- March 2nd, 2023, 12:13 am
#436563
This is a discussion forum topic for the November 2022 Philosophy Book of the Month, In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All.
A noteworthy theme throughout the book is summed up in Suggestion Four at the end of the book: "Let go of moralizing or similarly judgemental language". That chapter explicitly advises to let go the words 'should' and 'ought'.
Thus, generally speaking, one who is following the advice of the book will never say things like, "X happened but shouldn't have happened", or "I am doing Y but ought not be doing Y."
One who is following the advice of the book might say, "I will do X", but they would not say, "I should do X". One thing to keep in mind about people who say that they "should" or "ought" to do something is that they almost certainly won't actually do it. People who will do it say "will", not "should". Generally, "should do" means, in part, "won't do".
One who is following the advice of the book won't issue prescriptions against unchangeable aspects of reality, such as by saying, for example, that the past 'should' be different than it is.
In fact, typically one who is strictly following the advice of the book would do their best to not use the words 'should' or 'ought' at all.
They won't willfully resent an unchangeable aspect of reality, or unchangeable reality as a whole, for being the way it unchangeably is.
In other words, one who is following the advice of the book will, like me, do their best to put into practice this principle: I fully and unconditionally accept that which I cannot change (i.e. that which I cannot control).
While it is essentially the same idea with different words, one word I do not address explicitly in the book as directly is the word 'expectation'".
I do briefly mention "expectation" in the chapter, "(Type 2) Temporal Enabling or Codependency (Abusive or Toxic
Pseudo-Love)". If you do not recall that chapter too well, I suggest re-reading the whole section in which that chapter appears: "Temporal Unity of Selves: Loving Yourself Over Time"
However, in that chapter, I reference 'expectation' only in an example, and don't address it directly in the 11 Suggestions at the end. So I will address it here, now.
Different people can use the same word in different ways, and even the same person can mean very different things by the same word in different contexts.
So, I will be clear: As I use the terms, expect does not merely mean predict. For example, when I say, "It will probably rain tomorrow" that is a prediction, not an expectation. If I say, "I will fire you if you don't get to work on time tomorrow," that is a conditional prediction (and perhaps a promise), but it is not necessarily an expectation, at least not as I use the terms.
Even a relatively simple AI designed to play chess or poker can make many predictions, including conditional ones. "If they move there, I'll move here; and then if they go there, I'll go there." Thus, there is nothing too special about predictions per se.
However, expectations are something significantly more than mere predictions. Unlike mere predictions, expectations also include some kind of superstitious or resentful judgementalism. Expectation acts as a primary gateway and foundation for blame and resentment.
While expectations can also be linked to predictions, often the opposite is the case. Often expectations are, in part, the opposite of predictions. Many times when one has an expectation against you, someone, or something, they actually don't predict that their expectation will be met. Often, they are predicting that you, or whatever is the subject of their expectations, will disappoint them by not meeting their expectations.
Indeed, as I explain in my other topic Whether you are looking for a savior or someone to save, or both, look into a mirror, misery loves company, and unhappy people find comfort in blaming others. For example, an angry person often isn't angry at you because they see something you did as angering, but rather vice versa: They were already angry and/or unhappy and thus were on the prowl for excuses and scapegoats. They aren't angry because they see you as angering; they see you as angering because they are angry. Unhappy people look for reasons to be unhappy. They look for scapegoats. They predict that they will be disappointed, and accordingly spend their days extra anxious and extra afraid, constantly waiting for the next big disappointing thing that doesn't meet their expectations. For some like this, life is just a series of unmet expectations--how incredibly frustrating, enraging, and resentment-worthy it must be for them.
Those ideas are also explored in my topic Perception is almost entirely a matter of projection, and my topic We see what we want to see, meaning what we choose to see.
The above is one reason the book uses several examples of abusive relationships, such as romantically abusive relationships between two people in space, or an abusive relationship between a younger and older version of the same human (e.g. your current self versus your so-called future self). The repeat physical abuser might say, "look what you made me do!" If the unhappy abuser was believed, the victim is to blame for not meeting the abuser's presumably lofty expectations. But was it really the victim or was it the expectations themselves? Or was it neither and the expectations are merely an excuse? Of course, a single human living on the planet alone can still suffer from expectations. As the book explores in more detail, many human beings are in an abusive self-hating relationship with their selves over time. Many put these high expectations on themselves, and then blame, judge, and unforgivingly resent themselves for failing to meet those expectations. They might look in the mirror and say, "it's your fault! You disgust me!" They might look at what they are doing, and, with judgemental resentment say, "you shouldn't be doing what you are doing, and you shouldn't be the way you are".
