Log In   or  Sign Up for Free

Philosophy Discussion Forums | A Humans-Only Club for Open-Minded Discussion & Debate

Humans-Only Club for Discussion & Debate

A one-of-a-kind oasis of intelligent, in-depth, productive, civil debate.

Topics are uncensored, meaning even extremely controversial viewpoints can be presented and argued for, but our Forum Rules strictly require all posters to stay on-topic and never engage in ad hominems or personal attacks.


Have philosophical discussions about politics, law, and government.
Featured Article: Definition of Freedom - What Freedom Means to Me
#470368
If you haven't already, you can sign up to be personally mentored by Scott "Eckhart Aurelius" Hughes at this link.


These questions are not rhetorical. If you somehow believe that taxation is not theft, then I would like you to explicitly answer each of these questions so that I can learn more about your interesting and very different perspective. I love learning about different perspectives.

Please don't skip questions. If you are going to reply, please answer them all.

1. Was the killing of German Jews during the Holocaust consensual? Was it murder or merely consensual assisted suicide?

2. Is so-called "legal marital rape" actually rape, or is it consensual because it is legal?

3. Did Martin Luther King consent to being arrested and jailed?

4. Did Henry David Thoreau consent to being arrested and jailed? (Henry David Thoreau, the author of Civil Disobedience, was arrested and jailed for the crime of refusing to pay taxes, which he did to protest slavery and the Mexican–American War.)

5. Are the pacifists currently in prison in the USA for refusing to pay taxes to the USA Federal Government there consensually? Are they actual literal prisoners (i.e. kidnapping victims) or are they consensual guests consensually staying at the prison?

6. If a mafia protection racket happens to be running in your neighborhood, and the mobsters come to your business with baseball bats and say you have to pay them for their protection services or they will bust up your business and break your legs, so you pay them to avoid that violence against you, is that consensual? Or is that theft and/or robbery? What if the mobsters really are protecting you and the other businesses on your block from even worse out-of-town gangsters that would attack you if your in-town gangsters weren't protecting you and their turf. What if many of your neighbors who are paying into that protection racket would eagerly voluntarily pay into it even if they weren't being threatened with baseball bats? Is that consensual then? Did you consent to having your legs broken? If you pay them to avoid getting your legs broken, is that payment consensual? (Again, these aren't rhetorical questions. I'm really asking.)

7. If you go to a bank, shoot the teller, and then take all the money out of the register, but then go and donate that money to a wonderful charity, was that theft and/or robbery? Does the fact that you spent the money on charitable causes that are for the greater good have anything at all to do with whether or not the transaction to get the money was consensual and/or whether or not it was theft? Does you spending the money on something allegedly good or charitable render a would-be theft into a non-theft?

8. If you mug me at gunpoint, and then use the money you got from me to buy a pizza, and then you offer me a slice, does me saying that your taking my money was theft mean that I don't like pizza or that I don't want a slice of pizza or that I'd be a hypocrite or contradicting myself if I accepted a slice of the pizza you bought with the money you forced me to give you a gunpoint?

9. In the times leading up to the American Revolution, were the taxes issued by the British Monarchy on tea and stamps that lead to the Boston Tea Party and Stamp Act Riots consensual?

10. Were the taxes charged by Hitler's government on Jews (and other citizens) consensual?

11. In Nazi Germany, when labor camp and concentration camp inmates were required to give all their jewelry and valuables and money to the guards upon entry, was that consensual or was that legal theft?

12. In Nazi Germany, was the labor done by inmates at the labor camps slavery or consensual?

13. When big state or federal governments imprison people for victimless crimes such as marijuana possession or homosexuality, and then force the inmates to do labor, such as happens in California, is that slavery or consensual labor?

14. Is taxation by big non-local governments (e.g. the USA Federal Government, the Europaea Union, etc.) consensual or non-consensual? Let's assume that this big non-local government charges taxes on anyone born in its vast huge lands, and won't let them leave without paying an exit tax. If they refuse to pay, they go to prison. If they resists going to prison, they get violently forced to go their killed for resisting arrest. Is that consensual or not consensual?

