Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

Philosophy Discussion Forums
A Humans-Only Philosophy Club

The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.

This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.


Have philosophical discussions about politics, law, and government.
Featured Article: Definition of Freedom - What Freedom Means to Me
User avatar
By Fried Egg
#465856
Quite simply, is Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) an example of the Orwelian concept of Doublespeak?
According to Wikipedia, “Doublespeak” is:
Doublespeak is language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g., "downsizing" for layoffs and "servicing the target" for bombing),[1] in which case it is primarily meant to make the truth sound more palatable. It may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning. In such cases, doublespeak disguises the nature of the truth.
It goes on to say:
The term "doublespeak" derives from two concepts in George Orwell's novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four, "doublethink" and "Newspeak", despite the term itself not being used in the novel.
So why do I suggest that we should view DEI as doublespeak? Because, it is a deliberate attempt to obscure and disguise the true intent and meaning of the framework that its advocates seek to establish.

They say they champion diversity but in its name seek to divide us into groups of different identities (and strengthen our awareness of such identities). They seek a diversity of representation from the various group identities whilst simultaneously seeking to silence diversity of opinion, to silence those considered to have a privileged group identity.

They speak of equity when in fact they are concerned only with equality of outcome, which necessitates deliberately treating people un-equally based on which group identity they belong to (i.e. affirmative action).

They talk of inclusion when in fact they mean exclusion of those who say things (or who’s mere presence) makes others feel unsafe or who state beliefs outside of the orthodoxy.

The words of “diversity”, “equity” and “inclusion” are all nice sounding, friendly words that are used to package up ideas and concepts (such as critical justice) in order to help them be easily accepted by the wider population, in order to claim the moral high ground and in order to claim that their detractors must be immoral (as surely you must be immoral if you oppose the concepts of diversity, equity or inclusion?) It is a movement that has attempted to put into practice ideas and philosophies quite apart from (and often in direct opposition to) the common place associations most people have with these words.

This is why I think DEI is an example of Doublespeak.
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#465865
This is a sign of the degradation of academic institutions. Once, the brief was (ostensibly) to teach people to think critically. Now critical thinking in academia is forbidden; one must follow the script or be "cancelled".
User avatar
By Mounce574
#465870
I agree that DEI is doublespeak. The fact that an unqualified person is hired based on any attribute (race, gender, religious, etc) instead of a qualified person that doesn't fit in the category is why we, in the United States at least, have so many things that are in lawsuits for negligence. I would much rather hire Bill the straight white guy who knows what he is doing instead of Muhammad from the Middle East that doesn't have a clue about what he is working on. (These are generalizations, so please don't consider this as being negative towards any one group).
In the book Caudacity, the author, John Falcone, states "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is Affirmative Action on steroids. DEI doesn’t elevate minorities with teaching or training to meet employment qualifications; no, DEI either reduces the employment qualifications until minorities qualify or prioritize their race over qualifications."
Location: Oklahoma In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=498982
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#465871
Mounce574 wrote: August 4th, 2024, 8:13 pmIn the book Caudacity, the author, John Falcone, states "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is Affirmative Action on steroids.
Exactly right. I worked in HR for some time and we had affirmative action programs that I agreed with. Each year, we'd gain a subsidy to hire an Aboriginal trainee, and help that young person get established in the work scene. It was a good system. However, every other position in the organisation was filled via merit, although there's always some measure of cronyism and nepotism.

That's how affirmative action should work, not as an overall hiring policy. Any deviation of merit is ultimately an act of self-sabotage.

The question is, why are the west and its corporations self-sabotaging?
User avatar
By Mounce574
#465880
Sy Borg wrote: August 4th, 2024, 10:15 pm
Mounce574 wrote: August 4th, 2024, 8:13 pmIn the book Caudacity, the author, John Falcone, states "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is Affirmative Action on steroids.
Exactly right. I worked in HR for some time and we had affirmative action programs that I agreed with. Each year, we'd gain a subsidy to hire an Aboriginal trainee, and help that young person get established in the work scene. It was a good system. However, every other position in the organisation was filled via merit, although there's always some measure of cronyism and nepotism.

That's how affirmative action should work, not as an overall hiring policy. Any deviation of merit is ultimately an act of self-sabotage.

