Describing predisposition to point of view

Chat about anything your heart desires here, just be civil. Factual or scientific questions about philosophy go here (e.g. "When was Socrates born?"), and so most homework help questions belong here. Note, posts in the off-topic section will not increase new members post counts. This includes the introductions and feedback sections.
User avatar
Tom Butler
Posts: 107
Joined: February 23rd, 2017, 10:24 pm

Re: Describing predisposition to point of view

Post by Tom Butler »

Protagoras wrote: July 15th, 2021, 11:43 am
Having read all the thread. I will come at if from a slightly different angle.
I would seperate these viewpoints into the artistic and scientific temperament.
The feelings based and the materialist temperament.
The creative temperament and the controlling temperament.
Such fundamental influencers of thought are what I am trying to get at.

I am using "point of view" in the sense of Physicalist or Dualist. What is the foundation assumption that informs choice (or opinion).

I am using "perspective" in the sense of the discerning intellect enjoyed by the person expressing a point of view. Another way of saying that might be whether the person who has a Physicalist point of view, for instance, has the perceptual tools to express an informed opinion. This is not an informed opinion in the sense of education. There are many well-educated people who express untenable opinions, apparently because their point of view prevents them from perceiving "the rest of the story" possibly suggested by a more complete perspective.

Temperament is a concept that I think helps me get to my point. We can parse differences in temperament in many ways. Yours is a good way. I tend to say "As an engineer ..." because I know the way I see the world is very different than, say, a psychologist. How we parse it is not as important as the concept, itself.

A story I was once told by a telephone equipment sales man concerned a lost contract because they misread the temperament of their client. They treated an apparent high roller casino executive as more flamboyant than he was. He asked, "Do you really think I would be trusted with this job if I was as flamboyant as you thought?" Those sales people were later given a course in "styles," which is a way to consider temperament.

Thanks!
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Describing predisposition to point of view

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Tom Butler wrote: July 15th, 2021, 9:02 pm
Protagoras wrote: July 15th, 2021, 11:43 am
Having read all the thread. I will come at if from a slightly different angle.
I would seperate these viewpoints into the artistic and scientific temperament.
The feelings based and the materialist temperament.
The creative temperament and the controlling temperament.
Such fundamental influencers of thought are what I am trying to get at.
This reminds me of the classical and romantic modes of thought that Pirsig describes in 'Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance'. It's the same idea, I think.


Tom Butler wrote: July 15th, 2021, 9:02 pm Temperament is a concept that I think helps me get to my point. We can parse differences in temperament in many ways. Yours is a good way. I tend to say "As an engineer ..." because I know the way I see the world is very different than, say, a psychologist.
🙂 I tend to say "As a designer ..." because I know the way I see the world is very different than, say, an engineer. 😄😄😄

[I have engineering qualifications, but spent nearly 40 years as a designer (of software).]
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Tom Butler
Posts: 107
Joined: February 23rd, 2017, 10:24 pm

Re: Describing predisposition to point of view

Post by Tom Butler »

Pattern-chaser wrote: July 16th, 2021, 8:33 am This reminds me of the classical and romantic modes of thought that Pirsig describes in 'Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance'. It's the same idea, I think.
That is an interesting reference. As I remember, in art, "romantics" are said to naturally emphasize form while "classical" thinkers tend to emphasize function. The author of the article considers this polarization a problem. While I agree, I think the purpose of classifying people into ways of thinking is intended to help everyone understand there is a difference. Perhaps most important, knowing people's point of view might enable better cooperation.

People are not the same. From one person's perspective, working with another person may further the first person's work or it may impede it. I spent a lot of time as a strategic planner, and in my company, I was probably the last hardware engineer in a office full of software engineers. Communication was always a challenge, but we shared the same sense of respect for eloquent function to achieve practical form.

Many of the ancient teachings emphasize the need to understand all paths but to learn to travel the middle way. A seeker, then, is taught to be able to approach choices from the classical point of of view (for instance), and if useful, move to the romantic point of view while always seeking the middle way.