In any case, whether issued against people, animals, events or others things, ridiculously high expectations are a useful tool for unhappy people to create scapegoats.
The unhappy person gets to blame their lack of inner peace (a.k.a. true happiness) on reality not meeting their expectations. They get to use judgementalism to criticize aspects of reality for being the way they are. "That happened but ought not have happened," they might judgmentally say, whatever that means. "You're not good enough," they might judgmentally say. "If there is a God, he is evil for making a world like this," they might resentfully say. "I'm unhappy and don't have inner peace because things out of my control are the way they are," they might say. Do they issue expectations and blame because they are unhappy, or do they lack the true happiness of inner peace because they issue expectations and blame? It's of course both, like the proverbial chicken and the egg. A karmic cycle, of sorts.
Can you see the difference between predicting a dog won't poop on your floor while you are at work versus expecting it?
When a prediction is revealed to be incorrect, then it is simply revealed as a miscalculation.
The predictor might say with a giggle, "Opps, I miscalculated."
The predictor might be frustrated, angry, sad, or afraid. They are just emotions and feelings, like hunger. All humans feel them. But the predictor doesn't add blame to the equation. An inner-peace-having predictor doesn't blame other people and things for their feelings. The lion might feel hunger upon seeing the antelope, and the antelope might feel fear upon seeing the lion, but there is no need to add blame to the equation. Like anything that is, the feelings just are; they don't need to be anyone or anything's fault, in the judgemental sense of the word, meaning the result of an unmet expectation. The predictor didn't have an expectation, and so the predictor doesn't judgmentally say or believe things like, "I'm angry because the weather didn't do what I expected it to do; it's evil!"
Predictors don't even 'blame' themselves for miscalculating because to do so would be to have had an expectation that they don't miscalculate. The predictor doesn't say things like, "I should have known."
In contrast, the expecter doesn't fully and unconditionally accept what they cannot control (i.e. what they cannot change). Instead, they set a bar of expectation against which to compare aspects of reality they cannot change or control, and resentfully judge reality, in whole and in parts, for failing to meet those expectations.
As I use the terms, one cannot have inner peace if one expects unchangeable reality to be different than it unchangeably is.
Prediction is consistent with unconditional love, unconditional forgiveness, and inner peace.
Expectation is not.
Prediction is consistent with letting go of blame and with transcending the idea that there ever is anything to forgive in the first place.
Expectation is not.
Prediction is consistent with letting go of any and all resentment.
Expectation is not.
Ram Dass once said, "When you go out into the woods and you look at trees, you see all these different trees. And some of them are bent, and some of them are straight, and some of them are evergreens, and some of them are whatever. And you look at the tree and you allow it. You see why it is the way it is. You sort of understand that it didn’t get enough light, and so it turned that way. And you don’t get all emotional about it. You just allow it. You appreciate the tree. The minute you get near humans, you lose all that. And you are constantly saying, 'You’re too this, or I’m too this.' That judging mind comes in. And so I practice turning people into trees. Which means appreciating them just the way they are."
The average human is not very rational. Humans are not rational agents. Humans are not nearly as different from the other animals as they often think, especially animals like the dolphin, the octopus, and the elephant. Even though an expecter would often put a ridiculously higher standard on humans and then get judgementally upset when the humans do not meet that high expectation, a human creature is not that far off from a cute puppy chasing its own tail.
Humans break promises and do other human things. Lions eat antelope. Dogs poop on floors. Trees do tree things. And hurricanes kill people.
Ram Dass turns people into trees. Sometimes I turn them into bees.
Do you blame buzzing bees for being bees?
I don't blame anything for anything.
I don't expect anything. Not from anyone, and not from anything.
I have inner peace, in large part, because I don't have any unfulfilled expectations. I don't have any unmet expectations.
When it comes to what I cannot control, I don't expect; I accept.
---
The book is available for purchase from all major book retailers in both ebook and hardcover format.
