Ok, you speak somewhat on the macro level. Walk me through what you envision at the micro level. Say you meet a girl 75 years from now, she likes you, you get her pregnant the old fashioned way, she delivers a son. What do you propose happening differently in 75 years than that?Gregory A wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 7:41 am Consider Is male gendercide a prediction apparently being made by someone who is 1. A clairvoyant who can see this event transpiring in the future. 2. A megalomaniac type whose paranoia is being used to establish a following, 3. Some simple person who is not blinkered by any real ideological leanings noticing over a period of time a particular alignment of events, some direct some almost incidental, but still these leading to the same catastrophic outcome.
It would be impossible to simply predict an event that ends with the death of the last male on earth in some fifty to one hundred years time (that's without there being plenty to back that prediction up). But who would want all males dead anyhow? No one really apart from an unassociated minority of the public. So if it were to happen then 'what' would be behind that eventuation. It may be that something that has happened in Time simply needs to happen. The determinism thing. The future exists and even apparently unrelated things need to comply with what it dictates. If for example London Bridge is still standing in one hundred years' time it could hardly fall down tomorrow.
This gendercide thing started off as a projection. With plenty of things to derail it I'd thought. Not now as these things don't exist, never existed. Just the opposite. Which make sense if something is destined to happen. That is nothing could possibly stop it happening and many things would need to assist it happening. Fortunately, there is no real way to see the future and we can at least try to prevent such a negative outcome still.
The disbelief and denials are some of those things not stopping but instead assisting an ongoing gendercide.
Gendercide - Inevitable
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
When an abortion occurs the gender of the foetus is rarely known. So I do not know what you are on about.Gregory A wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 6:08 amSculptor1 wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 5:23 amGregory A wrote: ↑April 27th, 2022, 6:41 amWhen a conservative "kills a girl" it is murder, but when a Liberal "kills a girl" it's an abortion. A Please explain is in order.
And it is femicide in effect only. It is not an intentional elimination of a gender but instead a filter that allows extra males through.
Femicide "in effect" is exactly femicide. Femicide is a way to favour more boys. The intentional elimination of a gender to promote the other.
I asked you to cite evidence but you seem to have found none.
I think the thread contributors can take that as a none available.
It's femicide when a fetus bearing 'X' chromosomes is terminated but when both X or Y bearing fetuses are terminated it's abortion. You can't assign a gender to a fetus and then call it abortion. It is homocide not femicide.
Abortion is not homicide, they call it abortion for a reason.
There is nothing here that makes sufficient sense to comment on.
Whereas the elimination of all males on earth will be as a direct result of natural attrition. Age, disease, crime & accidents combining to eliminate the male. The gendercide process then in realty taking place without the breaking of any laws or violation of any ethics. The elimination of embryos bearing the 'Y' chromosome, which are not 'male' as that applies to a human being and the taking of a life under most circumstances is a crime.
What are you really trying to say.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: April 5th, 2022, 7:52 pm
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
The predicted status of all males in 75 years time will be that they are dead. If I should be the one who makes it through till then ( I will be 136 years) that's from my home in the wilds, it would be unlikely I should ever encounter a female anyhow. But regardless if it should happen nothing will come of it as I would have been castrated decades before that moment.LuckyR wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 11:46 amOk, you speak somewhat on the macro level. Walk me through what you envision at the micro level. Say you meet a girl 75 years from now, she likes you, you get her pregnant the old fashioned way, she delivers a son. What do you propose happening differently in 75 years than that?Gregory A wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 7:41 am Consider Is male gendercide a prediction apparently being made by someone who is 1. A clairvoyant who can see this event transpiring in the future. 2. A megalomaniac type whose paranoia is being used to establish a following, 3. Some simple person who is not blinkered by any real ideological leanings noticing over a period of time a particular alignment of events, some direct some almost incidental, but still these leading to the same catastrophic outcome.
It would be impossible to simply predict an event that ends with the death of the last male on earth in some fifty to one hundred years time (that's without there being plenty to back that prediction up). But who would want all males dead anyhow? No one really apart from an unassociated minority of the public. So if it were to happen then 'what' would be behind that eventuation. It may be that something that has happened in Time simply needs to happen. The determinism thing. The future exists and even apparently unrelated things need to comply with what it dictates. If for example London Bridge is still standing in one hundred years' time it could hardly fall down tomorrow.
