Sentience. What is it?

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
User avatar
Papus79
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Papus79 »

I'd be curious on what it is that would have them see rocks as sentient. I'm probably more accepting of ideas that something has to be a self-organizing system for sentience to have a management role and to that end there might be 'something that it's like to be' most of organic life and perhaps plenty of systems that we didn't even know had it (ie. multiple realizability, even overarching canopies like egregores come to mind).

As for reincarnation, it seems like something has to be pretty well stapled together, which again in almost a Gurdjieff direction that it has to be an intensely integrated system for that integration to outlast a physical vehicle which might have scaffold it to begin with in which case those relationships still 'stick'. That's where, with rocks, I'm not sure you'd have reason for that sort of interconnection in simple amalgams, almost like when people flog panpsychism with 'are chairs conscious?' at which point you have to say not unless we've genetically engineered a plant to grow them fully formed.
Humbly watching Youtube in Universe 25. - Me
User avatar
UniversalAlien
Posts: 1577
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by UniversalAlien »

Sentience :?:

"What makes you think human beings are sentient and aware? There's no evidence for it. Human beings never think for themselves, they find it too uncomfortable. For the most part, members of our species simply repeat what they are told-and become upset if they are exposed to any different view. The characteristic human trait is not awareness but conformity, and the characteristic result is religious warfare. Other animals fight for territory or food; but, uniquely in the animal kingdom, human beings fight for their 'beliefs.' The reason is that beliefs guide behavior which has evolutionary importance among human beings. But at a time when our behavior may well lead us to extinction, I see no reason to assume we have any awareness at all. We are stubborn, self-destructive conformists. Any other view of our species is just a self-congratulatory delusion. Next question."
- Michael Crichton
{"Michael Crichton" (Quotes, The Lost World (1995))




"The important thing is: how much less you think of the body, of yourself as matter—as dead, dull, insentient matter;
how much more you think of yourself as shining immortal being".

- Swami Vivekananda
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7066
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Sculptor1 »

UniversalAlien wrote: July 26th, 2021, 6:22 am Sentience :?:

"What makes you think human beings are sentient and aware? There's no evidence for it....


The evidence is that you think you are sentient.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8232
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Pattern-chaser wrote: July 24th, 2021, 12:38 pm General comment, not personally aimed at Sculptor1, but at him and all others who voice similar views regularly.

Why is it that philosophers have such huge difficulties when asked to generalise and broaden their thinking? Is flexibility of thought so difficult, or is it that this flexibility is considered ideologically unsound, I wonder?
Sculptor1 wrote: July 25th, 2021, 3:56 am Rather than pretend that you were not making a "personal comment"...
I wasn't. I meant exactly what my words convey; nothing more, nothing less. I communicate explicitly, without implication.


Sculptor1 wrote: July 25th, 2021, 3:56 am why do you not just say how a "rock is conscious" is demonstrable in some way?
The term used previously was "sentient". Now you choose "conscious", although you might've chosen "living", or another similar term. The trouble is, they all mean something a little bit different from the others. In this case, I think the idea is that the universe is a living thing, and a rock being part of it is therefore living too. [N.B. I'm a follower of Eastern philosophy, religion and mysticism, but I'm very far from an expert, and might well have this all wrong.]
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7066
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: July 26th, 2021, 11:28 am
Pattern-chaser wrote: July 24th, 2021, 12:38 pm General comment, not personally aimed at Sculptor1, but at him and all others who voice similar views regularly.

Why is it that philosophers have such huge difficulties when asked to generalise and broaden their thinking? Is flexibility of thought so difficult, or is it that this flexibility is considered ideologically unsound, I wonder?
Sculptor1 wrote: July 25th, 2021, 3:56 am Rather than pretend that you were not making a "personal comment"...
I wasn't. I meant exactly what my words convey; nothing more, nothing less. I communicate explicitly, without implication.


Sculptor1 wrote: July 25th, 2021, 3:56 am why do you not just say how a "rock is conscious" is demonstrable in some way?
The term used previously was "sentient". Now you choose "conscious", although you might've chosen "living", or another similar term. The trouble is, they all mean something a little bit different from the others. In this case, I think the idea is that the universe is a living thing, and a rock being part of it is therefore living too. [N.B. I'm a follower of Eastern philosophy, religion and mysticism, but I'm very far from an expert, and might well have this all wrong.]
What is sentient??

