Killing is not relevant to this topic.h_k_s wrote: ↑January 12th, 2020, 10:08 pmAnimal slaughter is cruel in all aspects, and forbidden by Buddhist principles. It is one of the forbidden professions.Greta wrote: ↑January 12th, 2020, 9:54 pm Just imagine you take a calf from its mother, each screaming in upset as they are parted. Then you coral and kill the calf. Then people buy its flesh in a plastic sealed packet at a supermarket, then they sear the flesh and eat it.
Life is inherently tough. Not everyone makes it.
I'm not sure why Right-to-Lifers stop caring once the baby is born. They argue against healthcare that would save lives. They argue for pointless that take lives.
On a farm or ranch, it is carried out on a smaller scale and always emotionally distressing to both the animal and to the farmer/rancher.
On an industrial scale, only the first employee who handles the skull piston is affected by the cruelty of the process. The rest of the assembly line workers are just handling a carcass that must then be skinned, gutted, halved, and cleaned for further processing. Most meat plants then send out the half-carcasses for further processing and distribution. The process thus dehumanizes the endeavor.
All the animals that I have ever killed died quickly not knowing what hit them. In most cases it was either a 30 caliber hunting bullet, or shotgun shot, or a 22 caliber backpacker's bullet. And as many hunters do, I always apologize to the animal when I walk up to it, and I thank it for its meat, and then endeavor not to waste any of it.
My cat does not have the same consciousness when he hunts, stalks, pounces, and kills smaller animals. He relishes these meals.
So it must simply be a human characteristic of regret that we feel when we kill something.
I wonder how abortion doctors feel when they abort fetuses?
Is abortion wrong?
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
- amplified cactus
- Posts: 26
- Joined: December 29th, 2019, 6:00 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
I don't see why this is relevant. A foetus can't just get up and walk away, and in any case, it wouldn't be able to understand any order you give it. There would just be no point having a requirement that women first explicitly command the foetus to leave, and then give it a "reasonable time" to do so, before using lethal force.Steve3007 wrote: ↑January 12th, 2020, 4:04 pmWhen we exercise our right to expel unwanted occupiers, would you say that we have the duty to allow them reasonable time to make their exit before killing them? For example, if I have a guest in my house and I decided that I no longer want that guest in my house, do I have the right to immediately shoot him dead? Or do I have the duty to let him know that he's no longer welcome and give him reasonable time to stand up and make for the door before reaching for my gun?amplified cactus wrote:For me it's simple: (1) Others have the right to occupy your body only with your explicit consent. (2) You have the right to revoke consent to the occupation of your body for any reason at any time. (3) It's acceptable to use lethal force against somebody occupying your body without your consent.
If the answer is "yes" then I suppose the next question (possibly a trickier one) is what constitutes "reasonable". I wonder how long we should give a foetus to exit our bodies before withdrawing life support.
As for the house guest, no you shouldn't have the right to shoot them. In general, it's not acceptable in my view to use lethal force against somebody occupying your house without your consent. You should let the unwanted occupier know that they are no longer welcome before e.g. calling the police or calling your friends to help you remove them, otherwise you'll make yourself look rather silly.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Regardless of how you feel about abortion, it kind of is.Killing is not relevant to this topic.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Folks who have a real choice (doctors have more choice than most) make their choice of specialty for many reasons, most of which are not how they should, hence why too many end up in the wrong field.Sculptor1 wrote: ↑January 13th, 2020, 5:41 amI think they would pride themselves on doing the best job they can to minimise suffering and do no harm.
You have to wonder how doctors choose the specialisms of their career path.
Since there exist in the world proctologists, you have to wonder if medical professionals genuinely have a sense of detachment. Do they actively choose this are are they just filling a hole in the market?
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
So unwanted guests with whom it's impossible to communicate can legitimately be immediately shot dead when they've outstayed their welcome?amplified cactus wrote:I don't see why this is relevant. A foetus can't just get up and walk away, and in any case, it wouldn't be able to understand any order you give it. There would just be no point having a requirement that women first explicitly command the foetus to leave, and then give it a "reasonable time" to do so, before using lethal force.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
I think some common sense is in order here.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Says who ?LuckyR wrote: ↑January 14th, 2020, 3:21 amFolks who have a real choice (doctors have more choice than most) make their choice of specialty for many reasons, most of which are not how they should,Sculptor1 wrote: ↑January 13th, 2020, 5:41 am
I think they would pride themselves on doing the best job they can to minimise suffering and do no harm.
