morality starting with emotion is referring to that being how children and the immature decide how to behave, I agree with you. For adults with life experience and personal integrity, logic plays a significant role in personal morality (hence this Forum). Your experience may differ.
Whatever you might think, people on both sides of the argument use reason, often this is little more than finding rationales to support their emotional reaction.
I shall admit that I regard abortion laws emotionally in terms of a view of society which seeks to impose its will and control people. MY reaction is about loss of autonomy and the desperate plight of unwanted children; it's also about my reaction to the sanctimonious hypocrisy of those that bleat about "the sacredness of life"; who seem to be the same people who blame poverty on the poor; promote the pro-gun lobby, and are happy about the latest war.
I would not call my reaction to that logical, though I can work out reasons that pro-life is often rationally bakrupt.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Got it. I don't disagree with your post as written. Post hoc rationalization is not only a thing, it is likely the default mode in routine situations. Of course, here in a philosophy forum, you'd hope that logical arguments would have more traction and thus modification of understanding (based on new, logical information /arguments) would be commonplace and actually changing minds would occur on occasion.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 6th, 2022, 6:04 amBut as you suggest logic is not a great tool to understand morality.LuckyR wrote: ↑December 6th, 2022, 2:52 amIf you mean that morality starting with emotion is referring to that being how children and the immature decide how to behave, I agree with you. For adults with life experience and personal integrity, logic plays a significant role in personal morality (hence this Forum). Your experience may differ.
Whatever you might think, people on both sides of the argument use reason, often this is little more than finding rationales to support their emotional reaction.
I shall admit that I regard abortion laws emotionally in terms of a view of society which seeks to impose its will and control people. MY reaction is about loss of autonomy and the desperate plight of unwanted children; it's also about my reaction to the sanctimonious hypocrisy of those that bleat about "the sacredness of life"; who seem to be the same people who blame poverty on the poor; promote the pro-gun lobby, and are happy about the latest war.
I would not call my reaction to that logical, though I can work out reasons that pro-life is often rationally bakrupt.
Perhaps how formulation of moral codes on neutral topics where an individual doesn't possess a pre-made opinion (no dog in the fight) would be instructive in determining whether "logic" is applied normally or selectively to support emotion.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Logic is always limited by premises. and reasoning is secondary in matter of morality.LuckyR wrote: ↑December 6th, 2022, 3:09 pmGot it. I don't disagree with your post as written. Post hoc rationalization is not only a thing, it is likely the default mode in routine situations. Of course, here in a philosophy forum, you'd hope that logical arguments would have more traction and thus modification of understanding (based on new, logical information /arguments) would be commonplace and actually changing minds would occur on occasion.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑December 6th, 2022, 6:04 amBut as you suggest logic is not a great tool to understand morality.LuckyR wrote: ↑December 6th, 2022, 2:52 amIf you mean that morality starting with emotion is referring to that being how children and the immature decide how to behave, I agree with you. For adults with life experience and personal integrity, logic plays a significant role in personal morality (hence this Forum). Your experience may differ.
Whatever you might think, people on both sides of the argument use reason, often this is little more than finding rationales to support their emotional reaction.
I shall admit that I regard abortion laws emotionally in terms of a view of society which seeks to impose its will and control people. MY reaction is about loss of autonomy and the desperate plight of unwanted children; it's also about my reaction to the sanctimonious hypocrisy of those that bleat about "the sacredness of life"; who seem to be the same people who blame poverty on the poor; promote the pro-gun lobby, and are happy about the latest war.
I would not call my reaction to that logical, though I can work out reasons that pro-life is often rationally bakrupt.
Perhaps how formulation of moral codes on neutral topics where an individual doesn't possess a pre-made opinion (no dog in the fight) would be instructive in determining whether "logic" is applied normally or selectively to support emotion.
It is the passions that drive such matters.
In science, often the passions can interrupt and ruin a good science debate. But there is no objective basis for say, the importance of life, the wishes of an individual, or the rights of man and woman. The fact that I have to add "woman" to the last sentence should tell us something about the recent past and how moral values have not always been bestowed evenly.
This is of great importance to the current debate where I feel there is a legacy of misogyny handing in the background where we see, mostly men, continue to deny women rights to their own body.
But the rights of men or women have never been objective, and so logic and reason is not what drives moral values.
One has first to accept that a right can and should to equal despite gender, age, race, creed, and so on. This is still rare in the world despite the UNDHR
- Mounce574
- Premium Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: October 8th, 2021, 2:24 am
- Location: Oklahoma
Re: Is abortion wrong?
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." NF from Motto
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023