Terrapin Station wrote: ↑June 10th, 2021, 9:17 am
A lot of this sounds unbelievable to say the least.
Can you link to anything that would give some independent verification of, and maybe a less rambling perspective on stuff like "attacks on your business" and the furniture in your home being destroyed?
Thank you for the comment! Please do not feel obliged to waste time on reading anything of it. I used this topic partly to 'process' actual information with regard the case
The WordPress ban of a popular optimization plugin with 20,000 professional users has remained a 'mystery' until today. The ban followed after I posted a neat written message that I had been treated 'unkind' by WordPress moderation, which was the case as is evident in the following comment by a user:
As it appears, such an action was never done before. It received no media attention and users were not allowed to talk about the ban on WordPress.org. Nobody knows the actual motive for the ban until this day (the idea that is displayed in the comment by a user, is actually not possibly the reason).
The preceding 'disrespectful' action came completely out of the blue.
There have been many incidents, smaller and bigger. It has been clear that some of the attacks/dishonest practices originated from the Government.
The full case with regard the air pollution attack has been written out on the following URL. It is substantiated with references to communication history.
https://translate.google.com/translate? ... erslag.nl/
The following shows the severity of the air pollution. I used a professional air cleaner and the room was pretty much dust free. What is visible was caused by 'air pollution' in just 2 days time.
It is impossible that the landlord did not see the damage. I was also using fitness machines in the room, so he must have noticed that the damage had caused a severe problem for me.
It was an absurd situation and I have maintained a respectful and wait-and-see attitude, with the aim of discovering the possible background of the attack.
While a police boss and the Municipality of Utrecht intervened, the landlord to became violent (my arms were wounded), extremely disrespectful and he denied replacement housing after two months, based on the lie that I had verbally agreed that I would arrange replacement housing myself for 'a few months' (he lied on purpose, to provoke me). All of this appears to have been an attempt to make me angry, with the landlord, while I had maintained a very respectful position towards him, went very far as if desperate to make me angry.
On February 1, 2020 the landlord communicated that he had "never had any problem with me" and that I was "a good tenant". He also indicated that I could continue to rent the living space.
landlord wrote: I really wish we could go back to the relationship between us from September 2016 to the end of November 2019. You are renting a room ... in Utrecht since September 1, 2016. I've never had any problem with you.
Then, on February 9, 2020 the landlord sends an e-mail with the subject "appearance of a cannabis plantation
" in which he falsely suspected me for a second time of criminal practices in the living space, which was nonsensical because the living space was completely out of order with no water and power.
Perhaps he attempted to have the police boss raid the room to force me out. He also sent a second email a day before with the subject "insect in your ceiling" and attempted to force me out for pest control.
I am truly a very neat person. Most often I wore 'Hugo Boss'-like clothing, am decent in communication etc.
Communicatively, there was no history showing that the landlord could have personally had anything against me. At one point, the landlord was even grateful for all the good deeds that I had done in his interest.
At question was simply: what was the origin of landlords absurd behavior and his attempt to harm me? It was clear for me, based on the communication history, that it was not likely something that he did on his own.
Then of course, there were the mentioned incidents at the Legal Counsil and police.
In its response, the Legal Counter sent an e-mail from someone with mental health problems who told a threatening paranoid story. That could hardly have been an accident and it is also unlikely that an employee of the Legal Counter would do such a thing. (this is evidence that the AIVD (secret service) must be the perpetrator of the air pollution attack).
The Utrecht Police did not take the report for violent trespassing seriously and insisted that I reported "poisoning" while I had never mentioned the word poisoning and had indicated at least 10 times that he reported assault. That is also an indication that the landlord has been protected.
The Utrecht District Court sided with the violent landlord, causing me to lose my home. In fact, this has resulted in a violent eviction.
The case was published on a political forum in Belgium where some users communicated to 'support me' (critical blog) and was read by over 25,000 people. Despite this, the background of the air pollution attack - now almost two years later - has remained a mystery, which is very strange.
Until today, the motive has remained a mystery and as is evident, the Municipality of Utrecht has chosen to continue to corrupt with a death threat, indicating that the origin of the attack is hate, which must be senseless hate because they do not know me and if there was a reason, then it is likely that it would have been known, considering that the case received considerable publicity via a public forum where anyone could participate.
The Municipality of Utrecht, landlord etc has left me behind with the great damage that was caused.
I have been 100% self-less with regard the critical blog, and I sort of had been prepared, but of course it is not nice when a Government is on a path to commit senseless hate crimes of increasing severity. The death treat is a very serious crime and it is certain that it was perpetrated by the AIVD (secret service).
Then there is the Rabobank, a fortune 500 company head-quartered in Utrecht. They invested 45,000 Euro together with a SEO agency and when I fulfilled my part of the agreement (with a 225,000 Euro investment), they 'walked away' without providing an explanation.
A business partner from London later contacted the SEO company. The owner didn't want to answer. The reason that he and the Rabobank investor suddenly gave up and left their investment has simply remained unknown. It's been very suspicious.
Considering the whole situation, it is only logical that the Rabobank, considering its link with me, at least has had some influence or oversight over what has happened.
If life were to be good as it was, there would be no reason to exist.