I disagree. For reference, I am the OP (Original Poster).
This topic is explicitly and intentionally not about what "should" be done or "ought" to be done, whatever such things mean.
Thus, any mentions or arguments about 'shoulds' or 'oughts' are misdirected/off-topic.
The Original Post contains some very specific points and asks some clear understandable specific questions, none of which have anything to do with 'shoulds' or 'oughts'.
That is, of course, because I don't believe in 'shoulds' and 'oughts'. More on that can be found in my following topics:
- There is no "Is-Ought Problem" because there is no 'ought'.
- Do you agree there is no problem of evil?
- The Clarity of Amorality
- How Unassertiveness Leads to Aggression and the Illusion of 'Shoulds' and 'Oughts'
- Man Is Not Fit to Govern Man: My Philosophy of Non-Violence, Self-Government, Self-Discipline, and Spiritual Freedom