For a specific patient, in very particular circumstances, it might not be about giving false hope, but simply not terrifying the patient for no good reason. For other patients, in other circumstances, the same conduct might even be criminally negligent. It's a judgement call; a very difficult and challenging judgement call, IMO.
Do words actually carry a big impact?
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
"Who cares, wins"
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2252
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
A patient should never be terrified by a clinician. Even a critical result is imminent it is important as well as ethical to keep the patient calm as far as possible. But it is the right of the patient to know the truth above everything else. A very bad message will initially break the patient, but eventually he/she will cope up with that. But it will be harder to accept the truth later when a patient is hyped with false hopes that were given to him for nothing else but to avoid him/her being terrified.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 9:18 amFor a specific patient, in very particular circumstances, it might not be about giving false hope, but simply not terrifying the patient for no good reason. For other patients, in other circumstances, the same conduct might even be criminally negligent. It's a judgement call; a very difficult and challenging judgement call, IMO.
– William James
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
As in the other topic, I have made my point, and now I will stop.
"Who cares, wins"
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2252
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
One may temporarily hold any amount of information thinking that it is done for the sake of the patient, to not make him panicked. But how can we choose the moment to reveal the rest of the information?Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 1:09 pm One of the skills a clinician needs is in 'bedside manner'. A good carer can tell the patient as much as they would want to know, holding back (maybe temporarily) on the rest of the bad news. This can be done without offering false hope.
As in the other topic, I have made my point, and now I will stop.
Let's say we mastered the art of giving only the necessary information without troubling a patient's mind. Even if we succeeded in not giving false hopes, how can we be sure that the patient did not get too much negative assumptions by our holding back of details?
– William James
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7984
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
There are clinicians who make a habit of describing the situation the worst possible way, with the thought being that the patient will on average do better than what was predicted and thus the patient and their family will be happier with the outcome than if the actual outcome was predicted.Sushan wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 4:45 amIn vague and grey situations the tone of the voice of the clinician will give either reassurance or terror to the patient with the equal mmessage. When the clinician really cannot say whether the patient is in a critical stage or not, then it is fair enough to reassure the patient. But, yes, as soon as when the real situation is understood I think it is fair and ethical to inform it to the patient as well.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 15th, 2021, 1:41 amWell we are in agreement that one should never lie to a patient. Though an experienced clinician can easily deliver two truthful yet entirely opposite sounding summaries of identical information.Sushan wrote: ↑October 14th, 2021, 7:54 pmPresence of placebo effect is real. But I do not think of it as a measurable or predictable thing. People are different from each other, so is the placebo effect since that has lot to do with the mental component.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 10th, 2021, 4:53 pm
Several things:
First the placebo effect is real and been demonstrated objectively in research studies. Second, the placebo effect can even be documented when the patient is told they are receiving a sugar pill.
More to the actual point, communicating with patients, I agree with you that the effects of communication styles is small, thus they are less of an effect when the medical situation is serious and large when the patient is healthy. Obviously the latter situation is much more frequent than the former.
I am not saying that communication is less effective. Medical personnel are tested for their polite conversing ability with patients for a reason. A patient must be felt reassured when a medical professional is caring for him. But I think that conversation should only contain the truth, and revealing that truth with the least negative effect to the patient is the real skill that any medical professional should develop.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 1:09 pm One of the skills a clinician needs is in 'bedside manner'. A good carer can tell the patient as much as they would want to know, holding back (maybe temporarily) on the rest of the bad news. This can be done without offering false hope.
As in the other topic, I have made my point, and now I will stop.
Ah, now you approach the core of this issue. A significant part of the healer's expertise is in people-skills. The questions you ask are difficult ones, difficult to answer, too. They can be answered, in practice in the real world, but it takes skill and judgement to do it well. A healer is not just someone who knows all about disease and pharmacy.Sushan wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 11:59 pm One may temporarily hold any amount of information thinking that it is done for the sake of the patient, to not make him panicked. But how can we choose the moment to reveal the rest of the information?
Let's say we mastered the art of giving only the necessary information without troubling a patient's mind. Even if we succeeded in not giving false hopes, how can we be sure that the patient did not get too much negative assumptions by our holding back of details?
