Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
Post Reply
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 7:23 am My argument is that truth and good logically precede value, e.g. the spacetime Universe, and thereby are of a nature of which it can be said that there is no opposite.
In the case of 'good', it cannot "precede value" as 'goodness' is a value judgement, nothing more (or less). Truth, admittedly, is a little more convoluted.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

As indicated by my logic, the denotation 'good' as a judgment in a historical context that derives meaning from memory in time. differs from 'good per se', which logically exists by the nature of valuing.

If you do not agree, can you address my logic and explain what exactly is wrong?
psyreporter wrote: August 30th, 2021, 6:55 pmThe human being necessarily follows the information obtained by the senses. One is therefor to establish whether anything precedes the senses and if so, what that is/can be.

Logically, for senses to be possible something must have preceded it: valuing.

Valuing cannot find its origin on the level of the individual which implies that the origin of the human in its actuality (as a being that necessarily follows from information provided by the senses, ie its 'consciousness') lays outside the scope of the individual.

The origin of valuing cannot be value which is a simple logical truth (something cannot be the origin of itself). By the nature of value, valuing appropriates its essential distinguish-ability from good and if that indicated good could be anything other than 'good per se', it would need to have been valued which by the mentioned simple logical truth is impossible.

Therefor, good and truth necessarily exist as precursor to any value in the world, and thus, are of a nature of which it can be said that there is no opposite. This also implies that a meaning of life is applicable on a fundamental level (a priori).
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 9:46 am As indicated by my logic, the denotation 'good' as a judgment in a historical context that derives meaning from memory in time. differs from 'good per se', which logically exists by the nature of valuing.

If you do not agree, can you address my logic and explain what exactly is wrong?
psyreporter wrote: August 30th, 2021, 6:55 pmThe human being necessarily follows the information obtained by the senses. One is therefor to establish whether anything precedes the senses and if so, what that is/can be.

Logically, for senses to be possible something must have preceded it: valuing.

Valuing cannot find its origin on the level of the individual which implies that the origin of the human in its actuality (as a being that necessarily follows from information provided by the senses, ie its 'consciousness') lays outside the scope of the individual.

The origin of valuing cannot be value which is a simple logical truth (something cannot be the origin of itself). By the nature of value, valuing appropriates its essential distinguish-ability from good and if that indicated good could be anything other than 'good per se', it would need to have been valued which by the mentioned simple logical truth is impossible.

Therefor, good and truth necessarily exist as precursor to any value in the world, and thus, are of a nature of which it can be said that there is no opposite. This also implies that a meaning of life is applicable on a fundamental level (a priori).
I would, but I'm a little unclear as to what your logic is. I offer these fragments, though:

Anything that precedes the senses is external to the human being in question. Sensation is the very first part of the perception process.

Nothing can be 'good per se', as "good" is a comparative term. It also applies specifically to something, or some group of things. Otherwise, we end up with what is good for X is bad for Y.

Valuing is something humans do. Outside of humans and our minds, value does not exist in the RL universe.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 31st, 2021, 1:58 pmI would, but I'm a little unclear as to what your logic is. I offer these fragments, though:

Anything that precedes the senses is external to the human being in question. Sensation is the very first part of the perception process.
Correct, but when one senses, one derives at a requirement of 'qualitative distinct-ability', which is valuing.

Valuing necessarily must take place before a physical 'sense' process can be put into motion, otherwise, what is sensed must have been known beforehand.

When it is assumed that anything is actually 'sensed' (thus unknown beforehand), than valuing must precede the senses.

The logic that I provided clearly shows that valuing cannot originate from the level of the individual, which implies that the origin of consciousness must lay outside the scope of the individual. This is based on simple and clear logic.
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 31st, 2021, 1:58 pmNothing can be 'good per se', as "good" is a comparative term. It also applies specifically to something, or some group of things. Otherwise, we end up with what is good for X is bad for Y.
Correct, nothing (no value) can be 'good per se'. Value cannot be the origin of itself. The origin of value is valuing which origin, by the nature of value, is logically (of which it can be said that it is) 'good per se'.
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 31st, 2021, 1:58 pmValuing is something humans do. Outside of humans and our minds, value does not exist in the RL universe.
No, as has been shown, valuing must precede the senses and thus it necessarily precedes the human.
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 2:50 pm Correct, but when one senses, one derives at a requirement of 'qualitative distinct-ability', which is valuing.
I'm really sorry, but I cannot parse any sense from this apparently English sentence. For example, the combination "derives at" is unknown to me.


psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 2:50 pm Valuing necessarily must take place before a physical 'sense' process can be put into motion, otherwise, what is sensed must have been known beforehand.
What is sensed is whatever light/sound/etc impinges on us from the external universe. Is this what you refer to, or are we talking at cross-purposes?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 31st, 2021, 2:58 pm
psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 2:50 pm Valuing necessarily must take place before a physical 'sense' process can be put into motion, otherwise, what is sensed must have been known beforehand.
What is sensed is whatever light/sound/etc impinges on us from the external universe. Is this what you refer to, or are we talking at cross-purposes?
It was already established that what one can consider to be 'us' necessarily follows the information provided by the senses. That 'us' cannot precede the senses, and thus, one is to establish the origin of sensing on the level of the senses (the senses become primary in the search for the origin of consciousness, which is to be considered a mere manifestation).

The senses - again: when it is established that the senses precede 'us' - necessarily require a 'qualitative distinct-ability' which is valuing.

It is established that the origin of valuing cannot reside within the scope of an individual because it cannot be value by the simple logical truth that the origin of value cannot be value itself.

Conclusion: the origin of life and consciousness must lay outside the scope of the individual and by the nature of value it necessarily is 'good per se' of which it can be said that there is no opposite.

If you do not agree, can you please explain what part of the above logic is invalid?
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 3:53 pm It was already established that what one can consider to be 'us' necessarily follows the information provided by the senses. That 'us' cannot precede the senses...
Senses are attributes of 'us', aren't they? They do not "precede" us in any way I can see. What am I missing?


psyreporter wrote: August 31st, 2021, 3:53 pm If you do not agree, can you please explain what part of the above logic is invalid?
I would gladly do so, but I am finding it exceptionally difficult to discern your 'logic'.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 1st, 2021, 9:14 amSenses are attributes of 'us', aren't they? They do not "precede" us in any way I can see. What am I missing?
How can it be possible to consider an 'us' BEFORE information had been present that that 'us' could use to be relevant within the context of physical reality?

Senses are primary BEFORE consciousness (an 'us') can manifest itself.

To explain the origin of consciousness is to explain the origin of sensing.

Do you not agree with the above?
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

psyreporter wrote: September 1st, 2021, 10:20 am
Pattern-chaser wrote: September 1st, 2021, 9:14 amSenses are attributes of 'us', aren't they? They do not "precede" us in any way I can see. What am I missing?
How can it be possible to consider an 'us' BEFORE information had been present that that 'us' could use to be relevant within the context of physical reality?

Senses are primary BEFORE consciousness (an 'us') can manifest itself.

To explain the origin of consciousness is to explain the origin of sensing.

Do you not agree with the above?
I think I'm beginning to understand. You think that sensation sort of activates consciousness, which is maybe dormant in the lack of incoming events (sensations)?

I think the origin of sensation is the real world, but I think the origin of consciousness lies within our minds. No?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
PoeticUniverse
Posts: 638
Joined: April 4th, 2015, 7:25 pm

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by PoeticUniverse »

psyreporter wrote: September 1st, 2021, 10:20 am Senses are primary BEFORE consciousness (an 'us') can manifest itself.
All input and analysis, whether external or internal, has to come before the consciousness of it a few hundred milliseconds later.
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 4th, 2021, 8:48 am I think I'm beginning to understand. You think that sensation sort of activates consciousness, which is maybe dormant in the lack of incoming events (sensations)?

I think the origin of sensation is the real world, but I think the origin of consciousness lies within our minds. No?
Consciousness cannot be dormant before sensing. Consciousness is a manifestation that follows sensing. Sensing is therefor the origin of consciousness.

The provided logic makes it evident that the origin of sensing must lay outside the scope of the individual which implies that:
  1. the origin of life must be external from both the human and physical reality.
  2. empirical science cannot provide an explanation.
The ‘scope of the individual’ is any point in spacetime from which a perspective is possible. Anything reference-able from that scope amounts to what is named ‘physical reality’ or ‘objective reality’ and it is a scope that includes all of which it can be said that it can be explained using empirical science.