View on Barnes and Noble | View on Amazon | View on Books-A-Million | View on Bookshelves
A noteworthy theme throughout the book is summed up in Suggestion Four at the end of the book: "Let go of moralizing or similarly judgemental language". That chapter explicitly advises to let go the words 'should' and 'ought'.
Thus, generally speaking, one who is following the advice of the book will never say things like, "X happened but shouldn't have happened", or "I am doing Y but ought not be doing Y."
One who is following the advice of the book might say, "I will do X", but they would not say, "I should do X". One thing to keep in mind about people who say that they "should" or "ought" to do something is that they almost certainly won't actually do it. People who will do it say "will", not "should". Generally, "should do" means, in part, "won't do".
One who is following the advice of the book won't issue prescriptions against unchangeable aspects of reality, such as by saying, for example, that the past 'should' be different than it is.
In fact, typically one who is strictly following the advice of the book would do their best to not use the words 'should' or 'ought' at all.
They won't willfully resent an unchangeable aspect of reality, or unchangeable reality as a whole, for being the way it unchangeably is.
In other words, one who is following the advice of the book will, like me, do their best to put into practice this principle: I fully and unconditionally accept that which I cannot change (i.e. that which I cannot control).
While it is essentially the same idea with different words, one word I do not address explicitly in the book as directly is the word 'expectation'".
I do briefly mention "expectation" in the chapter, "(Type 2) Temporal Enabling or Codependency (Abusive or Toxic
Pseudo-Love)". If you do not recall that chapter too well, I suggest re-reading the whole section in which that chapter appears: "Temporal Unity of Selves: Loving Yourself Over Time"
However, in that chapter, I reference 'expectation' only in an example, and don't address it directly in the 11 Suggestions at the end. So I will address it here, now.
Different people can use the same word in different ways, and even the same person can mean very different things by the same word in different contexts.
So, I will be clear: As I use the terms, expect does not merely mean predict. For example, when I say, "It will probably rain tomorrow" that is a prediction, not an expectation. If I say, "I will fire you if you don't get to work on time tomorrow," that is a conditional prediction (and perhaps a promise), but it is not necessarily an expectation, at least not as I use the terms.
Even a relatively simple AI designed to play chess or poker can make many predictions, including conditional ones. "If they move there, I'll move here; and then if they go there, I'll go there." Thus, there is nothing too special about predictions per se.
However, expectations are something significantly more than mere predictions. Unlike mere predictions, expectations also include some kind of superstitious or resentful judgementalism. Expectation acts as a primary gateway and foundation for blame and resentment.
While expectations can also be linked to predictions, often the opposite is the case. Often expectations are, in part, the opposite of predictions. Many times when one has an expectation against you, someone, or something, they actually don't predict that their expectation will be met. Often, they are predicting that you, or whatever is the subject of their expectations, will disappoint them by not meeting their expectations.
Indeed, as I explain in my other topic Whether you are looking for a savior or someone to save, or both, look into a mirror, misery loves company, and unhappy people find comfort in blaming others. For example, an angry person often isn't angry at you because they see something you did as angering, but rather vice versa: They were already angry and/or unhappy and thus were on the prowl for excuses and scapegoats. They aren't angry because they see you as angering; they see you as angering because they are angry. Unhappy people look for reasons to be unhappy. They look for scapegoats. They predict that they will be disappointed, and accordingly spend their days extra anxious and extra afraid, constantly waiting for the next big disappointing thing that doesn't meet their expectations. For some like this, life is just a series of unmet expectations--how incredibly frustrating, enraging, and resentment-worthy it must be for them.
Those ideas are also explored in my topic Perception is almost entirely a matter of projection, and my topic We see what we want to see, meaning what we choose to see.
The above is one reason the book uses several examples of abusive relationships, such as romantically abusive relationships between two people in space, or an abusive relationship between a younger and older version of the same human (e.g. your current self versus your so-called future self). The repeat physical abuser might say, "look what you made me do!" If the unhappy abuser was believed, the victim is to blame for not meeting the abuser's presumably lofty expectations. But was it really the victim or was it the expectations themselves? Or was it neither and the expectations are merely an excuse? Of course, a single human living on the planet alone can still suffer from expectations. As the book explores in more detail, many human beings are in an abusive self-hating relationship with their selves over time. Many put these high expectations on themselves, and then blame, judge, and unforgivingly resent themselves for failing to meet those expectations. They might look in the mirror and say, "it's your fault! You disgust me!" They might look at what they are doing, and, with judgemental resentment say, "you shouldn't be doing what you are doing, and you shouldn't be the way you are".
