Wilson wrote:That's an incredibly confused and paranoid post, Supine.
Eh, no. And off the online discussion boards like this, ethnic Black-American men in face-to-face discussion with me comprehend my points and agree with them. The recent Oregon court ruling stating the DMV must list a man (white in this case) as identitfying as non-binary as neither male nor female has not helped the American case with its covert war on black males known as The War on Drugs. Those black males I speak with comprehend easily that if crack cocaine was said to cause one to think he or she is neither male nor female and to cross dress if they were born biologically male, that the American empire would use that as evidence
for a need to keep crack cocaine illegal and to criminalize drug addiction.
See, the empire kept claiming Martin Luther King Jr. was right about "Judge me not by the color of my skin but by the content of my character." But as is becoming evident the empire while condemning black males for X thing eventually will approve of X thing for whites. Moving the bar or line. So, the "character" thing becomes meaningless. We are seeing that now with the drug addiction issue plaguing more upper-middle-class whites. The media is doing for them what they did for the LGBTQ. Humanizing them. Giving them full human character stories. But that was not done for impoverished whites (collateral damage in the war on black males) and black males.
Albeit, ethnic Black-Americans like selling out black males for trinkets, similar to what black Africans did during the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade. So, Obama or Hilary offering mass numbers of Black-Americans something like more hours per month on their "Obama phones" should be enough to shut them up if they ever start opening their mouths. That old yarn about "We have to pick the lesser of the two evils among the political parties."
What I'm saying is drug addiction will become accepted and lose much of its stigma along the same way male homosexuality became mainstream and accepted. That is: Not by Black-Americans accepting it first
, but rather by white Americans in the middle, upper-middle, and upper-class accepting it first.
The War on Drugs will becoming to an end because upper-middle-class white Americans with wives, daughters, sons, brothers hooked on opiates will bring it to an end.
Drug addiction unlike homosexuality, transsexualism, and the growing popularity of gender-queer will never become totally "cool" like these sexual identities because drug addiction often (not always) comes with some dysfunction in personal life and economic problems. Nonetheless, views about it will greatly change.
So, 20 years or so from now some white woman will be happy to date some IV heroin addicted, gender-queer white man, dressed in women's clothing, that's agnostic but regards himself as "spiritually" Muslim, who advances in the ranks of the US Army while struggling to do 15 push-ups, switching his hips in front of his son, and frequently expressing his disdain for Russians. Black-American women will be head-over-heels for such a white man too.
So, 20 years from now heroin addiction, speaking bad about heroin addicts will get you attacked
verbally with sheer disdain and contempt like speaking bad about homosexuals today.
Just like this new Oregon court ruling is going to have Americans tripping over themselves to come up with another explanation (lie) for how an American human can be born neither male nor female even though he looks like a man, has a Y chromosome, produces sperm, and impregnated a woman. Your allies in the sciences will get to working hard to help confirm your narrative through scientific research and data. And thus confirm such a human is not male nor even female. Many in biology will keep silent because they support the political goals, just as those in their field before them kept silent because they supported the goals of the Nazis.
People in the sciences once tried to find a gene for alcoholism and one for drug addiction just as they once tried to find one for homosexuality. But genetic determinism has lost some steam, but not entirely, they will need to use it to explain and persuade Americans for the new gender-queer thing.
-- Updated June 19th, 2016, 10:30 pm to add the following --
It would help if you were familiar with Alcoholics Anonymous and its various literature and meetings rather than knowing nothing at all about it but thinking you do.
AA unlike the Catholic Church is the last bastion of personal responsibility left in the West.
You probably think I mean that as applying to homosexuality, when I really don't. That you don't know just provides further evidence of the moral collapse in the USA.
My liberal Catholic mother once responded to me, "Oh! But we pray for drug addicts all the time in mass."
That's a Catholic mass. Prayers. Yet, the drug addict, the car theif, the Wall Street liar, the murderer... no one is instructed to change let alone taught how to change.
AA believes itself to teach a person how to change. How to change their drug addictive ways. And it's purely "Old School." Almost an entire meeting in AA is the addict talking about and discovering their personal flaws.
This is why AA has such a bad success rate, and so does every known recovery program on planet earth.
The statistics for "success" in any recovery program on earth is laughable. LAUGHABLE. What's "success"? 1 year, 3 years, 20 years? Why don't some of you prejudiced people apply that same methodology of "success" to the recovery programs for homosexuality. A dude relapses into gay sex even after having married a woman, produced a child, and been living a heterosexual lifestyle for 10 years and you people would be jumping up and down in enthusiasm claiming his release is proof a gay man can't change his behaviors. Philip Seymour Hoffman a talented actor was drug clean and sober for OVER 20 years and the dude went back to using and eventually over dosed. So, what was the "success"?
Every person picking up drugs to use for the first time THINKS it's a matter of will power to stop using if they ever get addicted. That in fact is the gate way "drug." Not marijuana. Interesting they (American powerful) dismiss alcohol as a gateway drug. I hate marijuana. But I loved to drink. And I jumped from drinking to snorting heroin (never used long enough to get addicted), snorting cocaine, and then to smoking cocaine. To this day I dislike smoking marijuana, and have zero desire for it. I'd rather jog 6 miles than smoke weed.