Intentional non-defensive killing - Do you always oppose it?
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: October 10th, 2015, 8:34 pm
Re: Intentional non-defensive killing - Do you always oppose it?
But, I don’t have any children. I am PRO Earth. It’s scientifically true that more than 1 or 2 kids will cause pain and suffering sometime in the future
-
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: May 9th, 2012, 3:13 pm
Re: Intentional non-defensive killing - Do you always oppose it?
You are polluting and using resources that are destroying the planet! Off to the gas chambers with you!Slavedevice wrote: ↑April 20th, 2022, 12:51 pm But, I don’t have any children. I am PRO Earth. It’s scientifically true that more than 1 or 2 kids will cause pain and suffering sometime in the future
-
- Posts: 493
- Joined: July 19th, 2021, 11:08 am
Re: Intentional non-defensive killing - Do you always oppose it?
I reject "always" because "always" implies a non-contextual "intentional non-defensive killing" but context is all that counts when it comes to killing.Intentional non-defensive killing - Do you always oppose it?
So we have the following possibilities:
intentional killing + defense
non-intentional killing + defense
non-intentional killing + non-defense
intentional killing + non-defense
Then we have the question "defense? what is it that is defended?" Physical integrity of one's body or physical integrity of other's bodies? One's own psychological integrity or the psychological integrity of others? One's own philosophical or moral values or the philosophical or moral values of others?
As a result I'd like to offer that 'non-intentional killing + non-defense' is an accident and 'intentional killing + non-defense' is a psychiatric perversion. But any killing in the context of defense is acceptable.
Freedom or death.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 6290
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Intentional non-defensive killing - Do you always oppose it?
Forget Catholics (see above), you should be targeting Mormons and the fundamentalist Christians who don't believe in birth control. Naturally you must support abortion rights. Though the west has mostly a stable to negative birth rate. Some Asian and most African countries have the highest birth rates. Of course you must be a huge supporter of education of young women and girls since that has been responsible for the greatest drop in reproduction.Slavedevice wrote: ↑April 20th, 2022, 7:13 am I think people who DO NOT believe in BIRTH CONTROL should be killed. The number one way to prevent catastrophic climate changes (which is and will cause suffering of innocent people) is to REDUCE the number of HUMANS!! If you clear your mind and see it this way - people (Catholic) that have many kids are enemies of the earth. If you think of earth as a sinking ship - the only fair way to save it is to throw out the ones contributing to the problem.
Of course most would use convincing folks to limit their family sizes over murder as their technique, but you seem to be wedded to the murder idea.
"As usual... it depends."