Why do many People Make Statements about God?
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: December 15th, 2016, 7:36 am
Why do many People Make Statements about God?
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
Some of the loaded assumptions are:
- 1. One or more gods exist.
2. There is only god.
3. Many people make statements about this one God.
4. This one God can have the trait of "height", whatever height is supposed to me mean in this usage.
5. Nothing has more "height" than this god.
6. This one God is "transcendent".
7. This one God is so "transcendent" that it is beyond being, oneness, effability, the Absolute, unsayability and transcendence.
8, Most people treat this one God incorrectly [presumably in the sense of how they talk about this particular god].
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: December 15th, 2016, 7:36 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
1. I have stated that God is beyond being, which includes "being" beyond existence (and essence). Therefore, I don't assume that God exists. Imho, God is rather above existence and non-existence.
2. Nowhere have I said or implied that there is only one god. Maybe, you have incorrectly deduced from the commonness of monotheism that I, too, think that there is only one god. In reality, I would even argue that all gods are real, at least in the form of essences (or rather something superior to essences, namely henads (a Neoplatonist concept), e.g. Odin-ness, Thor-ness, Zeus-ness, Apollo-ness and Ra-ness), because we could otherwise not even think about them. However, I think that, from the transcendence of God, it follows that God even surpasses godhood, so that God is no mere god and that the word "God" is really a misnomer.
4. I have implied that God has the trait of highness, not height. However, that is an artifact of writing (or speaking) about God, who is completely unspeakable. In reality, God probably even transcends highness. Concerning the nature of highness, it is very difficult and probably impossible to define. In fact, if it were amenable to definition, it would probably not be worthy of itself.
5. As stated above, it is a consequence of the limitation of language that we scribe highness to God in speaking and writing.
6. In the same way that God is above highness, God is above transcendence. Strictly speaking, it is a fallacy to ascribe mere absolute transcendence to God. Damascius already realized that the Unsayable is exempt from exemption.
On two of the other assumptions, I would like to comment as follows:
3. You are right in criticizing this assumption. It is quite possible that most people use the word "God" to denote something very different from what I designate by the word "God". Properly speaking, however, God cannot be denoted by any name, including the word "God".
8. Indeed, I should only have assumed that if most people use the word "God" as I do, then they would be treating God incorrectly by talking about God in the way they do. I see no problem with that assumption, since, according to my "knowledge" (please correct me if I'm wrong), most people say that whatever they designate with the word "God" exists, or doesn't exist, or cannot be known to exist or not exist. All of these statements are clearly transcended by God.
Concerning the last remaining assumption, assumption 7, I do not believe it. Belief is lower than knowledge, but God surpasses the One, which is the source of all knowledge, and therefore, God has to be dealt with using something above knowledge and not something below knowledge such as belief (in the sense of opinion). Unlike belief, whose opposite is belief in the contrary, the "super-knowledge" that deals with God doen't have an opposite.
On the whole, you have correctly pointed out that I have made explicit or implicit assumptions in my written post. However, that is an artifact of me writing (or speaking) about God. I did what I sought to criticize, namely, talking or writing about God, but my linguistic treatment of God at least admits the insufficiency of language when it comes to God. You questioned whether my assumptions are meaningful, but that is exactly what I did when I wrote that nothing can be said of God and when my forum post stated that it is completely inadequate.
- JaxAg
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: December 16th, 2018, 10:17 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: December 15th, 2016, 7:36 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
Definitely the first one. In fact, one of the points of this topic is to realize its own pointlessness (and yes, even that is pointless). However, the topic isn't completely without any purpose. Its purpose is to help awaken a sort of non-verbal, non-discursive and above-rational noetic understanding of God. On the other hand, even the nous falls completely short of God, so the topic is actually purposeless.JaxAg wrote:If God is beyond intelligible discussion, then this topic is pointless. If God is not beyond intelligible discussion, then this topic is just plain wrong. Which would you prefer?
Do you mean that the answer is that most people aren't overly fond of radically transcendent thought?Eduk wrote:@ChanceIsChange isn't the answer obvious?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
Well yes and no. Many if not most gods over the millenia have not been omnipotent nor omniscient, and thus while those gods were more intelligent and capable than humans, they were not overly so. Therefore discussion and speculation about them is completely reasonable. OTOH, you are correct that currently popular gods who are omniscient and omnipotent are so out of the understanding of humans that discussion and even contemplation about them is pointless. Those may as well not exist (which a growing percentage of folks are coming to agree with).ChanceIsChange wrote: ↑December 17th, 2018, 4:32 amDefinitely the first one. In fact, one of the points of this topic is to realize its own pointlessness (and yes, even that is pointless). However, the topic isn't completely without any purpose. Its purpose is to help awaken a sort of non-verbal, non-discursive and above-rational noetic understanding of God. On the other hand, even the nous falls completely short of God, so the topic is actually purposeless.JaxAg wrote:If God is beyond intelligible discussion, then this topic is pointless. If God is not beyond intelligible discussion, then this topic is just plain wrong. Which would you prefer?
Do you mean that the answer is that most people aren't overly fond of radically transcendent thought?Eduk wrote:@ChanceIsChange isn't the answer obvious?
- JaxAg
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: December 16th, 2018, 10:17 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
OTOH, there may be much purpose in discussing a God who isn't so far beyond discussion. And it seems to me that most definitions of God are at least intelligible. It takes a mischievous, or overly-abstract, mind to propose a God too transcendent to discuss.ChanceIsChange wrote: ↑December 17th, 2018, 4:32 amDefinitely the first one. In fact, one of the points of this topic is to realize its own pointlessness (and yes, even that is pointless). However, the topic isn't completely without any purpose. Its purpose is to help awaken a sort of non-verbal, non-discursive and above-rational noetic understanding of God. On the other hand, even the nous falls completely short of God, so the topic is actually purposeless.JaxAg wrote:If God is beyond intelligible discussion, then this topic is pointless. If God is not beyond intelligible discussion, then this topic is just plain wrong. Which would you prefer?