For the sake of argument, let's define a "big non-local government" as a government that meets all of the following criteria:

- jurisdiction spans more than 10,000 square miles
- jurisdiction covers more than 10 million people
- annual budget is greater than $100,000,000,000 USD ($100 billion)
- won't let people leave, at least not without charging them an exit tax, and/or charges taxes even if people do leave


Please do not answer question #14 until you have answered all 13 of the previous questions.

Please also do not reply to allege that one question creates a 'false analogy' with another. Please do not read between the lines like that. I am not saying that the different things being asked about in the different questions are analogous. In fact, if they were perfect analogies, I wouldn't need to ask all 11, I could just ask 1.

I'm just asking different questions about consent, so I can understand your perspective about consent and various other related philosophical concepts, so I can see what patterns are there if any between your answers, so I can better understand your unique view and perspective. I love learning about new viewpoints.


With love,
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes





And had to get its funding somewhere...
And had to get its funding somewhere...
MLK-never-forget.jpg (86.38 KiB) Viewed 1792 times




---
---
In addition to having authored his book, In It Together, Eckhart Aurelius Hughes (a.k.a. Scott) runs a mentoring program, with a free option, that guarantees success. Success is guaranteed for anyone who follows the program.
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes Signature Addition: View official OnlineBookClub.org review of In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

View Bookshelves page for In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
#471176
I believe that taxation is theft. But I am unable to think of an economical model that can run with absolutely zero taxation. Hence, I am answering your questions.

1. Holocaust killings:
No, the killing of German Jews during the Holocaust was not consensual. It was murder.

2. Legal marital rape:
Legal marital rape is still rape, as legality does not equate to morality.

3. Martin Luther King’s arrest:
Dr. King did not consent to his arrest. He accepted the consequences as a strategy of civil disobedience.

4. Thoreau’s arrest:
Similarly, Thoreau did not consent to his arrest. His refusal to pay taxes was an act of protest.

5. Pacifists in prison:
Pacifists in prison for refusing to pay taxes are not there consensually. They are prisoners, not guests.

6. Mafia protection racket:
Paying the mafia to avoid harm is not consensual; it’s coercion.

7. Robbery for charity:
Taking money by force, even for charitable purposes, remains theft.

8. Mugging for pizza:
If someone mugs you and buys pizza with your money, the act of theft remains theft. Accepting a slice of pizza doesn’t erase the initial act.

9. Pre-Revolution taxes:
Taxes imposed by the British Monarchy on American colonists (not only the American colonists, they imposed taxes on all the countries that they forcefully commanded) were not consensual.

10. Nazi taxes:
Taxes levied by Hitler’s government were non-consensual.

11. Confiscation in camps:
Taking valuables from concentration camp inmates was theft, regardless of legality.

12. Labour in camps:
Labor done by inmates in Nazi labor camps was slavery, as it was forced and done without consent.

13. Forced labour in U.S. prisons:
Forcing inmates to work for little or no compensation in U.S. prisons is a form of modern slavery.

