Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Chat about anything your heart desires here, just be civil. Factual or scientific questions about philosophy go here (e.g. "When was Socrates born?"), and so most homework help questions belong here. Note, posts in the off-topic section will not increase new members post counts. This includes the introductions and feedback sections.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:00 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 11:52 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:11 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 9:13 am
Indeed not. Common delusions are very serious indeed.
Human society is dangerously deluded.
People are killed every day due to delusions.

Says who?

:lol:
You can check any psychiatry book or even google and see the meaning of the word 'delusion'.
Neither psychologists nor psychologists invented the word. It had coinage 300 years before the "art" of psychology.
So the rest of your offering is null and void.
Monopolies do not exist on words.
There are many terms that are misused. But that does not change its meaning, only the meaning is manipulated by various people for their own agendas. There are occasions that though someone can read a word, cannot understand it properly. That also does not change the real meaning of that word.

People can be deluded by various things. And if they cause harm to others because of that, they are taken into mental health related hospitals under a mental health act and treated accordingly. But the things that some people do due to their personal agendas cannot be categorized as delusions because they have their own motives for their acts and behaviours.
Have you ever stopped to consdier the depths of your own quotidian delusions?
Everything cannot be defined by history. Something coming into practice early does not make it right.
You are denyng my value as a historian, and also denying the normal use of a word appropriated more lately by a discipline not directly assocated with this forum . Many philosphers would agree with me that religion is, in fact a delusion. So trying to undermine my argument by bringing in a definition from outside the discipline of philosophy is not appreciated. Words should be taken as they are meant. I do not expect to see a definition Nazi and you should not expect me to respond positively to such pedanticism.

I may have my delusions and I will keep them (but I only used the word 'delusions' only for the sake of your understanding. I am not having any firm beliefs related to anything. If you can prove me wrong, I will accept at any point).
There's already plenty to go on, but you are not in the habit of revealing anything about yourself. One delusion that is obvious is your pedantic belief in attacting narrowly defined meanings to words, with disregard for common parlance and typical use. Words do not have fixed and indelible meanings and it is a delusion to think that is the case.


A word which is used wrong by the common people does not change its meaning.
Delusional.
Word meanings are ever changing.
But someone accepting that distorted meaning makes his intellect less valuable, and when that someone argues upon that it becomes humorous.
Tutut. Ad hominems??

Maybe you should let Richard Dawkins know that his intellect is below your own lofty one??

Christopher Hitchens would often compare faith to delusion. His intellect was so much higher than any contributor to this Forum.
If anyone looks humourous, that would be you.

Just to make it perfectly clear.
I have no hesitation regarding all religion as human kind's most dangerous delusion, and regard it as a mental illness in the extreme.
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sushan »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:29 pm
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:00 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 11:52 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:11 am

You can check any psychiatry book or even google and see the meaning of the word 'delusion'.
Neither psychologists nor psychologists invented the word. It had coinage 300 years before the "art" of psychology.
So the rest of your offering is null and void.
Monopolies do not exist on words.
There are many terms that are misused. But that does not change its meaning, only the meaning is manipulated by various people for their own agendas. There are occasions that though someone can read a word, cannot understand it properly. That also does not change the real meaning of that word.

People can be deluded by various things. And if they cause harm to others because of that, they are taken into mental health related hospitals under a mental health act and treated accordingly. But the things that some people do due to their personal agendas cannot be categorized as delusions because they have their own motives for their acts and behaviours.
Have you ever stopped to consdier the depths of your own quotidian delusions?
Everything cannot be defined by history. Something coming into practice early does not make it right.
You are denyng my value as a historian, and also denying the normal use of a word appropriated more lately by a discipline not directly assocated with this forum . Many philosphers would agree with me that religion is, in fact a delusion. So trying to undermine my argument by bringing in a definition from outside the discipline of philosophy is not appreciated. Words should be taken as they are meant. I do not expect to see a definition Nazi and you should not expect me to respond positively to such pedanticism.

I may have my delusions and I will keep them (but I only used the word 'delusions' only for the sake of your understanding. I am not having any firm beliefs related to anything. If you can prove me wrong, I will accept at any point).
There's already plenty to go on, but you are not in the habit of revealing anything about yourself. One delusion that is obvious is your pedantic belief in attacting narrowly defined meanings to words, with disregard for common parlance and typical use. Words do not have fixed and indelible meanings and it is a delusion to think that is the case.