That applies to the point I am trying to understand. In terms of ancient wisdom, seekers deliberately try to understand the underlying nature of experiences and habitually try to live in accordance with that understanding. I often encounter people who are educated, smart, well-intentioned but seemingly incapable of thinking outside of what they were taught. Is it the ability to think abstractly that is missing?

First comes fundamental characteristics ... perhaps temperament ... that enables a person to perceive underlying form. Then comes the evolution of personal axiomatic truths based on the resulting perception. What leads one person to a physicalist conclusion and another to a dualist conclusion from the same facts?
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8268
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Describing predisposition to point of view

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Tom Butler wrote: July 16th, 2021, 1:57 pm I often encounter people who are educated, smart, well-intentioned but seemingly incapable of thinking outside of what they were taught. Is it the ability to think abstractly that is missing?
What I call 'flexibility of thought' is rare. Not only that, but it is treated with active contempt by just the sort of people you describe. It's the ability to broaden a point of view, to generalise so that we can (sometimes) discover the pattern. It's something I have always valued in myself, when I could do it. I was stunned when I discovered this highly valuable way of thinking is treated with scorn by those who are frightened (?) by it.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Tom Butler
Posts: 107
Joined: February 23rd, 2017, 10:24 pm

Re: Describing predisposition to point of view

Post by Tom Butler »

Pattern-chaser wrote: July 18th, 2021, 11:00 am What I call 'flexibility of thought' is rare.
Take a look at https://ethericstudies.org/first-sight-theory/. James Carpenter https://www.parapsych.org/users/jcarp/profile.aspx composed a theory he refers to as "First Sight Theory." While he is an active parapsychologist, his day job is clinical psychology.

Of course, "First Sight," is a reference to psi sensing and the way our mind preprocesses perception. You can ignore that part if you wish. You have indicated awareness of the preprocessing part. The important part of the theory is what I refer to as the "Ruleset" for preprocessing is detailed in the Corollaries. I refer to part of the preprocessing function as the "Perceptual Loop."

Image

Worldview is the arbiter of what we consciously experience. From birth, its dominant authority is our human's instincts.

The Extremity Corollary is probably the one that most applies here:

(paraphrased, I think) #10. Extremity Corollary: "The frequency of switching affects the relative density of accumulated additive or subtractive references to the meaning in question. Rapid switching renders potential meaning irrelevant to ongoing experience"

(paraphrased, I think) #9. Switching Corollary: A person will be fairly consistent in how information is processed, (but) may switch in how information is weighted, the sign attributed to it, and therefore, whether or not it is included in behavior. This switching will occur rapidly or slowly depending on the consistency and purity (focus) of unconscious intention, and this, in turn, is determined by the relative weight of the information over time, situational factors that promote or diminish critical analysis, changes of approach in a task and mood.

Switching, which is influenced by personality style, is not necessarily a good thing.

Again from Carpenter -- Persons who are disposed to switch rapidly include those who:
  • tend to approach situations cognitively and analytically
  • lack consistent purpose and motivation
  • take a detached-observer posture toward most situations
  • are chronically ambivalent
  • are cognitively disorganized are highly distractible


Persons who tend to switch slowly, conversely, tend to be persons who:

  • approach situations globally and holistically
  • are strongly and consistently purposive
  • engage themselves wholeheartedly in situations
  • are not overly self-doubting or uncertain
  • are well-integrated cognitively
  • are prone to hold focus purposively and not become distracted
  • are dissociative (when in certain states).


As far as I can tell, the one input we have from our conscious self to our perceptual processes is intention. I do not understand how to model the trigger that changes a person from passive expression of Worldview to intended examination of Worldview. Lifetime-wise, I see the "realization" event as a change in phase in which the person gradually realizes the need to examine the implications of assumed truths. When I try to help a person move toward greater lucidity, I begin with teaching the importance of managing intention and examining implications of assumed truth.

Again, the real question is what enables a person to begin movement from passive living to examined living? My assumption is that society is better of as more people make that change.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophers' Lounge”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021