"I just want sexual tension relief. In my opinion/experience there is nothing spiritual to be had by dealing with a woman, or at least a young, inexperienced, likely uneducated third world woman."heracleitos wrote: ↑September 25th, 2022, 2:05 pmMy taste is certainly more in line with biology. Why else does 90% of the world population think just like me, and not like you?
The reason why virginity is so prized is otherwise simple economics.
At a price of zero, there are hundreds of men, if not thousands, who would jump on the opportunity to have sex with a woman. So, if the woman has a habit of giving it away for free, she will always have ample opportunity to do exactly that. By increasing the price for one sexual act to just $100, the number of male buyers already shrinks dramatically. If a woman has a long-standing habit of having sex with men who are not paying anything at all, why on earth would I pay for it, by providing for her? Seriously, what exactly stops her from handing it out for free again?
Taking a cheap ho seriously -- a worthless one, actually -- is simply a bad idea.
The value of a woman depends on how much she can get for sex. If she has always had to supply it for free, then she is effectively worth nothing.Men just want sexual tension relief. There is nothing spiritual to be had by dealing with a woman.
It is clearly women who are infatuated with money. I merely use money as a tool, to get them to spread their legs for me. The tool works fantastically well. So, why would I not use it?
Fixed it for ya.