"Who cares, wins"
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2252
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
I am sorry but I do not think any clinician with a sane mind would do such a thing unless he/she is having some agenda for popularity or to be named as a saint. And I have never seen such a practice from any clinician throughout my short career in medicine so far.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 3:42 amThere are clinicians who make a habit of describing the situation the worst possible way, with the thought being that the patient will on average do better than what was predicted and thus the patient and their family will be happier with the outcome than if the actual outcome was predicted.Sushan wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 4:45 amIn vague and grey situations the tone of the voice of the clinician will give either reassurance or terror to the patient with the equal mmessage. When the clinician really cannot say whether the patient is in a critical stage or not, then it is fair enough to reassure the patient. But, yes, as soon as when the real situation is understood I think it is fair and ethical to inform it to the patient as well.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 15th, 2021, 1:41 amWell we are in agreement that one should never lie to a patient. Though an experienced clinician can easily deliver two truthful yet entirely opposite sounding summaries of identical information.Sushan wrote: ↑October 14th, 2021, 7:54 pm
Presence of placebo effect is real. But I do not think of it as a measurable or predictable thing. People are different from each other, so is the placebo effect since that has lot to do with the mental component.
I am not saying that communication is less effective. Medical personnel are tested for their polite conversing ability with patients for a reason. A patient must be felt reassured when a medical professional is caring for him. But I think that conversation should only contain the truth, and revealing that truth with the least negative effect to the patient is the real skill that any medical professional should develop.
It is good to predict and expect the worst possible and act accordingly. But this sort of a behaviour is unacceptable.
– William James
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2252
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
A healer should be thorough about his field, diseases and pharmacy. But along with that he should understand his clients, humans. And we should keep in mind that a healer too is a human. He can take calculated decisions, but as of any other's decisions these ones too can possibly become wrong or bad ones. As I previously mentioned holding back details can give a wrong impression to the patient. But at the same time over-reassurance will give false hopes. The balance between these two should be gained somehow and that is what a clinician should practise.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 8:53 amPattern-chaser wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 1:09 pm One of the skills a clinician needs is in 'bedside manner'. A good carer can tell the patient as much as they would want to know, holding back (maybe temporarily) on the rest of the bad news. This can be done without offering false hope.
As in the other topic, I have made my point, and now I will stop.Ah, now you approach the core of this issue. A significant part of the healer's expertise is in people-skills. The questions you ask are difficult ones, difficult to answer, too. They can be answered, in practice in the real world, but it takes skill and judgement to do it well. A healer is not just someone who knows all about disease and pharmacy.Sushan wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 11:59 pm One may temporarily hold any amount of information thinking that it is done for the sake of the patient, to not make him panicked. But how can we choose the moment to reveal the rest of the information?
Let's say we mastered the art of giving only the necessary information without troubling a patient's mind. Even if we succeeded in not giving false hopes, how can we be sure that the patient did not get too much negative assumptions by our holding back of details?
– William James
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7984
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
Well your short career experience notwithstanding, I have observed this firsthand. True it was in the 90s and the practitioner was retirement age at the time.Sushan wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 11:58 amI am sorry but I do not think any clinician with a sane mind would do such a thing unless he/she is having some agenda for popularity or to be named as a saint. And I have never seen such a practice from any clinician throughout my short career in medicine so far.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 3:42 amThere are clinicians who make a habit of describing the situation the worst possible way, with the thought being that the patient will on average do better than what was predicted and thus the patient and their family will be happier with the outcome than if the actual outcome was predicted.Sushan wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 4:45 amIn vague and grey situations the tone of the voice of the clinician will give either reassurance or terror to the patient with the equal mmessage. When the clinician really cannot say whether the patient is in a critical stage or not, then it is fair enough to reassure the patient. But, yes, as soon as when the real situation is understood I think it is fair and ethical to inform it to the patient as well.
It is good to predict and expect the worst possible and act accordingly. But this sort of a behaviour is unacceptable.
Second issue, are you in a surgical field? The communication tone is very different from that of medical fields (and what I described was recommended by a surgeon).
