In saying "there is no such thing as Climate Science" you seem to be saying that the scientific method is not applicable to the Earth's climate. Is it outrageous and dishonest of me to say that's what you seem to be say?!? How could I possibly conclude that you're saying anything else? But if you're not saying that, then by all means tell me what you are saying!!Given I believe something you concluded as to what I meant? Something I "seemed" to be saying is something I therefore must believe?
In post #65 you also accused me of dishonesty for saying things like this:Yet again, an example of your dishonesty.
In post #66 I addressed this accusation and conceded that the part about golf was a stretch. At no point did you mention golf. But I pointed out that you have in fact explicitly stated that you believe there is a very wide ranging global conspiracy involving numerous high profile people and groups to confiscate private property and immobilise us - i.e. to enslave us. You had no reply to what I said there. You just carried on.Apart from meaning that we're all victims of a global conspiracy to enslave or kill us involving most of the rich and powerful people in the world who all play golf together while hatching their dastardly plots.
Why do you continue to falsely accuse me of dishonesty? Will you ignore post #104 too?