Your nominations are in! The poll to vote for the June Philosophy Book of the Month is now open!


Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Have philosophical discussions about politics, law, and government.
Featured Article: Definition of Freedom - What Freedom Means to Me
Post Reply

With which statement do you agree?

I want it to be illegal for a very poor teenager who was impregnated from being raped by an immediate family member to get an abortion even in the first week of pregnancy even if the doctors can and did detect the baby has severe genetic disorders and that the pregnancy if taken to term would have complications greatly risking the life of both the mother and would-be baby.
7
9%
I want it to be legal for a wealthy woman who is 5 days past her due date (of birth) to get an abortion even though doctors are sure that the healthy baby would be delivered safely and relatively easily otherwise and even though many safe, healthy, loving families are willing to adopt the would-be newborn immediately and even pay the woman significantly for that.
14
18%
I do not agree fully with either one of the above statements.
59
74%
 
Total votes: 80

User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 6670
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

amorphos_ii wrote: May 22nd, 2023, 6:03 pm I think the most important decision or at least equally so, is the child’s.
The potential-child has no decision. The potential-child is not (yet) equipped to make decisions. So the parent(s) take their decisions for them. That's what parenthood is about. If you make a potential-child, the responsibility is yours. And abortion is one possible option that some parents will wish to consider. I think they should have that right.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 13825
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by Sy Borg »

Geez Louise! Teens under eighteen have to rely on an adult parent or guardian for some issues, yet amophos wants a foetus - with less intelligence than a flatworm - to make decisions as to how its mother will live her life.

Perhaps we should allow cockroaches to make decisions about affairs of state while we are at it? Some would say that they couldn't do worse than the current nest of roaches but that greatly underestimates the complexity of governance, just as the difference between a first trimester foetus and a newborn baby is greatly underestimated.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 6670
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

amorphos_ii wrote: May 22nd, 2023, 6:03 pm why is it a matter only for the woman? The man will have to pay for the child just as much as the female...
Er, it's not about paying, it's about care. Not all of life can be understood in terms of dollars. 🤑
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
amorphos_ii
Posts: 144
Joined: October 2nd, 2022, 1:19 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by amorphos_ii »

I don’t think the infant needs the ability to say/state their decision, or think it, in order to have one. A severely disabled adult may not be able to state their decisions or opinions but still have the right to live.

A human foetus may resemble a flatworm [but it isn’t that specifically is it!] or some such thing at the very early stages, but they are a bit more human at a later stage when they can still be aborted, which depends upon the laws of that in your country.


I think that both parents have to pay for the child then it is both of their decisions at least in that respect. Perhaps if the female signed a waver so the male participant doesn’t have to pay, then fine.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 6670
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

amorphos_ii wrote: May 25th, 2023, 8:52 pm I don’t think the infant needs the ability to say/state their decision, or think it, in order to have one.
Perhaps not, but the foetus — not yet an "infant"! — would need the ability to make a "decision", which it does not have. That purely practical observation places the burden fairly on the parents, to make that decision for, and on behalf of, their potential child. And if the pregnancy is a mistake, and the parents do not have the means — not just 🤑 — to raise the child, then perhaps abortion is an appropriate course for them. It shouldn't be my decision, or yours, but that of the parents, for the responsibility here is theirs, not ours.


amorphos_ii wrote: May 25th, 2023, 8:52 pm I think that both parents have to pay for the child then it is both of their decisions at least in that respect. Perhaps if the female signed a waver so the male participant doesn’t have to pay, then fine.
As I said:
Pattern-chaser wrote: May 25th, 2023, 8:51 am Er, it's not about paying, it's about care. Not all of life can be understood in terms of dollars. 🤑
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
amorphos_ii
Posts: 144
Joined: October 2nd, 2022, 1:19 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by amorphos_ii »

I meant that a decision doesn’t have to be made by someone, it can e.g. be a moral or ethical decision or any given more universal decision. Secondly, when it does grow up, it will probably be glad the decision can be made on your behalf. A new born baby or an infant cannot decide for themselves, so do we kill them for all the same reasons as abortion?

Care may involve paying and the ability to pay.

How good are people at making decisions? My ex had an abortion, then three months later got pregnant again. Women have all those decisions contrasted with hormones whirling around making their minds get mixed up. When I left her [the relationship was a nightmare on both parts [she spilt with me then me her almost weekly]] I got made to feel guilty, when she specifically said she wanted the child for her and I was only the sperm donor.