A word which is used wrong by the common people does not change its meaning.
Delusional.
Word meanings are ever changing.
But someone accepting that distorted meaning makes his intellect less valuable, and when that someone argues upon that it becomes humorous.
Tutut. Ad hominems??

Maybe you should let Richard Dawkins know that his intellect is below your own lofty one??

Christopher Hitchens would often compare faith to delusion. His intellect was so much higher than any contributor to this Forum.
If anyone looks humourous, that would be you.

Just to make it perfectly clear.
I have no hesitation regarding all religion as human kind's most dangerous delusion, and regard it as a mental illness in the extreme.
In extremes, anything can be a mental disorder. But not everything that are extreme categorized as mental disorders. And that is why specific mental disorders are given specific diagnostic criteria. Otherwise a man's personality trait will be named as a psychiatric disorder. This is similar for the meanings of the words. Yes, their meanings can be changed. But technical terms are not subjected for change of the meaning because it will definitely harm the practices that use those words in a technical way. And also naming religious beliefs as delusions is quite Narcistic, which is a personality trait as well.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
User avatar
mystery
Posts: 380
Joined: May 14th, 2021, 5:41 am
Favorite Philosopher: Mike Tyson
Location: earth

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by mystery »

Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 8:12 am
mystery wrote: May 25th, 2021, 6:30 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 3:51 am
mystery wrote: May 25th, 2021, 2:45 am

Hi Sushan,

It would be easy to make technical points on this topic, that avoid the issue. Instead, I'll just tell, yes I agree.

Usually, in this context follow means to try to behave and react in the ways suggested by Jesus. If doing that the impact is much, spiritual, physical, psychological, emotional, probably others I don't list. It is a lifestyle and decision framework for everything if being congruent. I have not read the book but familiar with the idea. For example, one can be a thief and tell that following Jesus. That would not be congruent as those activities are not endorsed by Jesus.

Spiritual itself touches all parts of our life, by only touching that will affect all.
Hi mystery,

Thank you for your valuable opinion.

You have a valid point. One can adopt what Jesus did as a human to one's lifestyle and that will impact all activities related to his life. But given the life that Jesus led and how he ended up, will it be healthy for a person at present to fully adopt to His lifestyle?
I will love to hear other opinions on this also.

I don't think so, I wish that it would be, and not in a way that many have build systems around his memory but in a way to truly follow the same ideals he did. The only way that makes sense is if it was tied to the eternal as is his promise. Otherwise no, the truth of human nature is that the strong take all and decide what is allowed to the less strong. Following Jesus is a path to evolutionary removal. Reward in heaven perhaps, on earth, no. Biological selection will reward the strong, not the just. It is what it is.
Biological selection and the strong one winning are things that we have experienced throughout the history and we are experiencing that today as well. But, has anyone seen heaven or has experienced spiritual development other than being heard of someone else's sayings? In such a background, is it wise to take a step away from evolution and go after an unknown, unseen heaven and a spiritual development giving up all the mundane comforts?
We agree on the power and reality of biology. Albeit it is often shrouded, with some effort it can be readily understood and managed.

If we saw heaven and told about it who will believe, for sure not the people that know us well.

Objectively heaven is the greatest tool to manage others. Simply teach them that competing and winning is bad/shameful. Sacrifice our natural desires now and get a reward later when dead. It is the perfect tool, no one can ever tell it is not true without question and shame. It is easier to back away from competition and go with a promise that hiding strength will be rewarded. At the same time the strong rule without challenge.

If life and time is without limits, then yes to explore every possibility is with merit. As it is we must choose and can not try all choices.

If we could somehow convince everyone else to not compete with us, we will be assured of success in all areas. psychological warfare.

Without religion and morality, every man wants to be king. Is life better with religion, yes it is, for the king.

Religion knows this, it is why all religions include a concept of marriage. Getting control of biology is the real root of power.

perhaps I over answer and am rambling.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:42 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:29 pm
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:00 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 11:52 am Neither psychologists nor psychologists invented the word. It had coinage 300 years before the "art" of psychology.
So the rest of your offering is null and void.
Monopolies do not exist on words.


Have you ever stopped to consdier the depths of your own quotidian delusions?
Everything cannot be defined by history. Something coming into practice early does not make it right.
You are denyng my value as a historian, and also denying the normal use of a word appropriated more lately by a discipline not directly assocated with this forum . Many philosphers would agree with me that religion is, in fact a delusion. So trying to undermine my argument by bringing in a definition from outside the discipline of philosophy is not appreciated. Words should be taken as they are meant. I do not expect to see a definition Nazi and you should not expect me to respond positively to such pedanticism.

