Gaia

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
User avatar
Stoppelmann
Premium Member
Posts: 847
Joined: December 14th, 2022, 2:01 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alan Watts
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Gaia

Post by Stoppelmann »

Sy Borg wrote: January 21st, 2023, 5:47 pm
Both the animate and inanimate can undergo quieter or more tumultuous times, just that only the sapient are aware of it and is capable of resisting entropy in more ways than just mindlessly holding tight. Still, there's nothing much more at peace in this reality than inanimate objects.

There's an old mediation idea that you breathe in peace and breathe out love. As part of the Earth we require a constant connection to stay alive through respiration. We draw in healthful, peacefully non-sentient molecules and breathe out our gratitude and appreciation for that peace, with love being basically the sapient equivalent to non-sentient peace.

I get weekly email digest of The Marginalian by Maria Popova (https://www.themarginalian.org) and this week she wrote:
Hermann Hesse believed that trees are our greatest spiritual teachers. Walt Whitman cherished them as paragons of authenticity amid a world of mere appearances. Remembering his most beloved friend, he wrote that she was “true, honest; beautiful as a tree is tall, leafy, rich, full, free — is a tree.” I too consider the people I most love my human trees — people firmly rooted in a foundation of moral beauty, relentlessly reaching for the light, bent into their particular beloved shape by the demands and traumas of their particular lives.

A century after Whitman, Ram Dass (April 6, 1931–December 22, 2019) drew on the human-tree analogy in a soulful invitation to treat ourselves — and each other — with the same nonjudgmental spaciousness with which we regard trees. Answering a question about how we can judge ourselves less harshly, he writes:

“Part of it is observing oneself more impersonally… When you go out into the woods and you look at trees, you see all these different trees. And some of them are bent, and some of them are straight, and some of them are evergreens, and some of them are whatever. And you look at the tree and you allow it. You see why it is the way it is. You sort of understand that it didn’t get enough light, and so it turned that way. And you don’t get all emotional about it. You just allow it. You appreciate the tree."

The minute you get near humans, you lose all that. And you are constantly saying, “You’re too this, or I’m too this.” That judging mind comes in. And so I practice turning people into trees. Which means appreciating them just the way they are.”

So, you can see I am very much someone who appreciates the poetic perception of life, which has its perspective on truth, but I like the way Maria Popova collects varying sources together and offers them for free, although you can contribute, and she is a constant source of fascination.

She also quotes the great English neurophysiologist Charles Scott Sherrington for example, who termed his orientation “Natural Religion”, which he published as Man on His Nature, which is in the public domain: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dl ... a151fba58f.

But this has nothing to do with Gaia.
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
Some academics scoff at Watts, but had some beautiful insights and he never fell into the holier-than-thou trap.

Our attempts at terraforming suffer from inexperience. The planet's been developing systems over billions of years, and the complexity builds over time. You'd need a helluva supercomputer to catch up, although I suspect that what AI achieves will always be, to some extent, a sketchy imitation of nature - just as imitations of pretty well anything will tend to fall short of the real thing.

Specialisation is a double-edged sword. It allows researchers to probe ever more deeply, and in greater detail, either confirming or disproving previously contestable hypotheses. Yet there is always the risk of siloing, of not being able to see "the wood from the trees". To that end, there has been a lot more cross-disciplinary work done this century. However, as I mentioned earlier, overviews tend not to be "scientific". If an idea does not generate potential experiments or observations to prove or disprove, then it falls into that most reviled of intellectual weastepaper baskets - philosophy :) Ideas without practicality or consequence.

Yet grand overviews can give us a sense of meaning and purpose. They can make us happier, more content. This is why people claim that science is not spiritual, or even anti-spiritual. Ironically, many scientists have strong spiritual feelings about the nature they study, but they only speak of it in informal settings, never when they are educating.

Yes, Sherrington mentioned above is quite possibly an example of that. For me Maria Popva seems to have it, “Wonder, Sherrington argues, is the appropriate mood with which to approach the workings of our improbable planet and their echo in the workings of the exquisite cathedral of chemistry and chance that is a human being. That is where traditional religions have both thrived and fallen short, emotionally compelling in their humanistic self-reference, yet limiting of wonder, which has to do with what lies beyond ourselves.”

We are too concerned with ourselves to look beyond, which is why we tend to anthropomorphise everything, and fail to take the whole dimension of life on our “improbable planet” into account. Terraforming Mars was of course the initial reason that Lovelock looked at the Earth so closely, and when you look into the complexity of climate science alone, you get the feeling that people are imagining terraforming to only take a manageable period of time, but our planet takes thousands of years.
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
George Carlin reckoned it was silly to think we could save the Earth. He figured the Earth will keep on doing fine, but we will be going away.

