The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.
This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.
Obviously one common/almost universal base criterion will be that the criminal has broken a law which we consider to be wrong by doing something that we consider to be right.
Yes.
I nominate Solzhenitsyn.
"Opinions are fiercest.. ..when the evidence to support or refute them is weakest" - Druin Burch
l don't have strong feelings about most in that list. Martin Luther King Jr. seems to have been a brave and good man who struggled to improve the lives of others. I don't know a lot about Gandhi but I understand that he was a hero of Indian independence and preached non-violence. So they'd both get a vote from me.
My own favourites? I quite like Robin Hood. Although he might be more mythical than historical, but I like his purported motive - rob from the rich to give to the poor.
And the Australian bushranger, Ned Kelly. He had a unfortunate childhood. And I like his nonchalance. On climbing the gallows he purportedly said," Oh, well. Such is life. And life is such. And after all it isn't much."
In modern times, maybe the great train-robber, Ronald Biggs. I like that he didn't injure anyone during his crime (as far as I know). And it was interesting how he managed to get lost and avoid arrest for so long.