The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Use this forum to discuss the March 2022 Philosophy Book of the Month, My Enemy in Vietnam by Billy Springer
User avatar
bilpol
New Trial Member
Posts: 1
Joined: March 26th, 2022, 2:15 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by bilpol »

Cats have a third eyelid, or nictitating membrane, in the inner corner of the eye, which is also covered by the conjunctiva. The cat third eyelid gives them an extra level of protection:
ernestm
Posts: 433
Joined: March 5th, 2018, 4:27 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by ernestm »

Sushan wrote: March 21st, 2022, 2:27 pm
ernestm wrote: March 20th, 2022, 3:57 am
Sushan wrote: March 19th, 2022, 10:33 pm
ernestm wrote: March 18th, 2022, 3:56 am
If I may extend that thought, there are a number of colloquial examples of linguistic differences between Western rationalists and African American speakers. Most notably perhaps is that a double negative emphasizes negativity rather than evaluate as a positive, viz. 'there ain't no more that can be said.' This results in many anomalies of thought regarding antonyms.

If the writer is sufficiently aware of the cultural differences in linguistic practices, the paradox could even be intentional.
Seemingly the concept of 'double negative' has become arbitrary and being used wrong nowadays. As far as I know, a double negative will provide a positive answer. But I have seen many occasions where it is used to convey a "NO".

Eg: I don't have nothing to say

This should mean (grammatically) that I have something to say. But this is used often to say that I have nothing to say. I am not sure whether this is due to differences in linguistics practices. But it is seen more and more today. Seemingly the care for grammar is growing less and less by day by day.
Oh, it is a long standing observation of African American vernacular that a double negative acts as emphasis, and has been enjoyed so much one now hears white people using it occasionally. It was first observed last cetnruty that it could account for why African Americans perform less well on comprehension tests, but the research was banned as racist after some outbreaks of violence at conferences discussing the issue.
I am not a racist. And I am not against making a language simpler. All the grammar and spelling makes it difficult to learn a language. But it is necessary to have some agreement when a language is used. If I understand the total opposite of what you say, how can we communicate with each other. And when it is put into thought, I don't see a way to emphasize a "NO" by saying it twice in a sentence. It will always be a "YES" to me.
Well its a little more complicated than that historically. The objection was to the Sapir Whorf hypothesis as being racist because it states that African American dialects create more widespread comprehension difficulties, because they are contrary to the rules of formal logic, and therefore, the definition of truth overall.
Good_Egg
Posts: 782
Joined: January 27th, 2022, 5:12 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Good_Egg »

One person doesn't speak good English, and we take it that he hasn't learned it properly yet. Two people don't speak good English, and it's a minority culture that we're supposed to respect...

The enemy of my enemy is someone I should be able to co-operate with because we have an interest in common. Friendship is something more than that.
"Opinions are fiercest.. ..when the evidence to support or refute them is weakest" - Druin Burch
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Sushan »

bilpol wrote: March 26th, 2022, 2:50 am Cats have a third eyelid, or nictitating membrane, in the inner corner of the eye, which is also covered by the conjunctiva. The cat third eyelid gives them an extra level of protection:
Although the response about cats and their third eyelid may seem unrelated to the original post at first glance, one could argue that it serves as a metaphor for the complex nature of human relationships and allegiances during times of conflict, such as in the case of Billy Springer in Vietnam.

The third eyelid in cats provides an additional layer of protection, much like how Billy Springer found a sense of security and belonging among the local Vietnamese population, rather than with his own comrades. This situation highlights how individual experiences and perspectives can shape our understanding of who we perceive as friends and foes, even in the most unexpected circumstances.

Racism, as mentioned in my original post, could indeed have driven Billy Springer to reconsider his allegiances, revealing that the lines between friends and enemies can be blurred by deeply ingrained biases and prejudices. The metaphor of the cat's third eyelid serves as a reminder of the need for extra layers of understanding and empathy in navigating complex human relationships, especially during times of conflict and division.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Sushan »

ernestm wrote: March 26th, 2022, 6:14 am
Sushan wrote: March 21st, 2022, 2:27 pm
ernestm wrote: March 20th, 2022, 3:57 am
Sushan wrote: March 19th, 2022, 10:33 pm

Seemingly the concept of 'double negative' has become arbitrary and being used wrong nowadays. As far as I know, a double negative will provide a positive answer. But I have seen many occasions where it is used to convey a "NO".

