Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
As I have said, because secular science believes that these interactions are the same and thus everything has cancelled out to nothingness or meaningless or Nihilism,call it what you wish then it has felt the need to invent a new mythical force to try and explain things.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8385
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
Secular science has been peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance is the truth of the matter, what with its mythical force gravity and its failed theories like the single Big Bang which relies on this mythical force totally.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
Natures magnetic forces don’t work on such logic which is proved by the magnetic force interactions of NN,SN,NS,SS
As I keep maintaining, if secular science logic was correct then all these force interactions should give exactly the same result of 4 off repulsions or 4 off attractions.
We all know they don’t.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15154
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
I've stopped engaging with him. I thought he might attempt to engage but he's not interested, only repeating the same incoherent rants about "secular science". His posts can safely be treated like ads for a product that no one will ever buy.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
The seance is dishonest as a trade and unprofitable as a recreational activity.Joshua10 wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 2:20 pmSecular science has been peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance is the truth of the matter, what with its mythical force gravity and its failed theories like the single Big Bang which relies on this mythical force totally.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.
The impartial deductive- inductive method of scientists is not like the often deliberate and always partial deceptions of those who hold seances.
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
Secular science is totally confused as I say and just makes things up as it goes along.
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
That’s not fair Sy Borg.Nobody is buying the single Big Bang theory anymore.Why aren’t those foolish secular scientist all over the media saying sorry because they got it wrong?Sy Borg wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 8:43 pmI've stopped engaging with him. I thought he might attempt to engage but he's not interested, only repeating the same incoherent rants about "secular science". His posts can safely be treated like ads for a product that no one will ever buy.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.
I have been engaging with you and suggesting science that makes sense and works and utilises known forces rather than that mythical force gravity created from flowery secular maths.
I have been explaining NATURES science!!
Nobody knows what gravity is remember and secular science has been using it as the basis for it grand theories which are also proving to be utter nonsense.
I go off the facts unlike secularism which just goes of made up assumptions to suit its incorrect Philosophical logic.
All sciences are interconnected remember.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8385
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.
If gravity is "mythical", what is it that holds you down to the floor?
"Who cares, wins"
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8385
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
The truth of the matter is that "secular" science does not and cannot pronounce on what is "good" or "bad". These terms have no use in a wholly scientific context. Nor does "secular" science ever accept the 'logic' that A = NOT(A), in any form. To say so is to deny and reject logic itself.
"Who cares, wins"
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8385
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.
I beg to differ.
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
I have suggested that magnetic forces hold matter together i.e. earth and our physical bodies due to vibrating/toggling +/- charges.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 29th, 2022, 8:26 amPattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 28th, 2022, 7:14 am You still seem to be peddling the same incomprehensible cross between science and seance. It's difficult to see how a constructive response might be made.If gravity is "mythical", what is it that holds you down to the floor?
I would similarly suggest that magnetic forces hold me down to the floor which is dependent upon spin of the planet which is an electromagnetic.
Certainly,not that mythical force gravity,that’s for sure.
-
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am
Re: Why Believe in a God when It is Impossible to Prove?
Where do you think secular science gets it +=- and -=+ philosophical logic from other than it’s secular belief system? Come on! are you kidding?Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑September 29th, 2022, 8:29 amThe truth of the matter is that "secular" science does not and cannot pronounce on what is "good" or "bad". These terms have no use in a wholly scientific context. Nor does "secular" science ever accept the 'logic' that A = NOT(A), in any form. To say so is to deny and reject logic itself.
toggling of + to a - and a - to a + = toggling of + to a - and a - to a + is the correct formula.
A + and a - have been divided and are separate from each other.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023