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
Aristotle, Aquinas, and Descartes said a lot about God and so it seems all the rest of us do so as well, excepting the atheists who say there is no god.ChanceIsChange wrote: ↑December 16th, 2018, 8:59 am As far as I know, nothing is higher than God. In particular, the Unsayable of the great Neoplatonist philosopher Damascius is not higher than God. However, the Unsayable is already so transcendent that nothing can be said about it - not even that it is absolutely transcendent and ineffable! So, why don't most people treat God correctly, that is, in a way that realizes that God is at least so transcendent that God is beyond being, oneness, effability and even beyond the Absolute, unsayability and transcendence? Of course, this forum post, including this very sentence, doesn't do God justice in the least.
Most of the current modern statements are originally from Aristotle.
- h_k_s
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Rocky Mountains
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
1 - Either God is immortal and we are not, or
2 - Both God and we are immortal, or
3 - We are immortal and God does not exist, or
4 - Neither we nor God is immortal.
I myself am leaning towards #2 of the above, but those are all 4 of the possibilities.
Regarding God's powers, I would say:
A - Either God has powers to do anything, or
B - God's powers are limited, or
C - There is no God.
I myself am leaning towards #2 of the above as well.
Regarding God's availability to each of us personally, I would say:
a - Either God is not accessible to us, or
b - God is accessible to some of us, or
c - There is no God.
Regarding God's accessibility, I am leaning towards #2 of the above here as well.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: December 15th, 2016, 7:36 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
I agree with you and add that God is much more powerful than merely omnipotent, since omnipotence itself somehow derives from God.LuckyR wrote:currently popular gods who are omniscient and omnipotent are so out of the understanding of humans that discussion and even contemplation about them is pointless.
That is beside the point, at least when it comes to God. God transcends both existence and non-existence, and even what is above them. So, to say that God exists, or that God does not exist, is completely meaningless. In fact, even saying that God transcends what is beyond existence and non-existence is without any meaning, as is this very sentence. Also, the thoughts we are having about God are totally inadequate. God is so far beyond them that they don't even relate to God in any way - in fact, God is too far above even for them not to relate to God.LuckyR wrote:Those may as well not exist
Then, you are obviously using the word "God" to refer to something very different from what I call "God". That is because God is above all definitions - in fact, God is above Definition itself. Also, we must be aware of God not really being beyond discussion, but even transcending being beyond discussion. However, even that is incorrect, since it would in some way relate God to being beyond discussion, which God isn't - although even...JaxAg wrote:there may be much purpose in discussing a God who isn't so far beyond discussion. And it seems to me that most definitions of God are at least intelligible.
I think that, on the contrary, a mind can never be abstract enough when it comes to thinking about God. Some of the people who had such abstract minds were the Platonists, beginning with Plato himself and including the great Neoplatonist philosopher Damascius. I still have much about him to learn, but that thinker's mind was, in my opinion, formidable and very well suited to thinking about the Most Transcendent - though even his mind, as all minds, falls utterly short of even coming close to God.JaxAg wrote:It takes a mischievous, or overly-abstract, mind to propose a God too transcendent to discuss.
I really recommend learning about - and, more importantly, learning from - Damascius, the last Neoplatonist.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
I agree.In fact, even saying that God transcends what is beyond existence and non-existence is without any meaning, as is this very sentence.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
Well, we are in agreement that your comments about gods are pointless opinions.ChanceIsChange wrote: ↑December 17th, 2018, 9:15 amI agree with you and add that God is much more powerful than merely omnipotent, since omnipotence itself somehow derives from God.LuckyR wrote:currently popular gods who are omniscient and omnipotent are so out of the understanding of humans that discussion and even contemplation about them is pointless.
That is beside the point, at least when it comes to God. God transcends both existence and non-existence, and even what is above them. So, to say that God exists, or that God does not exist, is completely meaningless. In fact, even saying that God transcends what is beyond existence and non-existence is without any meaning, as is this very sentence. Also, the thoughts we are having about God are totally inadequate. God is so far beyond them that they don't even relate to God in any way - in fact, God is too far above even for them not to relate to God.LuckyR wrote:Those may as well not exist
- Intellectual_Savnot
- Posts: 97
- Joined: November 26th, 2018, 11:07 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Myself
- Location: Wokeville, California
- Contact:
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
However, the topic isn't completely without any purpose. Its purpose is to help awaken a sort of non-verbal, non-discursive and above-rational noetic understanding of God. On the other hand, even the nous falls completely short of God, so the topic is actually purposeless."
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14992
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Why do many People Make Statements about God?
The success of humanity is based on our smarts. Thus we are very curious animals. So, if something is a mystery, then we have always been compelled to do what we can to work through the riddles, especially if the issue seems important.
Obviously the nature of existence and our fates are especially important to us. We have inherited the traits that kept our ancestors alive and fecund and are thus we are compelled to survive. If we don't know what happens to us subjectively after death then our post-mortem fate is of considerable concern! So we naturally try to work out how to best survive the crossing over.
At some stage, however, someone realised that claiming to be inspired by God gave them power over people. They obeyed. This tapped into another aspect of our survival instincts - our main advantage over other animals (and each other) comes from outsmarting them. So then all these alternate realities aka religions cropped up, each offering salvation that was provisional on obedience.
You have to watch out for tricky apes in the jungle!
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023