I may have my delusions and I will keep them (but I only used the word 'delusions' only for the sake of your understanding. I am not having any firm beliefs related to anything. If you can prove me wrong, I will accept at any point).
There's already plenty to go on, but you are not in the habit of revealing anything about yourself. One delusion that is obvious is your pedantic belief in attacting narrowly defined meanings to words, with disregard for common parlance and typical use. Words do not have fixed and indelible meanings and it is a delusion to think that is the case.


A word which is used wrong by the common people does not change its meaning.
Delusional.
Word meanings are ever changing.
But someone accepting that distorted meaning makes his intellect less valuable, and when that someone argues upon that it becomes humorous.
Tutut. Ad hominems??

Maybe you should let Richard Dawkins know that his intellect is below your own lofty one??

Christopher Hitchens would often compare faith to delusion. His intellect was so much higher than any contributor to this Forum.
If anyone looks humourous, that would be you.

Just to make it perfectly clear.
I have no hesitation regarding all religion as human kind's most dangerous delusion, and regard it as a mental illness in the extreme.
In extremes, anything can be a mental disorder. But not everything that are extreme categorized as mental disorders. And that is why specific mental disorders are given specific diagnostic criteria. Otherwise a man's personality trait will be named as a psychiatric disorder. This is similar for the meanings of the words. Yes, their meanings can be changed. But technical terms are not subjected for change of the meaning because it will definitely harm the practices that use those words in a technical way. And also naming religious beliefs as delusions is quite Narcistic, which is a personality trait as well.
And your point is what....?

Parmaceuticals are in the business of inventing mental illnesses, and exporting them as ideas to poorer countries and emerging markets.
They call it exporting a category. India was the recent reciepent of such an export in the matter of "depression" - a category previously unheard of in times past. Now it is highly fashionable to obtain various kinds of anteprepressants, which Pharma have been only too happy to supply by the ship load.

Back on topic. Religion is much the same; it validates a system of bad thinking, making okay to ignore reason and accept faith as an alternative.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by LuckyR »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 7:23 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:42 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:29 pm
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:00 pm

Everything cannot be defined by history. Something coming into practice early does not make it right.
You are denyng my value as a historian, and also denying the normal use of a word appropriated more lately by a discipline not directly assocated with this forum . Many philosphers would agree with me that religion is, in fact a delusion. So trying to undermine my argument by bringing in a definition from outside the discipline of philosophy is not appreciated. Words should be taken as they are meant. I do not expect to see a definition Nazi and you should not expect me to respond positively to such pedanticism.

I may have my delusions and I will keep them (but I only used the word 'delusions' only for the sake of your understanding. I am not having any firm beliefs related to anything. If you can prove me wrong, I will accept at any point).
There's already plenty to go on, but you are not in the habit of revealing anything about yourself. One delusion that is obvious is your pedantic belief in attacting narrowly defined meanings to words, with disregard for common parlance and typical use. Words do not have fixed and indelible meanings and it is a delusion to think that is the case.


A word which is used wrong by the common people does not change its meaning.
Delusional.
Word meanings are ever changing.
But someone accepting that distorted meaning makes his intellect less valuable, and when that someone argues upon that it becomes humorous.
Tutut. Ad hominems??

Maybe you should let Richard Dawkins know that his intellect is below your own lofty one??

Christopher Hitchens would often compare faith to delusion. His intellect was so much higher than any contributor to this Forum.
If anyone looks humourous, that would be you.

Just to make it perfectly clear.
I have no hesitation regarding all religion as human kind's most dangerous delusion, and regard it as a mental illness in the extreme.
In extremes, anything can be a mental disorder. But not everything that are extreme categorized as mental disorders. And that is why specific mental disorders are given specific diagnostic criteria. Otherwise a man's personality trait will be named as a psychiatric disorder. This is similar for the meanings of the words. Yes, their meanings can be changed. But technical terms are not subjected for change of the meaning because it will definitely harm the practices that use those words in a technical way. And also naming religious beliefs as delusions is quite Narcistic, which is a personality trait as well.
And your point is what....?