Eg: I don't have nothing to say

This should mean (grammatically) that I have something to say. But this is used often to say that I have nothing to say. I am not sure whether this is due to differences in linguistics practices. But it is seen more and more today. Seemingly the care for grammar is growing less and less by day by day.
Oh, it is a long standing observation of African American vernacular that a double negative acts as emphasis, and has been enjoyed so much one now hears white people using it occasionally. It was first observed last cetnruty that it could account for why African Americans perform less well on comprehension tests, but the research was banned as racist after some outbreaks of violence at conferences discussing the issue.
I am not a racist. And I am not against making a language simpler. All the grammar and spelling makes it difficult to learn a language. But it is necessary to have some agreement when a language is used. If I understand the total opposite of what you say, how can we communicate with each other. And when it is put into thought, I don't see a way to emphasize a "NO" by saying it twice in a sentence. It will always be a "YES" to me.
Well its a little more complicated than that historically. The objection was to the Sapir Whorf hypothesis as being racist because it states that African American dialects create more widespread comprehension difficulties, because they are contrary to the rules of formal logic, and therefore, the definition of truth overall.
It's important to acknowledge that language and its usage evolve over time, often reflecting the cultural, social, and historical contexts in which it is spoken. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which posits that the structure of a language influences the way its speakers perceive and understand the world, has indeed been a controversial topic. However, rather than viewing linguistic differences as inherently negative or limiting, we can instead appreciate the richness and diversity they bring to human communication and thought.

Regarding the use of double negatives in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other dialects, it is essential to recognize that the rules and conventions of one dialect or language do not necessarily apply universally. While it may be challenging for some to understand and accept unconventional grammatical structures, this does not necessarily imply that the speakers of such dialects are less capable of comprehension or logical thinking. Instead, it reflects the diverse ways in which human beings express themselves and engage with the world around them.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Sushan »

Good_Egg wrote: March 28th, 2022, 6:59 pm One person doesn't speak good English, and we take it that he hasn't learned it properly yet. Two people don't speak good English, and it's a minority culture that we're supposed to respect...

The enemy of my enemy is someone I should be able to co-operate with because we have an interest in common. Friendship is something more than that.
It's essential to differentiate between language proficiency, dialects, and cultural differences when discussing communication and interpersonal relationships. While it's true that language plays a significant role in connecting people and fostering mutual understanding, we must also recognize that friendship and cooperation extend beyond linguistic barriers.

The ancient proverb, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," suggests that shared interests or common goals can bring people together, even if they may not have been allies under other circumstances. In the case of Billy Springer, it appears that he found common ground with the Vietnamese people due to their shared experiences of racial discrimination. This connection transcended linguistic and cultural barriers, allowing for a sense of camaraderie and understanding.

It's crucial not to conflate linguistic proficiency with cultural respect or understanding. Just because someone may not speak "good English" does not mean they are incapable of forming deep connections or establishing cooperative relationships with others. The diversity of human languages and dialects reflects the richness and complexity of human experience, and embracing these differences can lead to a more inclusive and harmonious society.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
ernestm
Posts: 433
Joined: March 5th, 2018, 4:27 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by ernestm »

Sushan wrote: May 2nd, 2023, 9:16 am
ernestm wrote: March 26th, 2022, 6:14 am
Sushan wrote: March 21st, 2022, 2:27 pm
ernestm wrote: March 20th, 2022, 3:57 am
Oh, it is a long standing observation of African American vernacular that a double negative acts as emphasis, and has been enjoyed so much one now hears white people using it occasionally. It was first observed last cetnruty that it could account for why African Americans perform less well on comprehension tests, but the research was banned as racist after some outbreaks of violence at conferences discussing the issue.
I am not a racist. And I am not against making a language simpler. All the grammar and spelling makes it difficult to learn a language. But it is necessary to have some agreement when a language is used. If I understand the total opposite of what you say, how can we communicate with each other. And when it is put into thought, I don't see a way to emphasize a "NO" by saying it twice in a sentence. It will always be a "YES" to me.
Well its a little more complicated than that historically. The objection was to the Sapir Whorf hypothesis as being racist because it states that African American dialects create more widespread comprehension difficulties, because they are contrary to the rules of formal logic, and therefore, the definition of truth overall.
It's important to acknowledge that language and its usage evolve over time, often reflecting the cultural, social, and historical contexts in which it is spoken. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which posits that the structure of a language influences the way its speakers perceive and understand the world, has indeed been a controversial topic. However, rather than viewing linguistic differences as inherently negative or limiting, we can instead appreciate the richness and diversity they bring to human communication and thought.