From the perspective of the individual, life and consciousness requires an external (physically neutral) origin.
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 4th, 2021, 8:48 am I think I'm beginning to understand. You think that sensation sort of activates consciousness, which is maybe dormant in the lack of incoming events (sensations)?

I think the origin of sensation is the real world, but I think the origin of consciousness lies within our minds. No?
psyreporter wrote: September 4th, 2021, 6:27 pm The provided logic makes it evident that the origin of sensing must lay outside the scope of the individual...
"Makes it evident"? I can't see that. What I see is an assertion. You say you have offered "logic" in justification, but I can't see it.


psyreporter wrote: September 4th, 2021, 6:27 pm Consciousness cannot be dormant before sensing. Consciousness is a manifestation that follows sensing. Sensing is therefore the origin of consciousness.
At least I can see the assertions you are making now, but I dispute your suggestion that you have offered justification for your views. You suggest that consciousness is created by sensation, and the process of perception that follows it. I think it is well understood and accepted that sensation and perception are pre-conscious, but your ideas go beyond that. Your view seems to say that I am totally passive, able only to react to the world as I perceive its behaviour.

This is an interesting view, but not one I find able to accept, when it seems my consciousness and conscious mind have continuous existence. How would we tell if it didn't? If you were right in your suppositions, how can we detect this?


psyreporter wrote: September 4th, 2021, 6:27 pm
  1. the origin of life must be external from both the human and physical reality.
  2. empirical science cannot provide an explanation.
Why must the origin of life be external from both the human and physical reality? It seems to me that life exists within "physical reality"; is that not so?


psyreporter wrote: September 4th, 2021, 6:27 pm From the perspective of the individual, life and consciousness requires an external (physically neutral) origin.
You say "requires", but again I ask why? And why is the origin of consciousness tied so directly to the origin of life itself? And what does "physically neutral" mean, please?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 5th, 2021, 8:43 am
psyreporter wrote: September 4th, 2021, 6:27 pm The provided logic makes it evident that the origin of sensing must lay outside the scope of the individual...
"Makes it evident"? I can't see that. What I see is an assertion. You say you have offered "logic" in justification, but I can't see it.
Proposition 1.1:

Consciousness can only manifest itself on the basis of information provided by the senses. Therefor, to explain the origin of consciousness is to explain the origin of sensing.

Do you agree?

Proposition 1.2:

Sensing is PRIMARY and necessarily precedes conscious experience, which implies that the potential for subjective value equation cannot have preceded the senses.

Do you agree?

Proposition 1.3:

Sensing necessarily requires a ‘qualitative distinct-ability’ which is valuing.

Do you agree?

Proposition 1.4:

The simplest departure from pure randomness implies value. This is evidence that all that can be seen in the world – from the simplest pattern onward – is value.

Proposition 1.5:

The origin of valuing cannot be value by the simple logical truth that something cannot be the origin of itself (the origin of the qualia 'patternness' (= value) cannot be a pattern). This implies that valuing cannot find its origin on the level of the individual and thus, that the origin of sensing and consciousness as manifestation must lay outside the scope of the individual.

Do you agree?

Proposition 1.6:

Based on the preceding logic it has been established that the origin of sensing and of consciousness must lay outside the scope of the individual and because of it, that conscious experience cannot be a predetermined program or a psychological illusion.

Do you agree?

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 5th, 2021, 8:43 amWhy must the origin of life be external from both the human and physical reality? It seems to me that life exists within "physical reality"; is that not so?
No, based on the above logic, a life form (as part of physical reality) is preceded by something for it to be 'alive', which is also evident by the simple consideration that the question 'why' the world exists is simply a question that requires an answer (thus, a life form is necessarily preceded by that something with which the 'why the world exists' question can be answered).

In the neutrino-biological cell theory of life, the origin of the Universe (meaning) is transferred on to the level of the individual within the scope of interaction between Neutrinos and matter (biological cells), which manifests itself as consciousness.

A short description of the theory:
https://psyreporter.com/life/

Image

Meaning precedes physical reality.

What preceded life on a fundamental level logically lays beyond it from the perspective of an individual life form. Therefor, the origin of life is also the purpose or goal of life. Life logically will seek the origin of itself, ie. develop subjective experience and become self-conscious.