This gendercide thing started off as a projection. With plenty of things to derail it I'd thought. Not now as these things don't exist, never existed. Just the opposite. Which makes sense if something is destined to happen. That is nothing could possibly stop it happening and many things would need to assist it happening. Fortunately, there is no real way to see the future and we can at least try to prevent such a negative outcome still.
The disbelief and denials are some of those things not stopping but instead assisting an ongoing gendercide.
You have predictably missed the point. Which in part was that those replying will be those who don't understand what it is being said. The rationale for this and something alluded to when my older brother had pointed out to me way back in the seventies which was that 'there should be 'very few melodies left to write'. That enacting as it does the 'rule of diminishing possibilities'. Which In relation to this forum is that although there are billions of potential forum members out there, all forums are destined to fade away because there are only limited applicable topics, and of those mostly have been covered and then these answered already. So, this gendercide thing fittingly being one of the last I would think. And by its nature something unpopular with the Left who should predominate among a dwindling group of hangers-on.
And you see the catch 22 is this maybe? That is consistent with it already being an outcome anything anyone may do to try prevent it from happening will be frustrated one way or another. A chronological protection sequence in action you might say. And if it may relate to probabilities, and those being around 99%, then there would only be a 1% chance of doing something to stop such a negative outcome. Best to keep on trying as maybe someone else will pick up on what I'm saying. Even one extra person acting exponentially in this battle.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: April 5th, 2022, 7:52 pm
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
Sculptor1 wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 4:30 pmWhen an abortion occurs the gender of the foetus is rarely known. So I do not know what you are on about.Gregory A wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 6:08 amSculptor1 wrote: ↑April 28th, 2022, 5:23 amGregory A wrote: ↑April 27th, 2022, 6:41 am
When a conservative "kills a girl" it is murder, but when a Liberal "kills a girl" it's an abortion. A Please explain is in order.
And it is femicide in effect only. It is not an intentional elimination of a gender but instead a filter that allows extra males through.
Femicide "in effect" is exactly femicide. Femicide is a way to favour more boys. The intentional elimination of a gender to promote the other.
I asked you to cite evidence but you seem to have found none.
I think the thread contributors can take that as a none available.
It's femicide when a fetus bearing 'X' chromosomes is terminated but when both X or Y bearing fetuses are terminated it's abortion. You can't assign a gender to a fetus and then call it abortion. It is homocide not femicide.
Abortion is not homicide, they call it abortion for a reason.
What 'I'm on about' is that if the gender of a fetus is not known that is an abortion, but if known it is femicide (in this instance). The problem then is by not knowing something a status can be sufficiently altered in some way so that it is not 'homicide' that's occurring.
Whereas the elimination of all males on earth will be as a direct result of natural attrition. Age, disease, crime & accidents combining to eliminate the male. The gendercide process then in realty taking place without the breaking of any laws or violation of any ethics. The elimination of embryos bearing the 'Y' chromosome, which are not 'male' as that applies to a human being and the taking of a life under most circumstances is a crime.
I'm saying the gendercide process is legal and not unethical and is also inevitable. There will be no males left in one hundred years. Even the museums of the future won't have any examples of them. The history books devoid of their mention after a new year zero had been declared. God the Mother the only god worshiped from then on. Males not even being tolerated as myths.There is nothing here that makes sufficient sense to comment on.
What are you really trying to say.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7091
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
There is no such thing as make gendercide.Gregory A wrote: ↑April 29th, 2022, 2:17 am I'm saying the gendercide process is legal and not unethical and is also inevitable. There will be no males left in one hundred years. Even the museums of the future won't have any examples of them. The history books devoid of their mention after a new year zero had been declared. God the Mother the only god worshiped from then on. Males not even being tolerated as myths.
THe rest of your comments seem confused and pleas for you to offer some evidence have fallen on deaf ears.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14992
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
Who or what predicted that nonsense?
You are basically saying that the entire human species will be on the verge of extinction in 75 years, yet you provide no evidence or even logical reasoning. DNA does not last forever. No amount of stored baby batter is going to save humanity long term if all men die out; there would also be massive unforeseen social consequences, given that the scale of such an extermination would be vastly greater than at any time in the history of Homo sapiens.
There's even less evidence for your claims than there are for a flat Earth.
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: February 6th, 2021, 5:27 am
Re: Gendercide - Inevitable
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023