14. Big non-local governments and taxation:
Taxation by large, non-local governments are non-consensual because individuals are compelled to pay under threat of legal or physical consequences.
#471188
1. Was the killing of German Jews during the Holocaust consensual? Was it murder or merely consensual assisted suicide?
It was clearly nonconsensual. As far as we know, the Jews had no intention of suicide, assisted or otherwise. Their killing was murder. They were not killed as punishment for disobeying any law. They were killed simply because they were Jewish. Same with the Roma, with gays, the disabled and anyone else the NAZIs did not like. .
2. Is so-called "legal marital rape" actually rape, or is it consensual because it is legal?
Legal does not equal consensual. Without consent, sex within or without marriage, is rape, IMO. Even in countries where nonconsensual sex within marriage is lawful, it is still rape, IMO. It may be lawful rape, but still rape, and it is morally repugnant.
3. Did Martin Luther King consent to being arrested and jailed?
MLK did not consent to arrest and imprisonment. But he understood that it was a likely corollary of his civil disobedience. He had no other way of publicly and peacefully advocating for change in America. He bravely did so despite the risk to his freedom.
4. Did Henry David Thoreau consent to being arrested and jailed? (Henry David Thoreau, the author of Civil Disobedience, was arrested and jailed for the crime of refusing to pay taxes, which he did to protest slavery and the Mexican–American War.)
He may not have consented to arrest and imprisonment even if his arrest and imprisonment were lawful.
5. Are the pacifists currently in prison in the USA for refusing to pay taxes to the USA Federal Government there consensually? Are they actual literal prisoners (i.e. kidnapping victims) or are they consensual guests consensually staying at the prison?
No, they are probably not in prison consensually even though their imprisonment is lawful. They did, however, understand that refusal to pay their lawfully levied taxes renders them liable to punishment. And that’s what they're getting. And rightfully so, IMO.
6. If a mafia protection racket happens to be running in your neighborhood, and the mobsters come to your business with baseball bats and say you have to pay them for their protection services or they will bust up your business and break your legs, so you pay them to avoid that violence against you, is that consensual? Or is that theft and/or robbery? What if the mobsters really are protecting you and the other businesses on your block from even worse out-of-town gangsters that would attack you if your in-town gangsters weren't protecting you and their turf. What if many of your neighbors who are paying into that protection racket would eagerly voluntarily pay into it even if they weren't being threatened with baseball bats? Is that consensual then? Did you consent to having your legs broken? If you pay them to avoid getting your legs broken, is that payment consensual? (Again, these aren't rhetorical questions. I'm really asking.)
The mafia’s theft, robbery and violence are nonconsensual and they are unlawful.
7. If you go to a bank, shoot the teller, and then take all the money out of the register, but then go and donate that money to a wonderful charity, was that theft and/or robbery? Does the fact that you spent the money on charitable causes that are for the greater good have anything at all to do with whether or not the transaction to get the money was consensual and/or whether or not it was theft? Does you spending the money on something allegedly good or charitable render a would-be theft into a non-theft?
A robbery is a robbery. Robbery is unlawful and nonconsensual no matter what the proceeds of the robbery are spent on.
8. If you mug me at gunpoint, and then use the money you got from me to buy a pizza, and then you offer me a slice, does me saying that your taking my money was theft mean that I don't like pizza or that I don't want a slice of pizza or that I'd be a hypocrite or contradicting myself if I accepted a slice of the pizza you bought with the money you forced me to give you a gunpoint?
A mugging is nonconsensual and unlawful, and this is so no matter what the money from the mugging is spent on.
9. In the times leading up to the American Revolution, were the taxes issued by the British Monarchy on tea and stamps that lead to the Boston Tea Party and Stamp Act Riots consensual?
Taxes are lawfully imposed by lawful governments. Once the Americans disentangled themselves from British rule in the War of Independence and set up their own independent constitutional government, they were able to stop paying taxes to the British government and were able to pay taxes instead to the new American government. Taxes imposed by the American government were lawful but may not have been consensual in all cases. Those who didn’t want to pay their taxes probably kept moving west until civilization caught up with them. Federal and state governments had constitutional power to levy taxes and they did so. And for good reason.
10. Were the taxes charged by Hitler's government on Jews (and other citizens) consensual?
Usually, but not always. No doubt some German citizens felt taxation by their government was nonconsensual. However, such taxation was lawful.
11. In Nazi Germany, when labor camp and concentration camp inmates were required to give all their jewellery and valuables and money to the guards upon entry, was that consensual or was that legal theft?
The confiscation of property in the camps was nonconsensual and it was theft. Most of the people in concentration camps were not there for having broken any law, the breaking of which prescribed the penalty of confiscation of property. They were there for being the wrong race or the wrong sexuality.
12. In Nazi Germany, was the labor done by inmates at the labor camps slavery or consensual?
It was nonconsensual. It was forced and unpaid labor. As such, it was slavery.
13. When big state or federal governments imprison people for victimless crimes such as marijuana possession or homosexuality, and then force the inmates to do labor, such as happens in California, is that slavery or consensual labor?
Punishment for law breaking is not slavery but neither is it, generally, consensual. However, it is lawful. People who do not agree with laws that imprison people for victimless crimes need to agitate, protest and work for the election of representatives and governments who will take such laws off the stature books. And that is what has happened in regard to laws about homosexuality and marijuana possession in many jurisdictions.
14. Is taxation by big non-local governments (e.g. the USA Federal Government, the Europaea Union, etc.) consensual or non-consensual? Let's assume that this big non-local government charges taxes on anyone born in its vast huge lands, and won't let them leave without paying an exit tax. If they refuse to pay, they go to prison. If they resists going to prison, they get violently forced to go their killed for resisting arrest. Is that consensual or not consensual?
It is usually consensual, if only implicitly so. I made no formal agreement, but I consent to paying my taxes to the federal and state governments, even though I might bitch about the details of how they are spent. I believe that taxation is implicitly accepted by most people because they see taxation as necessary to enable a civilized nation to function. People therefore implicitly consent by paying their lawfully levied taxes.