You have to wonder how doctors choose the specialisms of their career path.
Since there exist in the world proctologists, you have to wonder if medical professionals genuinely have a sense of detachment. Do they actively choose this are are they just filling a hole in the market?
What do you mean?hence why too many end up in the wrong field.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
I make a point of speaking to medical students who are at the point of choosing their specialty about their default process for making the choice and giving them the benefit of several decades of experience with dealing with practicing docs who self report having made the wrong decision and why.
- amplified cactus
- Posts: 26
- Joined: December 29th, 2019, 6:00 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
I like how you just ignored the paragraph right after the one you quoted. Here is the relevant part again: "As for the house guest, no you shouldn't have the right to shoot them. In general, it's not acceptable in my view to use lethal force against somebody occupying your house without your consent."Steve3007 wrote: ↑January 14th, 2020, 3:53 amSo unwanted guests with whom it's impossible to communicate can legitimately be immediately shot dead when they've outstayed their welcome?amplified cactus wrote:I don't see why this is relevant. A foetus can't just get up and walk away, and in any case, it wouldn't be able to understand any order you give it. There would just be no point having a requirement that women first explicitly command the foetus to leave, and then give it a "reasonable time" to do so, before using lethal force.
Huh? I never made that analogy. As far as I can tell, you were the one who brought up house guests.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is abortion wrong?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Is abortion wrong?
You're cool with 5 minutes before delivery of a full term infant?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑January 15th, 2020, 9:50 am Not wrong on my view. And I wouldn't have a time limit on abortions.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is abortion wrong?
Yes.LuckyR wrote: ↑January 15th, 2020, 4:49 pmYou're cool with 5 minutes before delivery of a full term infant?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑January 15th, 2020, 9:50 am Not wrong on my view. And I wouldn't have a time limit on abortions.
Abortion being permissible doesn't hinge on the developmental stage of the baby on my view. It hinges on whether the baby is wholly contained within the mother.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
In your view, is it permissible to kill the baby, perhaps by stabbing, so long as that doesn't harm the mother, as the mother is in the process of giving birth, but before the head of the baby has fully emerged (assuming that the mother agrees to this)?Terrapin Station wrote:Abortion being permissible doesn't hinge on the developmental stage of the baby on my view. It hinges on whether the baby is wholly contained within the mother.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Is abortion wrong?
I'd restrict it to when the baby is wholly contained inside the mother. But I'd sooner agree to infanticide in some cases than agree to prohibiting abortion at any point.Steve3007 wrote: ↑January 15th, 2020, 5:09 pmIn your view, is it permissible to kill the baby, perhaps by stabbing, so long as that doesn't harm the mother, as the mother is in the process of giving birth, but before the head of the baby has fully emerged (assuming that the mother agrees to this)?Terrapin Station wrote:Abortion being permissible doesn't hinge on the developmental stage of the baby on my view. It hinges on whether the baby is wholly contained within the mother.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Is abortion wrong?
If there was a binary choice between the two, with no option in between, then I would consider your position more reasonable than simply permitting infanticide on the basis of what I see as the arbitrary question of the baby's location.Terrapin Station wrote:I'd restrict it to when the baby is wholly contained inside the mother. But I'd sooner agree to infanticide in some cases than agree to prohibiting abortion at any point.
My own view begins with the acknowledgement that there is no possibility of demonstrating, in any sense, an entirely objective argument as to when abortion should be allowed. I think this, as with many problems, is because it involves the need to impose an arbitrary binary distinction on a process that is a continuum. That is the process of a single cell created from the parents' bodies developing into a separate human being. It is not possible to objectively state a moment when a human being is present. But, since that distinction has to be made for the purposes of legislation and action, I would base it on various criteria that vary from case to case. The one constant criterion would be technical biological decisions as to when we deem the foetus to be sentient.
So I think that both affording rights to single celled embryos and denying rights to near-newborn babies are equally absurd/abhorrent positions in our culture. Though obviously if I lived in a different culture (ancient Sparta, perhaps) I might feel differently.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023