The March Philosophy Book of the Month is Final Notice by Van Fleisher. Discuss Final Notice now.

The April Philosophy Book of the Month is The Unbound Soul by Richard L. Haight. Discuss The Unbound Soul Now

The May Philosophy Book of the Month is Misreading Judas by Robert Wahler.

My work is "too experimental and non-commercial"

Please post all introductions in this forum. Tell us how you found the philosophy forums, what interests you about philosophy, and a little about you, such as your age, where you live, what you do for a living, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Randy333
New Trial Member
Posts: 1
Joined: December 19th, 2019, 5:56 pm

My work is "too experimental and non-commercial"

Post by Randy333 » January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm

A question for all of you: Do you consider any written works too experimental and non-commercial? What would you consider too experimental for a book, if anything? Allow me to take some time to explain why I ask these questions, and how they affect human culture.

Years ago, I developed a deep passion for writing, particularly fiction. I’ve never professed myself a flawless author. In fact, I’m somewhat critical of the four novels I’ve written. I’ve evolved as a writer like many others, and only recently came to pursue a creative direction profoundly divergent from my literary origins. I always wanted to be authentically deviant from the industry norm, but even within my own career path I’ve deviated sharply from my initial style and interests, and not in the way some authors change only in slight differences and genre focuses. Even the work that is the subject of this post’s title has become a shadow of the past to me, giving way to a deeper, darker, stranger breed of literature rarely found on bookshelves.

As a writer and researcher, I am interested in many fields: dreams, nightmares, sleep paralysis, hypnagogic and hypnopompic states, hauntings, demonology, cosmology, cryptozoology, metaphysics, insanity, astral and infernal visions, advanced intelligence, alternate dimensions, transhumanism, global catastrophic risk, UFOs, DMT realms, salvia realms, surrealism, the occult, transcendence, eternity, and immortality. I am very bored by conventional human culture, the typical surface-level subjects such as politics, celebrities, sports, film, news, tech, social media, memes, popular music, fashion, and so forth. I’ve become disillusioned by modern society. None of it interests me very much, all the trivial little gadgets and the cults of personality and the incessant conflict over political structures and other artifices. Eventually you’ve become so familiarized you can glance at a news article or even a novel and anticipate exactly how it will be written. Is anyone else here utterly uninterested in contemporary culture? I just can’t bring myself to care about any of it, when I see and sense deeper, darker, and stranger realms in the cosmos beyond and within, as well as in the scattered episodes of phantom oddity that’ve plagued this world for ages. I am far more interested in a single soul’s nightmares and apparitions than I am in the entire array of daily news items produced by this planet. Tell me of your nightmares. Tell me of your specters. I have no use for much else now. I wish to know more of the life beyond this world, and, more importantly, of the phantasmagorical life within life itself. It is the hidden mystery of the mind that draws me most now, above all other mysteries.

There is much more I could say on this subject, and much more that I would say if there weren’t stringent constraints on the freedom of authors to discuss their own works. I will only say, in conclusion of this introduction, that an editor once informed me my works are “too experimental and non-commercial” to be published. Personally, I take this a compliment. They didn’t tell me my works are poorly written, or insipid, or unoriginal. Rather, my works are apparently intolerable to the industry gatekeepers because they’re “too experimental and non-commercial” – as if experimentation is taboo and all works must fit into a neat little cookie-cutter standard of commercialization. My work seeks to explore and illuminate how truly bizarre, magical, and enigmatic this cosmos is. I also dislike some of the conventional artistic standards, which I find pollute the central essence of art. There is a certain system in place that defines how writers should and shouldn’t write a book, which elements it should and shouldn’t include, and so forth. This can easily serve to suppress experimental works, especially works that do not conform to some of the usual conventions. Unfortunately, it would appear I don’t fit the mold expected of writers in our current world. I’m curious about the true limits of experimentation in philosophy, art, and literature. It seems there’s a vein of culture that abhors experimentation, and I’m interested to hear some of your thoughts as to the limits of experimentation in our world.

- D.L.X.

creation
Posts: 423
Joined: November 22nd, 2019, 10:39 pm

Re: My work is "too experimental and non-commercial"

Post by creation » January 13th, 2020, 1:47 am

Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
A question for all of you: Do you consider any written works too experimental and non-commercial?
This depends on what you mean by 'non-commercial'? If you just mean for selling for obtaining more money purposes, or 'non-commercial' as in no one will want to read it or non-readable?

If it is the former, then I am not even interested in answering the question, but if you mean the latter, then I would say, No.

I do not consider any written work too experimental nor too unwanted/unreadable. Human beings would not change (progress?) as much as they have, and do, if it was not for thinking and writings that were/are seen as different and/or "out there".
Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
What would you consider too experimental for a book, if anything?
Nothing.

But I am not the best person to ask, nor answer, I have probably only read about five or six books in my lifetime.
Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
Allow me to take some time to explain why I ask these questions, and how they affect human culture.