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2252
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
Yes, I was basically in surgical field but currently I am working generally in both surgical and medical fields. I am not sure whether the communication will be different depending on the speciality, since what we do is dealing with patients and illnesses, and despite the speciality the patients and their expectations are almost the same. So we have to tackle with them carefully.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 7:09 pmWell your short career experience notwithstanding, I have observed this firsthand. True it was in the 90s and the practitioner was retirement age at the time.Sushan wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 11:58 amI am sorry but I do not think any clinician with a sane mind would do such a thing unless he/she is having some agenda for popularity or to be named as a saint. And I have never seen such a practice from any clinician throughout my short career in medicine so far.LuckyR wrote: ↑October 20th, 2021, 3:42 amThere are clinicians who make a habit of describing the situation the worst possible way, with the thought being that the patient will on average do better than what was predicted and thus the patient and their family will be happier with the outcome than if the actual outcome was predicted.Sushan wrote: ↑October 19th, 2021, 4:45 am
In vague and grey situations the tone of the voice of the clinician will give either reassurance or terror to the patient with the equal mmessage. When the clinician really cannot say whether the patient is in a critical stage or not, then it is fair enough to reassure the patient. But, yes, as soon as when the real situation is understood I think it is fair and ethical to inform it to the patient as well.
It is good to predict and expect the worst possible and act accordingly. But this sort of a behaviour is unacceptable.
Second issue, are you in a surgical field? The communication tone is very different from that of medical fields (and what I described was recommended by a surgeon).
– William James
- Formless777
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: October 22nd, 2021, 2:24 am
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
As an experienced patient I agree. Many patients want to participate in their treatment whether it's invasive or medical.Yes, I was basically in surgical field but currently I am working generally in both surgical and medical fields. I am not sure whether the communication will be different depending on the speciality, since what we do is dealing with patients and illnesses, and despite the speciality the patients and their expectations are almost the same. So we have to tackle with them carefully.
Obviously there is a large power imbalance between medic and patient. **Surgeons' and physicians' tone of voice or choice of words can intimidate a patient who may seek information or to express his feelings.The clinician should be truthful but avoid bullying or patronising. Proper training of medics should include useful phrases such as "Is there anything you want to tell me /know? " " How do you feel about this?" " Here is what I said in a short list / leaflet to help you to remember it all." (producing a well written leaflet in the appropriate language and reading over it with patient, soliciting comments from the P to make reasonably sure the P understands and has sufficient memory to carry out instructions.) Non-compliance is both expensive and unhealthy and these simple techniques don't take up an inordinate amount of time or money.'
In multilingual countries such as the USA it's especially important for clinicians to learn good diction, and also engage a proficient interpreter if needed.
** Not only an imbalance of knowledge but often social status too.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
You don't acknowledge the existence of social skills, then? The skills that allow people to judge their audience (whether of one or many), and to put across their message in a way that does not offend or annoy? I am quite deficient in these skills, but some people are so skilled it's almost magical. These skills exist, and they are what is required in answer to your post , I think.Formless777 wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2021, 4:51 am There is something to be said for a good bedside manner. If you think that certain people will not assume that you are being condescending to them whatever you say, then you underestimate human stupidity and tetchiness. What is most important is to tell the truth as you understand it, as clearly as you know how in cases of medical information.
"Who cares, wins"
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: June 12th, 2021, 9:29 pm
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
. Because, words are the only stuff which our logical mind can understand.
. Unless, one goes beyond mind ... you will never understand that which is wordless ... that which cannot be contained by any word(s) ... because you will never be able to understand anything more other than words and jargon.
. Unless, one becomes a meditator ... one will never understand the blessings that existence is to pour on ones' being. And that experience of awe is the unnameable ... that experience of God is the indescribable.
. People live a life immersed into a pseudo-flow of words.
. And Life is not words. Words are part of the logical mind ... which in turn is an infinitesimal segment of Life.
. Before our cunning mind has entered into this universe ... which does not represent more than 3 min of this world history, if we condense it in a timeframe of 12 hours ... Life was; existence was ... This whole quintessence was already celebrating the dance of Life.
. Not that people contain words; words contain people.
. Not that people master the mind; the mind masters people.
. We cannot control our own mental responses to that which is surround us ... due to our own prejudices, which ultimately are born out of the ego.
. That is why different words mean different things for different people.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Do words actually carry a big impact?
...and what of our illogical minds? Logic is something we employ only occasionally, not consistently. That's just how humans are. Words carry meaning, in an approximate way. Words are what we use because we don't have telepathy. They work surprisingly well, but they are far from perfect.Anand_Haqq wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2021, 1:50 pm . Yes.
. Because, words are the only stuff which our logical mind can understand.
Words often carry a HUGE impact. At other times, they carry much less impact. It varies according to what we are trying to communicate with those words, I think.
"Who cares, wins"
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023