Parmaceuticals are in the business of inventing mental illnesses, and exporting them as ideas to poorer countries and emerging markets.
They call it exporting a category. India was the recent reciepent of such an export in the matter of "depression" - a category previously unheard of in times past. Now it is highly fashionable to obtain various kinds of anteprepressants, which Pharma have been only too happy to supply by the ship load.

Back on topic. Religion is much the same; it validates a system of bad thinking, making okay to ignore reason and accept faith as an alternative.
You aren't trying to imply that India is immune to depression, are you?
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

LuckyR wrote: May 26th, 2021, 11:59 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 7:23 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:42 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:29 pm
You are denyng my value as a historian, and also denying the normal use of a word appropriated more lately by a discipline not directly assocated with this forum . Many philosphers would agree with me that religion is, in fact a delusion. So trying to undermine my argument by bringing in a definition from outside the discipline of philosophy is not appreciated. Words should be taken as they are meant. I do not expect to see a definition Nazi and you should not expect me to respond positively to such pedanticism.

There's already plenty to go on, but you are not in the habit of revealing anything about yourself. One delusion that is obvious is your pedantic belief in attacting narrowly defined meanings to words, with disregard for common parlance and typical use. Words do not have fixed and indelible meanings and it is a delusion to think that is the case.

Delusional.
Word meanings are ever changing.


Tutut. Ad hominems??

Maybe you should let Richard Dawkins know that his intellect is below your own lofty one??

Christopher Hitchens would often compare faith to delusion. His intellect was so much higher than any contributor to this Forum.
If anyone looks humourous, that would be you.

Just to make it perfectly clear.
I have no hesitation regarding all religion as human kind's most dangerous delusion, and regard it as a mental illness in the extreme.
In extremes, anything can be a mental disorder. But not everything that are extreme categorized as mental disorders. And that is why specific mental disorders are given specific diagnostic criteria. Otherwise a man's personality trait will be named as a psychiatric disorder. This is similar for the meanings of the words. Yes, their meanings can be changed. But technical terms are not subjected for change of the meaning because it will definitely harm the practices that use those words in a technical way. And also naming religious beliefs as delusions is quite Narcistic, which is a personality trait as well.
And your point is what....?

Parmaceuticals are in the business of inventing mental illnesses, and exporting them as ideas to poorer countries and emerging markets.
They call it exporting a category. India was the recent reciepent of such an export in the matter of "depression" - a category previously unheard of in times past. Now it is highly fashionable to obtain various kinds of anteprepressants, which Pharma have been only too happy to supply by the ship load.

Back on topic. Religion is much the same; it validates a system of bad thinking, making okay to ignore reason and accept faith as an alternative.
You aren't trying to imply that India is immune to depression, are you?
I am suggesting the possibility that once upun a time people got sad for specific reasons. Now they no longer try to understand those reasons when they can reach for a pill.
Humans managed for 100,000 years without obsessing over this and many other categories.
WHy reflect upon how to improve your life when you can just drop a Valium.
I get depressed. I take steps to improve. I do not make a fetish out of my illness, and get on with things without the "help" (ahem!) of drugs.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by LuckyR »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 5:37 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 26th, 2021, 11:59 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 7:23 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:42 pm

In extremes, anything can be a mental disorder. But not everything that are extreme categorized as mental disorders. And that is why specific mental disorders are given specific diagnostic criteria. Otherwise a man's personality trait will be named as a psychiatric disorder. This is similar for the meanings of the words. Yes, their meanings can be changed. But technical terms are not subjected for change of the meaning because it will definitely harm the practices that use those words in a technical way. And also naming religious beliefs as delusions is quite Narcistic, which is a personality trait as well.
And your point is what....?

Parmaceuticals are in the business of inventing mental illnesses, and exporting them as ideas to poorer countries and emerging markets.
They call it exporting a category. India was the recent reciepent of such an export in the matter of "depression" - a category previously unheard of in times past. Now it is highly fashionable to obtain various kinds of anteprepressants, which Pharma have been only too happy to supply by the ship load.

Back on topic. Religion is much the same; it validates a system of bad thinking, making okay to ignore reason and accept faith as an alternative.
You aren't trying to imply that India is immune to depression, are you?
I am suggesting the possibility that once upun a time people got sad for specific reasons. Now they no longer try to understand those reasons when they can reach for a pill.
Humans managed for 100,000 years without obsessing over this and many other categories.
WHy reflect upon how to improve your life when you can just drop a Valium.
I get depressed. I take steps to improve. I do not make a fetish out of my illness, and get on with things without the "help" (ahem!) of drugs.
You seem to be confusing sadness (typically caused by negative life events) with depression (caused by neurotransmitter imbalance in the brain).
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 1:49 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 5:37 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 26th, 2021, 11:59 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 7:23 am

And your point is what....?

