"A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Discuss the May Philosophy Book of the Month, Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through by Jeff Meyer
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

"A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

This topic is related to the philosophical book of the month of May, Fear Not Dream Big & Execute byJeff Meyer


"Even looking at our expert leader, Jesus, whose Word is life, we can see this lesson lived out. Jesus is not merely an itinerant preacher who directs our steps. He is a soul-stirrer who invites us to walk with Him. If our master, Jesus, leads us by walking with us and stirring us to discover, then these earthly leaders must learn to come alongside and help others discover their own best answers."
(Chapter 2, Page 9)

Most often we compare how a boss will treat his subordinates and how a leader will treat his followers. Upto now I had the idea that a leader should guide his/her followers. But this author has given leadership a new meaning claiming that it is not the leader's job to show the path and guide his/her followers towards a specific goal, but to inspire them to find their own answers and be their own guidance.

Do you agree with this 'job description' of a leader? If a leader is guiding his/her followers, will it make he/she a 'not so good' leader?
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by LuckyR »

It depends on the context. Specifically, if one is leading teammates engaged in simple tasks, micromanaging exactly what they should do will lead to efficient success. OTOH, when leading professionals performing complex tasks, emotional support to assist the team to come up with there own best tactics, is superior strategy.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sculptor1 »

A general needs to do both.
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by psyreporter »

It is a modern trend, but is it best for (long term) efficiency for progress of 'humanity'?

The primary argument in favor of efficiency is that providing autonomy to people will provide them with a sense of purpose, which in turn, provides motivation for higher performance, provides better health and provides improved happiness.

It is interesting to note that purpose is a primary factor for efficiency. When people feel that they serve a greater purpose, they are capable of higher performance. This could be evidence that people in general must be fundamentally 'good'.

The question would essentially be whether the concept 'meritocracy' is valid.

For centuries, the promise of the “American Dream” has been that as long as someone buckles down and works hard, she can achieve her goals. In other words, we’ve perpetuated the meritocratic notion that the more effort one puts in and the more ability one possesses, the more success one can attain.
https://www.philosophytalk.org/shows/merits-meritocracy

Meritocratic Equality of Opportunity builds on Formal Equality of Opportunity’s opposition to formal and arbitrary discrimination. Meritocracy requires that positions and goods be distributed solely in accordance with individual merit.
https://edeq.stanford.edu/sections/meritocracy

Should a leader unlock 'the best' in people by inspiring them to move mountains?

I personally would be in favor of such an intention, due to the simple consideration that in order to serve the purpose of life, a base level of respect for 'others' is essential because it is not possible to determine the value of another in relation to the purpose of life beforehand. Therefor, from a leader's perspective, to serve the purpose of life optimally would be to unlock or enable people's talents and performance, i.e. to 'inspire' them.
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

LuckyR wrote: May 5th, 2021, 12:52 pm It depends on the context. Specifically, if one is leading teammates engaged in simple tasks, micromanaging exactly what they should do will lead to efficient success. OTOH, when leading professionals performing complex tasks, emotional support to assist the team to come up with there own best tactics, is superior strategy.
Whether with experts or a set of simple members a leader have to achieve a specific goal. So the direction and the way to achieve that should be decided by the leader and then he has to guide the team members. That guiding have to be tailor-made for different team mates depending on their strengths and weaknesses. Still the guidance part should remain as per my view.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by LuckyR »

Sushan wrote: May 5th, 2021, 11:16 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 5th, 2021, 12:52 pm It depends on the context. Specifically, if one is leading teammates engaged in simple tasks, micromanaging exactly what they should do will lead to efficient success. OTOH, when leading professionals performing complex tasks, emotional support to assist the team to come up with there own best tactics, is superior strategy.
Whether with experts or a set of simple members a leader have to achieve a specific goal. So the direction and the way to achieve that should be decided by the leader and then he has to guide the team members. That guiding have to be tailor-made for different team mates depending on their strengths and weaknesses. Still the guidance part should remain as per my view.
Your suggestions are why companies fail and people generally hate their bosses (because of the boss's incompetence).
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

LuckyR wrote: May 6th, 2021, 2:05 am
Sushan wrote: May 5th, 2021, 11:16 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 5th, 2021, 12:52 pm It depends on the context. Specifically, if one is leading teammates engaged in simple tasks, micromanaging exactly what they should do will lead to efficient success. OTOH, when leading professionals performing complex tasks, emotional support to assist the team to come up with there own best tactics, is superior strategy.
Whether with experts or a set of simple members a leader have to achieve a specific goal. So the direction and the way to achieve that should be decided by the leader and then he has to guide the team members. That guiding have to be tailor-made for different team mates depending on their strengths and weaknesses. Still the guidance part should remain as per my view.
Your suggestions are why companies fail and people generally hate their bosses (because of the boss's incompetence).
There is no argument regarding how a leader should act if he/she is incompetent. He/she should not have been the leader in the first place.