The idea of "primitives" is fun to think of in terms of stone axes in the Stone Age. The first stone axes were basically sharp shards of rock that the people found. Fast forward a few thousand years, and those stone axes are beautiful little works of art, meticulously flaked away to precise shapes, with a ridge at the bottom to allow them to be attached to spears. The latter would undoubteedly see the former as "primitive".

Looking at the extent of change made by humans over a relatively short time geologically, I think it's fair to say we are actually different. Our empowerment means we are change agents, as described above. I consider this as neither hypothesis nor theory, just bald observation.


George Carlin was right, but my used of the term primitive was more as a comparison, without denying the ancients proficiency in survival and even aesthetic appreciation. The problem with us being change agents is, as you probably agree, that we often do not know what we are doing with regard to interacting on a larger scale. Otherwise, we would have moved forward at a slower pace, and avoided much of the pollution we have caused. But then again, when you look how we ignored indigenous culture and their knowledge of their surroundings, it was typical for humankind to be arrogant about his “civilisation”.
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
You have the poetic side covered well here, so I'll add a view through a more prosaic lens. Everything is in a state of disequilibrium. This is good, otherwise nothing would happen and the universe would truly be "dead". The Earth, like another entity, is basically a mess of little imbalances all over the place. The Earth is constantly balancing and rebalancing under a constant spray of solar radiation. This causes the hydrated surface of the planet to bubble, and life is basically a complexified collection of such "bubbles".

I think that the poetic covers that it its mythology, which you can interpret as saying that the disequilibrium you mention is a part of life. Our path is a line between the extremes, and the dichotomy has to be balanced, but will pull one way and then the other. Yin and Yang have their demands on us, and it is recognition of that which helps us retaining stability in the storms that pull at us from all directions.
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
Yes, there were warnings. That's what people have always done via stories and myths handed down (and embellished) over generations, and it's what we are still doing. There's warnings everywhere. Climate change. Natural disasters. War. Economic downturns. Extinctions. Unemployment. Ecosystem breakdown. Crime. Inequality. Social division ... we humans are a pretty diligent bunch - or rather, we humans are diligent parts of the Earth, amongst other things :)

For the most part, it seems we are in furious agreement on this. Thanks for the topic, its one that is dear to me.

I think the problem, especially with the new storms on the horizon, is that we do need heed the lessons of the past, that balance is precarious and requires of us that we continually compensate, even out, and counterpoise, which the economic machine we have created is increasingly unable to do. The variability of cultures to do this has been reduced and monocultures compete with the same products, causing the multiplicity of sources to reduce. A new ice age or a significant warming of the northern hemisphere would sensitively reduce the availability of food resources, and the expertise in other parts of the world has been decimated. This possibility is hardly covered by experts, and yet they talk about terraforming … deluded.

Yes, I can tell that the topic is dear to you, it is nice to have such an exchange.
“Find someone who makes you realise three things:
One, that home is not a place, but a feeling.
Two, that time is not measured by a clock, but by moments.
And three, that heartbeats are not heard, but felt and shared.”
― Abhysheq Shukla
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Gaia

Post by Sy Borg »

Stoppelmann wrote: January 22nd, 2023, 4:50 am
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
Some academics scoff at Watts, but had some beautiful insights and he never fell into the holier-than-thou trap.

Our attempts at terraforming suffer from inexperience. The planet's been developing systems over billions of years, and the complexity builds over time. You'd need a helluva supercomputer to catch up, although I suspect that what AI achieves will always be, to some extent, a sketchy imitation of nature - just as imitations of pretty well anything will tend to fall short of the real thing.

Specialisation is a double-edged sword. It allows researchers to probe ever more deeply, and in greater detail, either confirming or disproving previously contestable hypotheses. Yet there is always the risk of siloing, of not being able to see "the wood from the trees". To that end, there has been a lot more cross-disciplinary work done this century. However, as I mentioned earlier, overviews tend not to be "scientific". If an idea does not generate potential experiments or observations to prove or disprove, then it falls into that most reviled of intellectual wastepaper baskets - philosophy :) Ideas without practicality or consequence.

Yet grand overviews can give us a sense of meaning and purpose. They can make us happier, more content. This is why people claim that science is not spiritual, or even anti-spiritual. Ironically, many scientists have strong spiritual feelings about the nature they study, but they only speak of it in informal settings, never when they are educating.

Yes, Sherrington mentioned above is quite possibly an example of that. For me Maria Popva seems to have it, “Wonder, Sherrington argues, is the appropriate mood with which to approach the workings of our improbable planet and their echo in the workings of the exquisite cathedral of chemistry and chance that is a human being. That is where traditional religions have both thrived and fallen short, emotionally compelling in their humanistic self-reference, yet limiting of wonder, which has to do with what lies beyond ourselves.”

