Sentience. What is it?
- AmericanKestrel
- Posts: 356
- Joined: May 22nd, 2021, 6:26 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Yagnyavalkya
- Location: US
Sentience. What is it?
Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
- 3017Metaphysician
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: July 9th, 2021, 8:59 am
Re: Sentience. What is it?
Taken from William Barrett's, Irrational Man:AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones. They may be at different levels of awareness, but they are all within the same Consciousness, the Oneness. Hinduism is mostly concerned with humans when discussing philosophy, in particular, Advaita or non-duality, although non-humans are also considered sentient. Budhists and Jains include all things that exist as being sentient.
Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
"St. Thomas, the Intellectualist, had argued that the intellect in man is prior to the will because the intellect determines the will, since we can desire only what we know. Scotus, the Voluntarist, replied that the will determines what ideas the intellect turns to, and thus in the end determines what the intellect comes to know."
- Voluntarism: in the modern metaphysical sense is a theory which explains the universe as emanating ultimately from some form of will. In a broader psychological sense, the term is applied to any theory which gives prominence to will (in opposition to intellect ). In this latter sense, but not in the former, the philosophy of Augustine, Anselm, William of Occam, and Scotus may be styled Voluntarism.
- Voluntarism is the theory that God or the ultimate nature of reality is to be conceived as some form of will (or conation). This theory is contrasted to intellectualism, which gives primacy to God's reason.
-According to intellectualism, choices of the will result from that which the intellect recognizes as good; the will itself is determined. For voluntarism, by contrast, it is the will which determines which objects are good, and the will itself is indetermined. Concerning the nature of heaven, intellectualists followed Aristotle's lead by seeing the final state of happiness as a state of contemplation. Voluntarism, by contrast, maintains that final happiness is an activity, specifically that of love.
-19th century voluntarism has its origin in Kant, particularly his doctrine of the "primacy of the practical over the pure reason." Intellectually, humans are incapable of knowing ultimate reality, but this need not and must not interfere with the duty of acting as though the spiritual character of this reality were certain.
I would like to propose that the metaphysical will (to live and survive) precedes the ability to reason and intellectualize from our senses (sense data). Consider why an individual wills themselves to live in the first place. Intellect seems to be subordinate to a greater feeling and/or that impulse of the Will. The will, may very well be this 'dumb and blind feeling' that existentially, just is. It just is, and exists a priori. It's fixed and innate to Being. Much like emergent instinct.
A practical example is the idea associated with the feeling of interconnect-ness viz. relationships. Human's have a need to be with other's and feel happy. Cognitive science says that it is only through other's that we achieve our goals( to fulfill purpose). Someone had to build the house we live in, or assemble the toys we have, make the cloths we wear, farm the food we eat, ad nauseum. We are interconnected, which is not too different than the idea of Love itself; to love ourselves and to love each other. And if some of these needs are not fulfilled, one may will themselves to die. Although that would indeed suggest that reason and intellect is preeminent or precedes the Will, it doesn't square with our intrinsic need or impulse to be, and seek happiness.
This seems much like asking the prisoner in solitary confinement with a death sentence and no appeals/parole, why he/she continues to will to live. Is it a feeling of hope? Hope for what? Metaphysically. what is hope, in and of itself? A feeling of some sort?
― Albert Einstein
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7094
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Sentience. What is it?
Rocks are not sentient.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones. They may be at different levels of awareness, but they are all within the same Consciousness, the Oneness. Hinduism is mostly concerned with humans when discussing philosophy, in particular, Advaita or non-duality, although non-humans are also considered sentient. Budhists and Jains include all things that exist as being sentient.
Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
It is a complete misunderstanding of sentience and a denial of the remarkable emergence on earth of this phenomenon.
To even atrribute sentience to plants is a complete travesty of the meaning of the word.
I can only conclude that "Samasara" is something entirely different.
ANd hey presto when I look it up we find Samsara means something utterly different.
-
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Alfred North Whitehead
- Location: canada
Re: Sentience. What is it?
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=pa ... ORM=HDRSC3
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: Sentience. What is it?
The word "so" might have given the impression that what came next was the logical conclusion from the first statement, but obviously it was not. And so, we are left wondering from where the Eastern thinkers took the idea that plants, rocks and stones are subject to feelings, sensations, suffering and rebirth. That is an extraordinaire claim.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones.
No, it doesn't make any sense, but I can guarantee you that many Western philosophers are willing to entertain that and even much more nonsense.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
- mystery
- Posts: 380
- Joined: May 14th, 2021, 5:41 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Mike Tyson
- Location: earth
Re: Sentience. What is it?
https://www.petrock.com/
Seriously it comes down to what can we perceive. Our senses are not enough to perceive but only a small amount of the entire universe even if we are able to reach it all. The question would have a different answer millions of years from now, after that time we would know more. Perhaps we are not as important as we think and don't know it.
These people support the idea of the great spirit and take it seriously, Native Americans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakota_mythology
- 3017Metaphysician
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: July 9th, 2021, 8:59 am
Re: Sentience. What is it?
News flash. Human sentience and intellect is an insoluble mix that is logically impossible to describe or explain. Much like the subconscious mind and the conscious mind working together. Hence, our own existence is not logical.Count Lucanor wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 6:45 pmThe word "so" might have given the impression that what came next was the logical conclusion from the first statement, but obviously it was not. And so, we are left wondering from where the Eastern thinkers took the idea that plants, rocks and stones are subject to feelings, sensations, suffering and rebirth. That is an extraordinaire claim.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones.
