The Bridge Between Science and Religion

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
blakelewis25
Posts: 1
Joined: October 23rd, 2008, 6:42 pm

The Bridge Between Science and Religion

Post by blakelewis25 »

This idea is contributed to the John Titor story that appeared on the anomolies site in 2001. I am extremely skeptical of the validity of said story but I am open to the possibility that what he said was true. This aside, it does raise an interesting theoretical question which is that if time travel were possible could all the events of the bible be explained through this future technology? I'm no biblical scholar but I know that the Christian church is mainly based on the deeds of Jesus of Nazareth and a host of miracles that basically put the "fear of God" into people of the time. For instance, the miraclulous birth of Jesus could now be explained with advanced in artificial insemenation. The great flood could possibly be explained by future advances in weather control and cloud seeding being studied today. If time travel were possible, the resurrection of Jesus could be easily explained.

The point isn't an attempt to debunk Christianity but rather to look these event objectively to try to explain these phenomena through modern (or potential future) science. If these ideas can be proven the philosophical question then emerges that people further ahead on our worldline are going through a great deal of trouble to convince us to follow certain moral principles for what purpose? My main question is : Do you believe that through science a literal as well as philosophical translation of the bible could be possible?
User avatar
Akhenaten
Posts: 209
Joined: August 29th, 2008, 6:22 pm

Post by Akhenaten »

Actually, the "Bible" had nothing to do with Yeshua Ben Yosef ("Jesus" was not his name, and those who think that an Arabic Hebrew was named an Italian/Latin styled name needs to be smacked... thats most christians). The 'New Testiment' was about his life and works, but in comparison to the old testiment, its a penny article in the saver. Also, do not forget, litterally hundreds of tomes and scrolls were removed from the bible at the Council of Nicea.

The Drake Equation, which is accepted in astrophysics as valid, tells us that there is between 10,000 to 13,000 advanced species in our own milky way. The equation basically was designed to determin the variables needed for life on earth, and then applied to the numbers of our galaxy... thus:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

Now then, with this in mind, also noting that in the 14.9 billion year history of our universe, we evolved roughly 20-500 million years ago, a half of a billion at a stretch, at most. Therefore, there is 14.3 billion years inwhich other civilizations have had time to rise and fall. The universe was stable enough for our sort of life after a meer billion years of expansion... therefore there has been 13.4 billion years, at the least, that other life has had time to evolve and surpass us.

All ancient cultures tell of visitors from the sky, often drawing circular or cigar shaped ships, even in cave drawings (again, you can look them up). Whether by Chariots of Fire (like that that took Issac and Jesus, in a ray of light), or by 'moving clouds' such as the one that hovered over the Hebrews for nearly 40 years, constantly... during the day it shielded them from the sun, at night it lit up and showed them their way.

It would be very easy for an advanced species, whether by purpose or by sheer accident, to have been taken as Godly to our people. To be honest, if I went back in time with a cigarrette lighter, a gun, and a med kit, I would be a god as well. Its not really that hard... imagine an ancient roman legion being frightened off by a speaker system... you know voices from no where, as loud as many waters and issuing forth from strange trumpets, as is often described in the bible.

CHristians are alien worshipers, the bloody buggers. :roll:
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT does not cover all individuals in the infinite and variable universe. This is in no way is speaking on cases of incredible, random, or odds of more than 1 : Pi against probability.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13820
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

Do you believe that through science a literal as well as philosophical translation of the bible could be possible?
No. A main tenet of the Christian myth is that God created all the laws of nature(or of science).

A miracle involves the suspension of a law of science or nature. It is inconceivable the the creator of heaven and earth does conjuring tricks.
mark black
Posts: 175
Joined: July 19th, 2008, 8:12 am

Post by mark black »

Occam's razor is an epistemological principle which states: the simplest adequate explanation is the best.

Supposing the existence of time travel and/or aliens to explain fantastical bible stories is the height of epistemological lunacy.

Consider depictions of Jesus's birth painted by 15th century artists. Did the baby actually glow with an ethereal light? If he had done it wouldn't have been too difficult for Herod and his men to pick him out of a line-up, would it? No, the shining halo around the infants head is retrospective deification - and so is all the rest.

Akhenaten - your alter rail is the fence around Area 51. Same principle, a seprated space representing arcane knowledge supporting the power structure. You want to believe, but it's too far. Requiring an infinite amount of energy in every moment, 186,000 miles per second, 60 seconds per minuet, 60 minuets per hour, day in day out, week after month after year, for four and a half years to reach the nearest star. You might just as well believe in God.

mb.
johnny rocket
Posts: 10
Joined: November 6th, 2008, 12:43 pm

That is a big if you are assuming

Post by johnny rocket »

If I were a squirrel would I eat cough drops?
User avatar
Akhenaten
Posts: 209
Joined: August 29th, 2008, 6:22 pm

Post by Akhenaten »

Actually, Mark Black, that is what I do believe. :lol:

In an infinitely dimensioned space (or one so large it may as well be), I must assume nearly infinite probability as there is nearly infinite space and time for it to exist in. Upon this logic, some-where, some-when there is a flat planet flying about that the people believes is round... and tomorrow an explorer falls off the edge sailing west.

