Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "No!"
This forum is for discussing the book In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All. Anyone can view the forum and read the post, but only people who purchased the book can post in the forum.
If your purchase has not already been verified (i.e. if you don't already have access to post in this forum), then please upload a screenshot of your receipt or proof or purchase via OnlineBookClub. Once the moderators approve your purchase at OnlineBookClub, you will then also automatically be given access to post in this forum.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 6032
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "No!"
Right now, if someone offered to give me literally a billion dollars, but to have it I would need to work 50 hours per week every week for the next ten years, I would say no.
I'd rather have that 50 hours per week than have the billion dollars.
(Needless to say, the exception of course would be if the "work" I was getting paid to do is something I would do anyway, because that's functionally equal to getting paid for nothing and working 0 hours to make that money. Instead, the idea is that you are selling yourself into a quasi-slavery in which you let someone else use your body/time/labor to do with it something you absolutely would not do it if you were not being paid the amount you are paid.)
For reference, a billion dollars for 50 hours per week for 10 years works out to an hourly rate of $38,461 USD. That's over thirty-eight thousands dollars per hour worked. But I would absolutely confidently turn down such an offer in an instant. That is, assuming I am not allowed to work less hours per week or quit the job partway through (at least without giving up the billion dollars). I might work one hour per week at the $38,461 USD per hour rate, but I definitely would not commit to work 50 per week at that rate. In other words, there's an increasing marginal rate to the value of my time as I sell more of it for money. I'm also extremely confident in my ability and tendency to increase my skills and earning potential over time, such that I would sell an hour of my time today for less than I would pre-sell an hour of my time in 5 or 10 years. In other words, I am confident that the market value of an hour of my time will continue to increase exponentially year over year like it has for the past decade.
There is no single right answer that applies for everyone if given that choice. There's several factors at play in that kind of decision, most notably the following two factors:
(1) how much you currently make per hour of work and how much you predict to make per hour of work over the next ten years. For example, if you get paid only $5 per hour and already work 50+ hours per week at that rate, and predict that you will still only be getting paid $5 per hour and still working 50+ hours at that low rate in ten years, then it would become effectively a no-brainier to accept the offer, as you'd be working the same hours but making way more money per hour. Likewise, in a contrasting example, if you are getting paid a $50,000 dollars per hour worked currently, and predict you will continue to get paid that much per hour worked, then it would be a no-brainer to refuse the offer because you would only be losing money if you took it. However, most people are in the middle where it isn't a no-brainer to go either way but rather a choice between having much more money but much less time or (potentially) much more time but less money.
(2) how much someone values their time, especially roughly speaking in terms of what's called "free time". There's a reason some people retire early while others who have just as much money and are just as able to afford it don't. Some people prefer to be richer, busier, and more stressed while others prefer to give up some (or a lot of) financial riches to enjoy a more retiree-like lifestyle. Again, there's no wrong easier; it's just a matter of personal preference, like preferring peanut butter sandwiches to tuna fish or vice versa.
For me personally, the only reason I'd be interested in a billion dollars (e.g. pick up a billion dollar bill off the ground rather than walk past it) is because of the fact that time is money and thus I can use that billion dollars to preserve or buy more time for myself, namely in terms of (1) not having to work for money to live and in terms of (2) being able to delegate more easily by paying other people to do work, chores, and tasks that I would otherwise spend time doing. For instance, with a billion dollars I would never spend another minute doing my own laundry ever again, since I could so easily pay someone else to do it even if I had to go way above typical market rates to do it.
If I have to sell 50 hours per week over ten years to get the billion dollars, that defeats the purpose. It would be worse than self-defeating actually: it would be counter-productive. I'd be forfeiting any chance of getting 50 hours per week back anytime within the next 10 years.
That 50 hours per week (26,000 hours over 10 years) is worth wayyyyy more to me than a billion dollars.
What about you? This is not a rhetorical question because we all have different situations and different priorities, and likewise there is no wrong answer. It's just a matter of what you want and prefer, in addition to the other unique aspects of your personal situation. So with that said, I curiously and poltely ask, if today you were given the one-time opportunity to take a job that would pay you one billion dollars upfront but you had to work 50 hours every week for the next 10 years (26,000 hours total) without the option to quit or work less, would you do it?
To make the math easier for you, that would be a rate of $38,461 USD per hour, meaning you would be getting paid $38,461 per hour to take the job, but you would have to work a full 50 hours every week for the next 10 years. Quitting or working less would not be an option. What would you choose and why?
With love,
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
a.k.a. Scott
---
In addition to having authored his book, In It Together, Eckhart Aurelius Hughes (a.k.a. Scott) runs a mentoring program, with a free option, that guarantees success. Success is guaranteed for anyone who follows the program.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
- In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=352929
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
1. What kind of job is it? For example, if it's a job I wouldn't like, I would not do it. However, if it's something I like, or can lean to like, I would do it.
2. What would I be doing otherwise? If the alternative is working say 40 hours a week doing something I don't like, I still would do it.
Here are the reasons why I would do it.
a) Time value of money
$1 billion paid today is worth way more than $1 billion paid 10 years from now. for this reason, technically, your hourly rate will be increasing over the year, although it may not seem so now.
b) 50 hours a week means 10 hours a day for 5 days a week. Assuming I sleep for 6 hours a day, I'll still have 76 hours a week. With good planning, you can still accomplish a lot with these hours.
