The political field

Have philosophical discussions about politics, law, and government.
Featured Article: Definition of Freedom - What Freedom Means to Me
Man With Beard
Posts: 31
Joined: August 2nd, 2013, 11:08 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Man With Beard »

Terrapin Station wrote: October 11th, 2020, 10:41 am The reason that libertarians would retain a public police force, by the way, is that they believe that a police force is necessary to enforce the laws that libertarians retain, and they think that a private police force wouldn't be feasible because it would too easily be corrupted, so that it's not actually upholding the laws--it would only be enforcing what its owners want it to enforce.
However, libertarians do not believe that those who cannot afford policing services should get policing services - so even a "public" libertarian police force is not all that public.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 6227
Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
Location: NYC Man

Re: The political field

Post by Terrapin Station »

Man With Beard wrote: October 13th, 2020, 10:59 am
Terrapin Station wrote: October 11th, 2020, 10:41 am The reason that libertarians would retain a public police force, by the way, is that they believe that a police force is necessary to enforce the laws that libertarians retain, and they think that a private police force wouldn't be feasible because it would too easily be corrupted, so that it's not actually upholding the laws--it would only be enforcing what its owners want it to enforce.
However, libertarians do not believe that those who cannot afford policing services should get policing services - so even a "public" libertarian police force is not all that public.
That's not true (at least not overall). Where are you getting that from?
User avatar
Arjen
Posts: 467
Joined: January 16th, 2019, 4:53 am
Favorite Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

Re: The political field

Post by Arjen »

=====================================
Chapter 2
=====================================


I think that we should redefine the political field in this way:
1) Moderation on one side, where some laws exist to protect individual rights and create possibilities for everyone to enterprise and supply equality under the law.
2) Totalitarianism on the other side; be it by the state to suppress individual freedoms to protect the masses against the individual, or be it by enterprises, created by individuals in order to exploit the masses. Because both kinds have the same effect: every individual loses human rights, while being exploited by large enterprises, ruled over by some form of elite.

===========================================

What do all of you think?
The saying that what is true in theory is not always true in practice, means that the theory is wrong!
~Immanuel Kant
User avatar
h_k_s
Posts: 1243
Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: The political field

Post by h_k_s »

Arjen wrote: October 8th, 2020, 5:39 pm
h_k_s wrote: October 8th, 2020, 4:55 pm So are you impressed yet? Or do I need to throw more verbiage at you?

At any rate, Plato and Aristotle are our primary philosophical sources. Herodotus also summaries the pro's and con's of democracy versus monarchy in comparing the Athenians with the Persians.
I like your description. It is quite good in many ways. But, I am looking for an answer in my quest :) (see the above post).

Thanks in advance!
There is no one answer. There is only a long history of debate about it.

You have stumbled on a question that has no cut and dried answer.

There are several of these in philosophy, such as is there One God, Many Gods, or no gods. Aristotle determined that were around 45 or so Gods. It is a philosophical question due to the philosophical issues of First Cause, Prime Mover, etc.

But your question specifically has a plethora of proposals such as unlimited and limited direct democracy, unlimited and limited republican democracy, dictatorship, monarchy, etc.

You read Plato's "Republic" right? That's his answer: a philosophical republic.
User avatar
Arjen
Posts: 467
Joined: January 16th, 2019, 4:53 am
Favorite Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

Re: The political field

Post by Arjen »

h_k_s I did read politeia. You might want to read Zizek's "Did somebody say totalitarianism?" I think he defines the differences between a totalitarian and open/free society nicely.

How do you like my 2nd chapter question: a seperation betwern moderate and totalitarian governments (above)?
The saying that what is true in theory is not always true in practice, means that the theory is wrong!
~Immanuel Kant
Man With Beard
Posts: 31
Joined: August 2nd, 2013, 11:08 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Man With Beard »

Terrapin Station wrote: October 13th, 2020, 11:33 am
Man With Beard wrote: October 13th, 2020, 10:59 am

However, libertarians do not believe that those who cannot afford policing services should get policing services - so even a "public" libertarian police force is not all that public.
That's not true (at least not overall). Where are you getting that from?
From libertarians, including a libertarian philosophy professor. It certainly logically follows from the premises - it would be wrong to make someone pay taxes to provide police services to someone else.

I realize that there is a huge variety of specific libertarian beliefs, but they all seem to be against providing public services to those who cannot pay for them.
Man With Beard
Posts: 31
Joined: August 2nd, 2013, 11:08 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Man With Beard »

Terrapin Station wrote: October 13th, 2020, 11:33 am

That's not true (at least not overall). Where are you getting that from?
From libertarians, including a libertarian philosophy professor. It certainly logically follows from the premises - it would be wrong to make someone pay taxes to provide police services to someone else.

