Page 1 of 1

Are you satisfied about the accuracy of the content?

Posted: October 2nd, 2021, 3:04 am
by Sushan
This topic is about the October 2021 Philosophy Book of the Month, The Prepper's Medical Handbook by William W Forgey

I noticed some points in this book which are out of the standard and accepted practices as per my knowledge. Few of them are, giving CPR even before securing cervical spine (just because there is no breathing, and even before checking pulse) , ending primary survey after the assessment of circulation and including AVPU assessment in the focussed assessment, but not in the initial assessment, etc.

If anyone of you who read this book is with some professional medical knowledge and a practice, did you notice any more flaws like this? Are you happy about the accuracy of the content of this book?