The only reason why I would not do it is if it's an awfully job I do not like at all. In general, I do like working. I like being productive, so I don't think I would have any reason not to like the work.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 10:16 am
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
So to answer the question, my answer would be no. Not only would I not have time to enjoy using the money but I won't have family time or time to just rejuvenate and do the things that I actually do love with those that I love. I'm getting to old for useless ventures that won't give me a quality of life but rather drain more life out of me. I am content with what I do now a.k.a. studying to teaching English online, reading and reviewing books and I don't have an employer that constantly make like I'm not worth the little money they willing to pay for my services. I now have you, Scott as an 'employer' so to speak, and you are willing to build and help people around you, why would I seek anything more?
- Surabhi Rani
- Premium Member
- Posts: 128
- Joined: November 3rd, 2022, 3:21 am
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: February 4th, 2024, 1:52 am
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
1. What kind of Job is it
2. The health risk of the job
3. How stressful is it
4. How old are you
After considering these factors, it becomes a lot easier to either decline or accept such offer. Personally I'd do it.
- Cristina-Ioana Toader
- Premium Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: February 27th, 2024, 4:48 pm
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
In today's unpredictable economic climate, obtaining such a substantial financial buffer can bring a sense of calm and steadiness. This fortune could open doors to funding new business ideas or making investments that could yield even higher returns, opportunities that are typically out of reach due to financial barriers.
With such wealth, you have the power to make a profound difference in the world. Engaging in philanthropy at a level that touches millions, backing initiatives and breakthroughs that tackle some of the most pressing global issues.
And let me be clear, I'm not looking for shortcuts or trying to have the best of both worlds without the commitment. I'm fully prepared and willing to dedicate the next decade to this endeavor.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 6032
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
26,000 hours is approximately three years.
Imagine you were offered to be paid $1 billion dollars if you let yourself be put into a dreamless coma for three years. Would you do it? You would basically be selling the next three years of your life and from your perspective suddenly become three years older. Presumably, some of your friends and family who you would love to spend time with would suddenly be instantly dead from your perspective. Anything that happens in the next three years you would miss out on. And you would get three less years, similar to being guaranteed to die three years sooner except (worse) those three years would be shaved off from your younger years (now) rather than at the end of your life. Would you do it?
A third way to imagine it is that instead of a three-year-coma, you would be selling yourself into three years of 24/7 slavery. This is not so much of a wild fiction since throughout history many people literally did sell themselves into slavery for a certain number of years (or for life) throughout history, such as to payoff debts or give the money to their family. Would you sell yourself into three years of full-fledged unquitable slavery to salve master who would literally own for three years if the price you'd be paid was $1 billion USD?
Again, there's no wrong answer. I'm just happily curious to know folks' answers and reasoning.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Cristina-Ioana Toader
- Premium Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: February 27th, 2024, 4:48 pm
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
The decision is deeply personal and would depend on numerous factors, including one's current life situation, future aspirations, personal values, and the intrinsic value one places on time versus money. For some, no amount of money could compensate for the loss of time and personal freedom (and I wholeheartedly respect that!). For others, the opportunities provided by the wealth could justify the commitment. I still align myself with the group that favors accepting the work in exchange for the billion dollars.
As you said, there is no universally correct answer, only what feels right to each individual based on their own life's context and values.
- Sushan
- Book of the Month Discussion Leader
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
- Contact:
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
1. Personal Development: Continuous work challenges us, pushing personal boundaries and fostering growth. It's an investment in our skills and abilities, enhancing our potential over time.
2. Purpose and Fulfillment: Engaging in meaningful work can offer a sense of purpose. It's not solely about the tasks at hand but contributing to something larger than ourselves, leading to profound personal satisfaction.
3. Financial Stability and Future Security: While the proposal is hypothetical, the concept of earning substantially more provides not just immediate financial relief but long-term security, enabling investments and the freedom to pursue other interests later without financial constraints.
4. Building a Legacy: At a prime age, there's an opportunity to make significant impacts professionally and personally. Working at something you're passionate about allows you to leave a mark, contributing to lasting change or innovation.
5. Networking and Relationships: Through work, we connect with a diverse range of individuals, expanding our professional network and building relationships that can enrich both our personal and professional lives.
6. The Value of Time: Understanding the intrinsic value of our time motivates us to pursue opportunities that promise growth, learning, and satisfaction, beyond monetary compensation.
7. Aligning with Passions: If the work aligns with personal passions or interests, it doesn't feel like a burden. It becomes a rewarding journey, blending passion with purpose.
– William James
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: March 5th, 2024, 7:11 pm
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
- CrisX
- Premium Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: February 6th, 2024, 2:56 am
- In It Together review: https://forums.onlinebookclub.org/viewt ... p?t=492782
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: March 6th, 2024, 3:57 am
Re: Time vs Money | If I was offered a billion dollars to work 50 hours per week for the next 10 years, I would say, "
Current Philosophy Book of the Month
2025 Philosophy Books of the Month
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
How is God Involved in Evolution?
by Joe P. Provenzano, Ron D. Morgan, and Dan R. Provenzano
August 2024
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023