In short, after reviewing the considerations, I don’t think it should be or is anyone’s decision. Sex makes children, so one should either take precautions or don’t have full sex.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7439
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by LuckyR »

amorphos_ii wrote: May 27th, 2023, 1:50 pm I meant that a decision doesn’t have to be made by someone, it can e.g. be a moral or ethical decision or any given more universal decision. Secondly, when it does grow up, it will probably be glad the decision can be made on your behalf. A new born baby or an infant cannot decide for themselves, so do we kill them for all the same reasons as abortion?

Care may involve paying and the ability to pay.

How good are people at making decisions? My ex had an abortion, then three months later got pregnant again. Women have all those decisions contrasted with hormones whirling around making their minds get mixed up. When I left her [the relationship was a nightmare on both parts [she spilt with me then me her almost weekly]] I got made to feel guilty, when she specifically said she wanted the child for her and I was only the sperm donor.

In short, after reviewing the considerations, I don’t think it should be or is anyone’s decision. Sex makes children, so one should either take precautions or don’t have full sex.
You are aware that every "precaution" method has a failure rate, right?
"As usual... it depends."
amorphos_ii
Posts: 144
Joined: October 2nd, 2022, 1:19 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by amorphos_ii »

of course, but they are small percentages and is why i don't see it in black and white.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7439
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by LuckyR »

amorphos_ii wrote: May 27th, 2023, 3:07 pm of course, but they are small percentages and is why i don't see it in black and white.
The ability to see gray on this topic is uncommon, kudos to you.

Having said that, just to be clear, small percentages multiplied by the hundreds of billions of episodes of intercourse annually equals tens of millions of unwanted, unplanned pregnancies while USING birth control. In the US, one in three pregnancies are unintended.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 6670
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

amorphos_ii wrote: May 27th, 2023, 1:50 pm Care may involve paying and the ability to pay.
Yes, but only an American would refer to $$$ so often. You have mentioned it at least 3 times now...

"Care" mostly concerns non-financial issues, IMO, to the extent that a focus on $$$ might even be seen to distort the whole discussion?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
amorphos_ii
Posts: 144
Joined: October 2nd, 2022, 1:19 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by amorphos_ii »

Having said that, just to be clear, small percentages multiplied by the hundreds of billions of episodes of intercourse annually equals tens of millions of unwanted, unplanned pregnancies while USING birth control. In the US, one in three pregnancies are unintended.


Silly me I didn’t realise the numbers were so high, on the news etc, they usually give percentages like 3% failure for the pill for example. Are 1 in 3 women forgetting to take the pill perhaps or not taking it correctly, well there seams to be a descrepancy in the numbers anyhow.
"Care" mostly concerns non-financial issues, IMO, to the extent that a focus on $$$ might even be seen to distort the whole discussion?
If I may, I think all facets should be taken into consideration, and care mostly has costs. 3 times in a ton of writing when it is an important aspect – is too much?
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7439
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by LuckyR »

amorphos_ii wrote: Yesterday, 7:09 pm
Having said that, just to be clear, small percentages multiplied by the hundreds of billions of episodes of intercourse annually equals tens of millions of unwanted, unplanned pregnancies while USING birth control. In the US, one in three pregnancies are unintended.


Silly me I didn’t realise the numbers were so high, on the news etc, they usually give percentages like 3% failure for the pill for example. Are 1 in 3 women forgetting to take the pill perhaps or not taking it correctly, well there seams to be a descrepancy in the numbers anyhow.
Uummm... not every woman is using the Pill as birth control. In typical use 8% of Pill users will get pregnant in a year. However other BC methods have failure rates as high as over 20%. The 33% unintended pregnancy rate reflects the fact that the pool of women seeking to avoid pregnancy is much, much larger in any given moment than those seeking pregnancy, thus a small percentage of this large pool ends up about one third the size of the much smaller group seeking pregnancy (right now). BTW 90% of women who don't want to be pregnant use a method of birth control.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 6670
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

amorphos_ii wrote: Yesterday, 7:09 pm 3 times in a ton of writing when it is an important aspect – is too much?
Three times during one brief, and minor, exchange seems a little too much?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Politics”

2023 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021