In any case, whether issued against people, animals, events or others things, ridiculously high expectations are a useful tool for unhappy people to create scapegoats.
The unhappy person gets to blame their lack of inner peace (a.k.a. true happiness) on reality not meeting their expectations. They get to use judgementalism to criticize aspects of reality for being the way they are. "That happened but ought not have happened," they might judgmentally say, whatever that means. "You're not good enough," they might judgmentally say. "If there is a God, he is evil for making a world like this," they might resentfully say. "I'm unhappy and don't have inner peace because things out of my control are the way they are," they might say. Do they issue expectations and blame because they are unhappy, or do they lack the true happiness of inner peace because they issue expectations and blame? It's of course both, like the proverbial chicken and the egg. A karmic cycle, of sorts.
Can you see the difference between predicting a dog won't poop on your floor while you are at work versus expecting it?
When a prediction is revealed to be incorrect, then it is simply revealed as a miscalculation.
The predictor might say with a giggle, "Opps, I miscalculated."
The predictor might be frustrated, angry, sad, or afraid. They are just emotions and feelings, like hunger. All humans feel them. But the predictor doesn't add blame to the equation. An inner-peace-having predictor doesn't blame other people and things for their feelings. The lion might feel hunger upon seeing the antelope, and the antelope might feel fear upon seeing the lion, but there is no need to add blame to the equation. Like anything that is, the feelings just are; they don't need to be anyone or anything's fault, in the judgemental sense of the word, meaning the result of an unmet expectation. The predictor didn't have an expectation, and so the predictor doesn't judgmentally say or believe things like, "I'm angry because the weather didn't do what I expected it to do; it's evil!"
Predictors don't even 'blame' themselves for miscalculating because to do so would be to have had an expectation that they don't miscalculate. The predictor doesn't say things like, "I should have known."
In contrast, the expecter doesn't fully and unconditionally accept what they cannot control (i.e. what they cannot change). Instead, they set a bar of expectation against which to compare aspects of reality they cannot change or control, and resentfully judge reality, in whole and in parts, for failing to meet those expectations.
As I use the terms, one cannot have inner peace if one expects unchangeable reality to be different than it unchangeably is.
Prediction is consistent with unconditional love, unconditional forgiveness, and inner peace.
Expectation is not.
Prediction is consistent with letting go of blame and with transcending the idea that there ever is anything to forgive in the first place.
Expectation is not.
Prediction is consistent with letting go of any and all resentment.
Expectation is not.
Ram Dass once said, "When you go out into the woods and you look at trees, you see all these different trees. And some of them are bent, and some of them are straight, and some of them are evergreens, and some of them are whatever. And you look at the tree and you allow it. You see why it is the way it is. You sort of understand that it didn’t get enough light, and so it turned that way. And you don’t get all emotional about it. You just allow it. You appreciate the tree. The minute you get near humans, you lose all that. And you are constantly saying, 'You’re too this, or I’m too this.' That judging mind comes in. And so I practice turning people into trees. Which means appreciating them just the way they are."
The average human is not very rational. Humans are not rational agents. Humans are not nearly as different from the other animals as they often think, especially animals like the dolphin, the octopus, and the elephant. Even though an expecter would often put a ridiculously higher standard on humans and then get judgementally upset when the humans do not meet that high expectation, a human creature is not that far off from a cute puppy chasing its own tail.
Humans break promises and do other human things. Lions eat antelope. Dogs poop on floors. Trees do tree things. And hurricanes kill people.
Ram Dass turns people into trees. Sometimes I turn them into bees.
Do you blame buzzing bees for being bees?
I don't blame anything for anything.
I don't expect anything. Not from anyone, and not from anything.
I have inner peace, in large part, because I don't have any unfulfilled expectations. I don't have any unmet expectations.
When it comes to what I cannot control, I don't expect; I accept.
---
The book is available for purchase from all major book retailers in both ebook and hardcover format.
View on Barnes and Noble | View on Amazon | View on Books-A-Million | View on Bookshelves
My entire political philosophy summed up in one tweet.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- By Sy Borg
- By Mo_reese