Those who explicitly do not consent to being lawfully taxed are free to break the law by ceasing to pay their taxes. In so doing, they understand that they will be liable to lawful punishment which may involve imprisonment. Although such punishment may be nonconsensual, it is lawful and, I believe, necessary. Civilization, stability and lawfulness are, IMO, better than lawlessness and anarchy which would ensue if central governments were rendered powerless to carry out the necessary economic and social roles. Governments must have revenue in order to provide their populations with the benefits of civilization such as the maintenance of defense and police forces, the building of public infrastructure and the provision health care, education, etc. Taxation is necessary to build and secure the nation.

Those individuals who do not consent to being taxed by a central government and who, by refusing to pay their taxes are willing to risk lawful punishment, may not consent to being punished, but they won’t get much sympathy from the majority who understand that their civilization depends on taxation. Levies put in place by local governments cannot replace taxation by central, state and national governments. People who don’t want to pay their taxes must expect to suffer the lawful consequences if they don't. Either that, or they need to emigrate to a country with a government who will not tax them. Or they need to organize and campaign in their own countries for the election of governments who will not tax them. Good luck with either of those options.

I like the 15th question.
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche Location: Antipodes
#471661
Some preliminary remarks before attempting your questions:

I approach this from the position that philosophy is inescapably about language. So that at least half the question is about how we use the word "consent" and its derivatives.

"Consent" means something like "agree to a course of action proposed by another". Consent is thus a choice. And only minds can make choices, and only individual people have minds.

That's simple and straightforward where there is a single act involved. An easy example is where a fellow-pupil asks if they can borrow your ruler. You choose to say yes or no, and so when they take it and use it that act is either with your consent or without.

More complex cases arise where an act has "strngs" attached - where people link two or more acts. If the man who runs the corner shop will sell you a chocolate bar for a dollar, and you choose to accept that offered trade, then most of us would say that you consent to paying him a dollar. Even though you might rather have the chocolate bar without paying, the fact that you have the choice to refuse the transaction means that in common usage we would say that you consent to pay.

(Absence of consent to the transaction might be exemplified by an alternative scenario where you've stolen a chocolate bar from your brother and your father finds out, grabs you by the collar, drags you to the corner shop and compels you to buy a bar for your brother to replace the one you stole).

But now suppose you buy the chocolate bar, but then run into the school bully who proposes a transaction where you give him the chocolate bar and in exchange he won't punch you in the face. If you give it to him, is that consensual ? You have the choice...

Seems to me that some people have a notion of moral rights. And therefore see a difference between the two situations. They would say that if you part with the chocolate bar only to avoid a wrong being done to you then that action is coerced by the threat of wrongdoing and is thus not consensual.

Whereas your option not to buy the chocolate in the first place involves no breach of rights and therefore is a valid "free" choice. It is not true to say that your desire for chocolate coerced you into parting with a dollar against your will.

I know you don't believe in moral rights. But am suggesting that many people do, and use that concept to distinguish between threats (linkages which coerce) and options where there is legitimate choice.