The question is, why are the west and its corporations self-sabotaging?
The Supreme Court overturned Affirmative Action in June 2023. Biden chose to create the DEI to counter that decision. Groups like Black Lives Matter started a big protest about it. The United States is highly volatile with people protesting different things and turning them into riots. Biden stepping down is a positive but the election is going to be interesting this year between Kamala Harris and Donald Trunp.
Location: Oklahoma In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=498982
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#465881
Mounce574 wrote: August 5th, 2024, 1:22 am
Sy Borg wrote: August 4th, 2024, 10:15 pm
Mounce574 wrote: August 4th, 2024, 8:13 pmIn the book Caudacity, the author, John Falcone, states "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is Affirmative Action on steroids.
Exactly right. I worked in HR for some time and we had affirmative action programs that I agreed with. Each year, we'd gain a subsidy to hire an Aboriginal trainee, and help that young person get established in the work scene. It was a good system. However, every other position in the organisation was filled via merit, although there's always some measure of cronyism and nepotism.

That's how affirmative action should work, not as an overall hiring policy. Any deviation of merit is ultimately an act of self-sabotage.

The question is, why are the west and its corporations self-sabotaging?
The Supreme Court overturned Affirmative Action in June 2023. Biden chose to create the DEI to counter that decision. Groups like Black Lives Matter started a big protest about it. The United States is highly volatile with people protesting different things and turning them into riots. Biden stepping down is a positive but the election is going to be interesting this year between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
Thanks for the info. That looks like capture of the Democratic Party by identity politics. Basically the opposite of what the party is supposed to represent. Helluva choice.

As an old school lefty who believed in merit, egalitarianism and judging people by character, I find current focus on race, gender and sexuality nauseating. DEI is almost exactly the same as old school bigotry, except with new targets. The only difference is that, bigotry was more a dirty corner of society, now all of the academic institutions and media are blatantly prejudiced and bigoted, and churning out more and more young bigots every year.
User avatar
By Pattern-chaser
#465895
Among other things, I see here, quite clearly, the American dislike of government, and of any approach that could be described (by the sensationalist press?) as a 'nanny state'. Not that I am defending such an approach, I merely note an antipathy here toward it. As some are talking of misdirection — claiming one thing, but trying to do quite another — isn't this just one more misdirection?
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#465905
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2024, 7:38 am Among other things, I see here, quite clearly, the American dislike of government ...
Pre-emptive strike? Wrong thread? There don't seem to be any special comments on govt on here.
User avatar
By LuckyR
#465923
Mounce574 wrote: August 4th, 2024, 8:13 pm I agree that DEI is doublespeak. The fact that an unqualified person is hired based on any attribute (race, gender, religious, etc) instead of a qualified person that doesn't fit in the category is why we, in the United States at least, have so many things that are in lawsuits for negligence. I would much rather hire Bill the straight white guy who knows what he is doing instead of Muhammad from the Middle East that doesn't have a clue about what he is working on. (These are generalizations, so please don't consider this as being negative towards any one group).
In the book Caudacity, the author, John Falcone, states "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is Affirmative Action on steroids. DEI doesn’t elevate minorities with teaching or training to meet employment qualifications; no, DEI either reduces the employment qualifications until minorities qualify or prioritize their race over qualifications."
I'm not certain in what context "unqualified" candidates are selected, it would be enlightening if an example could be provided. In the cases I'm familiar with, there is an overabundance of candidates who meet the selection criteria, ie they're all "qualified". That's the standard scenario in high demand situations such as entry into medical school, law school, Ivy league universities, tenure track professorships etc. Say Blacks are 10% of the population but are 5% of qualified medical school applicants. No matter what anyone does 75% of all of these qualified applicants won't be selected. In the distant past 1% of the class was Black, later 5%, it never reached 10%. Would it be OK if it was 10%?
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#465926
How about Claudine Gay as an unqualified appointment? Her output is nowhere near what it should have been for a person in that position. Further, her doctorate was largely plagiarised - and the plagiarism is worse than reported. She based a lot of the work on the work of a single former colleague, Dr Carol Swain, who had left her tenured post due to mistreatment.

Would Claudine Gay have been given the position if not a female black activist? Not a chance.
User avatar
By Lagayascienza
#465931
Do we need to be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater on the issue of DEI? Is it all really some grand conspiracy by the radical-looney-left? Or is there a place for addressing historical injustices whilst not hindering promotion on merit?
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche Location: Antipodes
User avatar
By Fried Egg
#465941
Lagayscienza wrote: August 6th, 2024, 3:53 am Do we need to be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater on the issue of DEI? Is it all really some grand conspiracy by the radical-looney-left? Or is there a place for addressing historical injustices whilst not hindering promotion on merit?
This is a good question. Has DEI merely gone too far and just needs to be reined in a little? Or is it fundamentally unsound, rooted in a misguided ideology?

