Females in philosophy
- psyreporter
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Females in philosophy
I just heard the following in a Partially Examined Life podcast, episode 130 Aristotle's "De Anima: What is life?" (origin of life).
The sad state of philosophy today is that 80% of our audience is male and at least as many people that contact us as potential guests, are male.
Questions:
1) Is philosophy primarily a masculine study?
2) Are there many female users on this forum?
3) What are the male-female statistics with regard noteworthy philosophers in history?
4) What can explain a disparity?
- psyreporter
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Females in philosophy
This article is about the state of the discipline.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_philosophy
"While there have been women philosophers since the earliest times, and a few were accepted as philosophers during their lives, almost no woman philosophers have entered the philosophical Western canon. Only in the past 25 years there has been a small change with the emergence of feminist philosophy.
Historians of philosophy are faced with two main problems. The first being the exclusion of women philosophers from history and philosophy texts, which leads to a lack of knowledge about women philosophers among philosophy students. The second problem deals with what the canonical philosophers had to say about philosophy and women's place in it. "
As it appears, women have been structurally excluded from philosophy, both from within and from the outside (history).
The International Association of Women Philosophers
Given the ridiculous and unacceptable underrepresentation of women in philosophy, the existence of a professional organization of women philosophers requires no explanation.
http://www.women-philosophy.org/
History of Women Philosophers and Scientists
https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/
Additional questions:
1) why is it important that women contribute to philosophy?
2) would it be important that women contribute equally? If so/not, why?
3) what subjects of philosophy have the most women participants? Is there a correlation visible, e.g. most women choosing subjects such as animal ethics? If so, are females excluded from specific area's of philosophy?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Females in philosophy
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Females in philosophy
- JackDaydream
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: July 25th, 2021, 5:16 pm
Re: Females in philosophy
I was talking to one of my female friends about how there seemed to be so few females posting on the philosophy forums which I use and she replied, 'Women have got better things to do with their time than write on forums.' This lead me to wonder if many women relate to philosophy in a different way because I know that females think about philosophical aspects of existence. It may be that many do not put it into a box called 'philosophy', but just see it as an aspect of life, and in as less formal way.
However, I think that a lot of women do study philosophy, so it may be that women find it hard to be accepted in male dominated academic circles. But, when I was a studying Social Ethics there was one senior female tutor, but she was extremely attractive and I wondered if this played a big role in her popularity and success. The tutor was extremely clever and has gone on to be a recognized professor, but I wonder if she would have done so well if she had been ugly and fat rather than slim, with blonde hair and a rich, mesmerising voice.
- psyreporter
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Females in philosophy
A search for women in philosophy pictures results in the following as the first result on some websites:
Are there initiatives or organizations that intend to motivate younger female students to choose philosophy?
Are male philosophers benefiting from a situation of less female competition? If so, why?
As it appears, the lack of women in philosophy may have resulted in serious problems with intellectual evolution of human kind.
- psyreporter
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Females in philosophy
APA Committee on the Status of Women in Philosophy
https://www.apaonlinecsw.org/
Mission: The Committee seeks to facilitate an understanding of issues of gender and of the range of positions represented in feminist theories and publishes the Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy.
Again a focus on feminism philosophy (politics), which may hinder females to pursue a career in philosophy.
People who choose philosophy with a warrior mindset to fight for an ideal (political motives) may be of a different type than would be required to perform in philosophy. They may more easily leave the field and choose a career in politics, because they simply would be able to have a bigger impact in politics.
- psyreporter
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Females in philosophy
RickLewis wrote: Theory (psyreporter), I attended a philosophy postgrad conference in Reading, UK, about a decade ago, to take part in a panel discussion. One of the other sessions was a presentation by Dr Marianne Janack (I think) and a colleague on why there are so few women in academic philosophy departments, and indeed in philosophy in general. A lot of actual research had clearly gone into the paper. I don't have a copy of it but maybe it is obtainable from Dr Janack?
From memory, the paper said that there are a LOT of women undergraduates studying philosophy - maybe even a majority of all philosophy undergraduates. Sadly the proportion of women is steadily whittled down as they climb the academic hierarchy. There aren't quite so many female philosophy postgrads. There are an even smaller proportion of junior lecturers in philosophy, and by the time you get to professors, the proportion is very small. (Sorry I can't recall any actual numbers). This steady shift in the gender balance with academic seniority is more like that found in science subjects such as physics and chemistry rather than in other humanities subjects, where the proportion of female academics remains high at all levels. The paper examined various proposed explanations. There is the possibility that a greater proportion of women than of men drop out when they have children. There is also the more psychological explanation that when members of group A are a tiny proportion within any activity B, then new group A people joining that activity tend to feel that they "don't belong", that it isn't really for them, and have more inhibitions about pushing themselves forwards. I don't know. So structural discouragement rather the the structural exclusion you describe - though no doubt that exists too.