You may be able to make that distinction without a notion of rights. Or you may end up with consensuality being purely a matter of opinion, depending on subjective judgment of whether an alternative is "reasonable" (implying that the option selected is consented-to) or "unreasonable" (implying that the option selected is coerced and thus not consented-to). If you see what I mean.

Second point is that one of the words derived from "consent" is "consensus". One possible process for group decision-making is to require consensus - to not do anything unless everybody agrees. (Noting that agreement may be reluctant - someone might agree to (i.e. give consent to) something they would prefer not to happen, just for the sake of ending the tedium of a long drawn-out decision process).

Such a process can be contrasted with a process of voting whereby only a majority have to consent; the minority have to put up with it. That's a viable decision process, which scales up to large numbers in a way that decision-by-consensus does not.

Or contrasted with a decision-process where the leader asks for information and suggestions and arguments for and against various courses of action, and then makes a decision.

Voting is thus more consensual than some decision-processes and less-consensual than others.

So being consensual is not a binary yes/no concept, but a scale.
#472406
LuckyR,

LuckyR wrote: December 29th, 2024, 5:37 am Here's a 15th.
Please answer all 14 questions before adding your own new questions. Thank you! :)

Alternatively, you are free to make your own separate forum topic for your other new question.
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes Signature Addition: View official OnlineBookClub.org review of In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

View Bookshelves page for In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
#472407
Good_Egg,
Good_Egg wrote: January 13th, 2025, 7:35 am Some preliminary remarks before attempting your questions:
Thank you for your preliminary remarks.

Please do also answer all 14 of the questions. I look forward to your answers. :)
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes Signature Addition: View official OnlineBookClub.org review of In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

View Bookshelves page for In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
#472408
Sy Borg
Sy Borg wrote: January 18th, 2025, 8:59 pm Q. What happens to a large country that ...
Please do not ask a 15th new question without at least answering all 14 of the questions in the OP. Please always stay on-topic, and make extra sure to not accidentally hijack any topics.

Of course, you are always free create a new forum topic to ask a separate question if there is some other question you want to ask the other members of the forum.
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes Signature Addition: View official OnlineBookClub.org review of In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

View Bookshelves page for In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
#472409
2. Is so-called "legal marital rape" actually rape, or is it consensual because it is legal?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am Legal does not equal consensual.

[Emphasis Added.]
I agree 100%.


3. Did Martin Luther King consent to being arrested and jailed?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 amMLK did not consent to arrest and imprisonment.
I don't understand; How is that MLK "implicitly" consented to pay taxes to his racist violent government that he called the greatest purveyor of violence in the world, but he didn't consent to being jailed? Aren't you contradicting yourself?

5. Are the pacifists currently in prison in the USA for refusing to pay taxes to the USA Federal Government there consensually? Are they actual literal prisoners (i.e. kidnapping victims) or are they consensual guests consensually staying at the prison?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 amNo, they are probably not in prison consensually
What if instead of being imprisoned they were just fined? Or given the option to be imprisoned or pay a fine? Would the fine somehow be consensual even though the imprisonment wouldn't be?

6. If a mafia protection racket happens to be running in your neighborhood, and the mobsters come to your business with baseball bats and say you have to pay them for their protection services or they will bust up your business and break your legs, so you pay them to avoid that violence against you, is that consensual? Or is that theft and/or robbery? What if the mobsters really are protecting you and the other businesses on your block from even worse out-of-town gangsters that would attack you if your in-town gangsters weren't protecting you and their turf. What if many of your neighbors who are paying into that protection racket would eagerly voluntarily pay into it even if they weren't being threatened with baseball bats? Is that consensual then? Did you consent to having your legs broken? If you pay them to avoid getting your legs broken, is that payment consensual? (Again, these aren't rhetorical questions. I'm really asking.)
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am The mafia’s theft, robbery and violence are nonconsensual
What makes a mafia protection racket suddenly become consensual just because the mafia calls itself a "government"?

Isn't that just a special pleading fallacy?

A rose by any other name smells just as sweet; right?

