Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
Also, it's not valid to consider dynamics that involve the collective as if only pertaining to individuals, eg. one person littering doesn't matter, but if the habit is widespread then that creates issues. By the same taken, a person legally owning a gun means very little - what happens when most of the population owns guns?
The higher the percentage of gun ownership, the higher the chance of guns being kept by the unstable and it also provides greater cover through numbers for those who keep guns for criminal purposes.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?
Why violent crime, why not gun crime? Violent crime is too easy of a hurdle, since violent offenders can't legally own guns, 100% of reoffenses by felons would be placed in the legal non gun ownership category.Greta wrote: ↑March 21st, 2019, 4:40 pm I do not see this as a philosophical question. What is the data regarding gun owners and violent crime?
Also, it's not valid to consider dynamics that involve the collective as if only pertaining to individuals, eg. one person littering doesn't matter, but if the habit is widespread then that creates issues. By the same taken, a person legally owning a gun means very little - what happens when most of the population owns guns?
The higher the percentage of gun ownership, the higher the chance of guns being kept by the unstable and it also provides greater cover through numbers for those who keep guns for criminal purposes.
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?
It is, if the data cited (in support of any position) has been produced by a logically flawed methodology.
It is surely true that, ceteris paribus, there will be more gun crimes if guns are readily available. E.g., if no guns existed in the US there would be no gun crimes. As long as most people can legally own guns, criminals will be able to get their hands on them (some by stealing them, but mostly via the black market).Also, it's not valid to consider dynamics that involve the collective as if only pertaining to individuals, eg. one person littering doesn't matter, but if the habit is widespread then that creates issues. By the same taken, a person legally owning a gun means very little - what happens when most of the population owns guns?
The higher the percentage of gun ownership, the higher the chance of guns being kept by the unstable and it also provides greater cover through numbers for those who keep guns for criminal purposes.
That ceteris paribus condition is the rub, however. Homicide rates do not correlate with gun ownership rates, either by state in the US or internationally by country (see the link above). Hence guns cannot be the "causes" of crime. But if guns are available persons with criminal propensities or intentions will make use of them (and as long as they exist in a country they will be available to criminals).
-
- Posts: 658
- Joined: September 10th, 2017, 11:57 am
OFF TOPIC POSTS FROM Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?
Dude, did you read the OP? This isn't about guns, it's specifically about legal gun ownership (vs non ownership) in a society awash in guns whether you choose to own one or not.Jan Sand wrote: ↑March 22nd, 2019, 1:19 am There are many ways to kill people but if the tool to kill people is easy to use and is easy to use to kill a large number of people with relatively no opposition then people who use this tool will do so. That a large number of people with guns are not deranged enough to kill lots of people is no guarantee that a small number of people who are deranged and have access to guns will not injure a horrifying number of random victims. That is the problem.
-
- Posts: 658
- Joined: September 10th, 2017, 11:57 am
Re: Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?
-
- Posts: 4696
- Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am
Re: Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?
That is incorrect. While the Japanese had secretly approached the Soviets (with whom they had a non-aggression pact) to explore and mediate the possibilities for a negotiated peace, they made no surrender offer. But the Soviets had already pledged to the Allies to enter the war against Japan 90 days after the war ended in Europe, and that Japanese overture went nowhere.
However, the Soviet declaration of war against Japan (exactly 90 days after VE day, as promised), was also a major factor in Japan's decision to surrender, although in his surrender speech Emperor Hirohito cited only the wish to avoid further atomic bombings as prompting his decision.
(Off-topic, I know, but misinformation needs to be corrected).
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: OFF TOPIC POSTS FROM Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
I removed the above posts as off-topic.
They were removed from the topic Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?
Whenever posting on the forums, please try very hard to stay on-topic.
If you see a forum topic, but want to talk about something else instead (even if tangentially related) then simply make a new forum topic to discuss that other thing.
If you see an off-topic post, please do not reply it. If you see a post that is mostly off-topic but has some on-topic content, do not reply to it.
Please use the report button to report off-topic posts. Do not reply to them. The Forum Rules instruct one to not reply to rule-breaking posts which includes posts that are off-topic or mostly off-topic.
This was only one question is a series of questions about gun control. So I'm sure many of the comments above will be on-topic in one of the other questions about gun control.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
If you made a mistake in presenting a political topic as philosophical, and I think you did, then a philosophical response would be to counter the critique rather than to sideline and ignore it.
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
However, it was more the other two paragraphs that I feel were off-topic and as such did and would have continued to derail the topic further and further as seen above. Here are two initial off-topic paragraphs:
Keep in mind question was: Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood of committing violent crime?Greta wrote:Also, it's not valid to consider dynamics that involve the collective as if only pertaining to individuals, eg. one person littering doesn't matter, but if the habit is widespread then that creates issues. By the same taken, a person legally owning a gun means very little - what happens when most of the population owns guns?
The higher the percentage of gun ownership, the higher the chance of guns being kept by the unstable and it also provides greater cover through numbers for those who keep guns for criminal purposes.