"In June of 2016, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in favor of a dog named Juno, declaring that while animals can be legally considered property, they are still “sentient beings capable of experiencing pain, stress and fear.” google

So if it takes a court of law to determine that a dog is sentient, in order to protect dogs against cruelty; does a court of law need to prpotect rocks from being smashed in a quarry too?
To say the universe is alive is an abuse of language. I'm all for having an open mind as long as your reason does not fall out of the hole.
popeye1945
Posts: 1085
Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
Location: canada

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by popeye1945 »

Sentience. a shot in the dark, sentience is the mind's experience through a body of the physical world, in an effort to correlate experience with apparent reality, thus to react appropriately.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8232
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sculptor1 wrote: July 26th, 2021, 12:22 pm To say the universe is alive is an abuse of language. I'm all for having an open mind as long as your reason does not fall out of the hole.
I would say it's the use of metaphoric language, not abuse. Reason does not evaporate just because we fail to stick to the literal use of words.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Papus79
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 19th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Papus79 »

Sculptor1 wrote: July 26th, 2021, 12:22 pm So if it takes a court of law to determine that a dog is sentient, in order to protect dogs against cruelty; does a court of law need to prpotect rocks from being smashed in a quarry too?
To say the universe is alive is an abuse of language. I'm all for having an open mind as long as your reason does not fall out of the hole.
I think what's politically pragmatic here and what's actually true might be slightly different things (and I'm not sure where we'd get the ground assumption that the universe cares about our moral comfort with the rules of our set and setting as higher primates).

I think we'd be getting absurd if panpsychism catching on turned into a discussion over whether basalt should have UN rights. I'd worry more if we'd emancipated factory-farmed chickens and put them at the top of the intersectional hierarchy but I see no sign of that happening anytime soon and probably for good reason - we aren't in evolutionary competition (that we know of at least) with chickens so our attitude toward them is largely indifferent other than as food source and thus a raw material to process for food.

If anything we'd be looking at how our Manichaean philosophies on the universe helped give us a Bostrom paperclip maximizer for an economy, and perhaps we'd be paying more attention to James Lovelock on his complex systems Gaia hypothesis and slipping neoliberalism a valium.

I notice as well that a lot of the upstart physics 'Theory of Everything' types who are coming out as the credible final contestants are heading more IIT-like directions as well, for example listening to a recent Stephen Wolfram interview on Curt Jaimungal channel Curt asked him, after his processing the evolution of the universe through cellular automata rules, whether the universe was 'conscious' and Wolfram admitted that he thought it was 'intelligent' but that consciousness was actually a step down from consciousness (not 100% sure what he meant by that, my guess is something like that it's a processor perhaps more so than being the important stuff).

There's just a lot to chew on this territory and it seems like over the past five to ten years the amount of high-end content in this direction has been increasing rather than decreasing. It's also somewhat agnostic to physicalism albeit things are getting fuzzy enough that the definition of what physicalism means seems to need regular updating.
Humbly watching Youtube in Universe 25. - Me
User avatar
3017Metaphysician
Posts: 1621
Joined: July 9th, 2021, 8:59 am

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by 3017Metaphysician »

UniversalAlien wrote: July 26th, 2021, 6:22 am Sentience :?:

"What makes you think human beings are sentient and aware? There's no evidence for it. Human beings never think for themselves, they find it too uncomfortable. For the most part, members of our species simply repeat what they are told-and become upset if they are exposed to any different view. The characteristic human trait is not awareness but conformity, and the characteristic result is religious warfare. Other animals fight for territory or food; but, uniquely in the animal kingdom, human beings fight for their 'beliefs.' The reason is that beliefs guide behavior which has evolutionary importance among human beings. But at a time when our behavior may well lead us to extinction, I see no reason to assume we have any awareness at all. We are stubborn, self-destructive conformists. Any other view of our species is just a self-congratulatory delusion. Next question."
- Michael Crichton
{"Michael Crichton" (Quotes, The Lost World (1995))




"The important thing is: how much less you think of the body, of yourself as matter—as dead, dull, insentient matter;
how much more you think of yourself as shining immortal being".

- Swami Vivekananda
I realize that was a great work of satire :shock: , but just as a rhetorical exercise, or just for some plain old fun, most of us would say to Mr. Crichton;

"What makes you think you are" un-aware and not sentient? Human beings think for themselves because they are subjective beings. What are subjective feelings? Animals, primarily have emergent instinct. Humans, primarily have will; the will to live, have choices and be happy/sad, and have purpose. Yet as suggested by Mr. Crichton, another irony would be that if we are "stubborn", it's precisely because of that sentient existence and self-awareness. What makes a human have stubbornness you may wonder? Can we escape that "stubbornness"? Should we escape it, or accept it it for what it is? No pun intended, but next question(s).

1. Love
2. Wonder
3. Aesthetics; beauty/ugliness, colors, etc..
4. Intention
5. Happiness/sadness/joy/curiosity
6. The Will/live/die/exist/purpose
7. Ad nauseum :D

Do any of those things provide for human purpose? Is purpose driven by some level of sentience? What happens when humans are without purpose or have no reason to live? Is that instinct or self awareness? Human volition and love; why should one choose to love or not love, and are they aware of their own need for same? Why raise a family? Why choose to live and not die? Do other animals choose to live/die because they are sad?