7. If you go to a bank, shoot the teller, and then take all the money out of the register, but then go and donate that money to a wonderful charity, was that theft and/or robbery? Does the fact that you spent the money on charitable causes that are for the greater good have anything at all to do with whether or not the transaction to get the money was consensual and/or whether or not it was theft? Does you spending the money on something allegedly good or charitable render a would-be theft into a non-theft?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am A robbery is a robbery. Robbery is [...] nonconsensual no matter what the proceeds of the robbery are spent on.

[Emphasis Added.]
I agree 100%.

8. If you mug me at gunpoint, and then use the money you got from me to buy a pizza, and then you offer me a slice, does me saying that your taking my money was theft mean that I don't like pizza or that I don't want a slice of pizza or that I'd be a hypocrite or contradicting myself if I accepted a slice of the pizza you bought with the money you forced me to give you a gunpoint?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am A mugging is nonconsensual [...], and this is so no matter what the money from the mugging is spent on.

[Emphasis Added.]
I agree 100%.

9. In the times leading up to the American Revolution, were the taxes issued by the British Monarchy on tea and stamps that lead to the Boston Tea Party and Stamp Act Riots consensual?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am Taxes are lawfully imposed by lawful governments. Once the Americans disentangled themselves from British rule in the War of Independence and set up their own independent constitutional government, they were able to stop paying taxes to the British government and were able to pay taxes instead to the new American government. Taxes imposed by the American government were lawful but may not have been consensual in all cases. Those who didn’t want to pay their taxes probably kept moving west until civilization caught up with them. Federal and state governments had constitutional power to levy taxes and they did so. And for good reason.
You didn't answer the question.

Please stop mentioning what's lawful or not lawful. That's off-topic.

The question is not whether it was lawful. The question is whether it consensual.

And as you already wisely and correctly said above about legal marital rape: "Legal does not equal consensual." (Your words, and I agree 100%.)

1. Was the killing of German Jews during the Holocaust consensual? Was it murder or merely consensual assisted suicide?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 amIt was clearly nonconsensual.
10. Were the taxes charged by Hitler's government on Jews (and other citizens) consensual?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 amUsually, but not always.
11. In Nazi Germany, when labor camp and concentration camp inmates were required to give all their jewellery and valuables and money to the guards upon entry, was that consensual or was that legal theft?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 amThe confiscation of property in the camps was nonconsensual and it was theft.
Haven't you contradicted yourself?

How is it possible that #11 is non-consensual (i.e. theft) but #10 is "usually" consensual (i.e. not theft)?

How does someone even go about consenting to paying for themselves to put into a labor camp while not consenting to be put in the labor camp?


12. In Nazi Germany, was the labor done by inmates at the labor camps slavery or consensual?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 amIt was nonconsensual.
I don't understand. Why is forced labor not consensual but forced payment is consensual?

How come taxes collected in the form of labor are non-consensual?

How is it any different for a government (or mafia protection racket) to say, instead of you owe us $100 cash, you owe us $100 worth of free labor, and if you don't give/do it you go prison?

Aren't you committing a special pleading fallacy and in effect completely contradicting yourself?

Stealing someone's money (i.e. the fruits of the labor) is tantamount to stealing their labor directly; right?





14. Is taxation by big non-local governments (e.g. the USA Federal Government, the Europaea Union, etc.) consensual or non-consensual? Let's assume that this big non-local government charges taxes on anyone born in its vast huge lands, and won't let them leave without paying an exit tax. If they refuse to pay, they go to prison. If they resists going to prison, they get violently forced to go their killed for resisting arrest. Is that consensual or not consensual?
Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am Those who explicitly do not consent to being lawfully taxed are free to [cease] to pay their taxes. In so doing, they understand that they will be liable to [...] punishment which may involve imprisonment. Although such punishment may be nonconsensual,
I agree with the above, as quoted.

Lagayascienza wrote: December 29th, 2024, 7:51 am Those individuals who do not consent to being taxed by a central government and who, by refusing to pay their taxes are willing to risk lawful punishment, may not consent to being punished,
I agree.