Regarding the use of double negatives in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other dialects, it is essential to recognize that the rules and conventions of one dialect or language do not necessarily apply universally. While it may be challenging for some to understand and accept unconventional grammatical structures, this does not necessarily imply that the speakers of such dialects are less capable of comprehension or logical thinking. Instead, it reflects the diverse ways in which human beings express themselves and engage with the world around them.
Of course, experimental results demonstrating the correlation empirically have no relevance, lol,

I quote Neil De Grasse Tyson, actually simplified it, because it was too long to read for most people

Reason is irrelevant to opinions that were not reached by reason.


The administrator has completely blocked my sharing of any external link whatsoever, so I will not be visiting here again. Good bye and good luck.
Good_Egg
Posts: 782
Joined: January 27th, 2022, 5:12 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Good_Egg »

Sushan wrote: May 2nd, 2023, 9:18 am The ancient proverb, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," suggests that shared interests or common goals can bring people together, even if they may not have been allies under other circumstances.
Depends on what you mean by "bring people together".

The classic example is allying with Soviet Russia to defeat Nazi Germany.

The Soviet system was a ghastly tyranny. Nobody should approve of it, embrace it, feel deep respect for it, appreciate it as part of the richness of human experience, or any other woolly-minded we're-all-wonderful-underneath cliche.

It was necessary to work with it to defeat a greater or more proximate evil, and that's all.

There is a wider gap between "ally" and "friend" than you seem willing to admit.
"Opinions are fiercest.. ..when the evidence to support or refute them is weakest" - Druin Burch
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Sushan »

ernestm wrote: May 6th, 2023, 2:32 am
Sushan wrote: May 2nd, 2023, 9:16 am
ernestm wrote: March 26th, 2022, 6:14 am
Sushan wrote: March 21st, 2022, 2:27 pm

I am not a racist. And I am not against making a language simpler. All the grammar and spelling makes it difficult to learn a language. But it is necessary to have some agreement when a language is used. If I understand the total opposite of what you say, how can we communicate with each other. And when it is put into thought, I don't see a way to emphasize a "NO" by saying it twice in a sentence. It will always be a "YES" to me.
Well its a little more complicated than that historically. The objection was to the Sapir Whorf hypothesis as being racist because it states that African American dialects create more widespread comprehension difficulties, because they are contrary to the rules of formal logic, and therefore, the definition of truth overall.
It's important to acknowledge that language and its usage evolve over time, often reflecting the cultural, social, and historical contexts in which it is spoken. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which posits that the structure of a language influences the way its speakers perceive and understand the world, has indeed been a controversial topic. However, rather than viewing linguistic differences as inherently negative or limiting, we can instead appreciate the richness and diversity they bring to human communication and thought.

Regarding the use of double negatives in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) and other dialects, it is essential to recognize that the rules and conventions of one dialect or language do not necessarily apply universally. While it may be challenging for some to understand and accept unconventional grammatical structures, this does not necessarily imply that the speakers of such dialects are less capable of comprehension or logical thinking. Instead, it reflects the diverse ways in which human beings express themselves and engage with the world around them.
Of course, experimental results demonstrating the correlation empirically have no relevance, lol,

I quote Neil De Grasse Tyson, actually simplified it, because it was too long to read for most people

Reason is irrelevant to opinions that were not reached by reason.


The administrator has completely blocked my sharing of any external link whatsoever, so I will not be visiting here again. Good bye and good luck.
Your reference to Neil De Grasse Tyson's quote raises an interesting point about the role of reason in forming opinions, particularly in relation to the discussion about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and the use of double negatives in African American Vernacular English (AAVE).

Indeed, reason plays a crucial role in our understanding and interpretation of the world. However, it's also important to note that our perceptions and opinions are shaped by a multitude of factors beyond reason, including our cultural, social, and linguistic backgrounds. The way we perceive and interpret language is one such factor.