Also, you mistake the concept of Alien, as I meant as implied, Entity. In an nearly infinitely dimensioned space, and the probabilities there-in, the concept of a being or entity that would pocess prowesses and modes of travel that we could not comprehend would very surely have to exist. Oddly the concept of Angels arriving in flaming chariots from the sky seems, atleast by Occum's Razor that you had brought up, to be a mis-representation of a real act. As the existence of Rameses, Moses, 'Jesus', and other such biblical figures have been archaeologically proven to exist, even accepted by neigh-sayers, we can assume that they were making an attempt at explaining things that they truly saw. Incidently, the correlations between biblical myth and modern day technology is almost blatant enough to give you a black eye, let alone how an even more advanced species would have been misconstrued by a highly imaginative species... us. God may simply be the commander of a ship who, by random chance, have discovered what we are very near to... physical immortality. In the early bible they say that man walked with God... litterally. There was no biblical prowess or real power given to 'God' in the first few books... only things that can be easily attributed to technology.

What you are suggesting is that in ancient times, nearly 1/10th of the population of the world had a mass hallucination, including the many Pharohs who documented these things. Today, one out of every 3 individuals have seen something in the sky that they cannot, for the life of them, explain. Your usage of Occum's Razor, to explain that nearly 4 billion people are hallucinating the same things, doesnt seem to fit.

Am I saying that Christianity or Christian perspective on, really, anything is correct?

No.

Am I saying that to dismiss a phenomena that has existed since the dawn of mankind, I.E. Gods, out of hand because you cannot see it is half imbecilic?

Yes.

In a light spectrum that ranges from below 30 HZ to over 2.9 * 10^27 HZ, we see between 400nm and 700nm of this. We are half blind, wearing a blindfold and beer goggles, in a basement, and trying to say that we can disprove it because we cannot see it? How infantile.
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT does not cover all individuals in the infinite and variable universe. This is in no way is speaking on cases of incredible, random, or odds of more than 1 : Pi against probability.
mark black
Posts: 175
Joined: July 19th, 2008, 8:12 am

Post by mark black »

Akhenaten,

First off, let's cut the insults - there's no need to be throwing around words like 'infantile' and 'imbecilic.' I'm not insulting you just because I disagree with you. I understand your ideas because I have entertained these ideas in my younger days - attempting to explain a Biblical account of history with reference to aliens. But all the so-called evidence is circumstantial, and we read into it what we want to see. In the end, and after much wasted effort I realized that evolution explains better why cultures are so similar the world over, why they all have a concept of God, why they all built big stone structures...and so on.

If I follow your logic here - I think you are suggesting that in an infinite time and space, everything that CAN exist, does exist. (Maybe you mean parallel universes - but this is another assumption without evidence barred by Occam's Razor, and therefore epistemic fantasy.) It's important to emphasise CAN. Because of the physical dymanics of time, space, energy and matter - a flat planet CANNOT exist. And nor can many other things we might imagine.

You say:
As the existence of Rameses, Moses, 'Jesus', and other such biblical figures have been archaeologically proven to exist, even accepted by neigh-sayers, we can assume that they were making an attempt at explaining things that they truly saw.
This is a false assumption. It just doesn't follow from the fact, that because Biblical characters were based on real people - the whole of the Bible is an attempt to explian what 'they truly saw.' There are many different genre's of writing - from factual reporting through political propoganda to outright fantasy. Read Homer's Odyssey, and consider that this was written a thousand years before the Bible. These are not unsophisticated people who would misinterpret, or be unable to explain what they 'truly' saw.

It's also important to remember that the Bible is a political document - and politicians lie. They distort the reality to favour themselves. Julius Ceaser wasn't really the Son of Jupiter. He took the title in order to justify his rule with reference to God(s). You are beginning with an idea you wish to be true and attemting to find evidence for it.

All your so-called evidence fits into this pattern - but it's a wrongful approach to knowledge. You must begin with what is known, not what you'd like to discover.

mb.
User avatar
Akhenaten
Posts: 209
Joined: August 29th, 2008, 6:22 pm

Post by Akhenaten »

I wasn't meaning the insults to be directed personally, I was refereing to the concepts themselves.

No, the way I am looking at this is honestly by a simple math concept that likely only makes any sense to me... I will list the variables:

A = The Volume of the universe (atleast what we can see of it, since every time we improve our telescopes there is more out there).