Parmaceuticals are in the business of inventing mental illnesses, and exporting them as ideas to poorer countries and emerging markets.
They call it exporting a category. India was the recent reciepent of such an export in the matter of "depression" - a category previously unheard of in times past. Now it is highly fashionable to obtain various kinds of anteprepressants, which Pharma have been only too happy to supply by the ship load.

Back on topic. Religion is much the same; it validates a system of bad thinking, making okay to ignore reason and accept faith as an alternative.
You aren't trying to imply that India is immune to depression, are you?
I am suggesting the possibility that once upun a time people got sad for specific reasons. Now they no longer try to understand those reasons when they can reach for a pill.
Humans managed for 100,000 years without obsessing over this and many other categories.
WHy reflect upon how to improve your life when you can just drop a Valium.
I get depressed. I take steps to improve. I do not make a fetish out of my illness, and get on with things without the "help" (ahem!) of drugs.

You seem to be confusing sadness (typically caused by negative life events) with depression (caused by neurotransmitter imbalance in the brain).
Sadness is the same as the brain state that identifies it, as is happiness; and hat people like to call depression , or elation is also characterised by neurological states.
So you are making an absurd distinction.
I'm not saying that mental illness is not a thing, I am suggesting that the drugs availiable for it tend to define the categories rather than the other way round.
"Mental Illness" is a very recent category and has been mobilised to crush difference and dissent. Activities outside the norm are the focus of scorn and attract oppression. China is an extreme example, but in the not too distant past we have the same sort of thing in the West, and there are still "cures" for homosexuality and other form s of deviancy.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by LuckyR »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 7:19 am
LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 1:49 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 5:37 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 26th, 2021, 11:59 am

You aren't trying to imply that India is immune to depression, are you?
I am suggesting the possibility that once upun a time people got sad for specific reasons. Now they no longer try to understand those reasons when they can reach for a pill.
Humans managed for 100,000 years without obsessing over this and many other categories.
WHy reflect upon how to improve your life when you can just drop a Valium.
I get depressed. I take steps to improve. I do not make a fetish out of my illness, and get on with things without the "help" (ahem!) of drugs.

You seem to be confusing sadness (typically caused by negative life events) with depression (caused by neurotransmitter imbalance in the brain).
Sadness is the same as the brain state that identifies it, as is happiness; and hat people like to call depression , or elation is also characterised by neurological states.
So you are making an absurd distinction.
I'm not saying that mental illness is not a thing, I am suggesting that the drugs availiable for it tend to define the categories rather than the other way round.
"Mental Illness" is a very recent category and has been mobilised to crush difference and dissent. Activities outside the norm are the focus of scorn and attract oppression. China is an extreme example, but in the not too distant past we have the same sort of thing in the West, and there are still "cures" for homosexuality and other form s of deviancy.
I assume, since you report acceptance of the existence of mental illness, that you do get that those with clinical depression don't need to have a negative life event to feel depressed, right?

I don't disagree that drug companies are interested in maximizing profit and thus seek to blur the lines between sadness and depression. Similarly others with agendas (politicians, lawyers, activists etc) have tried to gloss over the difference between normal and abnormal moods.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 11:21 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 7:19 am
LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 1:49 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 5:37 pm

I am suggesting the possibility that once upun a time people got sad for specific reasons. Now they no longer try to understand those reasons when they can reach for a pill.
Humans managed for 100,000 years without obsessing over this and many other categories.
WHy reflect upon how to improve your life when you can just drop a Valium.
I get depressed. I take steps to improve. I do not make a fetish out of my illness, and get on with things without the "help" (ahem!) of drugs.