With regards to the use of double negatives in AAVE and other dialects, our understanding or opinion of it might be influenced by our own linguistic background and the norms and conventions we're accustomed to. If we approach it purely from a logical or grammatical perspective, it might seem counterintuitive or even incorrect. However, if we consider it in the context of the cultural and linguistic traditions from which it arises, we might come to appreciate it as a valid and meaningful form of expression.

In this sense, the quote you've provided might be seen as an invitation to reflect on the ways in which our opinions about language are formed, and the role of reason, cultural context, and personal bias in shaping these opinions.

I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this. How do you think our linguistic backgrounds influence our perceptions and opinions about language? Can reason and cultural understanding coexist in our interpretation of linguistic phenomena like double negatives in AAVE?
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
Bright U
Premium Member
Posts: 11
Joined: May 22nd, 2023, 7:22 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Bright U »

Racism took men to unimaginable extents in those days. For Billy, at the time, it made more sense to align with his allies than with his comrades. The idea that the enemy of my enemy is my friend is a complex concept because the enemy of your enemy may turn out to not really be your friend.
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Sushan »

Good_Egg wrote: May 24th, 2023, 4:14 am
Sushan wrote: May 2nd, 2023, 9:18 am The ancient proverb, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," suggests that shared interests or common goals can bring people together, even if they may not have been allies under other circumstances.
Depends on what you mean by "bring people together".

The classic example is allying with Soviet Russia to defeat Nazi Germany.

The Soviet system was a ghastly tyranny. Nobody should approve of it, embrace it, feel deep respect for it, appreciate it as part of the richness of human experience, or any other woolly-minded we're-all-wonderful-underneath cliche.

It was necessary to work with it to defeat a greater or more proximate evil, and that's all.

There is a wider gap between "ally" and "friend" than you seem willing to admit.
Your response brings up a very pertinent point about the distinction between "ally" and "friend," and the potential danger of conflating the two. Indeed, while alliances can be formed out of necessity or shared interests, this does not necessarily imply a deeper bond or mutual respect, as the term "friend" might suggest.

The case of the alliance between the Allies and Soviet Russia during World War II that you've mentioned provides a stark illustration of this distinction. While they joined forces to defeat a common enemy, their ideologies and political systems were fundamentally at odds. This alliance was strategic and pragmatic, rather than a reflection of mutual affection or shared values.

Your point highlights the importance of maintaining a nuanced understanding of relationships, particularly in the political and international spheres. The adage "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" may be a useful heuristic in certain contexts, but it oversimplifies the complexities of these relationships and the motivations underlying them.

This leads to some interesting questions for further discussion. For instance, what does it mean for two parties to be truly "friends," in the context of international relations or politics? Can shared opposition to a common enemy ever form the basis for a more lasting or meaningful relationship? And how should we navigate the ethical implications of allying with parties whose values or practices we fundamentally disagree with? I'm interested to hear your thoughts on these matters.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
Good_Egg
Posts: 782
Joined: January 27th, 2022, 5:12 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by Good_Egg »

I'm imagining an RAF officer and a Soviet pilot interned in the same Nazi prisoner of war camp.

Seems to me that they could become real friends.

Because the circumstances would strip away much of their different cultural contexts. And they might well find in each other something to like and admire, that goes beyond a solidarity in the face of their common enemy.

But I'd guess that, re-encountering each other after the war, that friendship would be strained. Re-united with their separate cultures, and with no common enemy, they would see a different side of each other.

Culture gives us role models for behaviour. And while we're more than the roles we play, those roles do rub off on us. I want to assert both that a person is more than their roles & culture, and that they are not independent of their roles and culture.
"Opinions are fiercest.. ..when the evidence to support or refute them is weakest" - Druin Burch
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: The enemy of my enemy is my friend

Post by LuckyR »

Bright U wrote: May 25th, 2023, 1:28 am Racism took men to unimaginable extents in those days. For Billy, at the time, it made more sense to align with his allies than with his comrades. The idea that the enemy of my enemy is my friend is a complex concept because the enemy of your enemy may turn out to not really be your friend.
The enemy of your enemy make have a similar interest to your's, but friendship depends on a lot more than sharing a common interest.
"As usual... it depends."
Post Reply

Return to “My Enemy in Vietnam by Billy Springer”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021