But if the competency part was okay, then the leader can guide his/her team towards a specific goal. If a leader let his/her team members to come out with their own creative plans and ideas, then who will remain to execute them? Won't there be much chance to such an attempt to be end in chaos?
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 5th, 2021, 1:30 pm A general needs to do both.
A general, or a leader should have various qualities. And the ability to inspire his followers as well as the ability to guide them should include in the list.

But, even among leaders there are good ones and bad ones. If we keep aside any other variables and consider only these two, guidance and inspiration, having which of these two 'in a large amount' will make the leader good or bad?
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Sushan wrote: May 6th, 2021, 3:29 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 5th, 2021, 1:30 pm A general needs to do both.
A general, or a leader should have various qualities. And the ability to inspire his followers as well as the ability to guide them should include in the list.

But, even among leaders there are good ones and bad ones. If we keep aside any other variables and consider only these two, guidance and inspiration, having which of these two 'in a large amount' will make the leader good or bad?
Neither quality would fulfil that need.
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 5:09 am
Sushan wrote: May 6th, 2021, 3:29 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 5th, 2021, 1:30 pm A general needs to do both.
A general, or a leader should have various qualities. And the ability to inspire his followers as well as the ability to guide them should include in the list.

But, even among leaders there are good ones and bad ones. If we keep aside any other variables and consider only these two, guidance and inspiration, having which of these two 'in a large amount' will make the leader good or bad?
Neither quality would fulfil that need.
I am sorry but I didn't get your point. Could you please elaborate it a bit. Were you meaning that either having the ability to guide or the ability to inspire won't make a good leader? If so, what will make a good leader?
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by LuckyR »

Sushan wrote: May 6th, 2021, 3:26 am
LuckyR wrote: May 6th, 2021, 2:05 am
Sushan wrote: May 5th, 2021, 11:16 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 5th, 2021, 12:52 pm It depends on the context. Specifically, if one is leading teammates engaged in simple tasks, micromanaging exactly what they should do will lead to efficient success. OTOH, when leading professionals performing complex tasks, emotional support to assist the team to come up with there own best tactics, is superior strategy.
Whether with experts or a set of simple members a leader have to achieve a specific goal. So the direction and the way to achieve that should be decided by the leader and then he has to guide the team members. That guiding have to be tailor-made for different team mates depending on their strengths and weaknesses. Still the guidance part should remain as per my view.
Your suggestions are why companies fail and people generally hate their bosses (because of the boss's incompetence).
There is no argument regarding how a leader should act if he/she is incompetent. He/she should not have been the leader in the first place.

But if the competency part was okay, then the leader can guide his/her team towards a specific goal. If a leader let his/her team members to come out with their own creative plans and ideas, then who will remain to execute them? Won't there be much chance to such an attempt to be end in chaos?
Who is better suited to come up with an effective plan, those who actually do the work and have a practical understanding of it, or a guy who doesn't do the actual work, but goes to meetings and entertains clients all day?

As I mentioned before, your commentary fits performing simple tasks, so simple even a boss would know what to do. This doesn't work well with professionals.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

arjand wrote: May 5th, 2021, 2:40 pm It is a modern trend, but is it best for (long term) efficiency for progress of 'humanity'?

The primary argument in favor of efficiency is that providing autonomy to people will provide them with a sense of purpose, which in turn, provides motivation for higher performance, provides better health and provides improved happiness.

It is interesting to note that purpose is a primary factor for efficiency. When people feel that they serve a greater purpose, they are capable of higher performance. This could be evidence that people in general must be fundamentally 'good'.

The question would essentially be whether the concept 'meritocracy' is valid.

For centuries, the promise of the “American Dream” has been that as long as someone buckles down and works hard, she can achieve her goals. In other words, we’ve perpetuated the meritocratic notion that the more effort one puts in and the more ability one possesses, the more success one can attain.
https://www.philosophytalk.org/shows/merits-meritocracy

Meritocratic Equality of Opportunity builds on Formal Equality of Opportunity’s opposition to formal and arbitrary discrimination. Meritocracy requires that positions and goods be distributed solely in accordance with individual merit.
https://edeq.stanford.edu/sections/meritocracy

Should a leader unlock 'the best' in people by inspiring them to move mountains?

I personally would be in favor of such an intention, due to the simple consideration that in order to serve the purpose of life, a base level of respect for 'others' is essential because it is not possible to determine the value of another in relation to the purpose of life beforehand. Therefor, from a leader's perspective, to serve the purpose of life optimally would be to unlock or enable people's talents and performance, i.e. to 'inspire' them.
A good explanation. I agree. A leader can inspire his followers and that will take their full potential out. And for the long run that will be quite important.