I think we can all agree that systemic discrimination against groups of people is wrong and should be addressed. And even if we manage to banish present day systemic discrimination that does not address historic injustices. But then introducing systemic discrimination in favour of historically disadvantaged groups doesn't address them either. The problem here is the preoccupation / obsession with group identities. Individuals (not groups) in the past suffered injustices and cannot compensated for by bestowing benefits upon a new set of individuals (that just happen to share the same group identity). We only introduce further injustices today against those individuals that lose out (because they are judged to be of a "privileged" group identity).

It is a perfectly valid question to ask what can be done to help those today who are presently disadvantaged to give them a leg up. As long as we don't base this assessment of need on their group identity. And DEI is rooted in a paradigm that sees the world through the prism of group identity and relative power structures. So I believe it cannot be reigned in or have its excesses curbed. It is a fundamentally flawed and bad way of looking at the world and needs to be rejected wholesale.
User avatar
By Fried Egg
#465942
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2024, 7:38 am Among other things, I see here, quite clearly, the American dislike of government, and of any approach that could be described (by the sensationalist press?) as a 'nanny state'. Not that I am defending such an approach, I merely note an antipathy here toward it. As some are talking of misdirection — claiming one thing, but trying to do quite another — isn't this just one more misdirection?
See my post above. One can support the idea of the government doing things that helps people compete in the labour market effectively (if they are judged to be disadvantaged) whilst still opposing DEI.

Besides which, DEI has taken on a life of its own and is now a lucrative industry (projected to be worth 24.3 Billion globally by 2030). Many companies employ DEI consultants, not because the government obliges them to, but because they have bought into the idea. Therefore being opposed to DEI has very little to do with being opposed to government intervention.
User avatar
By Pattern-chaser
#465944
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2024, 7:38 am Among other things, I see here, quite clearly, the American dislike of government ...
Sy Borg wrote: August 5th, 2024, 6:12 pm Pre-emptive strike? Wrong thread? There don't seem to be any special comments on govt on here.
???

The topic itself seems to be about the imposition of overly-Liberal policies or standards being imposed by a faceless external authority, although government is not mentioned explicitly, just as DoubleSpeak is not mentioned in Orwell's novel. Look:
Fried Egg wrote: August 4th, 2024, 12:38 pm Quite simply, is Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) an example of the Orwelian concept of Doublespeak?

...

So why do I suggest that we should view DEI as doublespeak? Because, it is a deliberate attempt to obscure and disguise the true intent and meaning of the framework that its advocates seek to establish.

They say they champion diversity but in its name seek to divide us into groups of different identities (and strengthen our awareness of such identities). They seek a diversity of representation from the various group identities whilst simultaneously seeking to silence diversity of opinion, to silence those considered to have a privileged group identity.
If I am mistaken, well, that's happened before...?
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus Location: England
User avatar
By Sy Borg
#465956
Lagayscienza wrote: August 6th, 2024, 3:53 am Do we need to be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater on the issue of DEI? Is it all really some grand conspiracy by the radical-looney-left? Or is there a place for addressing historical injustices whilst not hindering promotion on merit?
If you look at the situation for all identified minorities, things had been steadily improving for them without DEI. There was no need for this accelerated affirmative action. Further, the nations where DEI divisions are most intense are the ones where such minorities are treated the best.

As a Caucasian Australian male, Lagaya, YOU need to do better. That is what you are being told. YOU are responsible for violence against women and racism against whomever. These things are all your fault. That is why, if you have a son, he will passed on for jobs based on his gender and skin colour.

The whole game is based on misrepresentations. White privilege? No, that's majority privilege - and it is vastly less ruthlessly enforced than Muslim privilege in the ME and Africa, black privilege in many African nations, Han privilege in China, Hindu privilege in India etc.

How about the gender pay gap? If you count hours worked, there is no gap. The hourly rate is the same. However, you will NEVER see a complicit media provide the proper information, just as they keep presenting charts with a non-zero axis to make false points. I worked in data analysis for a while, so I am very familiar with this stuff. I analysed such things over extended periods.

It's very simple. Merit selection. The most experiences, qualified and skilled person for the job. Subsidised traineeships for young Aboriginal workers are useful bridges for but, that too, should be competitive and awarded on merit. That is, those who who the most potential.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 29

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

On Spirits: The World Hidden Volume II

On Spirits: The World Hidden Volume II
by Dr. Joseph M. Feagan
April 2025

Escape to Paradise and Beyond (Tentative)

Escape to Paradise and Beyond (Tentative)
by Maitreya Dasa
March 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking for Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking for Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science
by Lia Russ
December 2024

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


A Woman's Freedom to Choose

I once witnessed the case of a young women aroun[…]

Subgroups tend to normalize to themselves. Mea[…]

I think with true happiness you earn or as you say[…]

Fact: Most restaurants did not go out of business […]