Keep in mind it is only one question in a series. So interesting off-topic comments there might be on-topic in a different question in the series.
For those wanting to discuss (1) whether or not gun ownership should be legal, or (2) discuss what things, factors, or types of stats should be considered in determining the legality of gun ownership, then those are completely separate topics that likely will come up later in the series. One is also free to start their own forum topic about such a topic. Neither of those things were the forum topic in question.
The question was the question. The question was not what would be valid to do with the answer to the question. The question was not whether the answer to the question will be useful for some purpose not.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
Indeed, the special gun control topic series is designed to start off with very simplistic uncontroversial questions that should result in minimal debate and move gradually to more complicated and more philosophical questions.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
The stats on this issue belonged in the OP, otherwise it's an invitation to do speak without knowledge, ie. not philosophical.
The only important figure here is comparing murder stats of comparable nations. How's the US's murder rate as compared with comparable western countries? To what extent does the US history of slavery contribute? What of the contribution of inequality in the US is increasingly making the nation look demographically more like a Communist state than a western democracy?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... aps-charts
The US does have special circumstances - through slavery in the past and corruption and extreme inequality in the present - as compared with other western democracies. These differences have been overplayed skilfully by the NRA (which is funded by arms companies) to blind people from the obvious fact that, the more people who own weapons of murder, the more people will die.
I always get a good laugh when people try to explain that, if everyone had a lethal weapons, then the M.A.D. principle will keep people behaving - as if in any time in the world's history that whole societies operated as rational agents. If that's the case then the US should not only have a lower shootings per capita rate than wiser nations, but a vastly lower shooting rate. Rather, it has by far the highest rate.
All of this is extremely well known and obvious but one cannot cut through entrenched corruption - and that is what's happening between the media, the NRA, arms companies and the political class (and now they are working to undermine Australia's gun laws to open up more markets - basically trading lives for profit and influence).
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5765
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
Those are interesting questions that will likely be on-topic in response to later questions in the gun control series.How's the US's murder rate as compared with comparable western countries? To what extent does the US history of slavery contribute? What of the contribution of inequality in the US is increasingly making the nation look demographically more like a Communist state than a western democracy?
The scope of Q2 is so extremely narrow and simplistic that to me those above questions are not relevant to answering Q2 versus later question in the series.
Your questions are much more interesting and philosophical than Q2. That itself helps explain why they are not on-topic in Q2.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Off-Topic Posts from Gun Control Series Q2 -- Is legally owning a gun correlated to different likelihood...
Your post has many truisms within it but sort of haphazardly skips about (from topic to topic). For example, comparing the data from countries with very few guns to the US is only helpful to countries with very few guns (Australia?) to help them decide to continue to have very few guns. It does nothing for the US since guns essentially last forever and the number of guns is so incredibly high that even if no new guns entered the market, there would be too many guns for over a century.Greta wrote: ↑March 26th, 2019, 5:30 pmThe stats on this issue belonged in the OP, otherwise it's an invitation to do speak without knowledge, ie. not philosophical.
The only important figure here is comparing murder stats of comparable nations. How's the US's murder rate as compared with comparable western countries? To what extent does the US history of slavery contribute? What of the contribution of inequality in the US is increasingly making the nation look demographically more like a Communist state than a western democracy?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... aps-charts
The US does have special circumstances - through slavery in the past and corruption and extreme inequality in the present - as compared with other western democracies. These differences have been overplayed skilfully by the NRA (which is funded by arms companies) to blind people from the obvious fact that, the more people who own weapons of murder, the more people will die.
I always get a good laugh when people try to explain that, if everyone had a lethal weapons, then the M.A.D. principle will keep people behaving - as if in any time in the world's history that whole societies operated as rational agents. If that's the case then the US should not only have a lower shootings per capita rate than wiser nations, but a vastly lower shooting rate. Rather, it has by far the highest rate.
All of this is extremely well known and obvious but one cannot cut through entrenched corruption - and that is what's happening between the media, the NRA, arms companies and the political class (and now they are working to undermine Australia's gun laws to open up more markets - basically trading lives for profit and influence).
While many choose to argue about the issue of legal guns turning into illegal guns and increasing crime, in my experience that is not a convincing argument to the responsible gun owner who won't illegally sell his weapon, is highly unlikely to be burgled and is at extremely low risk of committing a gun crime, personally. In addition, the statistical reality is that the increased risk of gun ownership for a significant number of legal gun owners lies in gun accidents and increased lethality of suicide (which I won't argue here is either a good or bad thing), not through murder/crime.
Lastly, the reason most folks discuss gun ownership today has little to do with the actual majority of morbidity of guns, instead it is headline grabbing mass shootings, that are a tiny fraction of the damage that guns do. Of course middle class, white kids dying at school freaks out voters while shootings of the economically disadvantaged in inner city slums nets no coverage, yet is a much larger problem.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023