You seem to be confusing sadness (typically caused by negative life events) with depression (caused by neurotransmitter imbalance in the brain).
Sadness is the same as the brain state that identifies it, as is happiness; and hat people like to call depression , or elation is also characterised by neurological states.
So you are making an absurd distinction.
I'm not saying that mental illness is not a thing, I am suggesting that the drugs availiable for it tend to define the categories rather than the other way round.
"Mental Illness" is a very recent category and has been mobilised to crush difference and dissent. Activities outside the norm are the focus of scorn and attract oppression. China is an extreme example, but in the not too distant past we have the same sort of thing in the West, and there are still "cures" for homosexuality and other form s of deviancy.
I assume, since you report acceptance of the existence of mental illness, that you do get that those with clinical depression don't need to have a negative life event to feel depressed, right?
Mostly the depression has a trigger. Bipolarity does seem cyclic but that can is not without triggers too. I'm no expert but from what I gather the downs can be a direct response to letting yourself engage too fully in the highs, as if there is a limited store of optimism that gets used up, ready for a rest which is the low. Despite the stuff about neurochemical no one really understands it, as much as they pretend they do. Diagnosis is basically via behaviour, and since that behaviour is a brain state there is a potential for false dualistic refections on cause and effect. Bipolar is fairly easy treated with Lithium.
There are far more complex problems. My brother has had shizophrenia for 40 years. So it is not like I do not know something about this. Myself and my son have depression, but prescription drugs are not a solution anymore than alcohol or pot is.

I don't disagree that drug companies are interested in maximizing profit and thus seek to blur the lines between sadness and depression. Similarly others with agendas (politicians, lawyers, activists etc) have tried to gloss over the difference between normal and abnormal moods.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by LuckyR »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 5:32 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 11:21 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 7:19 am
LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 1:49 am


You seem to be confusing sadness (typically caused by negative life events) with depression (caused by neurotransmitter imbalance in the brain).
Sadness is the same as the brain state that identifies it, as is happiness; and hat people like to call depression , or elation is also characterised by neurological states.
So you are making an absurd distinction.
I'm not saying that mental illness is not a thing, I am suggesting that the drugs availiable for it tend to define the categories rather than the other way round.
"Mental Illness" is a very recent category and has been mobilised to crush difference and dissent. Activities outside the norm are the focus of scorn and attract oppression. China is an extreme example, but in the not too distant past we have the same sort of thing in the West, and there are still "cures" for homosexuality and other form s of deviancy.
I assume, since you report acceptance of the existence of mental illness, that you do get that those with clinical depression don't need to have a negative life event to feel depressed, right?
Mostly the depression has a trigger. Bipolarity does seem cyclic but that can is not without triggers too. I'm no expert but from what I gather the downs can be a direct response to letting yourself engage too fully in the highs, as if there is a limited store of optimism that gets used up, ready for a rest which is the low. Despite the stuff about neurochemical no one really understands it, as much as they pretend they do. Diagnosis is basically via behaviour, and since that behaviour is a brain state there is a potential for false dualistic refections on cause and effect. Bipolar is fairly easy treated with Lithium.
There are far more complex problems. My brother has had shizophrenia for 40 years. So it is not like I do not know something about this. Myself and my son have depression, but prescription drugs are not a solution anymore than alcohol or pot is.

I don't disagree that drug companies are interested in maximizing profit and thus seek to blur the lines between sadness and depression. Similarly others with agendas (politicians, lawyers, activists etc) have tried to gloss over the difference between normal and abnormal moods.
Anti-depressants are not a cure, that's true. Of course insulin is not an the cure for type 1 diabetes. It is a temporary symptom reliever. In fact just about all chronic diseases are not curable (by definition).
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

LuckyR wrote: May 29th, 2021, 12:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 5:32 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 11:21 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 7:19 am
Sadness is the same as the brain state that identifies it, as is happiness; and hat people like to call depression , or elation is also characterised by neurological states.
So you are making an absurd distinction.
I'm not saying that mental illness is not a thing, I am suggesting that the drugs availiable for it tend to define the categories rather than the other way round.
"Mental Illness" is a very recent category and has been mobilised to crush difference and dissent. Activities outside the norm are the focus of scorn and attract oppression. China is an extreme example, but in the not too distant past we have the same sort of thing in the West, and there are still "cures" for homosexuality and other form s of deviancy.
I assume, since you report acceptance of the existence of mental illness, that you do get that those with clinical depression don't need to have a negative life event to feel depressed, right?
Mostly the depression has a trigger. Bipolarity does seem cyclic but that can is not without triggers too. I'm no expert but from what I gather the downs can be a direct response to letting yourself engage too fully in the highs, as if there is a limited store of optimism that gets used up, ready for a rest which is the low. Despite the stuff about neurochemical no one really understands it, as much as they pretend they do. Diagnosis is basically via behaviour, and since that behaviour is a brain state there is a potential for false dualistic refections on cause and effect. Bipolar is fairly easy treated with Lithium.
There are far more complex problems. My brother has had shizophrenia for 40 years. So it is not like I do not know something about this. Myself and my son have depression, but prescription drugs are not a solution anymore than alcohol or pot is.