I realize that there is a huge variety of specific libertarian beliefs, but they all seem to be against providing public services to those who cannot pay for them - or they mix libertarianism with other ideologies.
User avatar
Arjen
Posts: 467
Joined: January 16th, 2019, 4:53 am
Favorite Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

Re: The political field

Post by Arjen »

Which is why identity politics is so destructive. Following the libertarian identity, a person would tend to go along with this idea (opening the way to repression by thugs). No one would agree to this if just thinking: "what will I do when a burglar points a gun at me"?
The saying that what is true in theory is not always true in practice, means that the theory is wrong!
~Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 6227
Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
Location: NYC Man

Re: The political field

Post by Terrapin Station »

Man With Beard wrote: October 14th, 2020, 4:54 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: October 13th, 2020, 11:33 am

That's not true (at least not overall). Where are you getting that from?
From libertarians, including a libertarian philosophy professor. It certainly logically follows from the premises - it would be wrong to make someone pay taxes to provide police services to someone else.

I realize that there is a huge variety of specific libertarian beliefs, but they all seem to be against providing public services to those who cannot pay for them - or they mix libertarianism with other ideologies.
So basically from two-three people you've talked to online.

Again, this is not at all the standard libertarian view. I've interacted with literally hundreds of libertarians and again I was involved with the US Libertarian party on a few different levels. I never ran into a single libertarian in that who felt that policing should hinge on being able to pay for it. The vast majority of Libertarians are in favor of a general fund (not necessarily achieved via taxes--alternatives include things like lotteries or other government business ventures, where a portion of the proceeds creates a general public fund) that pays for things like police, fire departments, court systems, emergency health care, etc., where access to those services is not at all dependent on being able to directly pay for them.

The standard libertarian view has jack$h|t to do with "following logically" from some overarching principle, as if we're worshipping a principle. It has to do with wanting much smaller government, much more personal freedom, in a practical manner.
User avatar
Arjen
Posts: 467
Joined: January 16th, 2019, 4:53 am
Favorite Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

Re: The political field

Post by Arjen »

I like that. In the end, politics is a way to make living together acceotible and doable for everyone. And yes, tbe more freedom, the better. But when needed, an extra law should be created. Practical.
The saying that what is true in theory is not always true in practice, means that the theory is wrong!
~Immanuel Kant
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Steve3007 »

Man With Beard wrote:...but they all seem to be against providing public services to those who cannot pay for them - or they mix libertarianism with other ideologies.
I think you're lumping different things together and calling them "public services" in a way that Libertarians would disagree with.

My understanding of Libertarianism, in general, is that it regards it as wrong to impose restrictions on people's freedoms unless it is to stop them from directly causing physical harm to others against their will, to protect property rights, to uphold freely entered contractual agreements and to protect and maintain commons. General principle: to stop people from using their freedom to infringe on the freedom of others. Taxation (the lawful, non-consensual confiscation of another person's lawfully acquired wealth) is one such imposition. Policing and judicial services are part of the system for enforcing those things. Therefore it's regarded as morally permissible to use taxation to fund them. Things like healthcare and education are not regarded as part of that system so it's not regarded as morally permissible to use taxation (or any other non-consensual confiscation of wealth or property) to fund them.

My own objections to Libertarianism have generally centred on the limited extent to which it recognizes various things as commons and its oversimplification of causal relationships between the things people are/aren't legally allowed to do and the wider, often long term and/or indirect, consequences for society as a whole. The notion that society, as a whole, is not a thing in itself but is a collective term for a bunch of individuals is often discussed in that context.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Steve3007 »

Error in the first sentence: "in a way that Libertarians would disagree with" - should read "wouldn't".
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Steve3007 »

Jeez I'm make a real mess of this post. If anyone's interested, please ignore the above correction. The first post was actually correct.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 6227
Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
Location: NYC Man

Re: The political field

Post by Terrapin Station »

Yeah, the reason that I left behind being a "party line Libertarian" is simply because I came to realize that a lot of people are in bad situations/dire straits/etc. for very complex reasons, where it's not a simple matter of wanting to get out of that situation and then they can get out of it, AND via feeling that it's not morally right for those people to be stuck in those bad situations/dire straits/etc. indefinitely, losing years of their life to that, just because we think they should be able to turn that around.

So while I'm still Libertarian in many respects, I'm no longer Libertarian in terms of broader economic/social structure issues.

But definitely very few Libertarians think that some people shouldn't have the benefit of police protection, fire departments, public court systems, etc.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The political field

Post by Steve3007 »

Terrapin Station wrote:Yeah, the reason that I left behind being a "party line Libertarian" is simply because I came to realize that a lot of people are in bad situations/dire straits/etc...
Have you ever discussed Libertarianism with GE Morton? I know you've discussed and disagreed on some other things but I don't remember seeing you discuss that. I ask because he seems to be what you describe as a "party line" Libertarian and has defended that brand of strict Libertarianism here several times.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Politics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021