Discuss The Story of Philosophy

We choose one book per month to read and discuss philosophically as a group.

January 2019 Philosophy Book of the Month: The Runaway Species: How Human Creativity Remakes the World by David Eagleman and Anthony Brandt

February 2019 Philosophy Book of the Month: The Fourth Age: Smart Robots, Conscious Computers, and the Future of Humanity by Byron Reese (Nominated by RJG)

March 2019 Philosophy Book of the Month: Final Notice by Van Fleisher

April 2019 Philosophy Book of the Month: The Unbound Soul: A Visionary Guide to Spiritual Transformation and Enlightenment by Richard L. Haight
Post Reply

How do you rate The Story of Philosophy?

1 star - poor, recommend against reading it
No votes
2 stars - fair, okay
No votes
3 stars - good, recommend it
No votes
4 stars - excellent, amazing
No votes
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 4323
Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic

Discuss The Story of Philosophy

Post by Scott » October 2nd, 2012, 10:46 pm

Please use this topic to discuss the October 2012 philosophy book of the month, The Story of Philosophy: The Lives and Opinions of the World's Greatest Philosophers[/i] by Will Durant.
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?

Posts: 65
Joined: June 17th, 2012, 3:51 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Emmanuel Levinas
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Re: Discuss The Story of Philosophy

Post by Chinny » October 6th, 2012, 10:16 pm

I was one of the people who eagerly voted for Durant's book. I read the book years ago as a student. Upon reading it again, I realize that while this is a very good introduction to some great thinkers (and other thinkers whose importance seem to have dwindled over the decades), this book isn't really a philosophical text, but rather an inventory of the history of philosophy. That is, there are no arguments or positions in this book that connect the various chapters. For this reason, this book has made a poor choice for the book of the month. Of course, we can disagree about what he has to say about certain philosophers (Does he get Plato "right"? Does his neglect of Kant's third Critique pose a problem for the reader?) or even his choice of philosophers (no Husserl, Heidegger or Sartre?), but Durant himself does not have a *position* that the book as a whole is meant to argue for.

This book is worth reading as an introduction to philosophy, but what else can be said about it from a critical standpoint?


Posts: 32
Joined: July 11th, 2009, 4:36 pm
Favorite Philosopher: MICHAEL OAKESHOTT

Re: Discuss The Story of Philosophy

Post by dogparktom » October 16th, 2012, 3:40 pm

I read the book years ago and also the author's books on civilization. Durant and his wife were historians, not philosophers. I distinctly remember that in Durant's final volume "The Lessons of History" he raised the question of historical laws. He answered that the only law that he recognized as a permanent feature of human reality was COMPETITION. Individuals and groups must compete!

I agree with Chinny's remarks.

Post Reply