Refutations to the allegation of criminal guilt (legal compatibilism)
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: February 7th, 2021, 7:46 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
- Location: Madison, Wisconsin; U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Refutations to the allegation of criminal guilt (legal compatibilism)
As I have not seen something against double posting, I have reconsidered a thesis previously presented here and present its new form:
No one has the authority to claim one or more defendants guilty of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt because no one has the expertise [such as infallibility in at least one domain of knowledge, skill, education, training, or experience (1)] for such authority.
[1] Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702
No one has the authority to claim one or more defendants guilty of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt because no one has the expertise [such as infallibility in at least one domain of knowledge, skill, education, training, or experience (1)] for such authority.
[1] Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702
- Dennis Francis Blewett