No, it doesn't make any sense, but I can guarantee you that many Western philosophers are willing to entertain that and even much more nonsense.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
Philosophy itself lives in the logic of language and words. But existence itself, is something beyond pure reason. These things 'not making sense' or perceived as nonsense; you should embrace them
― Albert Einstein
- AmericanKestrel
- Posts: 356
- Joined: May 22nd, 2021, 6:26 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Yagnyavalkya
- Location: US
Re: Sentience. What is it?
I am sorry that ‘so’ caused some consternationCount Lucanor wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 6:45 pmThe word "so" might have given the impression that what came next was the logical conclusion from the first statement, but obviously it was not. And so, we are left wondering from where the Eastern thinkers took the idea that plants, rocks and stones are subject to feelings, sensations, suffering and rebirth. That is an extraordinaire claim.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones.
The idea behind it is the concept of karma and rebirth, although i dont know if Jains and Budhists believe in rebirth. In any case all of what we see as the world, are in essence conciousness, one single Conciousness. The form each takes is transient, subject to decay and death. Conciousness is eternal and is all there is. Everything is connected and are all within the single Conciousness.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: Sentience. What is it?
All evidence amounts to the opposite, but I'm sure everyone is entitled to believe whatever they want to believe, either gods, eternal consciousness or dragons.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 24th, 2021, 8:24 amI am sorry that ‘so’ caused some consternationCount Lucanor wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 6:45 pmThe word "so" might have given the impression that what came next was the logical conclusion from the first statement, but obviously it was not. And so, we are left wondering from where the Eastern thinkers took the idea that plants, rocks and stones are subject to feelings, sensations, suffering and rebirth. That is an extraordinaire claim.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones.
The idea behind it is the concept of karma and rebirth, although i dont know if Jains and Budhists believe in rebirth. In any case all of what we see as the world, are in essence conciousness, one single Conciousness. The form each takes is transient, subject to decay and death. Conciousness is eternal and is all there is. Everything is connected and are all within the single Conciousness.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
-
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm
Re: Sentience. What is it?
Eastern thought gets non-duality right in general as opposed to Western philosophy, yes there is "one Consciousness" which is the same as existence, as the world. In that sense, everything is sentient. But the normal meaning of sentience is roughly: having/being an individual mind, obviously rocks aren't sentient in that sense.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones. They may be at different levels of awareness, but they are all within the same Consciousness, the Oneness. Hinduism is mostly concerned with humans when discussing philosophy, in particular, Advaita or non-duality, although non-humans are also considered sentient. Budhists and Jains include all things that exist as being sentient.
Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
The karmic cycle / suffering / rebirth etc. is entirely nonsense and not needed for the above to be true.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8268
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Sentience. What is it?
AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones. They may be at different levels of awareness, but they are all within the same Consciousness, the Oneness. Hinduism is mostly concerned with humans when discussing philosophy, in particular, Advaita or non-duality, although non-humans are also considered sentient. Budhists and Jains include all things that exist as being sentient.
Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
General comment, not personally aimed at Sculptor1, but at him and all others who voice similar views regularly.
Why is it that philosophers have such huge difficulties when asked to generalise and broaden their thinking? Is flexibility of thought so difficult, or is it that this flexibility is considered ideologically unsound, I wonder?
"Who cares, wins"
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7094
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Sentience. What is it?
I think the attribute of an open mind is great untill all the reason falls out of it.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑July 24th, 2021, 12:38 pmAmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones. They may be at different levels of awareness, but they are all within the same Consciousness, the Oneness. Hinduism is mostly concerned with humans when discussing philosophy, in particular, Advaita or non-duality, although non-humans are also considered sentient. Budhists and Jains include all things that exist as being sentient.
Does this make sense, a concept that can be understood and accepted? How does it differ from Western philosophy?
Thank you.
General comment, not personally aimed at Sculptor1, but at him and all others who voice similar views regularly.
Why is it that philosophers have such huge difficulties when asked to generalise and broaden their thinking? Is flexibility of thought so difficult, or is it that this flexibility is considered ideologically unsound, I wonder?
Rather than pretend that you were not making a "personal comment", why do you not just say how a "rock is conscious" is demonstrable in some way?
- Consul
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Sentience. What is it?
- Consul
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Sentience. What is it?
objective sentience = sensory percipience
subjective sentience = sensory experience
- UniversalAlien
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sentience. What is it?
YESAmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 24th, 2021, 8:24 amI am sorry that ‘so’ caused some consternationCount Lucanor wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 6:45 pmThe word "so" might have given the impression that what came next was the logical conclusion from the first statement, but obviously it was not. And so, we are left wondering from where the Eastern thinkers took the idea that plants, rocks and stones are subject to feelings, sensations, suffering and rebirth. That is an extraordinaire claim.AmericanKestrel wrote: ↑July 23rd, 2021, 9:54 am In Eastern thought sentience is understood as all beings that are subject to feelings and sensations, suffering, and rebirth. In sum, it is called Samsara. So this includes not just humans, but also animals, plants, even rocks and stones.
The idea behind it is the concept of karma and rebirth, although i dont know if Jains and Budhists believe in rebirth. In any case all of what we see as the world, are in essence conciousness, one single Conciousness. The form each takes is transient, subject to decay and death. Conciousness is eternal and is all there is. Everything is connected and are all within the single Conciousness.
Sentience is a relative term and may have different definitions and meanings
- But the 'matrix' of all remains the same.
Form Max Planck world famous physicist and founder of Quantum Mechanics:
“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness.
We cannot get behind consciousness.
Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”
― Max Planck
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023