In terms of Philosophy Now magazine, for what it is worth, the proportion of our subscribers who are women is hard to gauge accurately but is definitely much higher than 20%. I'd say it is more like 35 or 40%. However, looking at the "letters to the editors" we receive, the proportion is much smaller - probably only about 10%. My own theory is that men are just more anxious to assert themselves in any forum. Certainly the "letters to the editor" we receive from women tend on average to be better than the "letters to the editor" we receive from men, which might suggest that women write only when they have something good to say. (No disrespect to the many excellent letters we publish which are from male readers, but they are the cream of the crop and many others aren't published due to lack of space.) Most full-length articles we receive (probably about 80%) are by men. Some of the very best articles we've published in the last 30 years have however been by women.
Rick Lewis
(Editor-in-Chief, Philosophy Now)
p.s Your list of women in philosophy links looks useful. Can I add, the Society for Women in Philosophy? (SWiP) They have several websites in different parts of the world, eg https://www.swip-ireland.com , https://www.swipuk.org and http://cswip.ca
Another ps. Theory, I completely agree with you about why it matters that women are somehow discouraged from engaging with philosophy in the same numbers as men. I don't know why women tend to specialise in (and be highly influential in) moral philosophy compared with other areas of philosophy. Is the explanation again something social or to do with philosophy's institutional structure, or with the way women are brought up to see themselves as nurturing and caring ? I don't know.
Original: https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtop ... 90#p528290
Latest issue:
https://philosophynow.org/Rick Lewis launched Philosophy Now in 1991, the first ever philosophy magazine worldwide. This new initiative facilitated a wave of popular philosophy activities in Great Britain, the United States, and elsewhere, which has since strengthened, and to the present owes much of its impetus to Lewis' work.
https://philosophynow.org/issues/147/Ha ... nd_Meaning
About the founder of the magazine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Lewis_(journalist)
https://philosophynow.academia.edu/RickLewis
The Panpsycast interview: https://thepanpsycast.com/panpsycast2/ricklewis1
- psyreporter
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: August 15th, 2019, 7:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Females in philosophy
Perhaps noteworthy for the topic is lady Justice, an allegorical personification of the moral force in judicial systems.Lacewing wrote: I agree. Females may offer valuable perspectives that males may not be as inclined to see. The fact that gods and sages are typically identified as 'male', shows how out-of-balance we are, and demonstrates a major skewing by males for control and domination.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Justice
The correlation between females and morality seems to exist since ancient history.
In ancient Egyptian religion, Ma’at is the Goddess of Truth, Wisdom, Justice and Morality. She represented leadership, philosophy and law.
https://www.ancient-origins.net/history ... ity-003131
https://www.ancient-egypt-online.com/maat.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat
A place to start with regard pioneering morality - with a trillion USD synthetic biology revolution (GMO or 'Eugenics on Nature') that intends to become 'the biggest thing in science in this century' at stake - may be plant morality.
Philosophy professor Michael Marder on plant morality:
Philosopher: Plants are sentient beings that should be eaten with respect
His claim that a plant is a sentient “intelligent, social, complex being” has been contested by some biologists, but a stronger reaction has come from animal-rights activists and vegans who fear their cause is undermined by extending a duty of respect to plants.
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/unth ... -1.1965980
Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/167 ... t-thinking
The Philosopher's Plant: An Intellectual Herbarium
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/223 ... er-s-plant
- Astro Cat
- Posts: 451
- Joined: June 17th, 2022, 2:51 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Bernard dEspagnat
- Location: USA
Re: Females in philosophy
1) Yes, but I suspect this has cultural reasons more than actual biologically sexed reasonspsyreporter wrote: ↑September 24th, 2021, 6:10 pm female-philosopher.jpg
I just heard the following in a Partially Examined Life podcast, episode 130 Aristotle's "De Anima: What is life?" (origin of life).
The sad state of philosophy today is that 80% of our audience is male and at least as many people that contact us as potential guests, are male.
Questions:
1) Is philosophy primarily a masculine study?
2) Are there many female users on this forum?
3) What are the male-female statistics with regard noteworthy philosophers in history?
4) What can explain a disparity?
2) Hi!
3) I'm skipping this one, I have no idea on the demographics historically. At my school though I work with a bridge program aimed at helping women to stay in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics). I know the demographics aren't historically good, but they are improving.
What I really wanted to get to is (4). There are countless ways in which women are discouraged from heavy cognitive pursuits starting from the cradle (if you look at gendered toys and their differences, for instance). Social expectations for young girls are incredibly different than they are for young boys, and it doesn't help when young women start to get older and butt heads with entrenched systemic misogyny, either.
As a scientist, some of my career viability comes from the ability to speak in conferences. Conference speaking is usually invitation-only, and guess which entrenched demographic gets to do the inviting?