Years ago, I developed a deep passion for writing, particularly fiction. I’ve never professed myself a flawless author. In fact, I’m somewhat critical of the four novels I’ve written. I’ve evolved as a writer like many others, and only recently came to pursue a creative direction profoundly divergent from my literary origins. I always wanted to be authentically deviant from the industry norm, but even within my own career path I’ve deviated sharply from my initial style and interests, and not in the way some authors change only in slight differences and genre focuses. Even the work that is the subject of this post’s title has become a shadow of the past to me, giving way to a deeper, darker, stranger breed of literature rarely found on bookshelves.

As a writer and researcher, I am interested in many fields: dreams, nightmares, sleep paralysis, hypnagogic and hypnopompic states, hauntings, demonology, cosmology, cryptozoology, metaphysics, insanity, astral and infernal visions, advanced intelligence, alternate dimensions, transhumanism, global catastrophic risk, UFOs, DMT realms, salvia realms, surrealism, the occult, transcendence, eternity, and immortality. I am very bored by conventional human culture, the typical surface-level subjects such as politics, celebrities, sports, film, news, tech, social media, memes, popular music, fashion, and so forth. I’ve become disillusioned by modern society. None of it interests me very much, all the trivial little gadgets and the cults of personality and the incessant conflict over political structures and other artifices. Eventually you’ve become so familiarized you can glance at a news article or even a novel and anticipate exactly how it will be written. Is anyone else here utterly uninterested in contemporary culture?
Yes.

You said that you have become disillusioned by modern society, I would suggest that so called "modern" society has become disillusioned, itself. Disillusioned from reality, and from the true meaning of being social, itself.
Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
I just can’t bring myself to care about any of it, when I see and sense deeper, darker, and stranger realms in the cosmos beyond and within, as well as in the scattered episodes of phantom oddity that’ve plagued this world for ages. I am far more interested in a single soul’s nightmares and apparitions than I am in the entire array of daily news items produced by this planet. Tell me of your nightmares. Tell me of your specters. I have no use for much else now. I wish to know more of the life beyond this world, and, more importantly, of the phantasmagorical life within life itself. It is the hidden mystery of the mind that draws me most now, above all other mysteries.
There is no real hidden mystery of the 'Mind'. What the 'Mind' actually IS, has just been hidden from coming to the forefront of knowledge and knowing. This is related to the stories of good and evil, in religion, and related to deception and deceiving. But nothing I say is directly related to religion nor directly to anything else for that matter.

See the way the Mind and the brain work is that although they work together in a sense within a human body, they are actually in direct opposition with each other. The Mind, of which there is only One universal Mind, which is always Truly OPEN, is being continually deceived by individual human brains, which fool each individual that they 'know' what the truth is and what is right and correct. But the brain can only think, whereas the Mind 'knows'. So, the brain, through the belief-system, will you assumptions and beliefs to 'try to' override what is actually 'known'. I say 'try to' because although the brain can and does override the Mind's knowing, once knowing how the Mind and the brain work, the brain cannot do override the Mind anymore.

Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
There is much more I could say on this subject, and much more that I would say if there weren’t stringent constraints on the freedom of authors to discuss their own works. I will only say, in conclusion of this introduction, that an editor once informed me my works are “too experimental and non-commercial” to be published. Personally, I take this a compliment. They didn’t tell me my works are poorly written, or insipid, or unoriginal. Rather, my works are apparently intolerable to the industry gatekeepers because they’re “too experimental and non-commercial” – as if experimentation is taboo and all works must fit into a neat little cookie-cutter standard of commercialization.
Human beings mostly listen to the brain, and the brain has human beings fooled that they 'need' money to live. To just about all older human beings they can only look at and see things from a monetary perspective. So, what that editor was more or less just telling you is, it is not salable.
Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
My work seeks to explore and illuminate how truly bizarre, magical, and enigmatic this cosmos is. I also dislike some of the conventional artistic standards, which I find pollute the central essence of art. There is a certain system in place that defines how writers should and shouldn’t write a book, which elements it should and shouldn’t include, and so forth.
This once again is the brain at work, influencing each and all other brains that there is only one way to live life, and that we 'should' all fit into that mold and that way of life. The brain is constantly at work 'trying to' fool and deceive all people, including one's own self.
Randy333 wrote:
January 12th, 2020, 7:40 pm
This can easily serve to suppress experimental works, especially works that do not conform to some of the usual conventions. Unfortunately, it would appear I don’t fit the mold expected of writers in our current world. I’m curious about the true limits of experimentation in philosophy, art, and literature. It seems there’s a vein of culture that abhors experimentation, and I’m interested to hear some of your thoughts as to the limits of experimentation in our world.

- D.L.X.
Getting past people's 'beliefs' is what is needed to expose and reveal things new and/or different things to people.

Post Reply