I don't disagree that drug companies are interested in maximizing profit and thus seek to blur the lines between sadness and depression. Similarly others with agendas (politicians, lawyers, activists etc) have tried to gloss over the difference between normal and abnormal moods.
Anti-depressants are not a cure, that's true. Of course insulin is not an the cure for type 1 diabetes. It is a temporary symptom reliever. In fact just about all chronic diseases are not curable (by definition).
A very poor analogy. For two reasons.

1) You can live without any psychoactive drugs, depressants and other offerings that screw with your head. No one can live without insulin, and if you are type 1 diabetic you die if you do not take it.

2) Insulin is not comparable since it specifically and directly targets a missing facor in the blood which it directly replaces. This may not be said of ANY psychoactive drug. And in many cases they can have serious effects which have nothing whatever to do with solving a problem.

There is a third reason which applies to many not all cases of mental illness; that many are not chronic.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by LuckyR »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 29th, 2021, 4:22 am
LuckyR wrote: May 29th, 2021, 12:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 5:32 pm
LuckyR wrote: May 28th, 2021, 11:21 am

I assume, since you report acceptance of the existence of mental illness, that you do get that those with clinical depression don't need to have a negative life event to feel depressed, right?
Mostly the depression has a trigger. Bipolarity does seem cyclic but that can is not without triggers too. I'm no expert but from what I gather the downs can be a direct response to letting yourself engage too fully in the highs, as if there is a limited store of optimism that gets used up, ready for a rest which is the low. Despite the stuff about neurochemical no one really understands it, as much as they pretend they do. Diagnosis is basically via behaviour, and since that behaviour is a brain state there is a potential for false dualistic refections on cause and effect. Bipolar is fairly easy treated with Lithium.
There are far more complex problems. My brother has had shizophrenia for 40 years. So it is not like I do not know something about this. Myself and my son have depression, but prescription drugs are not a solution anymore than alcohol or pot is.

I don't disagree that drug companies are interested in maximizing profit and thus seek to blur the lines between sadness and depression. Similarly others with agendas (politicians, lawyers, activists etc) have tried to gloss over the difference between normal and abnormal moods.
Anti-depressants are not a cure, that's true. Of course insulin is not an the cure for type 1 diabetes. It is a temporary symptom reliever. In fact just about all chronic diseases are not curable (by definition).
A very poor analogy. For two reasons.

1) You can live without any psychoactive drugs, depressants and other offerings that screw with your head. No one can live without insulin, and if you are type 1 diabetic you die if you do not take it.

2) Insulin is not comparable since it specifically and directly targets a missing facor in the blood which it directly replaces. This may not be said of ANY psychoactive drug. And in many cases they can have serious effects which have nothing whatever to do with solving a problem.

There is a third reason which applies to many not all cases of mental illness; that many are not chronic.
1) Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the issue of suicide as a result of clinical depression.

2) Perhaps you are also unfamiliar with low serotonin (depression) being raised with SSRIs. Analogous to low insulin or thyroid hormone being replaced with similar chemicals.

3) True, some aren't chronic, yet most are.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sculptor1 »

LuckyR wrote: May 30th, 2021, 1:45 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 29th, 2021, 4:22 am
LuckyR wrote: May 29th, 2021, 12:08 am
Sculptor1 wrote: May 28th, 2021, 5:32 pm
Mostly the depression has a trigger. Bipolarity does seem cyclic but that can is not without triggers too. I'm no expert but from what I gather the downs can be a direct response to letting yourself engage too fully in the highs, as if there is a limited store of optimism that gets used up, ready for a rest which is the low. Despite the stuff about neurochemical no one really understands it, as much as they pretend they do. Diagnosis is basically via behaviour, and since that behaviour is a brain state there is a potential for false dualistic refections on cause and effect. Bipolar is fairly easy treated with Lithium.
There are far more complex problems. My brother has had shizophrenia for 40 years. So it is not like I do not know something about this. Myself and my son have depression, but prescription drugs are not a solution anymore than alcohol or pot is.
Anti-depressants are not a cure, that's true. Of course insulin is not an the cure for type 1 diabetes. It is a temporary symptom reliever. In fact just about all chronic diseases are not curable (by definition).
A very poor analogy. For two reasons.