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 5th, 2021, 8:43 am
psyreporter wrote: September 4th, 2021, 6:27 pm Consciousness cannot be dormant before sensing. Consciousness is a manifestation that follows sensing. Sensing is therefore the origin of consciousness.
At least I can see the assertions you are making now, but I dispute your suggestion that you have offered justification for your views. You suggest that consciousness is created by sensation, and the process of perception that follows it. I think it is well understood and accepted that sensation and perception are pre-conscious, but your ideas go beyond that. Your view seems to say that I am totally passive, able only to react to the world as I perceive its behaviour.

This is an interesting view, but not one I find able to accept, when it seems my consciousness and conscious mind have continuous existence. How would we tell if it didn't? If you were right in your suppositions, how can we detect this?
The provided logic indicates that 'meaning' is pre-conscious (pre-existence). On a fundamental level, meaning would essentially perform as 'mind' since a pattern is bound by observation/perception (a pattern can only derive significance by observation/perception). Thus, meaning would perform like mind which would explain that it manifests as consciousness by being transferred onto the level of the individual in neutrino-matter (biological cell) interaction.

In the Neutrino-biological cell theory of life, life would originate from the Sun.

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 5th, 2021, 8:43 amYou say "requires", but again I ask why? And why is the origin of consciousness tied so directly to the origin of life itself? And what does "physically neutral" mean, please?
Can it be said that consciousness is of substance without life? If not, is there at least one clue that it could be so?

Logically and most likely, consciousness is merely a manifestation of the origin of life.

Why would you believe that it is so / could be so?

Physically neutral would imply 'outside the scope of physical reality' (i.e. not a product of causality)

Neutrinos move at the speed of light and can change their mass up to 3000x in size, by themselves, which is called flavor switching or morphing. It is why the particle is called a ‘ghost particle’ (spooky particle).

At light speed there is no time and distance.

Does light experience time?
But for light itself, which is already moving at light speed… You guessed it, the photons reach zero distance and zero time.
https://phys.org/news/2014-05-does-ligh ... -time.html

When a Neutrino would be able to travel at light speed by being unbound by mass on a fundamental level it would need to deviate from a state of timelessness. That deviation 'out of itself' may entail the essence of 'meaning' which manifests itself in the physical world as mass and weak-force interaction in biological cells (e.g. brain neurons).
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Psyreporter, I find your perspective, and the words you use to describe it, difficult to understand. Your perspective is unique in my experience, and I am having a lot of difficulty simply understanding what you say. So I have not answered many of your questions, because I don't really understand what's being asked. Let's start with this little nugget:


psyreporter wrote: September 16th, 2021, 7:00 pm The provided logic indicates that 'meaning' is pre-conscious (pre-existence).


I think meaning is asigned both consciously and non-consciously, part of that taking place during the process of perception, which is (as you say) pre-conscious. Oh, and pre-conscious is far from equivalent to pre-existence, IMO.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
psyreporter
Posts: 1022
Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Is Good Stronger Than Evil?

Post by psyreporter »

Pattern-chaser wrote: September 17th, 2021, 1:44 pm Psyreporter, I find your perspective, and the words you use to describe it, difficult to understand. Your perspective is unique in my experience, and I am having a lot of difficulty simply understanding what you say. So I have not answered many of your questions, because I don't really understand what's being asked. Let's start with this little nugget:
psyreporter wrote: September 16th, 2021, 7:00 pm The provided logic indicates that 'meaning' is pre-conscious (pre-existence).
I think meaning is asigned both consciously and non-consciously, part of that taking place during the process of perception, which is (as you say) pre-conscious. Oh, and pre-conscious is far from equivalent to pre-existence, IMO.
I would agree with your assertion.

The qualia patternness is bound by perception (a pattern is not possible without perception) which means that the origin of 'the Universe' (existence) logically manifests itself as consciousness.

When you indicate that the part of perception that provides the origin of meaning is pre-conscious, then I would agree, with the essence of perception - which is meaning before value/pattern - being the origin of both physical reality and consciousness, with life and consciousness being a direct manifestation of that meaning (part of perception) in a pure form.
PsyReporter.com | “If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.”
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021