We are too concerned with ourselves to look beyond, which is why we tend to anthropomorphise everything, and fail to take the whole dimension of life on our “improbable planet” into account. Terraforming Mars was of course the initial reason that Lovelock looked at the Earth so closely, and when you look into the complexity of climate science alone, you get the feeling that people are imagining terraforming to only take a manageable period of time, but our planet takes thousands of years.
Agree with Maria P. You need to have a busy, preoccupied mind to not appreciate the weirdness of reality. And it's not getting any less odd!


Stoppelmann wrote: January 22nd, 2023, 4:50 am
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
George Carlin reckoned it was silly to think we could save the Earth. He figured the Earth will keep on doing fine, but we will be going away.

The idea of "primitives" is fun to think of in terms of stone axes in the Stone Age. The first stone axes were basically sharp shards of rock that the people found. Fast forward a few thousand years, and those stone axes are beautiful little works of art, meticulously flaked away to precise shapes, with a ridge at the bottom to allow them to be attached to spears. The latter would undoubteedly see the former as "primitive".

Looking at the extent of change made by humans over a relatively short time geologically, I think it's fair to say we are actually different. Our empowerment means we are change agents, as described above. I consider this as neither hypothesis nor theory, just bald observation.


George Carlin was right, but my used of the term primitive was more as a comparison, without denying the ancients proficiency in survival and even aesthetic appreciation. The problem with us being change agents is, as you probably agree, that we often do not know what we are doing with regard to interacting on a larger scale. Otherwise, we would have moved forward at a slower pace, and avoided much of the pollution we have caused. But then again, when you look how we ignored indigenous culture and their knowledge of their surroundings, it was typical for humankind to be arrogant about his “civilisation”.
I worry about this on a practical level but not an existential one. No one - human nor animal - has ever had much clue about what's going on beyond practicalities. Billions of people lived and died believing that the Earth was surrounded by a dome of stars and that diseases were caused by evil spirits. Despite being pretty clueless, the Earth's life forms have come a long way in the last three billion years.

Stoppelmann wrote: January 22nd, 2023, 4:50 am
Sy Borg wrote: January 20th, 2023, 4:11 pm
Yes, there were warnings. That's what people have always done via stories and myths handed down (and embellished) over generations, and it's what we are still doing. There's warnings everywhere. Climate change. Natural disasters. War. Economic downturns. Extinctions. Unemployment. Ecosystem breakdown. Crime. Inequality. Social division ... we humans are a pretty diligent bunch - or rather, we humans are diligent parts of the Earth, amongst other things :)

For the most part, it seems we are in furious agreement on this. Thanks for the topic, its one that is dear to me.

I think the problem, especially with the new storms on the horizon, is that we do need heed the lessons of the past, that balance is precarious and requires of us that we continually compensate, even out, and counterpoise, which the economic machine we have created is increasingly unable to do. The variability of cultures to do this has been reduced and monocultures compete with the same products, causing the multiplicity of sources to reduce. A new ice age or a significant warming of the northern hemisphere would sensitively reduce the availability of food resources, and the expertise in other parts of the world has been decimated. This possibility is hardly covered by experts, and yet they talk about terraforming … deluded.

Yes, I can tell that the topic is dear to you, it is nice to have such an exchange.
Yes, our economic system resembles a house coming ever closer to falling down, with people desperately adding extra patches and struts to hold it up. In time, it will fail.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Gaia

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Stoppelmann wrote: January 22nd, 2023, 4:50 am I get weekly email digest of The Marginalian by Maria Popova (https://www.themarginalian.org)
Thanks for that link. I used to follow Brain Pickings, but lost the feed when it changed (I think). Now I'm following again, via RSS. 👍
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Stoppelmann
Premium Member
Posts: 847
Joined: December 14th, 2022, 2:01 am
Favorite Philosopher: Alan Watts
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Gaia

Post by Stoppelmann »

Pattern-chaser wrote: January 24th, 2023, 10:21 am
Stoppelmann wrote: January 22nd, 2023, 4:50 am I get weekly email digest of The Marginalian by Maria Popova (https://www.themarginalian.org)
Thanks for that link. I used to follow Brain Pickings, but lost the feed when it changed (I think). Now I'm following again, via RSS. 👍
You are very welcome ...
“Find someone who makes you realise three things:
One, that home is not a place, but a feeling.
Two, that time is not measured by a clock, but by moments.
And three, that heartbeats are not heard, but felt and shared.”
― Abhysheq Shukla
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021