In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
This forum is for discussing the book In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All. Anyone can view the forum and read the post, but only people who purchased the book can post in the forum.
If your purchase has not already been verified (i.e. if you don't already have access to post in this forum), then please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 6032
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
Objectively, the universe has no 'now' (versus 'then') in the same way it has no left side (versus right side).
Einstein showed that the difference between space and time is as much an illusion as the difference between left and right. Change your speed or direction and suddenly what was once space becomes time (or vice versa), what was once future becomes past (or vice versa), and what was once left becomes right (or vice versa).
The illusions/appearance of leftness, hereness, & nowness emerge from subjectivity (a.k.a. 'consciousnesses', or 'subjective experiences', or 'conscious presences'), with each instance of such subjectivity/consciousness having its own left, right, here, now, and present.
Even terms like "the present" are in and of themselves misleading at best if not inherently nonsense. Such illusions and/or emergent appearances are by definition not singular or definite. There is no "the present" nor "the past" nor "the left" nor "the right". Insofar as there are consciousnesses (i.e. conscious presents), then each has its own corresponding unique relative subjective present, and its own relative subjective emergent leftness, etc.
Insofar as there are countless or even infinite consciousnesses scattered in the otherwise timeless eternal 4D spacetime, there are countless infinite presents in 4D spacetime. There is no 'the present' or 'the past' nor 'the left', but rather there are infinite relative subjective emergent presents, pasts, lefts and rights all existing together as part of the eternal timeless whole that is holistic reality. There is no singular special 'the present' that exists as some special piece or slice of the whole universe, but rather the universe as a whole is revealed as a patchwork of countless and presumably infinite presents. The temporal-based dualism that would seem to separate present from non-present does not really exist, but is rather analogous to an optical illusion, emerging from a distorted and inherently subjective perspective.
How consciousness fits into it is perhaps best explored and explained by my book, "In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All". As explained in the book, you, meaning the real you (i.e. 'consciousness' or 'conscious presence' itself), are what makes the now now and makes the here here. Without you, there is no now, there is no here, there is no present, and there is no time. And, yet, most interesting the real you and the real I are (as shown in the book) one and the same.
What it means for the simpler narrower area of objective physics (i.e. when excluding conscious subjectivity from the description of fundamental reality) is perhaps best explored and explained in the following three forum topics:
- Would Flat-Land Four-Eyed Freddy Notice a Difference?
- Objective Leftness and Rightness Do Not Exist
- Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.
^ Please do read and reply to each of the above three forum topics, preferably in the order listed. I look forward to discussing these interesting issues with you.
The book is available for purchase from all major book retailers in both ebook and hardcover format.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Surabhi Rani
- Premium Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 3:21 am
Re: In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 21
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:20 am
- In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=257448
Re: In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
- Olga_Markova
- Premium Member
- Posts: 12
- Joined: February 15th, 2023, 3:42 pm
- In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=491403
Re: In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
I am more inclined to think of leftness and time as relative anchors that define the reality for the consciousness - if the anchor of time did not exist, for example, there would be no tie of consciousness to the events meant to happen at any particular time anchor - be it sleep, awakeness, and any activities. But I think the book places this concept in the frames of "subjective" which is conceptually the same as "relative", so I agree.
I'll look at the three suggested forum threads too.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: January 2nd, 2024, 7:38 pm
Re: In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes wrote: ↑January 17th, 2023, 4:35 pm This is a discussion forum topic for the November 2022 Philosophy Book of the Month, In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All.
In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
Objectively, the universe has no 'now' (versus 'then') in the same way it has no left side (versus right side).
Einstein showed that the difference between space and time is as much an illusion as the difference between left and right. Change your speed or direction and suddenly what was once space becomes time (or vice versa), what was once future becomes past (or vice versa), and what was once left becomes right (or vice versa).
The illusions/appearance of leftness, hereness, & nowness emerge from subjectivity (a.k.a. 'consciousnesses', or 'subjective experiences', or 'conscious presences'), with each instance of such subjectivity/consciousness having its own left, right, here, now, and present.
Even terms like "the present" are in and of themselves misleading at best if not inherently nonsense. Such illusions and/or emergent appearances are by definition not singular or definite. There is no "the present" nor "the past" nor "the left" nor "the right". Insofar as there are consciousnesses (i.e. conscious presents), then each has its own corresponding unique relative subjective present, and its own relative subjective emergent leftness, etc.
Insofar as there are countless or even infinite consciousnesses scattered in the otherwise timeless eternal 4D spacetime, there are countless infinite presents in 4D spacetime. There is no 'the present' or 'the past' nor 'the left', but rather there are infinite relative subjective emergent presents, pasts, lefts and rights all existing together as part of the eternal timeless whole that is holistic reality. There is no singular special 'the present' that exists as some special piece or slice of the whole universe, but rather the universe as a whole is revealed as a patchwork of countless and presumably infinite presents. The temporal-based dualism that would seem to separate present from non-present does not really exist, but is rather analogous to an optical illusion, emerging from a distorted and inherently subjective perspective.
How consciousness fits into it is perhaps best explored and explained by my book, "In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All". As explained in the book, you, meaning the real you (i.e. 'consciousness' or 'conscious presence' itself), are what makes the now now and makes the here here. Without you, there is no now, there is no here, there is no present, and there is no time. And, yet, most interesting the real you and the real I are (as shown in the book) one and the same.
What it means for the simpler narrower area of objective physics (i.e. when excluding conscious subjectivity from the description of fundamental reality) is perhaps best explored and explained in the following three forum topics:
- Would Flat-Land Four-Eyed Freddy Notice a Difference?
- Objective Leftness and Rightness Do Not Exist
- Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.
^ Please do read and reply to each of the above three forum topics, preferably in the order listed. I look forward to discussing these interesting issues with you.
The book is available for purchase from all major book retailers in both ebook and hardcover format.
Leftness is a subjective interpretation based on spatial orientation, while time is a more complex and abstract construct rooted in physics and our perception. Some argue time is a human-made concept, while others see it as a fundamental aspect of the universe. It's a philosophical and scientific debate with various perspectives.
- Surabhi Rani
- Premium Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 3:21 am
Re: In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: In the same sense leftness is not real, time is not real.
– William James
Current Philosophy Book of the Month
2025 Philosophy Books of the Month
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023