With love,
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes Signature Addition: View official OnlineBookClub.org review of In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

View Bookshelves page for In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
#472416
I propose an understanding of "consensual" as follows.

All actions have consequences. For an action to be consensual, the actor has to have chosen that action (with all its foreseeable consequences) over a baseline alternative of non-interaction with those involved.

Trying to apply that understanding to the questions:

1. Holocaust killings:
German Jews were not given the option of carrying on with their normal lives without interacting with Nazis, and therefore all the assaults and degradation and killings that they suffered were not consensual.

2. Legal marital rape:
Could be consented to. Either if, on the night that the husband comes home drunk, the wife chooses confrontation with foreseeable consequences (over sleeping unmolested in the spare room). Or if before the wedding the wife knows exactly what sort of man she is marrying and prefers this to remaining single.

3. Martin Luther King’s arrest:
When Dr. King said "here I stand, I can do no other" this is rhetoric. Seems like the literal truth is that he did have the option of not interacting - of not doing anything that would breach the law (however wrong you think that law might be).

4. Thoreau’s arrest:
5. Pacifists in prison:
6. Mafia protection racket:
In each case the state/mafia is not permitting the other party the option of non-interaction, and thus the interaction is non-consensual.

7. Robbery for charity:
8. Mugging for pizza:
Again, the robber/mugger is not allowing the victim to opt out of the interaction, so what transpires is non-consensual, regardless of who ends up with the proceeds.

9. Taxes in colonial US
Interestingly, those who set sail from their home country to colonise another are one of the few groups of whom it can be said that they have opted into the regime of their destination (rather than the non-interaction of sailing elsewhere). So these are more consensual than most taxes.

10. Nazi taxes:
14: Central government taxes
No modern government gives citizens the option of not participating in the activity of the state. In frontier societies, there was in some times and places the option of living beyond the reach of the law.

11. Confiscation in camps:
12. Labour in camps:
13. Forced labour in U.S. prisons:
No inmates are given the option of declining to participate.

So, attempting to apply a rigorous definition of "consent", we find that the consensual/nonconsensual distinction does not necessarily map to most people's notions of right/wrong.

Current Philosophy Book of the Month

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

2025 Philosophy Books of the Month

On Spirits: The World Hidden Volume II

On Spirits: The World Hidden Volume II
by Dr. Joseph M. Feagan
April 2025

Escape to Paradise and Beyond (Tentative)

Escape to Paradise and Beyond (Tentative)
by Maitreya Dasa
March 2025

They Love You Until You Start Thinking for Yourself

They Love You Until You Start Thinking for Yourself
by Monica Omorodion Swaida
February 2025

The Riddle of Alchemy

The Riddle of Alchemy
by Paul Kiritsis
January 2025

2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science

Connecting the Dots: Ancient Wisdom, Modern Science
by Lia Russ
December 2024

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...

The Advent of Time: A Solution to the Problem of Evil...
by Indignus Servus
November 2024

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age

Reconceptualizing Mental Illness in the Digital Age
by Elliott B. Martin, Jr.
October 2024

Zen and the Art of Writing

Zen and the Art of Writing
by Ray Hodgson
September 2024

How is God Involved in Evolution?

How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters

Launchpad Republic: America's Entrepreneurial Edge and Why It Matters
by Howard Wolk
July 2024

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side

Quest: Finding Freddie: Reflections from the Other Side
by Thomas Richard Spradlin
June 2024

Neither Safe Nor Effective

Neither Safe Nor Effective
by Dr. Colleen Huber
May 2024

Now or Never

Now or Never
by Mary Wasche
April 2024

Meditations

Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
March 2024

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

The In-Between: Life in the Micro

The In-Between: Life in the Micro
by Christian Espinosa
January 2024

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021


Less is more. I enjoyed the analogy of asking for […]

Will tech surpass war?

Talk me out of this opinion. please, if you can.[…]

Equal Pay - Gone too far?

I wouldn't mind someone explaining to me here ho[…]

I have heard it said that the "left" has[…]