B = The Volume of our solar system.

C = The total ammount of activities (fundamental particles on up) performed by our solar system in its 10 or so billion history.

D = The Percentage of universal volume filled by our solar system.

E = Total Possible Variables that could happen, per geometric point, within the laws of physics, in our solar system, at every point in time.

F = The total possible variables that could happen, per geometric point, within the laws of physics, in the volume of the universe at every point in time.

Z = The total ammount of possible things that have taken place in the volume of the universe over the past 14+ billion years.

The probability ratio then comes to:

1 Google * 10^Google For | Every Variable to have taken place.

1 Google * 10^Google Against | Every Variable to have taken place.

On this precept, a planet can be flat.

Granted with no degrees in advanced theoretical mathematics, I am estimating.
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT does not cover all individuals in the infinite and variable universe. This is in no way is speaking on cases of incredible, random, or odds of more than 1 : Pi against probability.
mark black
Posts: 175
Joined: July 19th, 2008, 8:12 am

Post by mark black »

Akahnaten,

Please pardon my absence. It's all very well to show, statistically, that the probability of a flat planet is not zero - but these mathematical gymnastics do not account for the physical dynamics of reality. I don't have an advanced degree in math either, so I don't know how it would go, but it's plain to see that some mathematical probabilities are barred by physical forces, in this case gravitation. Planets, and soap bubbles are round for a reason. Probability math makes no account of these reasons. It's therefore wrong to assume that everything that might be imagined to exist - exists. Rather, everything that can exist given the nature of the universe, exists. On that premise, I think we can discount flat planets.

mb.
User avatar
Akhenaten
Posts: 209
Joined: August 29th, 2008, 6:22 pm

Post by Akhenaten »

I can state this number with absolute certainty... we can see less than 0.00000000000000001% of our current physical domains, universally speaking.... atleast with any detail. This number is an abstract, as we can't see our next star system with much detail, and realitivly its rather close.

My proposition isn't so much that infinite probability exists, my position is that we know so very little about the universe that even those with a PH.D. are meerly guessing. Therefore, intrinsically, we have no idea what -is- possible out there. Please google Galactic Bubble.
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT does not cover all individuals in the infinite and variable universe. This is in no way is speaking on cases of incredible, random, or odds of more than 1 : Pi against probability.
df544
Posts: 98
Joined: February 20th, 2009, 6:17 pm

Post by df544 »

You have to understand FULLY the medium first before talking about anything in it.

What is the medium of the Bible?

Words.

The first thing then is to understand that words are representations of something, not that something itself. Put words together and you have to understand whether those words are allegory, fiction, non-fiction, novel, comedy, etc.

Can we fully understand the Bible, and in particular, the Gospels of Jesus Christ?

It depends with what type of consciousness you are investigating it with. With scientific consciousness, you have to go by written histories of which none can be found about Jesus.

As far as a time machine, this is not present-day science.

Fantasy-wise, with a time-machine I would go back to the time before the Big Bang.
Charlemagne
Posts: 298
Joined: July 18th, 2014, 7:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Chesterton
Location: Lubbock, Texas

Re: The Bridge Between Science and Religion

Post by Charlemagne »

If anyone is serious about the title of this thread, the bridge between science and religion, read this:

https://catholicinsight.com/science-and ... s-forever/
Charlemagne
Posts: 298
Joined: July 18th, 2014, 7:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Chesterton
Location: Lubbock, Texas

Re:

Post by Charlemagne »

Belinda wrote: October 25th, 2008, 4:53 am
Do you believe that through science a literal as well as philosophical translation of the bible could be possible?
No. A main tenet of the Christian myth is that God created all the laws of nature(or of science).

A miracle involves the suspension of a law of science or nature. It is inconceivable the the creator of heaven and earth does conjuring tricks.
It is inconceivable that with your own puny powers you should be able to limit the powers of the Creator of heaven and earth.

Isn't that a tad arrogant of you? :roll:
MAYA EL
Posts: 177
Joined: May 2nd, 2019, 11:17 pm

Re: The Bridge Between Science and Religion

Post by MAYA EL »

Time travel will never be possible because time is a concept .
And I think the bible is a metaphysical and metaphorical book that talks about mankind's journey from mindless animal to complex higher being with a god mind and so every single story in the bible is just a story
Charlemagne
Posts: 298
Joined: July 18th, 2014, 7:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Chesterton
Location: Lubbock, Texas

Re: The Bridge Between Science and Religion

Post by Charlemagne »

MAYA EL wrote: December 16th, 2022, 8:38 am Time travel will never be possible because time is a concept .
And I think the bible is a metaphysical and metaphorical book that talks about mankind's journey from mindless animal to complex higher being with a god mind and so every single story in the bible is just a story
Do you mean a real-life story or a fictional story?
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021