1) You can live without any psychoactive drugs, depressants and other offerings that screw with your head. No one can live without insulin, and if you are type 1 diabetic you die if you do not take it.

2) Insulin is not comparable since it specifically and directly targets a missing facor in the blood which it directly replaces. This may not be said of ANY psychoactive drug. And in many cases they can have serious effects which have nothing whatever to do with solving a problem.

There is a third reason which applies to many not all cases of mental illness; that many are not chronic.
1) Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the issue of suicide as a result of clinical depression.
Try not to be patronising. Suicide does not change my viewpoint. Sane people; drugged up people; and people off their meds all commit suicide.

2) Perhaps you are also unfamiliar with low serotonin (depression) being raised with SSRIs. Analogous to low insulin or thyroid hormone being replaced with similar chemicals.
See abpve


3) True, some aren't chronic, yet most are.
User avatar
Sushan
Book of the Month Discussion Leader
Posts: 2221
Joined: February 19th, 2021, 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: Do you agree with the author on this statement?

Post by Sushan »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 26th, 2021, 7:23 am
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 10:42 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:29 pm
Sushan wrote: May 25th, 2021, 12:00 pm

Everything cannot be defined by history. Something coming into practice early does not make it right.
You are denyng my value as a historian, and also denying the normal use of a word appropriated more lately by a discipline not directly assocated with this forum . Many philosphers would agree with me that religion is, in fact a delusion. So trying to undermine my argument by bringing in a definition from outside the discipline of philosophy is not appreciated. Words should be taken as they are meant. I do not expect to see a definition Nazi and you should not expect me to respond positively to such pedanticism.

I may have my delusions and I will keep them (but I only used the word 'delusions' only for the sake of your understanding. I am not having any firm beliefs related to anything. If you can prove me wrong, I will accept at any point).
There's already plenty to go on, but you are not in the habit of revealing anything about yourself. One delusion that is obvious is your pedantic belief in attacting narrowly defined meanings to words, with disregard for common parlance and typical use. Words do not have fixed and indelible meanings and it is a delusion to think that is the case.


A word which is used wrong by the common people does not change its meaning.
Delusional.
Word meanings are ever changing.
But someone accepting that distorted meaning makes his intellect less valuable, and when that someone argues upon that it becomes humorous.
Tutut. Ad hominems??

Maybe you should let Richard Dawkins know that his intellect is below your own lofty one??

Christopher Hitchens would often compare faith to delusion. His intellect was so much higher than any contributor to this Forum.
If anyone looks humourous, that would be you.

Just to make it perfectly clear.
I have no hesitation regarding all religion as human kind's most dangerous delusion, and regard it as a mental illness in the extreme.
In extremes, anything can be a mental disorder. But not everything that are extreme categorized as mental disorders. And that is why specific mental disorders are given specific diagnostic criteria. Otherwise a man's personality trait will be named as a psychiatric disorder. This is similar for the meanings of the words. Yes, their meanings can be changed. But technical terms are not subjected for change of the meaning because it will definitely harm the practices that use those words in a technical way. And also naming religious beliefs as delusions is quite Narcistic, which is a personality trait as well.
And your point is what....?

Parmaceuticals are in the business of inventing mental illnesses, and exporting them as ideas to poorer countries and emerging markets.
They call it exporting a category. India was the recent reciepent of such an export in the matter of "depression" - a category previously unheard of in times past. Now it is highly fashionable to obtain various kinds of anteprepressants, which Pharma have been only too happy to supply by the ship load.

Back on topic. Religion is much the same; it validates a system of bad thinking, making okay to ignore reason and accept faith as an alternative.
Pharmaceuticals can be marketing diseases. So are the companies that make anti-virus software. They produce new viruses. But that does not imply that there are no naturally born viruses. So are the illnesses. There are illnesses that are not marketed by pharmaceuticals, but are existing and has to be treated. Today the issue with this self-medication by many in the society is not only due to the advertisements by the pharmaceuticals, but also because people read about illnesses on internet, feel like doctors, self- diagnose and self-prescribe.

And regarding the religions, I don't think the religions are forcing humans to ignore reasoning, but people are the ones who ignore reasoning and hand over everything to faith in the name of various religions.
“There is only one thing a philosopher can be relied upon to do, and that is to contradict other philosophers”

– William James
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophers' Lounge”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021