As I have not seen something against double posting, I have reconsidered a thesis previously presented here and present its new form:
No one has the authority to claim one or more defendants guilty of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt because no one has the expertise [such as infallibility in at least one domain of knowledge, skill, education, training, or experience (1)] for such authority.
[1] Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702
Refutations to the allegation of criminal guilt (legal compatibilism)
-
Dennis Blewett
- Posts: 51
- Joined: February 7th, 2021, 7:46 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Madison, Wisconsin; U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Refutations to the allegation of criminal guilt (legal compatibilism)
- Dennis Francis Blewett
Upcoming Philosphy Books of the Month
Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022
Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022
My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022
2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022
The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022
What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022
The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022
Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)
The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022
Previous Philosophy Books of the Month
The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021
Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021
Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021
Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021
Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021
Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021
If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021
The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021
Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021
Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021