Misogyny doesn't have to be explicit to be real. I'm not suggesting that every PI, lab lead, conference organizer is a good ol' boy misogynist. It's the implicit misogyny stemming from subtle cultural histories that has been a large part of the problem. It's getting better now that people are more aware of it. Women are taken more seriously. Yet studies (some of which I'm aware of as recently as 2018, I admit I don't peruse this literature as much as I used to, it depresses me) show that the effect still exists: despite women actually making up roughly half of doctoral students, we are invited to fewer conferences, chosen by less PI's, taken on less often as post-docs, etc.
This effect doesn't just exist in the elite STEM world, it exists for fields like philosophy as well.
--Richard Feynman
- Astro Cat
- Posts: 451
- Joined: June 17th, 2022, 2:51 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Bernard dEspagnat
- Location: USA
Re: Females in philosophy
1) Representation is as important as anything. As I said somewhere else on this forum, when I was a teen, I was unreasonably excited about Hypatia because she was a woman that was known for her brain rather than her social acumen. I don't think I even understood what she was known for when I was first excited by her. Wow! A famous philosopher, mathematician, polymath as far as I was concerned at the time! Insert my lil' dreamy eyes.psyreporter wrote: ↑September 24th, 2021, 7:27 pm Additional questions:
1) why is it important that women contribute to philosophy?
2) would it be important that women contribute equally? If so/not, why?
3) what subjects of philosophy have the most women participants? Is there a correlation visible, e.g. most women choosing subjects such as animal ethics? If so, are females excluded from specific area's of philosophy?
It's important that women contribute to philosophy because it has to be a fact that women are interested in philosophy. They may just get discouraged along the way more often than boys. (In STEM it has been called the "leaky pipeline" phenomenon)
2) In an ideal world, sure; though I'm not suggesting to enforce such a thing. In an ideal world, pretty much anything done by anybody should (within standard deviations) reflect the general population because it would mean that nobody is being held back by bias, prejudice, or anything of the sort. So in an ideal world I'd expect to see roughly 50% of philosophers being women as natural happenstance.
3) That's an interesting demographics question, but I think we should be careful so as not to assume women would be attracted to this or that subject for any reasons other than socially informed ones (e.g., we need to be careful not to suggest women are "naturally" attracted to this or that subject more than another: cognitive tests show men and women perform the same, and it's very likely that differences are social artifacts caused by upbringing rather than actual sexed preferences)
That being said, there is a lot of fantastic feminist literature that focuses on gendered topics for obvious reasons (and like anything else, there is a lot of crap feminist literature too).
--Richard Feynman
- Astro Cat
- Posts: 451
- Joined: June 17th, 2022, 2:51 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Bernard dEspagnat
- Location: USA
Re: Females in philosophy
Heh I'm as big of a feminist as they come but I remember the first time I read the words "feminist epistemology" on a screen and I was like "what the actual [expletive] does that mean"LuckyR wrote: ↑September 25th, 2021, 1:18 am Excellent observation. The fact that women have been historically excluded from the men's club that formal Philosophy was and is, is not a surprise. Add to it, the fact that modern female philosophers self segregate into "feminist philosophy" (as opposed to general philosophy), lowers their numbers even further.
--Richard Feynman
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Females in philosophy
I can understand the short term "advantage" of specializing in feminist philosophy, to try to emphasize a viewpoint that is underrepresented. However, in the long term, participating in the mainstream with a minority view, does more to normalize that view, than retreating to an enclave of like-minded individuals.Astro Cat wrote: ↑June 18th, 2022, 4:02 amHeh I'm as big of a feminist as they come but I remember the first time I read the words "feminist epistemology" on a screen and I was like "what the actual [expletive] does that mean"LuckyR wrote: ↑September 25th, 2021, 1:18 am Excellent observation. The fact that women have been historically excluded from the men's club that formal Philosophy was and is, is not a surprise. Add to it, the fact that modern female philosophers self segregate into "feminist philosophy" (as opposed to general philosophy), lowers their numbers even further.
- Astro Cat
- Posts: 451
- Joined: June 17th, 2022, 2:51 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Bernard dEspagnat
- Location: USA
Re: Females in philosophy
Yeah, I agree; though I do think there is a place for feminist philosophy (not that you’re saying there isn’t). I get that the problem is ratio. But I also get why women would be interested in it. I haven’t really said a lot here, have I? Lol! ^_^LuckyR wrote: ↑June 19th, 2022, 2:08 am I can understand the short term "advantage" of specializing in feminist philosophy, to try to emphasize a viewpoint that is underrepresented. However, in the long term, participating in the mainstream with a minority view, does more to normalize that view, than retreating to an enclave of like-minded individuals.
--Richard Feynman
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8271
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: Females in philosophy
"Who cares, wins"
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023