...I don't see any "un-awareness" there Mr. Crichton :P

Carry on sentient Beings!
“Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter.” "Spooky Action at a Distance"
― Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7066
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: July 27th, 2021, 7:47 am
Sculptor1 wrote: July 26th, 2021, 12:22 pm To say the universe is alive is an abuse of language. I'm all for having an open mind as long as your reason does not fall out of the hole.
I would say it's the use of metaphoric language, not abuse. Reason does not evaporate just because we fail to stick to the literal use of words.
Why not just say what you mean~? Afterall is said and done all langauge is metaphor. Just choose a better word.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7066
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Papus79 wrote: July 27th, 2021, 7:54 am
Sculptor1 wrote: July 26th, 2021, 12:22 pm So if it takes a court of law to determine that a dog is sentient, in order to protect dogs against cruelty; does a court of law need to prpotect rocks from being smashed in a quarry too?
To say the universe is alive is an abuse of language. I'm all for having an open mind as long as your reason does not fall out of the hole.
I think what's politically pragmatic here and what's actually true might be slightly different things (and I'm not sure where we'd get the ground assumption that the universe cares about our moral comfort with the rules of our set and setting as higher primates).

I think we'd be getting absurd if panpsychism catching on turned into a discussion over whether basalt should have UN rights.
Why not? Please answer!
I'd worry more if we'd emancipated factory-farmed chickens and put them at the top of the intersectional hierarchy but I see no sign of that happening anytime soon and probably for good reason - we aren't in evolutionary competition (that we know of at least) with chickens so our attitude toward them is largely indifferent other than as food source and thus a raw material to process for food.

If anything we'd be looking at how our Manichaean philosophies on the universe helped give us a Bostrom paperclip maximizer for an economy, and perhaps we'd be paying more attention to James Lovelock on his complex systems Gaia hypothesis and slipping neoliberalism a valium.

I notice as well that a lot of the upstart physics 'Theory of Everything' types who are coming out as the credible final contestants are heading more IIT-like directions as well, for example listening to a recent Stephen Wolfram interview on Curt Jaimungal channel Curt asked him, after his processing the evolution of the universe through cellular automata rules, whether the universe was 'conscious' and Wolfram admitted that he thought it was 'intelligent' but that consciousness was actually a step down from consciousness (not 100% sure what he meant by that, my guess is something like that it's a processor perhaps more so than being the important stuff).

There's just a lot to chew on this territory and it seems like over the past five to ten years the amount of high-end content in this direction has been increasing rather than decreasing. It's also somewhat agnostic to physicalism albeit things are getting fuzzy enough that the definition of what physicalism means seems to need regular updating.
Panpsychism is a theory that does no work. It seems little more than a bit of wished for magic in your life.
If panpsychism was false everything would appear exaclty as it does.
What's the point?
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6013
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Consul »

Pattern-chaser wrote: July 27th, 2021, 7:47 am
Sculptor1 wrote: July 26th, 2021, 12:22 pm To say the universe is alive is an abuse of language. I'm all for having an open mind as long as your reason does not fall out of the hole.
I would say it's the use of metaphoric language, not abuse. Reason does not evaporate just because we fail to stick to the literal use of words.
I agree. For instance, when we speak of the birth and death of stars we're speaking metaphorically, since stars aren't literally living beings. (I'm talking about astrophysical stars, not about human stars such as pop stars, who literally are living beings.)

However, panvitalism/panbiotism—the view that everything has life/is alive—does use the concept of life literally, doesn't it?
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6013
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Consul »

Two different questions:
1. What is it to be sentient? (What does "sentient" mean?)
2. What is sentient? (What things are sentient?)
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6013
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by Consul »

UniversalAlien wrote: July 26th, 2021, 6:22 am "The important thing is: how much less you think of the body, of yourself as matter—as dead, dull, insentient matter;
how much more you think of yourself as shining immortal being".
- Swami Vivekananda
The cemeteries are full of "shining immortal beings"! :wink:
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
UniversalAlien
Posts: 1577
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Sentience. What is it?

Post by UniversalAlien »

Consul wrote: July 27th, 2021, 12:48 pm
UniversalAlien wrote: July 26th, 2021, 6:22 am "The important thing is: how much less you think of the body, of yourself as matter—as dead, dull, insentient matter;
how much more you think of yourself as shining immortal being".
- Swami Vivekananda
The cemeteries are full of "shining immortal beings"! :wink:
Not true - the cemeteries are full of dead bodies - "shining immortal beings" never die :arrow: :idea:

In fact some pagan {Hopi Indians} and religious {Christian} mystic theology postulates "ascended masters" who may interact with the physical World even if they are no longer in it :roll:
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021