But when pursuing short term goals, I don't think that the leader can wait to bring the potential out from his followers. So in such a situation a leader has to identify his team and ide them accordingly.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sushan »

LuckyR wrote: May 7th, 2021, 2:41 am
Sushan wrote: May 6th, 2021, 3:26 am
LuckyR wrote: May 6th, 2021, 2:05 am
Sushan wrote: May 5th, 2021, 11:16 pm

Whether with experts or a set of simple members a leader have to achieve a specific goal. So the direction and the way to achieve that should be decided by the leader and then he has to guide the team members. That guiding have to be tailor-made for different team mates depending on their strengths and weaknesses. Still the guidance part should remain as per my view.
Your suggestions are why companies fail and people generally hate their bosses (because of the boss's incompetence).
There is no argument regarding how a leader should act if he/she is incompetent. He/she should not have been the leader in the first place.

But if the competency part was okay, then the leader can guide his/her team towards a specific goal. If a leader let his/her team members to come out with their own creative plans and ideas, then who will remain to execute them? Won't there be much chance to such an attempt to be end in chaos?
Who is better suited to come up with an effective plan, those who actually do the work and have a practical understanding of it, or a guy who doesn't do the actual work, but goes to meetings and entertains clients all day?

As I mentioned before, your commentary fits performing simple tasks, so simple even a boss would know what to do. This doesn't work well with professionals.
A leader cannot be a person who has no idea about the task. A politician can be such a person, and usually ppoliticians fail when they try to do things by their own.

Whether it is a simple task or whether you are working for a huge goal with a set of professionals, you have to guide your team. That does not mean that you have to be a dictator. You can always listen to them and take their ideas. But the final decision and the plan should be yours and otherwise it will lead only to chaos.

'Too many cooks will spoil the soup'
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Sushan wrote: May 7th, 2021, 12:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 6th, 2021, 5:09 am
Sushan wrote: May 6th, 2021, 3:29 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 5th, 2021, 1:30 pm A general needs to do both.
A general, or a leader should have various qualities. And the ability to inspire his followers as well as the ability to guide them should include in the list.

But, even among leaders there are good ones and bad ones. If we keep aside any other variables and consider only these two, guidance and inspiration, having which of these two 'in a large amount' will make the leader good or bad?
Neither quality would fulfil that need.
I am sorry but I didn't get your point. Could you please elaborate it a bit. Were you meaning that either having the ability to guide or the ability to inspire won't make a good leader? If so, what will make a good leader?
A leader can be highly inspirational, though useless as a leader.
And a leader can be a great guide, but also useless as a leader.

Leadership also requires the ability to listen and delegate, intelligence, vision, charisma, and care for the followers. There is no point leading your followers to their deaths even if they find it inspirational.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: "A good leader should not guide his/her followers, but should inspire them". Do you agree?

Post by LuckyR »

Sushan wrote: May 7th, 2021, 5:43 am
LuckyR wrote: May 7th, 2021, 2:41 am
Sushan wrote: May 6th, 2021, 3:26 am
LuckyR wrote: May 6th, 2021, 2:05 am

Your suggestions are why companies fail and people generally hate their bosses (because of the boss's incompetence).
There is no argument regarding how a leader should act if he/she is incompetent. He/she should not have been the leader in the first place.

But if the competency part was okay, then the leader can guide his/her team towards a specific goal. If a leader let his/her team members to come out with their own creative plans and ideas, then who will remain to execute them? Won't there be much chance to such an attempt to be end in chaos?
Who is better suited to come up with an effective plan, those who actually do the work and have a practical understanding of it, or a guy who doesn't do the actual work, but goes to meetings and entertains clients all day?

As I mentioned before, your commentary fits performing simple tasks, so simple even a boss would know what to do. This doesn't work well with professionals.
A leader cannot be a person who has no idea about the task. A politician can be such a person, and usually ppoliticians fail when they try to do things by their own.

Whether it is a simple task or whether you are working for a huge goal with a set of professionals, you have to guide your team. That does not mean that you have to be a dictator. You can always listen to them and take their ideas. But the final decision and the plan should be yours and otherwise it will lead only to chaos.

'Too many cooks will spoil the soup'
You mean "should not" (and I agree with you), yet bosses commonly don't know a lot about the work.

Chaos? What's the difference between a group of professionals coming up with plans A, B and C, discussing it and choosing B. Or a boss listening to their discussion and choosing B? It has nothiing to do with cooks and soup. At the professional levels bosses and leaders are more cheerleaders to keep the troops motivated than a source of expertise.
"As usual... it depends."
Post Reply

Return to “Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute by Jeff Meyer”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021